Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
12
2.
ANTENNA DESIGN & STRUCTURE
The design of the microstrip patch is influenced by many
dimensional parameters like length, width and height of
the structure. The dimensions of the slot and electrical
permittivity of the substrate also plays an important role
to make an efficient antenna design. The flow chart of the
design of proposed antenna is given in Figure 1. These
steps have been strictly followed to obtain the optimal
dimensional parameters of the proposed design.The
proposed antenna in this paper is designed with a compact
rectangular slot and a pentagon shape feeding structure at
the interior portion of the feed. The basic geometry of
proposed UWB antenna is shown in Figure 2. The
Figure 2 Geometry of the proposed antenna
proposed antenna is designed on FR4 substrate of
thickness, h = 1.6 mm with dielectric constant, r= 4.4.
Table 1 Constructional parameters of proposed
The CPW feed is designed with 50 transmission line
structure
which consists of a single strip having width of 2.4 mm is S.no Parameters
Dimensions
used to feed the antenna. The patch size is characterized
1
Length of proposed Antenna, L
28 mm
by the length L, width W, thickness h, length of the slot
2
Width of Proposed Antenna, W
21 mm
Ls, width and gap between the ground plane and feed
4
Length of slot, Ls
15 mm
strip, The constructional parameters of the proposed
5
Width of slot, Ws
17 mm
antenna are detailed in Table 1. The fields at the edges of
6
Gap between the strip width and
0.5 mm
the patch undergo fringing because the dimensions of the
ground plane, g
patch are finite along the length and width [1]. For better
7
Feed strip width
2.4 mm
resonance performance parameters, good impedance
matching is required and it can be calculated using
3.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
equation (1) and (2) [1].
3.1.
Return Loss
S-parameters describe the input-output relationship
between ports (or terminals) in an electrical system.
Return loss is the difference between forward and
reflected power, in dB [1].In order to access the
effectiveness of the proposed design, developed
methodology were used to draw the structure of antenna.
Copyright to IJIREEICE
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
13
ZMK ZC 11
(4)
Resonating Frequency
Return Loss
(GHz)
(dB)
1.
3.57
-23.94
2.
6.59
-19.54
3.
9.09
-15.13
4.
11.19
-30.08
5.
13.03
-18.11
3.2.
Input Impedance
Electromagnetic waves may encounter differences in
Figure 5 Simulated imaginary input impedance of the
impedance at each interface while traveling through the
proposed antenna
different parts of the antenna system, from the source to
the feed line to the antenna and finally to the free space.
Table 3 Input Impedance of proposed antenna
The input impedance of an antenna is a complex function
of frequency, which cannot be presented in any simple
S.
Resonating Frequency
Input
analytical form. The antenna terminal impedance at a
no.
(GHz)
Impedance
single frequency may be accurately described by a
(ohms)
resistance in series with a reactance as given in equation
1.
3.57
53.75+j5.43
(3). The degree of mismatch is a function of input
2.
6.59
46.11-j9.40
impedance and characteristic impedance of the line as
3.
9.09
66.52+j12.19
given in equation (4), where Zc is the characteristic
4.
11.19
48.09+j2.40
impedance of the transmission line and is the voltage
5.
13.03
46.99+j11.72
reflection coefficient at the antenna input terminals. It
determines the amount of incident or available power
VSWR
which is reflected at the input antenna terminals in to the 3.3.
Basically the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) is a
1
measure of the impedance mismatch between the
) (3)
line [11]. ZMK RMK j (LMK
transmitter and the antenna. Large value of VSWR
CMK
corresponds to the high mismatch. Minimum value of
Copyright to IJIREEICE
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
14
Resonating Frequency
(GHz)
3.57
6.59
9.09
11.19
13.03
VSWR
1.13
1.23
1.42
1.06
1.28
Radiation Patterns
Copyright to IJIREEICE
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
(a)
15
Antenna
Geometry
UWB slot
antenna
with
triangular
tuning stub
[5]
UWB slot
antenna
with
pentagonal
tuning stub
Resonating
Frequency
(GHz)
3.50
Retur
n Loss
(dB)
-21.2
6.50
9.30
11.2
-25.0
-21.2
-33.0
3.57
-23.94
6.59
19.54
15.13
30.08
18.11
9.09
11.19
13.03
4.
Bandwidth
(percentag
e)
114%
(3.111.4
GHz)
125%
(3.1-13.48
GHZ)
CONCLUSION
Copyright to IJIREEICE
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
16
REFRENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Copyright to IJIREEICE
DOI 10.17148/IJIREEICE.2015.3103
17