International

Journal of Civil Engineering

and Technology
(IJCIET),
ISSN 0976 6308
(Print),
INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL
OF CIVIL
ENGINEERING
AND
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME

TECHNOLOGY (IJCIET)

ISSN 0976 6308 (Print)

ISSN 0976 6316(Online)
Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61
IAEME: www.iaeme.com/Ijciet.asp
Journal Impact Factor (2014): 7.9290 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com

IJCIET
IAEME

EFFECT OF L/B RATIO OF STONE COLUMN ON

BEARING CAPACITY AND RELATIVE SETTLEMENT OF
SANDY SOIL (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY)
Umar Rashid Lone1,

Mohd Hanief Dar2,

Mohd Younus Ahanger3

B tech, Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Srinagar, India

M tech, Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Srinagar, India
3
B tech, Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Srinagar, India

ABSTRACT
Stone columns are one method of ground improvement having a proven record of experience.
They are ideally suited for improving soft clays and silts and also for loose silty sands. In spite of the
wide use of stone columns and their development in construction methods, present design methods
are empirical, and only limited information about designing stone columns are available in technical
codes. This study is dedicated to observe practically the effect of various parameters of stone column
on the bearing capacity of sandy soils by model testing. In this study square footing has been used
and model tests were conducted with varying L/B ratio of stone columns. The test results followed
that relative settlement was minimum corresponding to L/B ratio (of stone column) of 2.5.
Key Words: Stone Column, Improvement of Soft Clays and Silts, Only Empirical Results
Available, Experimental Study, Best L/B Ratioobtained.
1. INTRODUCTION
The stone column technique was adopted in European countries in the early 1960s. Many
researchers have developed theoretical solutions for estimating the bearing capacity and settlement
of foundations reinforced with stone columns. Priebe, (1995) proposed a method for estimating the
settlement of foundations resting on an infinite grid of stone columns. The basic for this method is
the unit cell concept.

55

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME

In spite of the wide use of stone columns and their development in construction methods,
present design methods are empirical, and only limited information about designing stone columns
are available in technical codes.
This study is focused on the comparison of soil improvement by varying various parameters
of stone columns by conducting the miniature model tests on sandy bed with a single stone column.
Stone columns were installed using ramming technique.
2. MATERIAL USED (SAND) AND ITS PROPERTIES
Sand was used as the primary material on which various model tests were conducted to
enhance its bearing capacity by reinforcing it with stone columns. Normal aggregates of 10mm size
were used as stone column material. The various properties of sand used are tabulated in table1.
Table 1 various properties of sand
Property

Value

Specific gravity

2.67

Effective grain size D10 (mm)

0.52 mm

D60 (mm)

0.90 mm

D30 (mm)

0.70mm

Co-efficient of Uniformity (Cc)

1.047

Co-efficient of Curvature (Cu)

1.731

Minimum dry unit weight(g/cc)

1.503

Maximum dry unit weight(g/cc)

1.74

Maximum void ratio

0.7764

Minimum void ratio

0.534

Bulking of sand (max.)

3.9% of water

Silt content

3.21 %

Friction angle

26

Cohesion

0.095 kN/m2

3. MODEL TESTS ON THE SOIL REINFORCED WITH SINGLE STONE COLUMN OF

DIFFERENT L/B RATIO
Model tests on the soil reinforced with single stone column (diameter 30mm) and the square
plate placed in the center of the model tank with stone column exactly in the center of square plate.
The sandy bed was prepared by compacting the sand in layer by layer into the steel tank of
dimension (403749) cm at the 55% relative density. Details of proving ring, dial gauges and plate
used is as under:
1 division of proving ring =0.161 kg, Least count of dial gauge =0.01mm
Size of square plate (a) = 10cm, Area of square plate (A) =a2= 0.01 m2
Density of sample in tank =1.638 g/cc. Weight of sand taken in tank = 118.787 kg
The test apparatus setup is shown in figure 1.
56

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME

Figure 1 Test apparatus setup

3.1. L/B ratio equal to 0.5
The load settlement curve for Plate Load Test (PLT) is shown in Figure 2
Load settlement curve
Load intensity (kN/m^2)

Settlement (mm)

10

20

30

0
5

Load settlement
curve

10
15
20
25

Figure 2 Load settlement curve for PLT 1

Bearing capacity by double tangent method = 13.85 kN/m2
3.2. L/B ratio equal to 1
The load settlement curve for Plate Load Test (PLT) is shown in Figure 3.
57

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME
Load settlement curve

Settlement (mm)

Load intensity (kN/m^2

10

20

30

40

50

0
load settlement curve

5
10
15
20
25

Figure 3 Load settlement curve for PLT 2

Bearing capacity by double tangent method = 22.5 kN/m2.
3.3. For L/B ratio equal to 2
The load settlement curve for Plate Load Test (PLT) is shown in Figure 4.
Load settlement curve
Load intensity (kN/m^2)
0

100

200

300

Settlement (mm)

0
2
4
Load settlement curve

6
8
10
12
14
16

Figure 4 Load settlement for PLT 3

Bearing capacity by double tangent method = 238 kN/m2
3.4. For L/B ratio equal to 2.5
The load settlement curve for Plate Load Test (PLT) is shown in Figure 5.

58

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME
Load settlement curve
Load intensity (kN/m^2)
0

100

200

300

400

Settlement (mm)

5
10

Load settlement
curve

15
20
25

Figure 5 Load settlement for PLT 4

Bearing capacity by double tangent method = 318 kN/m2.
3.5. For L/B ratio equal to 3
The load settlement curve for Plate Load Test (PLT) is shown in Figure 6.
Load settlement curve
Load intensity (KN/m^2)
0

100

200

300

400

Settlement (mm)

0
5
Load settlement curve
10
15
20
25

Figure 6 Load settlement curve for PLT 5

Bearing capacity by double tangent method = 320 kN/m2.
4. RESULTS OF MODEL TESTS ON SOIL REINFORCED WITH SINGLE STONE
COLUMN
Model tests were conducted using square surface footing on soil reinforced with single stone
column in the center of the tank with different values of L/B.
59

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME

4.1 Comparison of bearing capacity of different model tests.

The bearing capacity of various models whose test data is presented above is compared in a
tabular form given in Table 2.
Table 2 Comparison of bearing capacity of different model tests
Test description
qu of reinforced soil
(kN/m2)
Footing type
Stone column (L/B)
Square(10cm)
Square(10cm)
Square(10cm)
Square(10cm)
Square(10cm)

0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.0

13.85
22.5
238
318
320

4.2 Analysis of results

Comparison between relative settlements of square footing on the soil reinforced with stone
column of different L/B ratio (L/B =0.5, 1, 2, 2.5, 3) is presented in graphical form as shown in
Figure 7.The curve shows that the soil reinforced with single stone column in the centre of L/B ratio
2.5 suffers a minimum settlement and its bearing capacity is more than others. On further increase of
L/B ratio there is no significant increase in the bearing capacity of the soil.
The effect on ultimate bearing capacity with the variation of L/B ratio is also presented in
Figure 8.
Relative settlement curve
q/YB
0

50

100

150

200

250

0
2
4

% settlement

L/B =0.5

L/B =1
L/B =2

10

L/B =2.5

12

L/B =3

14
16
18
20
22

Figure 7 Relative settlement curve soil reinforced with stone column of different L/B.

60

qu (kN/m2)

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 6316(Online), Volume 6, Issue 1, January (2015), pp. 55-61 IAEME
Effect of L/B on qu

350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0

2
L/B Ratio

Figure 8 Effect of L/B on bearing capacity

5. CONCLUSION
From the model tests performed on the virgin soil and soil improved by the single stone
column it can be concluded that relative settlement studies show that the square footing on the soil
reinforced with single stone column with L/B = 2.5 in the center gives better bearing capacity.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

8.
9.

10.

11.

12.

Bowles, J.E. (1996). Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Rao and Ranjan, Gopal (2009). Basic and Applied Soil Mechanics. New Age Publishers.
Munfakh, G. A. (1997). Ground improvement engineering issues and selection.
Elias, V., Welsh, J., Warren, J., and Lukas, R., Ground Modification Technical Summaries,
Federal Highway Administration Publication No. FHWA-SA- 98-086, September 1998.
Humphrey, Dana, (1998) Civil Engineering Applications of Tire Shreds-Short Course for
FDOT, FDEP, Gainesville, FL.
Ground improvement techniques by Dr.P.Purushothama Raj.
Ambily, A.P., and Gandhi, S.R.,Behaviour of Stone Columns Based on Experimental and
FEM Analysis, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol.133, 2006,
pp.405-415.
Andreou, P., Frikha, W., Canou, J., Papadopoulos, V., and Dupla, J.C.,Experimental Study
on Sand and Gravel columns in Clay, Ground Improvement, vol.161, 2008, pp.189-198.
Design and construction of stone column vol. (I&II), Author R. D. Barksdale and R. C.
Bachus,Feder,al Highway Administration August 1980-August 1982 ,Office of Engineering
and Highway Operations Research and Development Washington, D.C. 20590.
Ahmed Neamah Naji, Dr. V. C. Agarwal, Prabhat Kumar Sinha and Mohammed Fadhil
Obaid, Influence of Crude Oil Fouling on Geotechnical Properties of Clayey and Sandy
Soils International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET), Volume 5, Issue 3,
2014, pp. 60 - 70, ISSN Print: 0976 6308, ISSN Online: 0976 6316.
Islam M. Abo Elnaga, The Use of Urea-Formaldehyde Resin In Sandy Soil Stabilization
International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET), Volume 5, Issue 6, 2014,
pp. 1 - 9, ISSN Print: 0976 6308, ISSN Online: 0976 6316.
Esraa A. Mandhour, Saad N. Al-Saadi, Saad F. Ibrahim, Study of The Efficiency of Stone
Columns In Soft Clay: Considering The Effect of Clay Minerals In Soil International
Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET), Volume 5, Issue 9, 2014, pp. 241 251, ISSN Print: 0976 6308, ISSN Online: 0976 6316.
61