You are on page 1of 27

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Analysis of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Beams


Using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques
MSC/Marc
10 October 2012
Rev A

Prepared By:
David R. Dearth, P.E.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc


16731 Sea Witch Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649-3054
Telephone (714) 846-4235
E-Mail AppliedAT@aol.com
Web Site www.AppliedAnalysisAndTech.com

Applied Analysis & Technology

Page i

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

"Analysis of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques"
The purpose of this article is to develop an understanding of the arithmetic involved in the design solution to
analyzing reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This article provides a single source review to outline the steps
necessary to perform analysis of RC beams beginning at the linear elastic region into the nonlinear analyses
and to ultimate failure.
In this analysis no prior knowledge of the cracked RC beam is assumed. The analytical results are compared
to actual test data from a RC beam tested under closely monitored laboratory conditions. A finite element
model is also constructed to produce a simplified nonlinear analysis of the RC beam using MSC Marc.
Introduction
During the process of designing reinforced concrete beams structural engineers typically estimate the
general sizing of the beam using conventional hand equations. These conventional hand analysis approaches
involve using linear elastic equations to compute equivalent, or transformed, cross sectional properties. The
linear elastic approaches have been utilized for many years and have for the most part been very successful.
These elastic equations are limited to estimating the onset of RC beam cracking of the concrete and to some
extent also approximating ultimate failure of the RC beam after initial cracking.
When it is desired to calculate the regions between initial cracking and ultimate failure, nonlinear analysis
techniques are required. When nonlinear approaches are desired, finite element analysis (FEA) techniques
are employed. Before considering taking on the task of calculating the nonlinear response of RC beams,
engineers should have at least a working knowledge of how to perform a conventional linear analysis using
pencil, paper and a calculator. When tasked with performing the nonlinear analysis one most likely will look
at a sample tutorial problem and simply follow the same steps with their particular problem of interest
substituting instructions from the sample tutorial. In essence this simply becomes a case of parroting the
steps outlined in the sample tutorial problem without fully understanding what is going on.
So how might one develop confidence in performing these types of nonlinear analysis problems? The best
way is to locate a sample real life problem with a known, documented solution that one can be work through
using hand calculations and also develop a FEA model.
So the question is.... How can one relate the physical observations witnessed in the environmental test lab
to virtual testing calculated using nonlinear FEA techniques? Or how one can simulate actual physical
testing of RC beams using computer analyses software?
The best approach would be to locate some actual test data. When it comes to verifying the analytical results
from analysis of RC beams there is very little documented information showing results from actual physical
testing under tightly controlled laboratory conditions.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 1 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

Sample Problem: RC Beam from Buckhouse Testing (1997) Marquette University

10 October 2012
1,2

A search through the available engineering literature found comprehensive, documented data of actual
physical testing under tightly controlled laboratory conditions of several RC beams performed by Foley and
Buckhouse1. Wolanski2 provides analytical correlation to the laboratory testing with detailed finite element
analysis of the 1997 Buckhouse1 RC beam tests. The investigations performed by Foley and Buckhouse1 are
cited in several other technical papers addressing FEA of RC beams.
Figure 1a shows a sketch of the1997 Buckhouse RC beam geometry, loading and boundary conditions.
Figure 1b shows the layout for the internal reinforcement, rebar & stirrups.

Figure 1a
RC Beam Tested at Marquette University

Figure 1b
RC Beam Reinforcement Layout

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 2 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Thumbnail Course Review of Fundamental Principals ACI 318 Analysis of RC Beams


There are generally three (3) methods for addressing stress and deflection in RC beams using conventional
hand equations per ACI 3183. The most common methods are:

Linear Elastic Uncracked Approach: The linear elastic uncracked method assumes tension stress in
the concrete remains below the cracking limit. Tension stresses are assumed linear elastic and fully
effective in an uncracked concrete section. This method is used to calculate the state of stress and
deflections when the RC beam structure is subjected to normal anticipated service load conditions.

Elastic Cracked Approach: The elastic cracked method assumes concrete tension stress has
exceeded cracking limits and neglects any concrete tension stress. Linear elastic compressive stresses
are balanced by tension stresses in the reinforcement.

Ultimate Cracked Approach: The ultimate cracked method assumes a simplified yielding stress
criterion. For ultimate load carrying strength capability, tension stress in the concrete is assumed
nonexistent and maximum compressive strain is assumed to equal c = 0.003. The balancing tensile
loading is assumed fully carried by the steel reinforcement with the steel at yield.

Stage 1: Linear Elastic Conditions Normal Service Life & Initial Crack Stress
During normal service life conditions no cracking of the concrete is assumed. Stresses and deflections of RC
beams can be performed using a conventional linear elastic approach. For normal service life conditions it
is assumed that stress in the RC remain in the linear elastic range and the only difficulty is computing the
sections properties, EcI, for the RC beam. In computing the section properties, Youngs modulus, Ec, is
taken as the 28 day strength value. The inertia, I, for the composite section of concrete and steel
reinforcement is computed using the conventional transformed section method.
Analysis for the uncracked RC beam can be performed by treating the RC beam as a composite assembly of
concrete and steel reinforcement. A conservative approach is to neglect the stiffness contribution from the
reinforcement and consider the gross section properties of the concrete only. When the steel reinforcement
is included, it is assumed the reinforcement steel maintains intimate contact with the surrounding concrete.
With intimate contact or bonding maintained, the steel reinforcement and concrete will maintain the same
strain compatibility during loading. So long as the maximum tensile stress in the concrete remains below the
maximum the tensile capacity stress of the concrete, fr, (fr is also referred to as the modulus of rupture)
then the RC beam will act as a conventional composite assembly.
To maintain strain compatibility between the steel reinforcement and surrounding concrete, the steel
reinforcement having a greater modulus of elasticity, Esteel > Econcrete, experiences a greater magnitude in
stress distribution across this composite section than does the concrete. The ratio in stresses between the
steel and concrete is called the modular ratio, n. Where n = Esteel / Econcrete. The transformed section
properties for the composite assembly of concrete and steel rebar is computed by replacing the steel area by
an equivalent concrete area.
Figure 2 shows a cross section of the concrete and rebar for the 1977 Buckhouse RC beam tested. For the
cross section shown in Figure 2, the transformed cross sectional properties for the composite assembly is Itr
= 5,138 in4. Appendix A lists detailed arithmetic to compute the properties listed in Figure 2.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 3 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Figure 2
RC Beam Linear Elastic Composite Section Properties
As a general rule of thumb concrete tension stress is approximately 1/10 the compressive values. For the
allowable compressive stress for concrete used, Wolanski2 listed a value of fc = 4,800 psi. ACI 318 9.5.2.33
computes tension stress or modulus of rupture stress, fr, computed based on the maximum compressive
stress using the following:

The onset of initial cracking of the concrete is computed per ACI 9.5.2.3 using the gross section properties.
The threshold cracking stress is computed from ACI 318 equations for the rupture stress, fr. For the gross
section the calculated cracking moment, Mcr, and corresponding equivalent loading Pcr = 4,680 lbs(1.). The
equivalent linear elastic deflections for this applied loading = 0.050.
For Figure 2 transformed section properties the cracking moment, Mcr_tr, and corresponding equivalent
loading Pcr_tr = 5,080 lbs. The equivalent linear elastic deflections for this applied loading = 0.052.

(1.) The calculated value of 4,680 lb is within 4% of the average physical observed loading to crack initiation equal to 4,500 lb.
quoted by Foley and Buckhouse1.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 4 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Stage 2: Elastic Cracked Section - Balanced State of Stress; Concrete & Rebar
Cracks begin to form when the tensile stress in the concrete exceed the maximum capacity of the concrete to
react tension stress at the modulus of rupture, fr. When the maximum tensile stress in the concrete exceeds
modulus of rupture, fr, the cross section is assumed to be "cracked" and all the tensile stress is assumed to be
carried by the steel reinforcement.
When a flexural crack occurs, it begins at the tension face when the tensile capacity is exceeded and the
crack propagates upward until the concrete is in compression. The section properties change as the crack
propagates, causing the increased tensile stress forcing the crack upwards toward the compression region.
Equilibrium is achieved once the crack stops propagating. Compressive stresses are still assumed to remain
in the elastic region.
For the cross section shown in Figure 3, the cross sectional properties for the composite assembly is Icracked
= 1,116 in4. Appendix A lists detailed arithmetic to compute the properties listed in Figure 3. The value of
Icrack it used to compute the instantaneous effective inertia, Ieff per ACI 318 9.5.2.3. This effective inertia is
used for computing deflections after crack initiation.

Figure 3
RC Beam Elastic Cracked Section Properties

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 5 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Stage 3: Ultimate - Cracked Moment Mu: Whitney Rectangular Stress Block


To compute ultimate failure, cracked bending moment, a simplified yielding stress criterion is assumed. For
ultimate load carrying strength capability, tension stress in the concrete is assumed nonexistent and
maximum compressive strain is assumed to equal c = 0.003. This magnitude of compressive strain is
representative of concrete with compressive strength from 2,000 < fc < 6,000 psi. The balancing tensile
loading is assumed carried by the steel reinforcement with the steel material at yield stress.
Figure 4 shows the cracked Whitney equivalent stress block cross section. The calculated ultimate moment
capacity Mu = 826,740 in-lbs. Using this calculated moment value, Mu, an equivalent ultimate loading Pu,
= 13,780 lbs(2.) can be calculated. Appendix A lists detailed arithmetic to compute the ultimate moment Mu
values for Figure 4. The equivalent deflections at this applied ultimate loading applied loading = 0.548.

Figure 4
RC Beam Ultimate Cracked Section

(2.) In the Foley and Buckhouse1 testing a theoretical ultimate load capacity value equal to 14,600 lb. is quoted. No
documentation could be found on how this 14,600 lb. value was computed; 13,780 lb. is within 6% of 14,600 lb. Foley and
Buckhouse1 noted the following: The moment due to the dead weight of the beam was subtracted from Mult to give the
moment capacity of the beam due to superimposed live load

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 6 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Results: Deflections from ACI 318 Hand Analyses


The effective inertia, Ieff, is calculated after crack initiation according to ACI 318 9.5.2.3(3.). Figure 5 shows
a comparison of measured deflections at the center line of the control beam C11,2 to the computed
deflections using ACI 3183 hand equations.
[

) ]

Figure 5
Comparison of ACI 318 Hand Calculations to 1977 Buckhouse Laboratory Test Data
(3.) When crack initiation calculations are performed using the transformed section properties, Itr, ACI 318 9.5.2.3 instead of
gross section properties, the effective inertia results in slightly lower deflections.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 7 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

FEA Model Definition for Nonlinear Cracking to Ultimate using MSC/Marc


For comparison purposes it was decided to duplicate as closely as possibly the RC beam test article and
FEA model definition described by Foley and Buckhouse1 and Wolanski2. MSC/Marc4 is one FEA program
that can be utilized to address the nonlinear characteristics confronted when analyzing RC beams. Figures
6a & 6b show isometric views of the RC beam geometry per Figures 1a & 1b. Due to the symmetry of
loading and geometry, the full RC beam can be idealized using quarter symmetric idealization as shown in
Figure 6b; symmetric boundary conditions (constraints) are denoted. For convenience the initial FEA
model was constructed using Femap v10.15 and imported into Patran 20104 using Marc Preferences4.

Figure 6a
Full RC Beam Geometry

Figure 6b
Quarter Symmetric RC Beam Geometry

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 8 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Concrete: Basic Isotropic Properties


The concrete is idealized using 3D solid elements. Youngs modulus of elasticity is computed using ACI
318 8.5.1. Modulus of elasticity of the concrete is

The stress-strain curve data for the concrete is shown in Figure 7. The Wolanski2 analysis used a Poissons
ratio for concrete = 0.3. It is recognized that a Poissons value of = 0.18 to 0.2 may be more representative
for concrete and therefore Poissons ratio = 0.2 is used herein. [Poissons ratio at 0.3 or 0.2 resulted in no
discernable difference in the deflection results.]

Figure 7
Concrete Compressive Stress-Strain Data from Wolanski2

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 9 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Concrete: Nonlinear Cracking Properties for MSC/Marc


The non-linear concrete cracking formulation used by MSC/Marc is called Buyukozturk model. The
typical strain-softening relationship of concrete shown in Figure 8.1 is idealized as shown in Figure 8.2. In
Figure 8.2 the area under the tension-softening region represents fracture energy Gf. When tensionsoftening, Es, is not included, material loses all load-carrying capacity; stress goes to zero upon cracking.
Assuming the characteristic length for the RC concrete beam equals the depth of the beam, hc = 18 inches.
Then fracture energy Gf can be calculated from the following:
(

)(

Figure 8.1

Figure 8.2

Typical stress-strain relationship for concrete

Uniaxial Stress-Strain Diagram

MSC/Marc Crack Data Input Dialog


Critical cracking stress, fr = 520 psi
Tension softening modulus = Non Specified Brittle Cracking
Crushing strain, c = .003 in/in Assumed per ACI
Shear retention factor = 1% Shear Retention after Cracks Develop (Conservative4)
Fracture energy, Gf = 0.62 lb/in (Reference)

(4.) Shear reinforcement is reacted by vertical stirrups.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 10 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Steel Reinforcement
The steel reinforcement (rebar & stirrups) is idealized using Rod/Truss elements with the node points
defined each rebar element sharing common nodes with the concrete solids. This approach is called discrete
idealization of rebar with the concrete. The steel material is defined using the nonlinear stress-strain curve
data listed below. The nonlinear material properties are entered using von Mises yield criteria.
Linear Youngs Modulus, Es = 29,000,000 psi
Poissons Ratio, = 0.3
Yield Stress, Fty, = 60,000 psi
Bi-Linear Elastic-Plastic Modulus, E1 = 2,900 psi (nearly perfectly plastic)
Figure 9 shows the layout for rebar and stirrups (5.) per Figure 1b.

Figure 9
Quarter Symmetric RC Beam Rebar & Stirrups

(5.) In the analysis performed by Wolanski2 an additional stirrup is shown at the mid-span location of the beam. The nonlinear
MSC/Marc FEA model developed herein was processed with and without the additional mid-span stirrup. The net results
were a negligible difference in the solutions.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 11 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Applied Loading & Solution Parameters


Foley and Buckhouse1 lists the ultimate recorded loading at failure equal to 16,300 lbs. To ensure uniform
deflections at the load points, individual concentrated loading is distributed as shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10
Concentrated Nodal Loading Distribution
The MSC/Marc nonlinear solution Load Increment Parameters were set to Adaptive increment type as
shown in Figure 11. The Iteration Tolerance Parameters for convergence were set to Residual Force = 10%.

Figure 11
Adaptive Load Increment Dialog Inputs

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 12 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Results: Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis MSC/Marc


Figure 12 shows a comparison of measured deflections at the center line of the control beam C1 of Foley
and Buckhouse1 to the computed deflections from the FEA model developed using MSC/Marc4.

Figure 12
Comparison of MSC/Marc Results to 1977 Buckhouse Laboratory Test Data
Notes:
(6.) The nonlinear FEA MSC/Marc solution contains only 17 output steps using adaptive load stepping
(7.) In the analysis performed by Wolanski2 the iteration parameters were adjusted during selected load steps to ensure the
analytical results better fit the experimental data. Having prior knowledge of the solution to the nonlinear response is not
what is generally available to analysts attempting to predict the response of beams before they are built. For the analysis
outlined herein, no prior knowledge of the solution is assumed and it was decided to perform the analysis by applying the
full ultimate loading and letting the program solution determine what happens in between zero load and full ultimate
loading.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 13 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Results: Stress at Crack Initiation Comparison to Hand Calculations


Figure 13 shows maximum principal stress contour plot of the concrete at the onset of crack initiation. As
indicated on the contour plot legend, the load step increment to the onset of cracking is Incr =11, Time
=0.32150 of total loading. The applied loading corresponding to Figure 13 is 16,300 x 0.32150 = 5,240
lbs. This value is within +3% of the hand calculations using the composite properties for the transformed
section (concrete & rebar) Pcr_tr = 5,080 lbs. The corresponding computed stress value of 490 psi is within
6% of the maximum allowable tension stress, or rupture stress fr = 520 psi defined per ACI 318 9.5.2.3.
Figure 13 illustrates the concrete stress distribution at the last linear-elastic load step before cracks begin to
develop.

Figure 13
Maximum Principal Stress Contour Plot
Last Load Step Prior to Crack Propagation

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 14 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Results: Crack Progression Crack, Strain Vector Plots


The progressive pictures shown in Figure 14 illustrate typical propagation of the concrete cracks by
displaying Vector plots of Resultant Crack Strain.

Figure 14
Crack Propagation Resultant Crack Strain

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 15 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Conclusions & Recommendations:


1.) This report demonstrates the use of linear and nonlinear finite element analysis techniques to
analyze RC beams. It is concluded that FEM code MSC/Marc can be utilized with a high degree of
confidence in performing these types of analysis investigations.
2.) In this report it was desired to simulate the element mesh density and procedures outlined in the
Wolanski2 analysis for purposes of direct comparison. It is recommended extended analysis be
performed using fine grid mesh density to improve the solution accuracy.
3.) In this report, the effects of creep, shrinkage, moisture intrusion, thermal cycling, fatigue, etc on
concrete have not been included. It is recommended to extend analysis to include these effects.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 16 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

References
1.) Christopher M. Foley and Evan R. Buckhouse, Strengthening Existing Reinforced Concrete Beams
for Flexure Using Bolted External Structural Steel Channels, Structural Engineering Report MUST98-1, January 1998.
2.) Anthony J. Wolanski, B.S., Flexural Behavior of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Beams Using
Finite Element Analysis, Masters Thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin May, 2004.
3.) ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI Manual of
Concrete Practice, Part 3, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1992.
4.) MSC/Marc Reference Manuals & Finite Element Analysis System: Volumes A, B, C, D" MSC

Software Corporation, 2 MacArthur Place, Santa Ana, California 92707


5.) Femap Finite Element Modeling and Post Processing: Siemens PLM Software Incorporated, 5800
Granite Parkway Suite 600, Plano, TX 75024

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 17 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

LIST OF SYMBOLS
As_eff = equivalent effective area of concrete due to presence of rebar
As_rebar = cross sectional area of each rebar
Aconc = total cross sectional area of concrete section
fc = 28 day compressive strength of concrete
fr = tensile capacity of concrete per ACI 318 9.5.2.3 also modulus of rupture
bc = base distance of concrete section
hc = vertical distance of concrete section
ccrack = c = distance for elastic compression of cracked section
Ec = modulus of elasticity for concrete per ACI 318 8.5.1
Es = modulus of elasticity for steel rebar
Gf = fracture energy
n = modular ratio of steel vs concrete
nrebar = number of rebar
drebar = reference distance to center of area for rebar
Ic_gross = cross sectional moment of inertia for uncracked concrete only
Icrack = cross sectional moment of inertia for cracked composite section
Itr = cross sectional area moment of inertia for uncracked composite section, concrete & rebar
Ieff = effective cross sectional area moment of inertia for composite section per ACI 318 9.5.2.3
Mcr_gross = bending moment to crack initiation based on gross section properties
Mcr_tr = bending moment to crack invitation using transformed cross sectional properties
Mu = bending moment to crack invitation using transformed cross sectional properties
Pcr_gross = loading to crack initiation gross cross sectional properties concrete only
Pcr_tr = loading to crack initiation using transformed cross sectional properties
Pu = maximum loading to ultimate using Whitney stress block cross sectional properties
yc_ref = reference distance to center of area for concrete
ybar = location of center of area for composite section, concrete & rebar
yu = beam deflection due to ultimate loading, Pu and Ieff.
ycr_gross = beam deflection due to crack initiation loading, Pcr_gross and Ic_gross.
ycr_tr = beam deflection due to crack initiation loading, Pcr_tr and Itr.
con_elastic = maximum elastic tension stress of concrete
1 = moment reduction factor
1 = coefficient for depth of equivalent Whitney stress block
au = depth of equivalent Whitney stress block
cu = distance to location of equivalent Whitney stress compression

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 18 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc


Applied Analysis & Technology was founded in 1982 and has extensive design and analysis experience in
mechanical engineering, aerospace, computer peripherals, medical components, piping networks, other
high-tech related fields, custom software, test equipment and prototype development. Our customer base
extends throughout the U.S.A. and as far away as Europe and South America. The primary focus of our
consulting firm is in finite element, FEA, analyses and computer aided design, CAD. Applied Analysis &
Technology utilizes specialized consultants in traditional design, metallurgy, failure analysis, conventional
mechanical analyses and environmental testing and other disciplines as required to achieve the desired
technical evaluation or design.
David R. Dearth is President of Applied Analysis & Technology, Huntington Beach, CA and can be
contacted by e-mail at AppliedAT@aol.com or at www.AppliedAnalysisAndTech.com.

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 19 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Appendix A
Summary Hand Calculations
& Analysis Notes

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page 20 of 20

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Stage 1: Linear Elastic Moment of Inertia Calculations for Composite Section


The concrete compressive strength at 28 days is given as:

Using ACI 318 8.5.1 modulus of elasticity of the concrete is computed as:

Concrete Modulus

The tensile capacity stress of the concrete, fr, is defined using ACI 318 9.5.2.3. This value fr is also referred
to as the modulus of rupture.

Concrete Cracking Stress for normal weight concrete


Beam Section Gross Moment of Inertia
, Base
, Height

Beam Cross Section


Per ACI 9.5.2.3 the crack initiation moment based on concrete gross section properties

Loading to crack initiation

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page A1 of A6

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

To calculate stress in the rebar, Transformed section properties are needed.


Compute modular ratio, n, to be used for transformed inertia
Concrete and

Steel

Where "n" is modular ratio of Esteel/Econcete. Transform area of Steel to equivalent or effective area of
concrete, As_eff
for each #5 rebar

number of rebar

The location of the centroid of area for the effective composite section, concrete & steel rebar is:

The transformed composite area moment of inertia is computed using parallel axis theorem
[

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

) ]

Page A2 of A6

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Compute the equivalent loading, P lbs, to just exceed the maximum allowable concrete tension stress to
initiate first cracking.
Recall:
Using bending equation cr_tr = (Mcr_tr *yc)/Itr, where Mcr_tr = Pcr_tr*60 in-lbs

Loading to crack initiation using transformed section properties


The corresponding stress in the steel rebar at this loading is rebar = n(Mcr_tr*yrbar)/Itr

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page A3 of A6

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Stage 2: Elastic Moment of Inertia Calculations for Cracked Section


When the maximum tensile stress in the concrete exceeds modulus of rupture, fr, the cross section is
assumed to be "cracked" and all the tensile stress is assumed to be carried by the steel reinforcement. The
compressive stress in the remaining concrete is assumed to remain elastic. Calculate the location of the
neutral axis for the cracked section from the top of the beam, "ccrack".
(

( )(

( )

The moment of inertia of this transformed area w.r.t. the neutral axis for "cracked" section is calculated
using the following for single reinforcement RC section:
[

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page A4 of A6

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Stage 3: Ultimate Strength Calculations for Cracked Section


For ultimate load carrying strength capability tension stress in the concrete is assumed nonexistent and
maximum compressive strain is assumed to equal c = 0.003. The magnitude of compressive strain is
representative of concrete with compressive strength from 2,000 < f'c < 6,000 psi. The balancing tensile
loading is assumed fully carried by the steel reinforcement with the steel material at yielding at fs_ty.
Calculate the location of the neutral axis for the cracked section from the top of the beam, "ccrack".
Equivalent Whitney Stress Block definitions
Moment Reduction factor u set equal to 1.0 to compute Ultimate moment,
Uniform distribution rectangular stress block, stress intensity factor 1
(
[

)
)

rebar steel yield stress


]

The maximum loading,

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page A5 of A6

Analysis of RC Beams using Nonlinear Finite Element Techniques

10 October 2012

Calculate Deflections from Elastic Moment of Inertia Calculations for Cracked Section
At the computed Ultimate Moment capacity, effective inertia is calculated using ACI 318 9.5.2.3. To be
conservative, the gross section properties, Ic_gross, and concrete modulus, Ec, are used.
Recall Ic_gross = 4,860 in4 and Mcr_gross = 280,592 in lbs
[

Where:

) ]

and

Recall ultimate loading Pu = 13,779 lbs

Note: When the transformed section properties are used in place of gross properties deflections at ultimate
loading equal -0.548".
Linear Elastic Deflection at Mid-Span using gross section properties =
(

Linear Elastic Deflection at Mid-Span using transposed section properties =


(

Applied Analysis & Technology, Inc.

Page A6 of A6

You might also like