Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

1 2 2
1.

1008722. 100872

F304.3

1674-9189201105-0078-13

2010

1982-
1966-

78

20082005

2007 Gardner

/
2010
2008
2000

Gardner

2007
2010

2008 9

2007

20082008
200920082009
2007

2008

2005

2008

2008 5

79

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

2005

80

40

587 4 000

80

1.

2010

81

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

2.

3.

24

82

350

1
1.

12008 71. 3%2009 71. 3%2010

71%

2
2008 37. 5%2009 37. 1%2010 36. 8%

4 70 /
83

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

2010

2009

2008

13 200 2000~2008

1 320

1 320

1 320

1 554

1 554

1 554

500

500

500

5 000/2004

300

300

300

3 974

3 974

3 974

3 200

3 100

3 000

60

60

60

1 000
1 332

900

1 200

1 132

1 000

1 000

200

190

190

300
0

100

160
300
0

100

100

6 732

11 416

10 984

10 706

2.5

9 909

9 900

5 641
9 800
2

19 818

24 750

19 600

7.61

44.13

19.90

1 402

7 547

10

300

7 010
6 119

150

7 442
6 990

4 662 3 08

800

1 085
165

13 200

2010

3 253

/ 0

2.

2011

3.

1 2008 3 253 2009 7 547 2010 1 402

84

2011 2

4.75

3.58

32.68

1.17

5.90

4.00

47.50

1.90

1.96

9.60

6.57

7.88

8.60

1.93

1.89

2.23

5.90
11.60
5.70

13.70

4.03
7.75
3.74
8.00

20.60

11.00

13.70

7.13

9.40
3.60

15.80
4.00

16.60
3.60
3.60

15.80
3.20
1.50
3.60

5.00
1.82
7.92

46.40
49.68
52.41
71.25
87.27
88.00
92.15
97.80
99.49

1.94

106.19

1.68

114.29

8.00
1.67
7.04
1.31
0.59
1.37

107.50
115.57
124.43
144.27
154.24
162.77

1.87

3.85

5.70

4.40

1.78

2.06

1.92

8.76

0.91

20.00

7.56

164.55

12.44

13.50

5.00

170.00

8.50

10.60
13.10
3.80
27.5
5.30

25.20
10.60
11.70
8.40

10.60
20.00
6.30
7.40

14.80
5.70

20.00
9.50

3.98
4.62
1.31
9.45
1.69
8.00
3.34
3.60
2.47
2.80
5.14
1.59
1.86
3.18
1.22
4.22
2.00

166.33
183.55
190.08

6.62
8.48
2.49

191.01

18.05

215.00

17.20

225.00

8.10

213.61
217.37
240.08
278.57

3.61
7.26
5.93
7.80

289.11

14.86

297.85

5.54

296.23

4.71

365.41

11.62

373.93

15.78

367.21
375.00

4.48
7.50

2011 2

10%~18%

1
85

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

0. 3

0. 5

2%~5%
3

4.00

0.75

433.33

12.50

10.3

21.36

120.34

5.50
4.50
6.50

18.50

2.00

175.00

1.60

181.25

6.85

170.07

2.95

20.50

10.00

105.00

5.50

2.85

92.98

5.50

10.00
180

9.50

2.85
5.85

10.00
5.80

92.98
70.94
80.00
63.79

119. 47%

0. 05

20 90

100 15. 2

2%~5% 90%
1. 6 / 1001-0. 02/0. 10. 0016=1. 568
2. 5

1.

70%80% 90%
86

2010 100 360

5 10 10 4

10 1 1~3 3~4 4

5 0. 1 / 0.15 /

0. 05 / 0. 7 / 20 6 6

8 30 1 000 22
13 10 2 100 / 6 /
1%

2 200 0.1 0.25

0.15 0.4 0.04 0.2

300~500
40 000 37
2

27 24 000 30 /

100 / 0. 1
0. 6~0. 7 / 0. 7~0. 8 / 4
4

24 000

100 /

20

80 /

1 000 /

0.1 /

101 700
120 800
19 100
18.89%

3.

1. 0 / 1. 3 / 1. 8 /
0. 9 / 1. 3~1. 5 / 1. 9 / 1. 5 /

1.7~1.8/1.90.35/0.8/0.10.2/
0. 3 / 0. 45 /

87

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

600~830 7 8:30 200~300

30 20 100
5

43.2

69 600

69 600

2 000

24 000/6

144 000

0.2%

200

60 /6

360

10%~20%

10 000

280

260 /6

1 560

700 000

=100 /

1 000 /

30% 10%10%10%

100

2 000 /
10 000

856 720

143 280
14.33%

1.2~1.5 //

20

80 /

1 000 /

10%~30%
50 420
61 092
13 672
12.11%

88

5%~10%

89

Agricultural Economics and Management

201 1 5 9

[ 1 ] , , , . [J]. (), 2008(4): 48-55.

[ 2 ] . [J]. , 2008(18).

[ 3 ] , Weldegebriel H T, Rayne A J. [J]. , 2007, 6(3): 885-898.

[ 4 ] , . [J]. , 2010(1): 10-17.
[ 5 ] , . . [J]. , 2009(5): 61-67.
[ 6 ] , . [J]. , 2000(1): 52-27.

[ 7 ] , , . [J]., 2010(1): 108-112.

[ 8 ] , , . [J]. , 2007(11):110-114.
[ 9 ] . [J]. , 2005(4): 66-72.

[10] , . [J]. , 20082: 39-48.

[11] , . [J]. . 2000, 5(6): 18-22 .
[12] , . [J]. , 2006(5): 59-62.

[13] , , . , [J]. 2009(15): 6-8.

[14] , . , [J]., 2008(11): 20-25.

[15] , , , . [J]. , 2008(5): 13-19.
[16] , . [J]. , 2009(7): 31-41.

[17] , , . [J]. , 2008(12): 14-26.

Cost-benefit Analysis on Vegetable Chain:

A Case Study in Shandong and Beijing
ZHANG Xicai1, ZHANG Lixiang2, ZHANG Yinan2
1. Beijing Business Management College, Beijing, 100872; 2. Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Abstract: The vegetable price system is an important component of agricultural production. Because of

the characteristics of vegetables, the prices have their own features. Based on the survey in Shandong and

Beijing, this article not only summarizes the three price conduction modes of vegetables, but also analyzes

the cost-benefit on vegetable production chain. Then we try to explain the underlying reason of the price
volatility, and come to the policy suggestions that we must establish a Long-term control mechanism, and

the mainstay of the mechanism is the Central Agricultural Products Wholesale Market which serves the
public.

Key words: vegetable chain; price volatility; circulation; policy

90