Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
The physical testing of plastic materials for the purpose of defining material constitutive models in finite element
analysis can be very simple or incredibly complex depending on the objective of the analysis. Linear analysis of
structural parts is routinely performed using only a couple simple parameters. More complex analysis may involve
elevated temperatures, severe plastic deformation and strain rate sensitivity requiring customized material model
development and rigorous experimentation. The purpose of this discussion is to introduce laboratory experiments
that may be used to evaluate the physical properties defined in material constitutive models.
The tensile test is probably the most commonly used for plastics
because the desired state of strain is relatively straightforward to
achieve in modern tensile testers and the experiment provides valu-
able information.
The strain in the tensile test must be measured in the region of the
test specimen where the desired strain state is achieved. For the ten-
sion specimen, this is in the narrow section. Figure 3, An axial extensometer mounted on a tensile
specimen.
Strain
Figure 4, A typical plastic tensile stress strain curve. Figure 5, A tensile test to very high strain.
Figure 7, Transverse strain plotted as a function of axial strain. The initial low strain
slope is the Poisson's ratio.
ISO and ASTM methods have definitions for yield stress and yield strain. In one approach, the yield stress is the
stress at a strain offset from the initial tangent to the stress-strain curve. In another approach, the yield stress is the
first local stress maximum. While these values give us an indication of the stress and strain where the linear region
ends, the underlying assumption is that plastics have a distinct transition from elastic only behavior to elastic plus
plastic behavior. However, deviation from a linear stress strain curve could be the result of nonlinear elasticity, vis-
coelasticity, or plasticity. Unraveling this is impossible without additional information.
Load-unload to 0.006
Tensile Test 20
20 15
Stress
10
15 in
g
ad
5 Lo ng
di
oa
nl
Stress
10 Region of Interest 0
Viscoelastic Recovery
Strain
5
Figure 11, A load-unload experiment with a total
strain of 0.006.
0 Load-unload to 0.008
20
Strain
Stress
10
g
in
ad
Figure 9, A typical plastic stress-strain curve with the yielding region of interest out- 5 Lo ng
di
lined. oa
nl
U
0
Load-unload to 0.02
Viscoelastic Recovery
0.020 16
Figure 12, A load-unload experiment with a total
strain of 0.008.
14
Load-unload to 0.02
Strain
0.015 12
Stress
10 20
0.010 8
15
6 g
in
ad
Stress
0.005
strain still recovering 4 Lo ng
10 di
oa
nl
2 U
5
0.000 0 Residual Strain Point
-2 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 Viscoelastic Recovery
Strain
Figure 10, Load-unload experiments are used to determine the plastic strain contribu-
tion to total strain. The graph shows the loading and unloading at one max strain Figure 13, A load-unload experiment with a total
point. Several experiments like this are used to quantify the plastic strain as a function strain of 0.020.
of total strain so that yielding can be more precisely determined. 1
Plastic deformation may appear at very small strain values. A more accurate way to determine the yield point is by
unloading the specimen. This requires loading a series of virgin specimens to incrementally increasing strain levels. A
typical tensile stress-strain might look like Figure 9. Using some judgment, we might focus on the outlined region
of interest to examine the yielding behavior. If we load a new test specimen as in Figure 9 but stop at a set total
strain followed by a quick removal of the stress on the specimen, we can observe the subsequent strain recovery.
The strain recovery consists of an initial quick elastic recovery followed by a slower viscoelastic recovery as shown in
Figure 10. After a reasonable time, we may define the residual strain in the specimen as plastic strain resulting from
the particular total strain. If we repeat this procedure at multiple total strain values on new specimens as shown in
Figures 11-13, we can construct a graph of residual strain as a function of total strain. (Figure 14) In this particular
test sequence, one might conclude that the onset of plastic yielding begins at approximately 0.006. Other materials
may not exhibit a distinct transition and it may be a more complex task to analytically describe the behavior.
0.0018
Strain Recovery Summary
0.0016 Tension
0.0014
Residual Strain
0.0012
0.0010
0.0008
0.0006
0.0004
0.0002
0.0000
-0.0002
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030
Applied Strain
Figure 15, Localized
Figure 14, The graph shows the residual strain as a function of total strain collected yielding or necking in
from a series of experiments on new tensile specimens. the tensile specimen-
making it difficult
to understand the
distribution of stress
and strain in the test
specimen.
Sometimes, when plastic is stretched beyond a given strain, incremental straining becomes very localized resulting in
a local narrowing of the test specimen. (Figure 10). This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as “necking”. This is
a complex material behavior and there is no longer a simple tension state throughout the test specimen. Generating
a material model to adequately describe this behavior is an advanced modeling idea and is generally not supported
in basic material libraries. However, there are modeling techniques typically involving optimizing software that start
with a specimen geometry and using the force displacement information along with the basic strain information, a
material model that describes the macro behavior in the material generated with reasonable success.
Thermal Expansion
quantitative information across a broad range of temperatures.
Slope B
Non-ambient properties
Temperature
Figure 17, Thermal expansion as a function of tem-
perature. The slope (CTE) over a large temperature
ranges may change significantly.
Tensile
at 5°C
Stress
at 23°C
at 75°C
at 110°C
Short term creep and long term creep are both important material
properties. Short term creep measurements are typically made at
stresses resulting in small strains in the material such that plastic
deformations do not significantly enter into the measurement.
These experiments typically last less than two hours over which
several decades of time may be captured.
at 5 MPa
Strain
at 23°C
at 1 MPa
at 50°C
Time
Strain
at 80°C
Time
Figure 22, Short term creep at 3 temperatures.
The rate or speed at which a stress is applied to plastic will alter the
response of the material. At slow speeds, most plastics will stretch
farther before failure and will yield at lower stress values than if the
stress is applied quickly. This effect becomes measurable with order
of magnitude rate changes (Figure 24).
Testing at slow speed requires very stable strain and force mea-
surement in addition to careful control of temperature. Testing at
automotive crash strain rates requires specialized loading systems,
customized strain and force measuring as well as high speed data
collection systems (Figure 23).
Strain
Figure 24, Plastic tensile stress strain data at decade increments of strain rate.
The compression state is probably the second most commonly used because the desired state
of strain is thought to be relatively straightforward to achieve. Actually, compression tests
are somewhat difficult to perform.
The experiment is generally performed by placing a right cylinder of the subject material
between two flatten flat platens and compressing it. The initial stiffness and sometimes
a yielding point may be derived from the resulting stress strain curve. Some plastics may
behave differently in compression than in tension so that the additional information may be
valuable.
The compression experiment suffers from a couple of disadvantages. The first is that the
presence of friction between the material and the platen will restrain the specimen from lat-
erally expanding causing unknown shear stresses. Secondly, the specimen is likely to buckle
Figure 25, Compres-
or at least distort at some point creating an unknown state of strain. Because the forces in a sion platens with
compression experiment may be high relative to the stiffness of the test frame and load cell, capacitive strain
direct measurement of strain at the platens is usually required (Figure 25). sensor.
Bend tests
The shear state of strain can be an important addition to the fitting of a material model.
Shear tests for plastics include various ‘notch’ based experiments including the Arcan and
Isopescu specimen style.
The shear experiment can provide meaningful data across a wide range of material stiffnesses
and a broad strain range. The region where the desired strain state occurs in the shear speci-
men tends to be small and some assumptions about the transfer of force through this region
are required (Figure 27).
Application and analysis objectives drive the material model and the testing program. It is
impractical to test and model all of the properties of plastic. Testing with appropriate strain
measurement at the correct temperatures and rates can provide much of the information
needed to develop material models.
References: