Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instituto de Investigaciones Electricas, av. Reforma 113 Col Palmira, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62490, Mexico
b CIICAp, UAEM, av. Universidad S/N, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico
Received July 4, 2005
AbstractCorrosion monitoring of different steels is carried out online in a combustion rig firing 32 kg/h of
fuel oil. Two temperature-controlled probes are designed to allow control of the specimens temperature and the
use of electrochemical noise (EN) and linear polarization resistance (LPR) techniques for corrosion monitoring.
Two probes are placed where the combustion gas reached a temperature of 850900, and another one at the
combustion gas exit where the rig was at 200240. Corrosion rates of an austenitic and a ferritic steel are
obtained where the temperature of the combustion gas is 850900, firing fuel oils with different content of
NaVS. Corrosion monitoring of mild steel is carried out in the test burning a fuel oil with the higher content
of NaVS by placing a corrosion probe in the low combustion gas temperature zone. The EN results show that
this technique is able to assess the corrosion rate in an environment at high temperature where fuel oil ashes
deposited and at a temperature high enough where they start to melt and a corrosion process proceeds. Results
show that this technique is able to assess the corrosivity of fuel oil ashes originated from fuel oil containing
different amounts of sodium, vanadium, and sulfur as corrosion causing impurities. Results of the low-temperature probe show that EN and LPR are able to detect the onset of corrosion on mild steel as a result of sulfuric
acid condensation on the probe. However, the corrosion rates are not the same, because localized corrosion is
taking place as detected by the EN technique. It is demonstrated that the use of two techniques for corrosion
monitoring can give a better understanding of the corrosion process. Electrochemical techniques used to assess
the corrosion resistance of alloys at high and low temperatures prove to be a valuable tool for the purposes of
materials selection or controlling the main process variables that affect the corrosion resistance of materials in
industrial equipment.
DOI: 10.1134/S1023193506050156
Key words: online corrosion monitoring, electrochemical noise, linear polarization, high-temperature corrosion, fuel oil ashes
INTRODUCTION
Corrosion monitoring for industrial and process
applications is a key issue to achieve high standards of
reliable and safe operation. Different techniques for
monitoring corrosion rate have been developed [1, 2].
However, the choice of the right technique and the
appropriate corrosion probe design is very important
for a successful online corrosion monitoring program.
Linear polarization resistance (LPR) is one of the
first techniques used for corrosion monitoring. This
technique is well known and documented [3, 4]. Lately,
the electrochemical noise technique (EN) has been
incorporated for corrosion monitoring in different
industries.
In the power industry, EN has been applied to monitor corrosion of materials performing in a high-tem* The text was submitted by the authors in English.
z Corresponding author, email: vsalinas@iie.org.mx
560
Vol. 42
561
Electrode Insulator
Air inlet
Air outlet
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
using both ECN and LPR data, along with other relevant parameters of each technique. Probe temperature
data as well was collected once per second in 300 s
blocks and recorded every 5 min as an average.
The experimental work was carried out in a combustion rig burning 32 kg/h of residual fuel oil. The design
of the combustion rig allows a combustion gas temperature gradient from exiting the furnace (1100) to the
stack (240). The high-temperature corrosion monitoring probes were inserted in the combustion gas duct
where the gas temperature was in the range 850900.
The low-temperature corrosion monitoring probe was
located in the stack duct where the combustion gas
were at 240.
Two online corrosion rate monitoring experiments
were carried out. In the first experiment, a lower content of V, Na, and S fuel oil (designated as fuel oil A)
was burned in the combustion rig, and, in the second
experiment, a higher content of V, Na, and S fuel oil
(designated as fuel oil B) was burned. Combustion conditions in both cases were the same (1% excess oxygen
in flue gas). The table shows the composition of V, Na,
and S in both fuels.
Two high-temperature probes were used in each
experiment. One probe was fitted with electrodes made
of a ferritic steel (ASTM SA 213 T 22), and the other,
with an austenitic steel (ASTM SA 213 304). In the
experiment with fuel oil B, a low-temperature corrosion
monitoring probe was positioned in the stack of the
combustion rig and was fitted with mild steel electrodes. Every test lasted 500 h. Initially, the temperature
of the two high-temperature corrosion probes was set to
Composition of impurities in fuels
Vanadium,
ppm
Sodium,
ppm
Sulfur,
wt %
Fuel oil A
226
29
3.4
Fuel oil B
280
59
3.8
No. 5
2006
SALINAS-BRAVO et al.
600
500
1
2
0
400
10
15
20
600
500
1
2
0
300
25
700
400
Fig. 2. Corrosion rate monitoring of the probe made of ferritic steel burning fuel oil type A.
600
500
400
1
5
10
15
20
300
25
Time, h
20
300
25
700
Temperature, C
15
Time, h
Time, h
10
700
2
600
500
1
2
0
Temperature, C
8
Corrosion rate, mm/year
700
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
562
400
10
15
20
300
25
Time, h
Fig. 4. Corrosion rate monitoring of the probe made of austenitic steel burning fuel oil type A.
Fig. 5. Corrosion rate monitoring of the probe made of austenitic steel burning fuel oil type B.
4 and 5 show the corrosion rate obtained in the hightemperature probes fitted with electrodes made of
ASTM SA 213 304 type austenitic stainless steel burning fuel oil A and B in the combustion rig. From
Figs. 25, it can be seen that both ferritic and austenitic
stainless steels corrode at a faster rate in the experiment
where the fuel oil with the highest content in Na, V, S
was burnt in the combustion rig.
Figure 6 shows the corrosion rate monitoring using
both electrochemical techniques (EN, LPR) simultaneously in the low-temperature probe fitted with mild
steel electrodes. This experiment was carried out burning fuel oil type B in the combustion rig.
The sensitivity of the EN technique to a change in
the electrode temperature was investigated in the test
burning fuel oil type B. Figure 7 shows that a change in
the probe temperature resulted in a change in corrosion
rate. In this case, the corrosion rate reached a maximum
value, then decreased down to a fairly constant value.
This value will correspond to the corrosion rate for the
temperature set in the probe.
RESULTS
Figures 2 and 3 show the corrosion rates obtained in
the high-temperature probes fitted with electrodes
made of ASTM SA 213 T 22 type ferritic stainless steel
burning fuel oil A and B in the combustion rig. Figures
Vol. 42
No. 5
2006
0.8
140
0.6
130
2
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
110
700
600
2
500
4
2
0
40
10
Time, h
1.2
130
0.4
2
120
110
140
Temperature, C
Localization index
0.8
30
0.8
120
B
0.6
80
0.4
40
0.2
0
20
20
150
1.2
10
15
Time, h
400
Temperature, C
120
563
Temperature, C
150
Corrosion rate, mm/year
1.0
Temperature, C
40
20
40
0
60
Time, h
Time, h
DISCUSSION
Vol. 42
The results obtained using EN for corrosion monitoring in a high-temperature gas environment where
flue oil ashes are deposited have demonstrated that this
technique can be used in this environment. This technique was able to assess the corrosion rate of materials
exposed to fuel oil ashes derived from fuel oil having
different amounts of Na, V. Fuel oil ash corrosivity has
been documented taking into account the content of Na,
V, S in ashes [13, 14] or Na, V in the fuel oil [1719].
In this case, higher corrosion rates were obtained for
both steels tested with fuel oil B, which is the fuel oil
with higher amounts of Na, V and sulfur. The EN sensitivity to a change in the electrode temperature was
confirmed. The response of the technique to a change in
probe temperature was very good as can be observed in
Fig. 7. This is important for assessing the corrosion rate
of materials at different temperatures in a corrosive
environment.
No. 5
2006
564
SALINAS-BRAVO et al.
Vol. 42
No. 5
2006
Vol. 42
565
No. 5
2006