Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beech 99 Modeling
A Beechcraft 99 aircraft, as shown in Fig. 1, is to be modeled using Matlab Simulink. The Beech 99
was designed in the 1960s as a civil aircraft with a capacity of one or two crew members and up to
15 passengers in a two abreast configuration. It has two PT6A-20 turboprop engines that produce a
maximum power of 715 SHP each. With a gross weight of 11,300 lb, this aircraft has a range of 900
nm at the maximum cruise speed of 224 kts, and 1010 nm at a cruise speed of 190 knots. Another
important characteristic of the aircraft is its stall speed of 75.6 knots. At sea level it can climb at a rate
of 2090 ft/min with a service ceiling of 25,000 ft.
Beech 99 was then calculated using MATLAB at the given trim velocity of 340 ft/s. The trim angle of
attack resulted in -0.056 degrees, an elevator deflection angle of 1.485 degrees, and a trim thrust of
890.7 lbs. The power required at trim was then calculated using the trim velocity and trim thrust. The
trim throttle setting was calculated by dividing the trim power required and the total power available,
which consists of the two 715 SHP turboprop engines. The following Figures show the differences in
aircraft states between trim and non-trim conditions.
Figure 2. Translational velocities, no trim (left) and with trim conditions (right)
Figure 3. Angular velocities, no trim (left) and with trim conditions (right)
Figure 4. Euler angles, no trim (left) and with trim conditions (right)
Figure 5. Inertial position, no trim (left) and with trim conditions (right)
3
Figure 6. Control inputs, no trim (left) and with trim conditions (right)
With all the aerodynamic derivatives, geometric parameters, and trim conditions set, three cases
were run to test the response of the simulation. The first test simulates the airplanes response to
elevator deflections, in these tests all the other parameters are left at trim condition except for the
control input that is being tested. The elevator starts at trim angle and from two to four seconds the
elevator deflects 0.5 degrees up, then from four to six seconds it deflects down 0.5 degrees from trim,
and finally it returns to its initial position until 500 seconds of the simulation are run. The control input
over time can be seen in Fig. 7, and it reflects the process previously stated. The other results from
the simulation can be seen in Fig. 8 to Fig. 11.
For aileron deflection, more changes are seen from the simulation. As expected, the roll rate, p,
varies in the time the ailerons are deflected. As a result of that the other angular velocities are
affected as seen in Fig. 13. The euler angles in Fig. 14 show how roll affects yaw and pitch, the
adverse yaw at a turn can be seen in the figure. The change in transverse velocity in the y-axis shows
the variation of speed due to the aileron deflection and Fig. 15 also shows the changes in velocity in
the x and z direction due to roll. When the aileron is deflected up, the airplane rolls right and starts
going east as seen in Fig. 16. After the aileron is deflected down it turns left and stars correcting its
course. The aileron deflection also causes the airplane to descend and after the ailerons are returned
to neutral position, the airplane stabilizes.
10
11
It can be concluded that the modeled aircraft successfully performed every test. These results prove
the Simulink model was modified correctly and further modifications can be now performed.
12