Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The BOP
Opportunity
The cost advantage favours keeping BTG and BOP project tenders
separate, say Ashish Lakhotia and RK Mishra
he CEAs
decision in 2009,
for the first time
separated a BOP
project from a BTG
project whereas
earlier, both were
clubbed together in
a single engineering,
procurement, and
construction tender
Project Name
Capacity
1
Mahagenco
Chandrapur
Bhusawal Expn Expn
Parli
Koradi
2 x 500 MW
2 x 500 MW
1x250 MW
3x660 MW`
2
APGenco
Vijaywada
Kakatiya (won by Tecpro)
Kothagudem
Krishnapatnam
Rayalaseema
(won by Tecpro)
1 x 500 MW Unit-7,
1 x 500 MW Unit 1
1 x 600 MW Unit 2
1 x 500 MW Unit-11
2 x 800 MW
1 x 600 MW Unit-6.
3
RRVUNL
Suratgarh
Chhabra
1 x 250 MW stage-IV
2 x 250 MW phase I
2x250 MW phase II
4
CSPGCL
5
MPGenco
Satpura
Malwa
2 x 250 MW
2x600 MW
Singareni Collieries
Singareni Collieries
NLC
(Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd)
NLC
on the job
There are a handful of BTG suppliers like L&T, BHEL, and BGR Energy
Systems. In the past, BTG orders have
Chart 2: A comparative statement of EPC vs BTG plus BOP price of tendered projects
EPC
Project
TNEB Mettur
3100 Crores Rs. 5.16 Crs
APGenco Kothagudem U#11, 1x500mw
1x600MW
RRVUNL
4800 Crores Rs. 4.08 Crs
Kalisindh 2x600MW
MahaGenco
Koradi 3x660 MW
APPDCL Krishnapatnam 2x800MW
on the job
he CEA should
influence SEBs or
the power ministry
to split the power
project tenders
into BTG and BOP
work. It is hoped
that governments
and PSUs will see
the advantages of
doing this
Conclusion