Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 May 2010
Received in revised form 24 June 2010
Accepted 29 June 2010
Available online 6 July 2010
Keywords:
Ciprooxacin
Multi-walled carbon nanotube
Cyclic voltammetry
Determination
Oxidation
a b s t r a c t
A simple, rapid and applicable electrochemical method was developed for the determination of
ciprooxacin (Cf) based on a multi-wall carbon nanotubes lm-modied glassy carbon electrode
(MWCNT/GCE). The constructed electrode (MWCNT/GCE) exhibited excellent electrocatalytic behavior
in the oxidation of Cf as evidenced by the enhancement of the oxidation peak current and the shift in the
oxidation potential to lower values (by 130 mV) in comparison with the bare GCE. A detailed analysis of
cyclic voltammograms and chronoamperograms gave fundamental electrochemical parameters including the electroactive surface coverage ( ), the transfer coefcient (), the standard rate constant (ks ) and
diffusion coefcient (D). Under optimized conditions in voltammetric method, the dynamic linear calibration curve for Cf was obtained in the concentration range of 401000 mol/L with the detection limit
of 6 mol/L. The analytical performance of this sensor has been evaluated for detection of the analyte in
urine and serum samples.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Quinolones are a group of compounds widely applied in veterinary and human medicine. Ciprooxacin (Cf) [1-cyclopropyl-6uoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-(piperazinyl) quinolone-3-carboxylic
acid) belongs to the second generation of quinolones with a uorine atom at the 6-position (uoroquinolones) and has a broad
spectrum of activity [1] together with an activity against several
intracellular bacteria [2].
These drugs form a group of antimicrobial agents used in the
treatment of urinary and respiratory tract infections with good
localized action on infected sites, gastrointestinal diseases as well
as in patients with intra-abdominal infections in combination with
antianaerobic agents [35]. These quinolones are effective against
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria through interference
with enzyme DNA gyrase, which is needed for the synthesis of
bacterial DNA [6,7].
There is much interested in determining uoroquinolones for
the purpose of clinical and pharmaceutical quality control. Over
years, various techniques including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [8,9], spectrophotometry [10,11], uorimetry
[12,13] have been proposed for the determination of Cf in pharmaceutical preparations or biological samples. Very few studies
involving electrochemical determination of Cf have been reported
[14,15].
111
peak potential at MWCNT/GCE was observed at less positive potential to be 0.97 V and the peak current increased compared with bare
GCE (Fig. 2, curve d). The increasing current as well as positive shift
of anodic peak demonstrate an efcient catalytic oxidation of Cf on
the MWCNT/GCE.
i=
nFAD1/2 C
1/2 t 1/2
(1)
where A is the electrochemical active area, D is the diffusion coefcient, C* is the bulk concentration of ferrocyanide and the other
parameters have their typical meanings. Under diffusion control, a
plot of i vs. t1/2 will be linear and the value of A can be obtained
from the slope since the precise value of diffusion coefcient of ferrocyanide is well known (6.20 106 cm2 /s). The electrochemical
active area of MWCNT/GCE was 0.09 cm2 .
Fig. 2. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) bare GCE in blank solution, (b) MWCNT/GCE in
blank solution, (c) bare GCE in the presence of 1 mmol/L Cf, (d) MWCNT/GCE in the
presence of 1 mmol/L Cf phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), scan rate: 100 mV/s.
112
Scheme 1.
Ep = E +
nF
ln
nF
ln
(3)
ip =
RT RTk
s
(2)
Fig. 4. (A) Cyclic voltammetric responses of 1.0 mmol/L Cf at MWCNT/GCE phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at scan rates, (inner to outer) 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 100,
150 mV/s. (B) The plot of peak current density vs. scan rate. (C and D) The variation
of peak potential vs. and ln , respectively.
113
Table 1
Results of analysis of real samples.
Sample
Added (mg)
Found (mg)
Recovery (%)
R.S.D. (%) (n = 3)
Serum
1.00
0.009
0.928
91.97
1.19
Urine
1.70
0.11
1.67
92.36
1.62
114
[14] A. Navalon, R. Blanc, L. Reyes, N. Navas, J.L. Vilchez, Anal. Chim. Acta 454 (2002)
83.
[15] P. ODea, A.C. Garcia, A.J. Miranda Ordieres, P.T. Blanco, M.R. Smyth, Electroanalysis 2 (2000) 637.
[16] S. Wong, E. Joselevich, A. Woolley, C. Cheung, C. Lieber, Nature 394 (1998) 52.
[17] W.A. De Heer, A. Chatelain, D. Ugarte, Science 270 (1995) 1179.
[18] R.H. Baughman, C.C. Cui, A.A. Zakhidov, Z. Iqbal, J.N. Barisci, G.M. Spinks, G.G.
Wallace, A. Mazzoldi, D. De Rossi, A.G. Rinzler, O. Jaschinski, S. Roth, M. Kertesz,
Science 284 (1999) 1340.
[19] S. Tans, A. Verschueren, C. Dekker, Nature 393 (1998) 49.
[20] J.J. Davis, R.J. Cloes, H.A.O. Hill, Protein, J. Electroanal. Chem. 440 (1997) 279.
[21] V.A. Pedrosa, S. Paliwal, Sh. Balasubramanian, D. Nepal, V. Davis, J. Wild, E.
Ramanculov, A. Simonian, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 77 (2010) 63.
[22] Y. Wu, Sh. Hu, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 41 (2005) 299.
[23] J. Chen, J.C. Bao, C.X. Cai, T.H. Lu, Anal. Chim. Acta 516 (2004) 29.
[24] S. Alwarappan, G. Liu, C.Z. Li, Nanomed. Biol. Nanotechnol. Med. 6 (2010) 52.
[25] S. Alwarappan, S. Prabhulkar, A. Durygin, C.Z. Li, J. Nanosci. Nanotechol. 9 (2009)
2991.
[26] F. Wang, J. Fei, Sh. Hu, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 39 (2004) 95.
[27] R.N. Hegde, R.R. Hosamani, S.T. Nandibewoor, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 72
(2009) 259.
[28] L. Fotouhi, E. Kohestanian, M.M. Heravi, Electrochem. Commun. 8 (2006) 565.
[29] L. Fotouhi, S. Faramarzi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 568 (2004) 93.
[30] L. Fotouhi, F. Raei, M.M. Heravi, D. Nematollahi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 639 (2010)
15.
[31] P.J. Britto, K.S.V. Santhanam, P.M. Ajayan, Bioelectrochem. Bioenergy 41 (1996)
121.
[32] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical methods, in: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley, New York, 2001.
[33] K.J. Huang, X. Liu, W.Z. Xie, H.X. Yuan, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 64 (2008)
269.
[34] M. Shap, M. Petersson, K. Edstrom, J. Electroanal. Chem. 95 (1979) 123.
[35] E. Laviron, J. Electroanal. Chem. 101 (1979) 19.
[36] J.C. Miller, J.N. Miller, Statistical for Analytical Chemistry, second ed., Eliis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, UK, 1992.