Professional Documents
Culture Documents
23 May 2013
Disclaimer
Table of contents
Where are the cement customers? Where are their petroleum coke
suppliers?
Future economics and conclusions
3,700 Mt
Assumptions:
Energy consumption
Company
Anhui Conch
Holcim
Lafarge
Heidelberg Cement
Cemex
Italcementi
Buzzi Unicem
Taiheiyo
Eurocement
Grasim (Aditya Birla Group)
187.0
148.0
141.1
89.0
65.8
2
51.1
27.3
14.6
2
30.0
2
40.0
Lafarge:
While we take a number of steps designed to manage energy and FUEL COST RISK,
these measures may not be fully effective in protecting us from this risk
Holcim
In our industry, companies that procure more efficiently in 2013 will have a cost, and therefore a
competitive, advantage
Roskill observation:
Cement is one of very few energy-intensive materials that saw its prices FALL over the period
2007-2012 despite a rising cost base of between 5% and 25% over the same period
Biomass
2%
Natural gas
5%
Alternative fuels
10%
Shale/lignite
5%
Heavy fuel
1%
Petroleum coke
20%
Source: Roskill based on 2012 annual results for selected major cement producers
Coal
57%
Disadvantages
Advantages
Price
Price
Price
10
11
12
13
China also now the main prop of the Asian market for thermal coal
14
15% Africa
32%
Europe
99% USA
2% Asia
40% Other
15
Source: Petroleum Coke Global Industry Markets & Outlook, 2012, Roskill
16
Source: Petroleum Coke Global Industry Markets & Outlook, 2012, Roskill
17
Carbon footprint
Coal, oil and natural gas are discretionary extracted fuels and every GJ
extracted has a carbon footprint associated with that discretionary use
Predictions to 2016
Cement production will continue to grow in all regions outside Europe, with
pricing gains everywhere
America to Asia is by far the largest trade flow for petroleum coke
Fuel grade petroleum coke will always be priced to move so delivered prices
will continue to be positioned lower than delivered coal prices on a per GJ basis
Petroleum coke
Global Industry Markets & Outlook
6th edition, 2012
Get accurate answers from independent experts