Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One key aspect to consider is the economic feasibility of anaerobic digesters and incinerators/gasifiers
A viable waste to energy (WTE) system to process municipal solid waste and wastewater can be costly, so producers
who are considering adopting this type of technologies need to examine all aspects of it. One key aspect to consider
is the economic feasibility of the technology.
Background
Kenya has many Cities and Towns(urban communities with population>40,000 for the AD & at least 250,000
households for incinerator) that generate volumes of municipal solid waste and wastewater. These wastes require
proper handling to reduce pollution and contamination.
Using anaerobic digesters (Biosolids) appears to be an attractive option since the AD process can stabilize most
agricultural (market vegetable waste), domestic and industrial organic wastes, wastewater and produce biogas, a
renewable energy. Biogas can be used as a fuel source to produce electricity and heat, just like natural gas. MSW can
be incinerated or gasified to generate electricity and/or heat (cogeneration).
The total capital costs of anaerobic digester plants are high and may range from a few hundred thousand to a few
million dollars. However, most of the other waste processing technologies, which may also require a high capital
investment, do not generate revenue like a biogas digester plant does. Some of the feasibility studies in North
America on anaerobic digesters concluded that the payback period ranges from 5 to 16 years when operated under
optimum and worst conditions, incentives for producing green energy can potentially reduce the payback period
significantly.
Annual Energy Revenue from 100 kWh Anaerobic Processing of Wastewater Plant 1:Beneficial community characteristics (Urban communities with population >40,000 ; Existing wastewater treatment
plant with biogas capture)
Urban Communities with Population
= >40,000
= $0.06/ kWh
= $5.5/GJ
= 2,000 GJ
Total annual savings from energy or the energy potential for exporting into the grid
= $59,240
Assumptions
30 days/year for maintenance shut down, number of operating days/year
= 335
= $750,000
= $0.02/kWh
= 804,000 kWh
Operating cost/year
= $59,240
= $0.06/kWh
Total incentives
Annual Energy Revenue from 100 kWh Incineration/Gasification of MSW Plant 2:Beneficial community characteristics (WTE facilities may be better suited to larger communities or regional districts,
with at least 250,000 households; High heat demand (potential to sell heat to other users). For an approximate idea of
energy output, a standard MSW combustion plant produces approximately 470 kWh of electricity and 760 kWh of
heat per tonne of MSW.
Urban Communities with Population
= >250,000 households
= $0.06/ kWh
= $5.5/GJ
= 2,894 GJ
Total annual savings from energy or the energy potential for exporting into the grid
= $64,159
Assumptions
30 days/year for maintenance shut down, number of operating days/year
= 335
= $750,000
= $0.02/kWh
= 804,000 kWh
Operating cost/year
= $64,159
= $0.06/kWh
Total incentives