Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
Article location:http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/62/bmw.html
December 19, 2007
Tags: Innovation, Management, Design, strategic planning
10/6/2011 1:22 PM
2 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
Just consider this: While the U.S. auto market was down 1.3% in 2001, BMW posted a 10% sales gain in
the United States and a 12% gain worldwide. In the United States, BMW roared past Mercedes-Benz to
become the second-best-selling premium brand behind Lexus. And it beat all automakers in
PricewaterhouseCoopers's annual survey on shareholder return.
At a time when many global companies are hunkering down and retrenching, BMW is moving forward,
placing a big bet that it has a winning design for future growth. Companies typically take risks because
there is no other option: Their backs are against the wall and there's no choice but to change. BMW is
making bold moves at the very peak of its success. "Carmakers are running up against a very tough
choice," observes brand analyst Will Rodgers, cofounder of SHR Perceptual Management. "Either they
protect their market share and play not to lose, like GM and Toyota, or they go all out, place some big bets,
and play to win. BMW is playing to win."
BMW's Design for the Future
It's just around midnight, and Bangle is lingering over a Weiss beer in a trendy Munich restaurant. He is
thinking about Stephen Jay Gould, the renowned author and paleontologist who died this past May. Or
rather, he is thinking about Gould's controversial theory known as punctuated equilibrium, which argues
that evolution proceeds slowly, but not always steadily; it is sometimes interrupted by sudden, rapid
change. Bangle believes that cars evolve in a similar fashion. And he is convinced that BMWs are entering
a period of abrupt, accelerated change in their own evolution.
"When you spend an enormous amount of money developing a new model, you don't just throw all that
money out the window seven years later and do something completely different," he says. "Instead, you
refine the car, you improve it, and you get your money out of it. Ultimately, you develop two generations of
cars that are very close in their evolutionary nature. But then, 14 years later, the conditions have changed
so radically -- competitive pressures, technological advances, safety and environmental regulations,
consumer preferences -- that it's time to make the big jump."
For BMW, it's time to make that jump. The company is resisting the lemming-like move of so many
carmakers to target every sector of the industry and pump out high volumes of product. BMW has mapped
out a different route, attacking one end of the industry: the high end. The company's new chairman and
CEO, Helmut Panke, explains BMW's decision to stick with what it knows best: "I cannot recall having
ever seen a clear and convincing correlation between size and success. At the moment, it seems as though
the greater the size, the greater the number of problems. Our own goal is clear: to be the leader in every
premium segment of the international automotive industry."
BMW's executives are gambling that a profound shift among consumer preferences will mean that in the
next decade, the worldwide market for luxury cars could grow by as much as 50%. (BMW expects that the
demand for mass-market cars will grow by just 25%.) "The car market seems to be bifurcating between
more expensive, prestige products and very inexpensive, high-volume products," says Tom Purves,
chairman and CEO of BMW North America. "The middle ground is the killing fields -- the worst business
to be in. You have to achieve enormous numbers to make any money at all."
With a global recession under way and many carmakers awash in red ink, BMW has decided that now is
the time to unleash an extraordinary product offensive on the luxury and near-luxury end. In the early
1980s, it produced four lines of cars: the 3, 5, 6, and 7 Series. Within the next six years, it will break out 20
new models and 3 new engine series, including the 1 Series, which will target young buyers; a new 6 Series,
which will be aimed squarely at high-end Mercedes models; an X3, which will take on premium SUVs;
variants of the Mini; and a new generation of super-luxury Rolls-Royces.
The redesigned 7 Series is leading the charge, and it has met with plenty of return fire. Bangle's design team
reshaped the 7's back end by raising the trunk lid and widening the opening. It also introduced a digitized
10/6/2011 1:22 PM
3 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
system, dubbed iDrive, which enables drivers to control 270 features -- from the navigation system to the
built-in phone to the surround-sound stereo -- by using a mouse-like device to scroll through menus on a
screen situated atop the dashboard. The radical look and the attempt to reimagine the human-computer
interface in a car have shocked some critics and buyers. More than 2,000 people have signed a "Stop Chris
Bangle" petition on petitiononline.com, calling on BMW to fire its design chief. (Presumably, the entry "I
hate myself for that design!" signed by one "Chris Bangle" is a fake.)
BMW counters that sales are running 17% ahead of those for the previous 7 Series during the same early
months of its life in the mid-1990s. Adrian Van Hooydonk, president of Designworks and the man who first
sketched the new 7 and developed its styling, contends that BMW's flagship car was in danger of being
stifled by the weight of its own history.
"Over the years, we've been very successful in defining the BMW look, which we've done by being very
precise in our designs," he says. "But when you make only incremental changes, you find yourself in a
corridor that gets narrower and narrower. Finally, you reach a dead end, and by then, the customer has
abandoned you for a car that's fresh and new. We had to break through that corridor. The goal for the new
7 was to push the boundaries as far as we could. You can't be a leader if you're not out in front."
"One Sausage, Three Different Lengths"
The effort to envision a new generation of BMWs began a decade ago. Soon after Bangle joined the
company in October 1992, he participated in an upper-management workshop that attempted to look 10
years out and pinpoint what premium-car buyers would want. They concluded that the first decade of the
new millennium -- the time we live in now -- would be a dynamic world of near-constant movement. BMW
would have to build products that move people both physically and emotionally. It could no longer be just a
car company. It had to be a mobility company. It had to become a company that let people motor.
This new vision finds its purest expression in the ad copy for the Mini Cooper: "When you drive, you go
from A to B. When you motor, you go from A to Z. . . . Nobody can tell you when you're motoring. You
just know." The brief for Bangle and his team was straightforward: Design cars that give people the
motoring spirit.
Boyke Boyer, head of exterior design, recalls that BMW's design team was woefully unprepared for this
new world. A rumpled man with tousled silver hair, a two-day beard, and a big laugh, Boyer is a 30-year
veteran of BMW. Sitting in his office at the FIZ, chain-smoking Marlboros, he says that at the time of
Bangle's arrival, the design team was near the bottom of the corporate food chain. The designers had
worked for two years without a design director; they lacked a leader to champion their cause and nurture a
point of view. As a result, the team fell under the thumb of BMW's justly famous engineering department.
"You'd never have a voice at meetings," Boyer exclaims, waving his hands dismissively. "The attitude was,
'Oh, those designers, pshh, pshh. They're nothing but a bunch of picture makers!' "
Not surprisingly, BMW design stagnated. The German auto press sometimes derided its conservative
approach as "eine Wurst, drei Gre" -- "one sausage, three different lengths" -- implying that its cars were
cast from the same mold. "When we'd launch new models at an automobile exhibition," explains Boyer,
"our colleagues from competing companies would come by and say, 'Are those all of your ideas? What do
you do all day?' We couldn't tell them that we'd tried radical approaches but they had all been turned
down."
BMW won't comment on why it recruited Bangle, but it's clear that the company had to quash the practice
of grinding out different-sized sausages. To ensure a future of successful styling at BMW, Bangle and his
team would have to expand the palette and develop a distinct look and feel for each model. But first he had
to meet an even tougher challenge: Find a way to elevate the department to the same lofty level as the
engineers. Design had to speak with a forceful voice throughout the 97,000-person company. Which meant
10/6/2011 1:22 PM
4 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
10/6/2011 1:22 PM
5 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
If collaboration is a crucial piece of the design process at BMW, then so too is internal competition. Just as
BMW's designers compete against Mercedes-Benz and Audi, they battle each other to create a winning car.
Bangle typically assigns as many as six teams to develop concepts for a single new BMW. The competition
can be intense, but it all plays to BMW's advantage. While the designers work out their visions for the next
coupe or sedan, the company leverages all of their ideas.
"The key here is diversity. If our people all thought the same way, we wouldn't have a design culture; we'd
just have mass opinion," explains Bangle. "That's why internal competition is a fundamental premise of this
organization: It gives us this dynamic exchange of viewpoints. The outcome is far more powerful than what
a single person could produce."
It's up to Bangle to draw the best designs out of each artist and keep his teams fresh over the threeto-four-year process of evolving a new car. It's a complex challenge. Experience has shown him that the
early front-runner often will not turn out to be the winning design. Bangle prepares for such an outcome by
instructing another team to come up with a concept that's diametrically opposed to the front-runner's
model. Such was the case in the competition to design the new 7 Series. While the early leader followed the
middle road, Van Hooydonk chose to take the road less traveled. There were many setbacks along the way,
but eventually, his unconventional design emerged as the winner.
Bangle contends that BMW is willing to live with this high-risk strategy over the short term, in hopes of
nailing big, long-term gains. Ultimately, the market will decide whether the 7 and the Z4 are the right cars
for the time. Bangle's thoughts are on the future. "BMW's mandatory retirement age is 60 for senior
management, which means that I've got just 14 years left here," he says while exiting the FIZ. "That's two
generations in car years -- just two shots at making an impact." And with that, he was gone. He was last
seen heading west, head held high, driving a bold, red 7.
10/6/2011 1:22 PM
6 of 6
http://www.fastcompany.com/node/45352/print
gestures. They spend hours debating whether there's enough "scccmt" in the lines -- that is, whether the
lines need to accelerate more. Bangle is particularly concerned with the "visual energy" and tension in a
car's surfaces, and he will use a series of plucked-string sounds ("ding-di-ding, ding ding") that rise in pitch
to imply changes of tension in a line. "There's no single language that can express what we're trying to do,"
says Boyke Boyer, who is unquestionably the king of onomatopoeia. "So we make up our own language."
Bangle puts it another way: "The definition that semanticists use for 'design' is meaning. Where there is
meaning, there is design."
Bill Breen (bbreen@fastcompany.com [1]) is a Fast Company senior editor.
Links:
[1] mailto:bbreen@fastcompany.com
10/6/2011 1:22 PM