Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Introduction
Scratch Tests Fundamentals
June 5, 2012
June 5, 2012
Scratch Tests
1. Scratch Hardness Test: Scratch with constant normal load on a
specimen and on a reference specimen using a stylus. Scratch width
data are utilized to obtain the scratch hardness of the specimen as
follows [1]:
=
(1)
where, subscripts s and ref stand for the test specimen and the
reference specimen, respectively. The terms H, L, and W denote
hardness, normal load, and scratch width, respectively. The test is
used for bulk and coating materials.
2. Scratch Adhesion Test: This test is performed by applying either a
progressive (~linearly increasing) or constant load [2-4].
June 5, 2012
Scratch Direction
Lc is a function of coating-substrate
adhesion, stylus-tip radius, loading
rate, mechanical properties of
substrate and coating, coating
thickness, internal stress in coating,
flaw size distribution at substratecoating interface, and friction
between stylus-tip and coating.
June 5, 2012
Constant load test requires more time but it provides greater statistical
confidence.
Progressive load test is suitable for rapid assessment and quality
assurance (QA) of coating. Hence, it is more popular for research and
development work on coating processes.
June 5, 2012
June 5, 2012
Damage Features
Through Thickness Cracking
Brittle Tensile Cracking: Nested microcracks; open to the direction of scratch;
straight and semi-circular; formed behind
the stylus.
Scratch Direction
Chevron Cracks
Arc Tensile
Hertz
Conformal
Scratch Direction
Chipping
June 5, 2012
Chipping
Rounded regions of coating removal extending
laterally from the edges of the scratch groove
8
Damage Features
Spallation
Buckling : coating buckles ahead of the stylus
tip; irregularly wide arc-shaped patches
missing; opening away from scratch direction.
Wedging : Caused by a delaminated region
wedging ahead to separate the coating;
regularly spaced annular-circular that extends
beyond the edge of the groove.
Recovery: regions of detached coating along
one or both sides of the grove; produced by
elastic recovery behind the stylus and plastic
deformation in the substrate.
Gross Spallation : Large detached regions;
common in coating with low adhesion strength.
June 5, 2012
Scratch Direction
Buckling
Wedging
Recovery
Gross Spallation
Coating Hardness
High
Low
Low
June 5, 2012
High
Plastic deformation of
coating and substrate
produces tensile and
conformal cracking with
buckling failure of
coating
10
Scratch Models
Benjamin and Weaver: They proposed two scratch models [5] based on
(a) tangential force (Fx) at the tip and (b) normal force. The 1st model can
be summarized as:
=
12
+ 4 2 +
(2)
where, d is scratch width, R is the tip radius, Hs and Hc are the hardness
of substrate and coating, respectively; t is the shear stress at the coatingsubstrate interface and t is the thickness of the coating.
The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd terms in the RHS of the equation (2) are the ploughing
force required to deform the substrate, the force to remove coating from
the surface, and the ploughing force required to push aside the sheared
film, respectively. This model can be used to obtain critical shear stress (tc)
of the coating-substrate interface. This model was found to work well with
Al-coated glass specimen.
June 5, 2012
11
Scratch Models
The 2nd model of Benjamin and Weaver is based on normal force that
describes scratching in terms of shear stress (ts) at the lip of stylus tip:
=
2 2
(3)
where, a is the contact radius between the tip and the coating (a d/2).
The model gives a measure of adhesion in terms of critical shear stress by
substituting a measured at the critical load.
Ollivier and Matthews: They [6] replaced HS in equation (3) by Fz/pa2,
resulting in a critical shear stress given by:
=
2 2
(4)
where, Lc = critical load and ac = contact radius at the critical load. This
model was able to yield semi-quantitative results for DLC films.
June 5, 2012
12
Scratch Models
Laugier: Total compressive stress (sx) under the leading edge of the
indenter is expressed as [8,9]:
= 2 2
4 +
3
8
1 2
(5)
3
1 2
4
1 2
+
(6)
is the Poissons ratio of the coating, Es and Ec are the Youngs moduli of
the substrate and the coating, respectively.
June 5, 2012
13
Scratch Models
For a << R, the shear stress (t) acting on the coating-substrate interface at
the lip of the indentation was approximated as :
(7)
(8)
The critical stress (sc) is the sum of external stress and internal stress at
the critical load. This model was purely elastic, and it was assumed that a
>> t. The model predicted results on carbide and nitride coatings
reasonably.
June 5, 2012
14
Scratch Models
Burnett and Rickerby [10]: The driving forces for removal of coating
consists of components of (i) an elastic-plastic indentation stress, (ii) an
internal stress, and (iii) tangential force. The following relation was derived
for critical scratching load:
=
2 2
8
(9)
June 5, 2012
15
Scratch Models
Bull et al [7] modified Burnett-Rickerby model assuming that the coating
detachment occurs when the tangential compressive stresses in the
coating in front of the stylus induce critical tensile stresses normal to the
coating-substrate interface: The critical load is given by:
=
(10)
where Ac is the cross-sectional area of the scratch track at the critical load:
=
2 1 2
1/2
2
2
(11)
June 5, 2012
16
June 5, 2012
17
Practical Approach
For all practical application, we perform scratch test to obtain the critical load
as a useful adhesion parameter for evaluation of coatings to ensure their
fitness for use.
June 5, 2012
18
19
June 5, 2012
20
21
22
Linear Scratch
Tool: Rockwell
Diamond indenter
200-mm tip radius
Adhesion: 25 N
June 5, 2012
23
Linear Scratch
Specimen: 3.5-mm
thick DLC coating on
Steel substrate.
1.5
1
0.5
0
Z [um]
Tool: Rockwell
Diamond indenter
200-mm tip radius
-0.5
-1
-1.5
Adhesion: 25 N
-2
-2.5
-150
-100
-50
50
100
X [ um ]
June 5, 2012
24
June 5, 2012
25
Linear Scratch
26
27
June 5, 2012
28
25
20
Z [um]
15
10
-5
-300
-200
-100
0
X [ um ]
100
200
300
29
3D-Scratch
30
31
32
Angular Scratch
33
Concluding Remarks
CETR-UMT
Test
system
can
perform
comprehensive evaluation of coatings by
automated imaging and profiling of scratch.
June 5, 2012
34
References
ASTM Standard G171 (03) Standard Test Method for Scratch Hardness of
Materials Using a Diamond Stylus.
2. ASTM Standard C1624 (05) Standard Test Method for Adhesion Strength and
Mechanical Failure Modes of Ceramic Coatings by Quantitative Single Point
Scratch testing
3. S. J. Bull, Surf. Coat. Technol. 50 (1991) 25.
4. S. J. Bull, Trib. Inter. 30 (1997) 491.
5. P. Benjamin, C. Weaver, Proc. R. Soc. London, A 254 (1960) 163.
6. B. Ollivier, J. Matthews, J. Adhesion Technol., 8 (1994) 651.
7. S.J. Bull, D.S. Rickerby, A. Matthews, A. Leyland, A.R. Pace, J. Valli, Surf. Coat.
Technol. 36 (1988) 503.
8. M.T. Laugier, Thin Solid Films 76 (1981) 289; 117 (1984) 243.
9. M.T. Laugier, J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) 2269.
10. P.J. Burnett, D.S. Rickerby, Thin Solid Films 154 (1987) 403; 157 (1988) 233.
1.
June 5, 2012
35
www.bruker-axs.com
productinfo@bruker-nano.com
May 8, 2012
36