Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quaternary International
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint
CNRS PACEA UMR 5199, Univ. Bordeaux, Avenue des facults btiment B18, 33405 Talence cedex, France
CNRS TRACES UMR 5608, Univ. Toulouse Le Mirail, Maison de la Recherche, 5 alles A. Machado, 31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Available online 2 March 2012
In south-western France, between 18,000 and 14,000 calBP, socio-economic changes are evident in
several spheres of Magdalenian hunter-gatherer activities which brought with them an array of transformations in osseous and lithic tools. Targeted prey species, although still dominated by ungulates, also
show an evolution during a period that was marked by signicant climatic and environmental changes
that can be correlated with cultural developments. Changes in procurement strategies and new patterns
in osseous and lithic weaponry are accompanied by the maintenance of social networks across large
regions, while at the same time there appears to be a geographic contraction of groups within regional
procurement networks. Ungulates remain the primary prey species but are supplemented by small game.
While it is important to evaluate the forces driving behind technological and socio-economic processes
through time, cultural evolution within each techno-complex ought to be accounted for as well. In order
to evaluate these internal developments, a more precise radiometric framework is necessary, which
integrates studies of osseous and lithic technology with available archaeozoological data. This contribution presents the rst results of such an undertaking based on a higher-resolution seriation of technological innovations and their implications in hunting activities. The rhythm of change appears to be
complex and nonlinear, and it highlights the innovative nature of Magdalenian weaponry. These rapid
changes, with respect to the Upper Paleolithic as a whole, provide insight into the impact of social
interactions as cultural stimulation, as well as how resource availability and human demography functioned as factors of changes.
2012 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The variable Late Glacial environments of Western Europe witnessed signicant, sometimes irreversible, changes in huntergather technology, mobility patterns and hunting strategies.
Ecologically induced changes or recongurations in the structure
and distribution of available animal biomass brought with them
innovations in material culture, particularly hunting weaponry. The
diffusion of technical know-how through expanded communication networks allowed human groups to respond to sometimes
rapid climatic changes and uctuations with dynamic solutions.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: m.langlais@pacea.u-bordeaux1.fr (M. Langlais), costamag@
univ-tlse2.fr
(S.
Costamagno),
v.laroulandie@pacea.u-bordeaux1.fr
(V. Laroulandie), petillon@univ-tlse2.fr (J.-M. Ptillon), ediscamps@gmail.com
(E. Discamps), jb.mallye@pacea.u-bordeaux1.fr (J.-B. Mallye), david.cochard@
ubordeaux1.fr (D. Cochard), delphine.kuntz@pacea.u-bordeaux1.fr (D. Kuntz).
1040-6182/$ e see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.053
139
Fig. 1. Location of principal Magdalenian sites in South-western France and its margins (coastlines at 120 and 110 m below modern sea level; dotted line: limit of the sands of Les
Landes), map created with ArcGIS 9.3, WGS 84 projection and MNT. After Amante and Eakins, 2009.
140
Fig. 3. Climatic contexts between 20 and 15 ka calBP according to glacial data (Langlais, 2007b after data from; Andersen et al., 2006; Svensson et al., 2006; NGRIP dating group,
2006; Rasmussen et al., 2006), marine data (Heinrich Stage 1 limits after data from Elliot et al. (2002); surface sea temperatures (SST) after data from Cacho et al. (2001), 2006;
Pailler and Bard, 2002; Bard, 2003) and continental data. Blling-Allerd (BeA), Younger Dryas (YD), Holocene (H).
141
Fig. 4. Direct radiocarbon dates on reindeer remains (light grey: Jura and Alps; dark grey: South-western France). After Costamagno et al., 2009; Costamagno, unpublished data;
Laroulandie, unpublished data; Bgouen et al., 2009; Oberlin and Pion, 2009; Bridault and Chaix, 2009; Szmidt et al., 2009a.
142
Fig. 5. Direct radiocarbon dates on red deer remains (light grey: Jura and Alps; dark grey: South-western France). After Costamagno et al., 2009; Costamagno, unpublished data;
Laroulandie, unpublished data; Oberlin and Pion, 2009; Bridault and Chaix, 2009; Szmidt et al., 2009a.
Fig. 6. Distribution of sites with quantied faunal lists for the Middle (a) and Upper
Magdalenian (b). Pie-charts represent NISP percentages of main herbivore species (of
the total number of identied ungulate remains) for each assemblage. Only assemblages with a total ungulate NISP greater than 50 have been included. Stratied
assemblages are represented by a white bar according to their position. The grey lines
placed offshore represent the past coastline for each period based on sea level estimations by Lambeck and Chappell (2001).
143
144
Table 1
List of sites providing data for Fig. 6 (NR UNG: Number of Ungulate Remains).
Culture
Code
Site
Level
NR UNG
References
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
MM
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
Aur
Bra
Can
Com4
Com5
Com8-13
Dur5
Enl4
Enl5
Esp
Fla
Gan
Gaz7
Gaz8
Laa1
Lab
Lau2
Mou
Peyru
Roc1
Roc2
Roc3
Sai3
StG
TucA
TucB
AraB1
AraB2
AraB3
Bel
Biz
Boi
Duf
Dur3
Dur4
Egl
Faur
Faus
Fon
Gar
Ist
Laa2
Lau1
Mad1
Mad2
MorA
MorB
Mur5
Mur6
Pey1
Sai1
Trou
Vac
Aurensan
Brassempouy
Canecaude
Combe-Cullier
Combe-Cullier
Combe-Cullier
Duruthy
Enlne
Enlne
Esplugues
Flageolet II
Gandil
Gazel
Gazel
Laa 2
Labastide
Laugerie-Haute
Moulin Neuf
Peyrugues
Roc de Marcamps
Roc de Marcamps
Roc de Marcamps
Sainte Eulalie
St-Germain-la Rivire
Tuc dAudoubert
Tuc dAudoubert
Arancou
Arancou
Arancou
Belvis
Bize
Bois-Ragot
Dufaure
Duruthy
Duruthy
Les Eglises
La Faurlie II
Faustin
Fontanet
La Gare de Couze
Isturitz
Laa 2
Laugerie-Haute
La Madeleine
La Madeleine
Morin
Morin
Murat
Murat
Peyrazet
Sainte Eulalie
Troubat
La Vache
?
1
CII
41 et 42
5
8,9,11,12.13A, 13C
5
4
5
159
66
5799
117
82
1926
322
351
59
322
734
816
7358
295
244
156
1647
1905
746
163
237
96
92
2221
294
196
80
293
71
1286
6057
1561
4011
2851
348
9097
594
94
91
5332
274
373
2892
5570
2260
2800
364
395
91
52
92
1012
81603
Clot, 1983
Patou-Mathis and Boukhima, 1996
Fontana, 1998
Delpech, 1975
Delpech, 1975
Delpech, 1975
Delpech, 1983
Fosse, 1992
Fosse, 1992
Clot, 1985
Delpech, 1983; Deplano, 1994
Griggo, 1997
Fontana, 1998
Fontana, 1998
Kuntz unpublished data
Clot in Omns (1982)
Delpech, 1983
Costamagno, 1999
Allard 1992
Slott-Moller, 1988
Slott-Moller, 1988
Slott-Moller, 1988
Delpech, 1983
Costamagno, 1999
Fosse in Bgouen et al. (2009)
Fosse in Bgouen et al 2010
Costamagno unpublished data
Fosse, 2000
Fosse, 2000
Fontana, 1998
Patou-Mathis et al., 1999
Griggo, 2005
Altuna and Mariezkurrena, 1995
Costamagno, 2006
Costamagno, 2006
Delpech and Le Gall, 1983
Berthet, 1999
Delpech, 1971
Clottes, 1979
Delpech, 1983
Letourneux in Ptillon (2006)
Kuntz unpublished data
Delpech, 1983
Delpech, 1975
Delpech, 1975
Delpech, 1983
Delpech, 1983
Costamagno unpublished data
Costamagno unpublished data
Costamagno unpublished data
Delpech, 1983
Costamagno, 2005
Pailhaugue, 1995, 1998
IX
2 to 14
7
8
US 4003-4009
secteur II
20 to 9 (sect. EAST)
2
3
3/3b 4/4b
4C
4D/5
III
1
Salle du Cheval Rouge
Galerie Bouquetin, Balcon 1
B1
B2
B3
1 to 4
G
56
4
3
4
all
C.5
all
?
B C D E F GO G G1 H
1 and F1
US 4010-4012
8 to 2 (sect. EAST)
2 to 12
13 to 17
A (AI AIV)
B (BI et BII)
V, Vn
VI
6
I
7a
Salle monique
Amongst bird species exploited, Ptarmigan (Lagopus) was hunted in mountainous zones and, at least in the Pyrenees, was sought
alongside Chough (Pyrrhocorax graculus). While available archeological evidence denitely indicates that these two species formed
part of Upper Magdalenian subsistence strategies, it remains difcult to determine the precise role of other avian resources. In the
Aquitaine Basin, Snowy Owl (Bubo scandiacus) was hunted not only
for its meat and bones, but probably also for its feathers and claws
(Eastham, 1998; Laroulandie, 2003, 2005, 2009). Several direct
dates on cut-marked Snowy Owl bones indicate that this subsistence behavior began at the very latest sometime between 16,000
and 14,000 calBP (Szmidt et al., 2009a). Available information
concerning shing practices also demonstrates a more intense
exploitation of aquatic resources during this period (Le Gall, 1999,
2003). In addition to these taxa, the consumption of smaller
animals such as ground squirrel is attested to at Rochereil,
Bois-Ragot and Morin (Jude, 1960; Marquet, 2005; Mallye, unpublished data). Furthermore, the recent re-examination of several
collections (Mallye, in prep.) has shown that small carnivores were
almost systematically exploited not only for their teeth (for the
manufacture of ornaments), but for their meat as well. However,
the deliberate extraction of pelts or feathers remains difcult to
establish from the archeological record alone (Mallye, 2007;
Laroulandie, 2009).
Upper Magdalenian techno-economic systems remain based
around blades and bladelets, although their technical roles evolved.
Blade tools continue to be transported over long distances, however
their production is freed from technical and economic constraints
(Langlais, 2010). This is most evident in the greater optimization of
locally available raw material sources, however this entailed
notable consequences in terms of size and quality, especially in the
Pyrenees (Simonnet, 2003; Lacombe, 2005; Langlais, 2010). The
145
Fig. 7. Diagram illustrating the changing trajectories of Magdalenian osseous and lithic weaponry between 18 and 14,000 calBP in the South-West of France (RTI: regional
technological innovation).
This evolution of both lithic and osseous tool kits during the
Upper Magdalenian also implies new hunting practices and it is
tempting to draw parallels between this evolution and the access to
(and selective choices of) new species. For example, the exploitation of small game, from a technological and subsistence standpoint, necessarily implies the acquisition and development of new
knowledge for their capture and processing. Questions can be
posed as to the function of shouldered, tanged, or foliate points in
addition to certain barbed points made of antler. Concurrently, but
146
at another interpretive level, nothing prevents envisaging a reorganization of the social division of tasks or certain ways of
viewing the world.
In attempting to rene the complex interaction between resource
availability and technical or socio-economic traditions and in order
to consider different forces driving these changes, the focus is on
a particular aspect of the archeological record: lithic and osseous
weapons. These artifact classes have the two-fold advantage of being
practically ubiquitous across the period and are directly related to
the acquisition of animal resources. Furthermore, they portray rapid
temporal and spatial variations and are therefore sound indicators of
chrono-cultural change (Ptillon, 2006; Langlais, 2010).
4. Changing trajectories: the example of magdalenian lithic
and bone weaponry
Direct radiocarbon dates recently procured from either prey
remains (cf. supra) or antler weaponry, for example from the site of
Isturitz (Szmidt et al., 2009b), provide better chronological resolution for discussing the evolution of Magdalenian hunting weaponry between 18 and 14 ka calBP. Bearing in mind the state of
research as well as limits of chronological precisions, four key
moments can be distinguished (Fig. 7).
At the beginning of the Middle Magdalenian (ca. 18,000 calBP),
an initial reconguration of antler weaponry can be observed
across the entire Magdalenian cultural sphere, especially in the
experimentation with new hafting methods. This is evident in the
development of Lussac-Angles points (Bertrand et al., 2003) and
the appearance of the rst undecorated spearthrower hooks
(Cattelain, 2004). Concerning lithic armatures, this period is noteworthy for the development of new morphotypes, especially
scalene bladelets in South-west France (upper levels of Saint-Germain-La-Rivire, Peyrugues c.3., Gandil, etc. Langlais, 2007b) and
pointed backed bladelets with truncated bases in the Poitou region,
as at Le Taillis des Coteaux, La Marche and Le Roc-aux-Sorciers
(Primault et al., 2007; Chehmana and Beyries, 2010; Langlais,
2010). Lussac-Angles points diffuse over signicantly larger territories between the south of the Paris Basin and the Iberian Peninsula (Bertrand et al., 2003), in parallel with a regionalization of
lithic morphotypes on either side of the Poitou region (Langlais,
2008).
Around 17,000 calBP was marked by the development of whale
bone points (Ptillon, 2008a), bivalve points (composed of two halfround rods) (Feruglio and Buisson, 1999; Rigaud, 2006) and the rst
barbed points (previously referred to as proto-harpoons). Decorated
antler points and spearthrower hooks appear, some of which
portray veritable regional idiosyncrasies (Cattelain, 2005; Fritz
et al., 2007), while others signal more extensive cultural units
(Braun, 2005). In terms of lithic armatures, the development of
small pointed backed bladelets in the Pyrenees (Tuc dAudoubert,
Isturitz, etc.) were produced from the edges of laterally prepared
cores which are markedly different from the scalene bladelets of
the Aquitaine region (Langlais in Bgouen et al., 2009; Langlais,
2010).
The beginning of the Upper Magdalenian in the Pyrenees and
Cantabrian Spain, ca. 16,000 calBP, sees yet another reconguration
of antler weapons including the development of barbed points and
new hafting methods such as forked bases, double-beveled bases
and foreshafts (Ptillon, 2006, 2007). In terms of lithic weaponry,
changes include the development of long shouldered points in the
Aquitaine region as at Duruthy (c.3, Arambourou et al., 1978;
Dachary, 2006) or Morin (c.B, Langlais, in prep.). A number of sites
in the Pyrenees are noteworthy for the presence of scalene triangles
made from bladelets, which are at times microlithic, such as at
Belvis or Parco (Langlais, 2008).
147
In: Zubrow, E., Audouze, F., Enloe, J.G. (Eds.), The Magdalenian Household.
Unravelling Domesticity. Suny Press, New-York, NY, pp. 175e197.
Braun, I.M., 2005. Art mobilier magdalnien en Suisse, Prhistoire. Art et Socits
50, 25e44.
Bridault, A., Chaix, L., 2002. Ruptures et quilibres dans la grande faune la n du
Plistocne et durant lHolocne ancien en Europe occidentale. In: Richard, H.,
Vignot, A. (Eds.), Equilibres et ruptures dans les cosystmes durant les 20
derniers millnaires en Europe de lOuest, Actes du colloque international de
Besanon, 2000. Presses Universitaires Franc-Comtoises (Annales littraires
730), pp. 53e60.
Bridault, A., Chaix, L., 2009. Rexions sur la recomposition des spectres fauniques
dans le massif jurassien et les Alpes franaises du nord durant le Tardiglaciaire.
In: Pion, G., Mevel, L. (Eds.), La n du Palolithique suprieur dans les Alpes du
nord franaises et le Jura mridional. Approches culturelles et environnementales. d. Socit prhistorique franaise (Mmoire 50), Paris, pp. 59e71.
Bundgen, B., 2002. Evolution des comportements techniques au Magdalnien
suprieur: les donnes de lindustrie lithique de la Madeleine (Dordogne),
sries rcentes, Thse de Doctorat, Universit de Bordeaux I, ex. multigraph.
Cacho, I., Grimalt, J.O., Canals, M., Sbaf, L., Shackleton, N.J., Schoenfeld, J., Zahn, R.,
2001. Variability of the Western Mediterranean Sea surface temperature during
the last 25,000 Years and its Connection with the northern Hemisphere climatic
changes. Paleoceanography 16 (1), 40.
Cacho, I., Grimalt, J.O., Canals, M., Sbaf, L., Shackleton, N.J., Schoenfeld, J., Zahn, R.,
2006. Western Mediterranean D18O and Uk37 Data and SST Reconstructions,
IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology (Data Contribution Series
106). NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USA.
Castel, J.C., Kuntz, D., Chauviere, F.X., GERBE, M., JUILLARD, F., 2007. Archozoologie
du Palolithique suprieur en Quercy. In: Jarry, M. (Ed.), Cultures et environnements palolithiques: mobilit et gestion des territoires des chasseurscueilleurs en Quercy, Rapport nal dACR, pp. 295e306, ex. multigraph.
Cattelain, P., 2004. Un propulseur indit de la grotte du Placard (Vihonneur, Charente, France). Notae Praehistoricae 24, 61e67.
Cattelain, P., 2005. Propulseurs magdalniens: marqueurs culturels rgionaux ? In:
Dujardin, V. (Ed.), Industrie osseuse et parures du Solutren au Magdalnien en
Europe, Actes de la table ronde sur le Palolithique suprieur rcent, Angoulme, 2003. d. Socit prhistorique franaise (Mmoire 39), Paris,
pp. 301e317.
Chauvire, F.X., Rigaud, A., 2009. Oublies ou stockes, les bauches de pointes de
projectile en bois de renne et leur gestion par les Magdalniens de la Garenne.
In: Bonnardin, S., Hamon, C., Lauwers, M., Quilliec, B. (Eds.), Du matriel au
spirituel: ralits archologiques et historiques des "dpts" de la Prhistoire
nos jours. Actes des XXIXe Rencontres internationales dArchologie et dHistoire, Antibes, 2008. d. APDCA, pp. 81e88.
Chehmana, L., Beyries, S., 2010. Lindustrie lithique du Roc aux Sorciers (collection
Rousseau). In: Buisson-Catil, J., Primault, J. (Eds.), Prhistoire entre Vienne et
Charente, Hommes et socits du Palolithique, Chauvigny. d. Association des
publications chauvinoises (Mmoires 38), pp. 453e460.
Clot, A., 1983. Dterminations de palontologie quaternaire dans le bassin de
lAdour (Premire srie, Pyrnes Atlantiques). Archologie des Pyrnes
Occidentales 3, 121e139.
Clot, A., 1985. Dterminations de palontologie quaternaire dans le bassin de
lAdour (Deuxime srie, Pyrnes Atlantiques). Archologie des Pyrnes
Occidentales 5, 205e222.
Clottes, J., 1979. Ornolac-Ussat-les-Bains - Grotte de Fontanet. Gallia Prhistoire 22,
653e654.
Cochard, D., Brugal, P., 2004. Importance des fonctions de site dans les accumulations palolithiques de lporids. In: Brugal, J.Ph., Desse, J. (Eds.), Petits Animaux et Socits Humaines. Du complment alimentaire aux ressources
utilitaires. Actes des XXIVe Rencontres internationales dArchologie et dHistoire, Antibes, 2003. d. APDCA, pp. 283e296.
Cochard, D., 2004. Les Lporids dans la subsistance des Palolithiques du Sud de la
France, Thse de Doctorat, Universit de Bordeaux I, 346 p., ex. multigraph.
Costamagno, S., Laroulandie, V., 2004. Lexploitation des petits vertbrs dans les
Pyrnes franaises du Palolithique au Msolithique: un inventaire taphonomique et archozoologique. In: Brugal, J.P., Desse, J. (Eds.), Petits Animaux et
Socits Humaines. Du complment alimentaire aux ressources utilitaires.
Actes des XXIVe Rencontres internationales dArchologie et dHistoire, Antibes,
2003. d. APDCA, pp. 403e416.
Costamagno, S., Cochard, D., Ferri, J.-G., Laroulandie, V., Barbaza, M., Cazals, N.,
Langlais, M., Valdeyron, N., Dachary, M., Galop, D., Martin, H., Philibert, S., 2008.
Nouveaux milieux, nouveaux gibiers, nouveaux chasseurs? Evolution des
pratiques cyngtiques dans les Pyrnes du Tardiglaciaire au dbut du Postglaciaire. Bulletin de la Socit prhistorique franaise 105 (1), 17e27.
Costamagno, S., Laroulandie, V., Langlais, M., Cochard, D., 2009. Exploitation du
monde animal sur le versant nord des Pyrnes durant le Tardiglaciaire. In:
Fullola, J.M., Valdeyron, N., Langlais, M. (Eds.), Els Pirineus i les rees circumdants durant el Tardiglacial. Mutacions i liacions tecnoculturals evolucion
paleoambiental. Actes du XIVe Colloque international dArchologie de Puigcerd, Hommage G. Laplace, novembre 2006. Institut dEstudis Ceretans,
pp. 185e209.
Costamagno, S., 1999. Stratgies de chasse et fonction des sites au Magdalnien
dans le sud de la France, Bordeaux, Thse de Doctorat, Universit de Bordeaux I,
2 t., 495 p., 329 Tabl., 132 Fig., 128 pl.
Costamagno, S., 2001. Exploitation de lAntilope saga au Magdalnien en Aquitaine.
Palo 13, 111e128.
148
149