Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOHNNY M. CEE
Petitioner
-versusGIGI S. GIMENEZ
Respondent
CIVIL CASE NO. ______
JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT OF
PETITIONER JOHNNY M. CEE
I, JOHNNY M. CEE, of legal age, single, and living at Tolentino St.
Sampaloc, Manila, petitioner in this case, state under oath as follows:
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The person examining me is Atty. John Paul T. Romero with address at
CTUB Paredes St. Sampaloc Manila . The examination is being held at the
same address. I am answering his questions fully conscious that I do so
under oath and may face criminal liability for false testimony and perjury.
PURPOSE: This affidavit/testimony of petitioner Mr. Johnny M. Cee is
being offered to prove that the respondent Ms. Gigi S. Gimenes contracted a
contract of lease last February 1, 2014 to rent a residential apartment in
Lacson St. Sampaloc, Manila. That the respondent used the said property for
commercial purposes that the latter instituted an eatery and carwash business
and she had a breach of contract and it had been instituted in the contract
entered by the petitioner and the respondent that the property must be solely
used for residential purposes. The petitioner upon discovery of the
businesses being instituted in his property is demanding the respondent to
vacate the area but the respondent did not vacate the area and ignored the
notices from the petitioner.
1. Q. Please state your name and other personal circumstances for the
record.
A. My name is Johnny Cee, 33 years old, single and a resident of
Tolentino St. Sampaloc, Manila.
2.
Q. Are you the same Johnny Cee, the petitioner in this case?
A. Yes sir.
3. Q. Do you know a certain Gigi Gimenez?
A. Yes sir. She was the one who leased my property apartment at Lacson
St. Sampaloc, Manila.
4. Q. When did you know her?
A. We entered into a contract of lease (Exhibit A) last February 1, 2014
for the mentioned apartment.
5. Q. What is the reason why are you complaining for the respondent to
vacate the property?
A. Upon my surprise visit in the said property to check last November
2014, I found out that my property was not solely used for residential
purposes but Ms. Gimenes used is for commercial purposes. She had
an eatery business and a carwash in the garage.
6.