8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

Chapter 8
Evaluating and Terminating the Project
This chapter discusses the issue of appraising the progress of a project and its
performance and describes the various ways that projects can be terminated. Project
evaluation criteria are listed and discussed. Also, the formal process of auditing a project
is overviewed including the information that should be contained in the audit report.
Guidelines for when to consider terminating a project, the types of project termination,
and the termination process itself are also discussed. The chapter concludes with a
discussion of the project final report.

Cases and Readings

Some cases appropriate to the subject of this chapter are:
Harvard: 9-696-083 Biogen, Inc.: rBeta Interferon Manufacturing Process
Development This 18-page case concerns a biotech firm that is wrapping up a new
manufacturing process project for a newly developed drug. One of the senior scientists is
charged with performing an evaluation of the project to document the lessons learned and
provide guidance for future projects.
Harvard: 9-692-069 Motorola, Inc.: Bandit Pager Project This 17-page case places
the student in the role of conducting an evaluation of an automated production process for
radio pagers. Although considered a major success by the company, there appear to be
some difficulties in marketing and production that need more attention. A 19 page
teaching note (5-692-069) is available.
Harvard: 9-175-184 Northeast Research Laboratory (B) This excellent 17-page
retrospective case describes a clients unexpected cancellation of what was thought to be
a successfully on-going project. Involves issues of control, auditing, evaluation,
termination, behavior, leadership, and organization.
Some readings appropriate to the subject of this chapter are:
F.R. Gulliver. Post-Project Appraisals Pay (Harvard Business Review, March-April
1987). This article points out the gross fallacy of ignoring the outcome of projects that
had thousands of hours of planning invested in them. Without postproject appraisals, the
organization learns nothing from the execution of the project, either in terms of how to do

110

8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

a better job in selecting and supporting projects in the future or in terms of what was
learned from the project itself. This article gives advice on how to organize and conduct
postproject appraisals. In addition, it describes four major lessons the involved company
learned from their appraisals.
B.M. Staw et al. Knowing When to Pull the Plug (Harvard Business Review, MarchApril 1987). This article has already become a classic on the psychological basis for
continuing a project invariably headed for disaster. The authors clearly point out the
dangers of certain personality types in project managers matching the needs profile of
certain organizations. In these all-too-frequent situations, projects are continued way past
the point where common sense would have called for their termination.

Answers to Review Questions

1. The termination project is similar to any other project except that there is only one
person conducting the termination itself and there is no "project selection" phase.
Also, it is a process of distribution of resources and personnel rather than acquisition
of them and the tasks to be conducted are relatively standard or else specified in
advance. It is best conducted by someone without an emotional investment in the
project. And finally, it is a completely administrative project with a single purpose.
2. There are often political, psychological, and other reasons why projects are continued
when they should be terminated. At times, projects that fail to meet their objectives
are continued because they are accomplishing other things of value to the
organization.
3. Any aspect of termination may cause an otherwise successful project to become a
failure, such as an inability to complete the work, not delivering the result, providing
poor product support, etc.
4. Inside auditors would probably be more efficient and less expensive. However, they
would not be as objective and they may not be familiar with how other firms or
organizations operate and could not make accurate comparisons. For example,
internal auditors may positively evaluate a situation that appears favorable when
outside auditors would report that the situation is not up to market standards based on
industry experience.
5. As discussed in the previous answer, internal and external auditors each have their
advantages and disadvantages. Students that initially answered external auditors
based on perhaps higher objectivity might note that in situations when cost or time is
critical, internal auditors might be preferred. Likewise, students that favored internal
auditors might recognize the need for external auditors when objectivity or expertise
is the key concern.
6. Frequent, brief evaluations have a better chance of finding problems as they are
developing and can thus be solved easier and quickly. The frequent, low level

111

8/Evaluating and Terminating the Project

evaluations are also less disruptive to the project team. Because of their frequency,
they would also better lend themselves to use as a control device.
7. Except for any confidential personnel items, the project team members should have
access to the full report. Without feedback, the team members are limited in their
growth possibilities.
8. The major value of a post-project audit is to inform senior management of poor
practices that should be avoided in future projects, or of beneficial practices that
should be adopted by future projects. The audit may be required by a customer who
wishes to manage future relationships with the firm.
9. When a general audit exposes a serious problem in the project or in the methods by
which the project was conducted, a detailed audit may be required to study such
problems in detail and recommend solutions.

Suggested Answers to Discussion Questions

10. For an effective audit, the team must have access to all project records and personnel,
as well as all functional and other organizational area records and personnel. Only
access to the customer should be limited to require prior clearance from top
management. If access is denied by team members, the audit team may have to
appeal to the project manager. If the project manager is the cause for the problem, the
audit team may have to appeal to senior management. In cases where full access was
not provided, the results must be qualified noting the lack of access.
11. Having familiarity with the administrative requirements of project terminations as
well as the new environment for the project, if there will be one; being objective and
impartial; being calm under stress; being task rather than functionally oriented; and
having the ability to effectively and efficiently execute the eight termination tasks.
12. The termination method should depend primarily on what is to happen with the
project. For example, if it is to be an ongoing entity, addition is best. If its job is
complete, then extinction is best.
13. The focus of the audit must be positive with the reports kept constructive,
unemotional, and professional. Pre-release discussions and a formal "appeal"
procedure for disagreements are also helpful.
14. The reasons for project selection are often more general in nature while the projects
goals are much more specific. One danger of evaluating the project based on the
reason it was selected is that a change or shift in the projects specific goals could go
undetected. This could result in a situation where projects goals become out of sync
with broader organizational goals. It might also lead to project proposals written in
such a way as to minimize expected project goals, always consistent with making
them high enough to insure selection. In spite of these dangers, the criteria for project

112

8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

selection is a good, but not sufficient, tool for evaluating completed projects and for
helping to determine if a project should be terminated before completion.
15. Major risks associated with the project and their potential impact on the projects
schedule, cost, or performance should be identified. If alternative courses of action
exist that may change future risks, they should also be identified. The parent
organization should also insist on proper ethical standards of behavior from the
project manager, team, and all functional managers connected with the project. A
large majority of the problems referred to in this question concern credit-for-success
and blame-for-failure. If a project succeeds or fails, the success or failure belongs to
the entire team.
16. There is no theoretical correct way of dealing with these problems. Any method of
sharing costs and/or profits that is acceptable to the several functional managers is
acceptable. The method of cost/profit sharing must be accepted prior to initiating the
project. Attempts to solve the problem when the project is completed are doomed.
17. Co-opt means to appropriate as ones own. This is a common tactic for parties
being audited. Passive resistance is advised. The audit team should listen
interestedly to all complaints, advice, etc., and proceed as if the co-opting had not
occurred. Noncommittal is the best attitude for the auditors.
18. Introduction: This is the key to all that follows. It is important to make sure that all
parties are in agreement with the statement of project direct goals and objectives.
Current status: It is also important that all parties agree about the current status of
the project. All direct costs and the actual state of work on the project should be
detailed in this section. This serves as the basis many of the reports
recommendations.
Future project status: Based on the current status section of the report, this section
describes what must be done to complete the project, including any required changes
in budget, schedule, scope, and goals of the project. This serves as a major input in
the decision to continue the project without modification of the plan, continue it with
modifications, or to terminate the project.
Critical management issues: This section allows senior management to exercise
control over any aspects of the project or its management that seem to be desirable.
Senior management may also consider alteration of any project management policies
that appear to be dysfunctional. Management may also install new project
management policies.
Risk analysis and risk management: This allows senior managers to reassess the risks
associated with the project given its current state. This assessment would include
both technological and monetary risk.
Final comments: This section provides information to senior managers about the
underlying assumptions made during data collection as well as the statistical
reliability and validity of the data if such an assessment can be made. The section
may also be used to collect any recommendation that might apply to future projects.

113

8/Evaluating and Terminating the Project

Incidents for Discussion Suggested Answers

General Construction Company: The member of the auditing team is not following
appropriate procedure in contacting the customer directly. The PM should immediately
inform top management of both the technical problem with the contract and of the breach
of audit procedure. Then the PM should arrange to get in touch with the client to resolve
the problem. The auditor should be disciplined for his breach of procedure. The
customer should include such an audit process in the contract, with results coming
directly to them. The customer may also insist on the audit being conducted by their own
people, or an outside party.
Lexi Electronics: Addition is the method of choice for this example. The project team
members should be utilized to lead, at least initially, the production of the new phone.
They have the most familiarity with the process and the product.

Suggested Case Analyses and Solutions

St. Dismas Assisted Living Facility -- VI
Teaching Purpose: This installment concludes the St. Dismas case. Issues include
estimating the final construction budget, addressing a work slowdown, revising the Gantt
chart, and the reporting of staff expenses.
1. Estimate the final construction budget.

114

8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

Construction Costs:
Building
Contingency
Land
Program development & equipment costs
Furniture
A&E Fees @ 5%
Financing costs
Capitalized interest
Site improvements
Phone & IS system
Kitchen equipment
Total

Organizational Costs:
Legal and accounting
Initial marketing
Project consultant
Follow-up Market survey
Total
Total

Budgeted

Estimated Actual at
Completion

Remaining $

6,743,000.00
674,300.00
600,000.00
405,000.00
400,000.00
347,000.00
202,000.00
135,000.00
125,000.00
30,000.00
30,000.00
9,691,300.00

$6,743,000.00
$674,300.00
$600,000.00
$405,000.00
$400,000.00
$347,000.00
$202,000.00
$135,000.00
$147,655.00
$30,000.00
$23,776.00
$9,707,731.00

$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
-$22,655.00
$0.00
$6,224.00
-$16,431.00

25,000.00
250,000.00
80,000.00
20,000.00
375,000.00

$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00

$25,000.00
$250,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
$375,000.00

10,066,300.00

$9,707,731.00

$358,569.00

The organizational costs can not be reflected in the final budget until the CFO
explains when and how the expenses will be allocated back to the projects budget
for the expenses incurred by the parent organization. The above reflects the
information provided in the case.
2. What should they do about the work slowdown?
The work slowdown is probably being caused by the construction crew because
they have not been informed of their next assignment. They are concerned about
the lack of work after the facility is completed. The project manager needs to
urge the contractor to inform his crew of their next assignment. Kyle also needs
to insist that no additional slowdowns be allowed, and that tighter controls are put
on the system to monitor that the project stays on schedule during the last few
months.
3. Create a Gantt chart with the revisions to the duration of the interior step. When will
the project be completed?
The project will be completed 8/1/01.

115

8/Evaluating and Terminating the Project

4. What is the importance of the fact that the Hospital staff expenses were not reported
under the project budget?
The importance of the omission of expenses on the project is significant. The
CFO should have provided the PM with the overhead allocations at the beginning
of the project. Those expenses can and will effect the projects budget and need
to be included in the overall project. The PM may not have control over the
expenses but they effect his bottom line and the success of the project in meeting
its budget. This late in the project there is little anyone, include the CEO, can do
to have an impact on the success of the project budgetarily without knowing
these costs.
Datatechs Audit
Teaching Purpose: This case illustrates how many of the topics discussed in previous
chapters can contribute to project failure and perhaps the need to terminate the project
early.
1. To what extent were the problems facing the notebook computer development project
avoidable? What could have been done to avoid these problems?
Indeed, all of the problems noted in the case were avoidable. First, there was no
project planning done on Steves part. This was, in part, due to Steves failure to
recognize significant differences between a minor product line extension project
and a more substantial new product line development project. Furthermore, there
was no team involvement in developing the WBS. Had the team been involved,
the need for a hinge system would probably have been identified. The problem
with manufacturing not being able to produce the notebook computer design
could have been avoided had this group been more involved earlier in the project.
Finally, there is need for a formal change request process. This would have
helped with the VPs request to redesign the computer to work with the new PDA.
2. Would it make sense to apply a project selection model such as the weighted scoring
model to the project to determine if it should be terminated?
Absolutely. Project selection models can be used to determine if a project should
be continued. When used in this fashion, updated information can be entered into
the model and a decision can be made regarding whether it makes sense to

116

8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

continue this project, particularly in light of new opportunities the organization

may have.
3. In your opinion, are the types of problems that arose in this situation typical of other
organizations? If so, what can organizations in general do to avoid these types of
problems?
These problems are indeed common. In some organizations, project managers
that spend little time planning a project are referred to as cowboys. Besides the
problem of inadequate planning, the problems of little team involvement, little
cross-functional integration, and lack of processes to control change are also all
too common. As discussed above, the solution of these problems is to ensure
adequate project planning is carried out, that there are adequate levels of
involvement both within the team and across functions, and to manage the scope
of the project.

Test Questions
True/False and Multiple Choice
T 1. ___ A project evaluation measures the projects performance relative to its plan.
F 2. ___ One should evaluate the project only after it is completed.
F 3. ___ The most difficult thing to evaluate is the projects budget and schedule.
T 4. ___ It is a best practice to set the evaluation criteria at the beginning of the project.
F 5. ___ A project audit should only be conducted after the project is completed.
F 6. ___ Audits conducted after the project is finished have little or no value to the
project manager.
T 7. ___ The audit team should establish a relationship with the project team.
T 8. ___ Project team members should be made aware of audits when or before the audit
process is started.
T 9. ___ The method used to terminate a project has a major impact on the work
environment of the organization.
T 10. ___ Termination by addition occurs when the project is made a new part of the
sponsoring organization or its client.
F 11. ___ Termination by integration occurs when the project is made a new part of the
sponsoring organization or its client.

117

8/Evaluating and Terminating the Project

T 12. ___ Formally ignoring a project by not giving it enough budget and resources is
also known as project starvation.
F 13. ___ Determining the best method for project termination is usually done by the
project manager.
T 14. ___ The process to be followed when terminating a project should be included in
the original project plan.
F 15. ___ The termination manager and the project manager are always the same person.
F 16. ___ It is best to have the project manager assume responsibility as the termination
manager of the project.
T 17. ___ When a project is terminated, the project manager should help with the
reassignment of project personnel.
F 18. ___ In a functional organization, layoffs of project personnel are likely when
projects are terminated.
T 19. ___ The projects final report is a history of the project.
F 20. ___ The project manager should only include objective, measurable data and
findings in the projects final report.
T 21. ___ A primary purpose of the projects final report is to improve future projects.
F 22. ___ Follow-up and communication on the projects performance is of little
importance after the project is completed.
T 23. ___ Project evaluation determines the progress of the project relative to the
objectives of the organization.
F 24. ___ Project evaluation will not increase the cost of the project.
F 25. ___ Team members should not contribute their opinions to or participate in the
project audit because they would bias the findings.
F 25. ___ The primary purpose of the project evaluation is to identify the projects
weaknesses.
T 26. ___ The project auditor must maintain political and technical independence during
the audit.
T 27. ___ A good time for a project evaluation is when major milestones are scheduled
for completion.

118

8/ Evaluating and Terminating the Project

F 28. ___ A financial audit has a broader scope than a project audit.
F 29. ___ In conducting an audit, the auditor must remember not to worry about the
anxiety he may cause the project team.
T 30. ___ All project records and files should be accessible to the audit.
F 31. ___ The primary purpose of the project final report is to determine the success of
the project.
T 32. ___ An official termination should be part of every project.
b 33. ___ What are the ways to terminate a project?
a. Starvation, depletion of resources, distribution and abandonment
b. Extinction, addition, integration, and starvation
c. Neglect, adoption, exterminating and assassination
d. A & C
e. B & D
b 34. ___ Who is best to determine the project termination method?
a. The project team
b. The senior executive termination team
c. The function department managers
d. The project manager
e. The project champion
e 35. ___The termination manager is responsible for which of the following:
a. Check that all work is completed
b. Make sure subcontractors completed work
c. Clear accounts for final billing
d. Determine what documentation to keep on the project
e. All of the above
b 36. ___ The primary purpose of the projects final report is?
a. Document the project
b. Improve future projects performance
c. Keep a diary of the project
d. Serve as an method of project evaluation
e. All of the above

119

8/Evaluating and Terminating the Project

d 37. ___ The primary focus of the project evaluation is to:

a. Identify what is going well on the project
b. Identify the problems on the project
c. Determine the cost of the project
d. Aid in achieving the projects goals
e. Give the project manager a good idea of how the project is progressing
b 38. ___ The formal audit report should contain
a. A list of the project team members and their roles
b. The current status of the project
c. The Work Breakdown Structure with costs
d. The cost of resources used to date on the project
e. None of the above is necessary
Short Answer
39. Why is the post project audit important?
To learn from the project. To account for all project property and expenditures.
40. What are some of the goals of the project evaluation?
Make recommendations to improve project performance, speed achievement of
results, identify what is going well and what are some mistakes made, fix problems
and avoid them in the future.

120