Introductiontothesecond Edition: Faith in Politics? - With A Question Mark at The End, One

JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 1 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 2C971B91
/production/dartonlongman/books/faithinpolitics/text
I NTROD UCTIO N TO THE SECO ND

E D I TI ON
The first edition of this book was driven by four factors. First, the
low esteem in which politicians are held and the general alienation
from, or at least indifference to, the democratic political process in
this country.
Secondly, a conviction that this was very unhealthy, and that
the political system under which we live could and should be
robustly defended, and we should all be encouraged to make
it work. Because of those two factors the book was entitled
Faith in Politics? with a question mark at the end, one
which was sometimes overlooked when people referred to the
book. In short, given the low reputation of politicians and the
general disenchantment with the political process, can we still
have confidence in the system?
The third factor was a belief that the fundamental values and
understanding of life on which our democracy is based have their
roots in the Christian faith.That is why the second part of the title
read Rediscovering the Christian roots of our political values. This
reference to Christian values was not meant in an exclusive sense,
for clearly our system is also in part the result of Enlightenment
philosophers and nineteenth-century Utilitarian reformers.
The fourth factor was the recognition by some of our most
respected thinkers that the combination of market and social
liberalism which has driven Western society for the last thirty years
has revealed a gaping void in our public life, and that something is
seriously wrong with the way we live now.
1
Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML
Division: text
Sequential 1
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 2 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 30CF9CFE
The Way We Live Now is the title of Anthony Trollopes 1875

novel about financial scandals. When Trollope returned from
abroad he was appalled by the greed and dishonesty that these
scandals revealed. This reminds us that the present discontent with
politics is nothing new, nor is the low esteem in which politicians
are held. In his great dictionary Dr Johnson defined a politician as
A man of artifice; one of deep contrivance and Boswell records
him saying that
Politicks are now nothing more than means of rising in the
world. With this sole view do men engage in politicks, and
their whole conduct proceeds upon it.1
Whatever view we take on whether the political scene in the

nineteenth or eighteenth centuries was worse than it is now, our
responsibility is with the present, and we cannot be anything less
than seriously disturbed, not just by the Westminster bubble, but
the whole global politico-economic system and the corruption
that seems so endemic in the world today.
FAITH IN POLITICS EVEN LESS FAITH
THAN BEFORE?
As we approach the 2015 General Election these four factors are
even more marked now than they were in 2010.
The first edition of this book was written in the light of the
scandal over MPs expenses. Not surprisingly, surveys showed that
MPs in parliament were held in particularly low esteem at the
time. More serious still, such surveys revealed widespread alienation from the political system as a whole, as indicated by low
turnout in elections and a dramatic fall in political party membership.
The latest survey of public attitudes towards conduct in public
life carried out in 2012 showed a slight upturn in positive attitudes
to MPs from 2010 2012 as MPs tightened up the expenses
system; nevertheless there has been a serious overall decline since
2004.2
2
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 2
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 3 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 341F76D1
For example, in 2004, 31 per cent of respondents believed that

all or most MPs told the truth. In 2012 this had dropped to
20 per cent. In 2004, 50 per cent of respondents believed that all or
most MPs did not use their power for personal gain, but in 2012
this had dropped to 33 per cent. Over the whole period from
20042012 the average level of trust in Judges was over
80 per cent, that of MPs less than 30 per cent.
The report also shows that some 40 per cent of respondents
were in effect disconnected or alienated from the political system.
As it said:
This alienated group of citizens just sees no party that could
sufficiently express their political views or represent their
interests, and is overwhelmingly sceptical or deeply sceptical
about public life. Moreover they are particularly located in
the younger age groups, with 46 per cent of the under 30s
falling into this category.3
Amongst this exceedingly gloomy data two bright spots appear.

First, people are much more positive about their local MP than
they are about MPs in general. The average level of trust in a
persons local MP over the period 200412 is about 45 per cent
(compared to less than 30 per cent for MPs in general), which is
higher than for top civil servants Then amongst people from an
ethnic minority background in the age group 3044 in lower
occupational grades 79 per cent hold one of the two most positive
attitudes to standards and trust in public life. Despite those two
tiny lights, it is clear that the challenge facing anyone who wants to
convince the electorate of the importance of the political process is
still a huge one.
A new factor in the political process, whose full effect is still to
be gauged, is the rise of campaigning groups using digital communication.This was brought home to me in connection with Part II
of the lobbying bill. Part II of this bill emerged in the summer of
2013 without any consultation and without any convincing
rationale, though the Government said that it was in order to keep
big money from distorting election results by using third party
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 3
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 4 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 376B46D7
campaigners as had happened in the United States. Charities and

other campaigning groups believed that that bill would severely
curtail their democratic right to campaign in election year and
immediately dubbed it the gagging bill. They then formed a
Commission on Civil Society and Democratic Engagement
which I was asked to chair. Through intense campaigning the
government was first of all forced to delay the passage of the bill to
consult, and eventually to amend the bill in a number of significant
areas, though not in all that was required.The pertinent point here
is not the flawed bill itself, now an Act, but the power of
campaigning to bring public pressure to bear. For example at one
stage in the passage of the bill the Commission set up a petition.
Only four days later I was able to stand up in the Lords with a
petition containing 160,000 signatures. The old style politics may
be tired, but this new style politics enables anyone to have a voice
on the issues that matter to them. Some MPs, who feel threatened
by this new style of politics, rightly point out that in the end it is
they who have to carry responsibility for decisions that are made,
and as often as not decisions are a matter of balancing one claim
against another. However, MPs are there to represent their electorate. Although as representatives rather than delegates they are
required to use their own judgement, as Edmund Burke classically
argued, it is fundamental to the democratic process that people
should be able to bring their views before them, especially during
an election period. Campaigning groups like 38 degrees with 2
million members, and a policy of campaigning on a range of issues
that concern their members, is one of these organisations that
enable the ordinary public to feel that they have a say.
What has also emerged with some starkness over the last three
years is that the crisis in the political system is part of a widespread
loss of confidence in many of our major institutions and a sense of
moral decline in society as a whole.
In 2004 those rating standards in public life quite or very high
were 46 per cent of those questioned, but by 2002 this has fallen to
35 per cent. Those rating them quite or very low rose in the same
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 4
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 5 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 37FE040D
period from 11 per cent to 28 per cent. This is a serious situation,

even accounting for the particular scandals of those years.
Some comfort can be had from the fact that although there was
an overall decline in standards from 2004 12 this hides fluctuations in that period. Standards rose from 2004 8 and then fell
sharply in response to the scandals concerning MPs and the press.
As they began to respond to the crisis, confidence in them rose
slightly. So, as the report notes, if trust can be lost, it can also be
regained. This is an important point. It would be quite wrong to
think that we are on a slippery slope taking us ever downwards.
What goes down, can go up. Standards may fall, but they can also
be raised. Confidence in the political system and public life more
generally, could be regained. This is also pertinent to the press, for
the newspaper hacking scandal has undoubtedly contributed to
the general loss of trust over the last decade.
Investigations into phone hacking by the News of the World and
other News International publications which began in 2005
resulted in high profile sackings, criminal charges and culminated
in the closure of the News of the World in 2011. The Leveson
Inquiry into the behaviour of the press and the police was set up in
the same year. Despite strong opposition from sections of the press
an independent system of press regulation under Royal Charter
was in principle put in place in late 2013. Unfortunately the
majority of the press were not prepared to sign up for this, and they
have set up their own regulator IPSO, the Independent Press
Standards Organisation. This has been heavily criticised as failing
to meet the essential requirements for an independent regulator set
out by the Leveson Inquiry. So this is an issue that will need to be
watched very carefully.
In the light of this scandal it is not surprising that the average
level of trust in tabloid journalists from 2004 12 was about
11 per cent, much lower than any other profession, thoughTV and
news journalists rated 52 per cent and broadsheet journalists
39 per cent. People will draw their own conclusions from this,
being encouraged by the continuing trust put in TV and news
journalists, and to a lesser extent broadsheet journalists, or disIntroduction
Division: text
Sequential 5
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 6 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3A32F96A
mayed by the behaviour of tabloid journalists. Apart from this, the

press is under huge financial pressure because of alternative ways in
which people now access the news, and readership of newspapers
is falling fast.
Although the press is not dealt with in detail in this book, a
flourishing, free press is fundamental to democracy, and a capacity
to investigate an issue persistently and in depth is a healthy, indeed
essential, feature. In an ideal world no doubt there would be no
vested interests that distort the truth but in the world as we know it
partiality is inevitable, and the only way in which the truth can be
served in such a world is to ensure that there is multiple ownership,
so that what one set of vested interests wants concealed it is in the
interests of others to reveal. As they may all be in it together, as we
say, all bound up with commercial interests of one kind or another,
it is also good to have publications that so far as possible stand
outside the system altogether to report what goes on inside it
without fear or favour. Sometimes one feels that it is only in Private
Eye that one discovers what is really going on in the world, and
learns what has been concealed in mainstream reporting.
Freedom within the law to express ones views, and to publish
those views, is fundamental to that liberty which is discussed in the
first section of Chapter 4. We take it for granted in the UK, but any
conversation with someone who has escaped from a regime where
such freedom is denied, will quickly bring out what a precious
feature of our society this is. It has to be strictly guarded even in a
democratic country; if not, it can quickly be lost or curtailed. In
India, in 2014, Penguin pulped all copies of a scholarly book on
the history of Hinduism because the Hindu nationalist BJP party
pressured them to do so. It was a very sinister development in a
country that prides itself on being the worlds largest democracy,
and a development which has not yet received the publicity that it
should have done.
An even greater crisis in recent years, one with wide reaching
and long lasting consequences, has been the banking scandal.
Beginning in 2008 with the collapse of Lehman Brothers, it was
touched on briefly in the first edition of the book, and not only
6
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 6
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 7 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 369AF9C4
did this collapse trigger the biggest recession in 80 years, but what
has become apparent is that its effects have been devastating in
many other ways. Adding to this, a further series of near criminal
policies by the banks continues to be revealed. The average citizen
has been seized with a mixture of disbelief and outrage at this
behaviour. The distinguished columnist Sir Simon Jenkins, a
notable champion of the free market even in areas which are the
moment are protected, ended one column by stating that all those
bankers and financiers involved in the near collapse of the system
should be taken out at dawn and shot.Yet bankers remain shameless. Profits can go down, and still vast bonuses are paid.Thousands
can be made redundant, yet it seems that money can always be
found for such undeserved sums.
The banking crisis was not an accident waiting to happen. It was
brought about by human beings acting with criminal irresponsibility. In one way we are all involved. As a society we have been
living with far too high levels of debt for too long. Governments
too are to blame both for the extent of deregulation in the first
place and a failure to have strong enough financial watchdogs in
place. But the key players are the bankers whose ratio of debt to
real assets was far too high, and who thought they could control
the future by eliminating risk with ever more complicated financial packaging.
Since then we have seen huge fines, sometimes running into the
billions, for financial wrong doing. By March 2013 major banks in
America had received penalties of $100 billion for wrongdoing
with an estimated $151 billion still to come.Yet as was reported by
one insider, many treat even such massive fines as the cost of doing
business which can be absorbed and which will have no real
influence in changing behaviour.4 In the UK amongst other
scandals there have been fines for fixing the Libor rate and the
foreign currency rate as well as for misselling insurance and
pensions on a massive scale. A world ruthlessly driven to maximising profit at any price has been exposed. When the film TheWolf of
Wall Street was shown in the Wall Street area of New York in
December 2013 the outrageous immoral behaviour of the predaIntroduction
Division: text
Sequential 7
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 8 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 331378DF
tory financial wolf of the film was cheered by many of those who
were watching those who were not from the financial world
who were watching found it a very disturbing experience, not
least because of all the talk about Wall Street having changed since
the crisis.
A very simple story sums up the fundamental change of ethos
that has taken place in our times. At a party I found myself talking
to a man who had retired from his bank surprisingly early. When I
enquired why, he said it was at the time of the big bang in 1986,
when the combination of financial deregulation and big banks
taking over many smaller institutions resulted in a huge surge in
financial activity. He said he had prepared a financial specification
for a particular client on the basis of what he judged to be in the
best interests of the client.The new owners examined this and told
him to scrap it and shape up another deal which would gain more
profit for the bank. He decided it was time to leave. There had
been a fundamental change of outlook from what was in the
interest of the client to what would maximise profit for the bank.
Profit is not a dirty word. But the mission statement of Dayton
Hudson the America retailing group sets this in its proper place.
This says:
The business of business is serving society, not just making
money. Profit is our reward for serving society well. Indeed,
profit is the means and measure of our service not an end
in itself.
That, I think gets it right. Profit is the means and measure of the
service. But the purpose is the service of society, whether it is
through manufacture, retailing or financial services. In so much of
our life, that is what has been lost or was never there in the first
place.5
Even apart from that however, it was argued by Adam Smith and
has been repeated by insiders in the financial world many times
since, that a good ethical environment is fundamental to the
success of the whole market economy.6 One aspect of this is a
concern for the broader social context in which the market
8
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 8
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 9 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 32B9AFC2
operates. Matthew Carney, the new Governor of the Bank of

England warned at a City dinner that capitalism was at risk of
destroying itself.
Just as any revolution eats its children, unchecked market
fundamentalism can devour the social capital essential for the
long-term dynamism of capitalism itself.7
Fundamental to the good ordering of a democratic society is the
probity of the police, and it is good that in the survey on public
standards from 2004 2012 senior police officers were second
only to judges with 69 per cent of respondents trusting them.
(There was no survey in relation to junior officers.) However, very
sadly, all is far from well in the area of policing.
In 1989 the Hillsborough tragedy left 96 people dead and 766
injured in the worst stadium disaster in British history. Their
families were never happy with the official story, but it was only
after 23 years with the report of an independent panel that the real
truth of what caused the crush began to emerge, with evidence
that the original account was skewed.
On 12 February 2014 the Home Secretary reported to Parliament on where the enquiries had got to. As reported in Hansard,
she said:
Around 400 witnesses have made requests to the
Independent Police Complaints Commission to see their
original statements. In addition, the IPCC has recovered
around 2,500 police pocket notebooks. These pocket books
had not been made available to previous investigations and
are now being analysed. The IPCC has also conducted
further analysis of the 242 police accounts now believed to
have been amended.
What has emerged, and is continuing to be revealed, about the

Metropolitan Police is even more serious, not least the evidence of
lying and corruption in the investigation into the murdered
teenager Stephen Lawrence.
All this is very disquieting. Desmond Tutu tells the story of
being a student at Kings College, London in the 1960s when he
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 9
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 10 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 35EF6B45
liked to go out in the street simply to look at and talk to a

policeman because he did not cease to marvel at the fact that the
police were on his side and not against him. It would be terrible if
that were no longer true.
Despite a succession of scandals involving the police there is also
some encouragement to be had from the fact that, after however
long a period of time and as a result of persistent courageous
campaigning by individuals, successive governments have been
willing to try to get at the truth. For truth matters. Indeed public
life depends on the assumption that the truth is being told, which
is why lying to parliament, or falsifying evidence, have always
rightly been regarded as such serious offences.
I am not someone who thinks that everything has gone to the
dogs and that all standards of behaviour have fallen. Clearly in
many areas of life standards have improved, and some forms of
behaviour which previous generations took for granted, we now
find morally intolerable. Nor on the other hand do I think that
overall we are morally better than our forebears. Indeed the debate
as to whether things have got better or worse is perhaps best met
by the remark of R. H. Tawney, the leading economic historian
and Christian Socialist of his generation, who might have been
thought to belong to those who thought that there had been some
improvement. However, when he was asked if he had noted any
progress in the world in his lifetime, he replied laconically, Yes, in
the deportment of dogs. Dogs today seem much better behaved
than the unruly creatures I knew in my boyhood.
One positive point which needs to be underlined from the
surveys quoted earlier is that the public has been quite consistent in
expecting office holders to abide by the seven principles of public
life, especially honesty, being committed to the public interest
rather than their own, making objective decisions and accountability. Measured by these principles the public may think that
standards have fallen, but the fact that we consistently think that
there are standards which remain essential, and which should be
observed, is important and gives grounds for hope. We need to
10
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 10
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 11 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 37F118F2
continue to press home their indispensability in all areas of our

public life.
THE FIRST FIVE CHAPTERS
The first chapter on Speaking for God in a Secular Age examines
the basis on which the Church claims to speak in and to the
political arena. In the text a distinction made by Rowan Williams
between programmatic and procedural secularism is referred to.
Since the first edition of my book the lecture in which Rowan
Williams made that distinction has been printed, along with a
range of other illuminating essays that relate to the role of religion
in public life.8 Particularly worth noting are the early chapters of
his book in which he outlines his understanding of a pluralist state.
In such a state both Christians and Muslims, who have wider
loyalties and who acknowledge a higher authority, can participate
in the democratic process and live with the consequences, even if
some policies are enacted to which their religion is opposed.
Also published since the first edition is a book by Nigel Biggar
in which he argues that the anxiety of many Christians to offer
something distinctive in the public sphere is misplaced. What
matters, he argues, is not that a view is distinctive but that it has
integrity, and by this he means that it is derived in a serious and
integrated way from Christian foundations.9 This is relevant to my
argument that Christians may very well participate in a process of
building up an overlapping consensus on some issue without
having to bring their underlying world view into the public frame.
The second chapter, on Law and Morality, considers the basis of
law, and argues that it has both a moral and a theological foundation. Law is a far less modish subject than democracy, for example,
but it is in fact more fundamental to our way of life than even
parliament. Wise commentators rightly remarked that one of the
many mistakes made in Iraq was the idea that democracy consisted
mainly of getting an electoral system going, whereas in fact the
rule of law is much more basic. Law is rooted in morality, and
understanding the correct relationship between the two is vital to
the health of a democracy. That relationship has changed in recent
Introduction
11
Division: text
Sequential 11
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 12 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3C8EAD5E
years, but it does not mean there is no relationship. That relationship remains vital for all areas of our political life.
The integral nature of this relationship between law and morality has recently been championed by one of the most distinguished
legal philosophers of our time, Ronald Dworkin. In Justice for
Hedgehogs he argues for a value holism in which fundamental
values, our understanding of law and our approach to politics are
seen as an integral whole.10 Beginning with the values of integrity
and personal responsibility he argues that a state must treat all its
citizens with equal respect and concern. He then shows the
outworking of this in both law and politics. Dworkin believes that
the realm of value and what follows from it politically and legally
constitutes a self-enclosed circle of reasoning which cannot be
undermined by science or justified by any religious or metaphysical point of view. It is valid in its own right. In a further book,
Religion Without God11, he argues that values such as beauty and
goodness constitute an objective realm existing in its own right.
Dworkin does not believe in God, but for him this realm of value
and beauty is what religion is all about, and it is in relation to this
that a persons life has meaning and significance.
Dworkins argument is an important one in combating both
ethical relativism and legal positivism. As indicated above, he is an
example of how you do not need to have a conventional religious
faith to see that law must be grounded in, and integrally related to,
fundamental moral values.12
The third chapter on What makes us think God wants Democracy? has a deliberately sceptical title because it is so easy to claim
that a particular political system has religious backing, as was done
for so long by advocates of the divine right of kings. But, aware of
this, it is nevertheless maintained that Democracy is the worst
system in the world except for all the others.13 At the same time
it is argued that it is above all a Christian understanding of what it
is to be a human being in society that enables us to see importance
of democracy in its totality, both as an expression of a desire to live
well together, and as a check on our tendency to pursue our own
interests at the expense of others.
12
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 12
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 13 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 36F30E46
The fourth chapter on Liberty, Equality and Life in Community looks at the three political values enshrined in the slogan of
the French Revolution and argues that all three are absolutely
fundamental to the Christian faith. Although they may be championed by a whole range of political philosophers, the Christian
faith offers a sure grounding for them; one which others may not
be able to share, but which they can recognise as undergirding
values that have a Christian basis as well as a secular justification.
The case is even stronger than may have been apparent at the time
of the first edition of my book as a result of Larry Siedentops
Inventing the Individual. In this book he sets out to change our
whole, taken for granted, understanding of the origins of liberal
egalitarianism.14 He argues that Renaissance scholars and those
who have followed them fundamentally misunderstood the nature
of the classical world. For him it is St Paul who is the key figure in
affirming the worth of the individual as such, and in a detailed
intellectual history tracing this through the Christian Middle Ages
shows how the value of the individual was continually reaffirmed
in different ways. One respected academic reviewing the book in a
secular journal wrote:
In the course of this journey, he explodes many (perhaps
even most) of the preconceptions that run through the
public culture of our day and that I took for granted
before reading this book.15
The book is a much needed corrective which provides a solid

historical basis for The Christian roots of our political values, the
subtitle of my book. Perhaps the only thing that is surprising is that
the Christian basis of liberal egalitarianism has been ignored for so
long. As Siedentop argues,If we in the West do not understand the
moral depth of our own tradition, how can we hope to shape the
conversation of mankind?16
The fifth chapter on Does God believe in Human Rights?
again has a sceptical tone to it because a cursory reading of some
parts of the bible might give the impression that God doesnt.
Further, in some periods of its history the church has in fact been
Introduction
13
Division: text
Sequential 13
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 14 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 39E20F55
an opponent of the rights which we now take for granted.

Nevertheless, it is maintained that, properly understood, the
Christian faith again offers a sure foundation for rights, and it is no
accident that the prime movers to bring the UN Declaration on
Human Rights into existence after World War II were some
prominent Christian statesmen.
CHAPTER 6 ISSUES OF IDENTITY
The final chapter on Who do we think we are? discusses those
questions of identity which are so crucial to understanding the
world in which we live today. There is a very close connection
between identity and religion and this is the major reason why
religion is such a potent factor in the world. The Christian faith
offers some distinctive insights about the issue of identity, casting
light on the question of who we think we are, and which has
implications for one of the major political concerns of our time.
National identity is not something that is fixed and unchanging.
On the contrary, it is in a state of continuing flux depending on the
nature of the polity and the circumstances that a country faces at
the time. Linda Colley, for example, has shown how the concept
of Britishness was forged between 1707 and 1837 by a set of ideas
such as Britain as an island and a bastion of liberty, and as a
Protestant nation with a powerful navy in contradistinction to
France, a despotic Catholic country.17 More recently she has
stressed that all the identities in the British Isles, whether Scottish,
English, Welsh or Irish have been shaped by their relationship not
only with one another but in relation to the Empire and Europe,
and that these identities have varied greatly depending on the
historical circumstances of the time.18
Since the first edition of this book I have been privileged to be a
member of a new Commission on Religion and Belief in British
Public Life, convened by the Woolf Institution. This went out to
public consultation in the summer of 2014 and is due to publish its
final report after the 2015 Election. This has enabled me to think
further about the relationship between religion and identity not
only from a Christian point of view, but from the perspective of
14
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 14
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 15 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 37011F17
living in a multi-faith society, albeit one still with an Established

Church. From about 2000 to 2008 there was a fair amount of
anxiety and debate about the concept of Britishness. If it is not so
much to the fore now, this is because we are much more at home
with the concept of multi-identities than when Norman Tebbitt
first proposed his question about which cricket team we support
(quoted later in this book). One sign of this was the opening
ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games in which a story of British
history was told which people in Britain felt comfortable with,
even though to avoid controversy it did not go very deep and was
not recognised as the Britain they knew by Americans.
In the first decade of the twenty-first century, in exploring
concepts of Britishness, many attempts were made to go beyond
civic identity, which is concerned primarily with institutions, to
include a range of values which were thought of as particularly
British. Gordon Brown, for example, in an article written in
March 2008 wrote that what matters are:
The common values we share across the United Kingdom:
values we have developed together over the years that are
rooted in liberty, in fairness and tolerance, in enterprise, in
civic initiative and internationalism.
He went on to suggest that these values live in the popularity of

our common institutions from the NHS and the BBC through to
the Olympics and such movements as Make Poverty History.
This kind of list has been criticised in two ways. First, for
suggesting that these are distinctively British values. But it can be
argued that these are values which have been developed in our
society, and which are fundamental to our life now, so they are
British in that sense, without claiming that British society has a
monopoly on them. The same values may be present in other
societies, perhaps taking a different institutional form.
I would suggest three of these values are fundamental to our life
together. Fairness, tolerance and openness to the world. Since the
Civil War of the seventeenth century the English (leaving aside the
Welsh, Irish and Scots for the moment) have on the whole been
Introduction
15
Division: text
Sequential 15
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 16 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 368CC1E4
reticent about their religious beliefs. Scratch an Englishman and

deep down you will probably find that some residual belief is in
fact there, but even stronger will be a moral conviction that things
ought to be fair, a conviction which has come to be part of the
moral ethos of all the constituent nations of the United Kingdom.
One obvious manifestation of this is the idea of fair play in sport,
but it goes much deeper than this. It is difficult to see where the
historic roots of this conviction about fairness lie. This is not the
case with tolerance, for the roots of this can be clearly seen in the
cult of liberty that characterised the British identity forged from
1707 to 1837 as traced by Linda Colley. Openness to the world
also has historic roots. These are to do with having been a great
empire, the transatlantic alliance and the fact that, like it or not, we
have been bound up with the rest of Europe. This means that in
contrast to the United States a policy of isolationism has never
been a serious option for the British. The loss of empire and the
weakening of the transatlantic alliance may have taken place, but its
healthy legacy is a sense that we should play a constructive and
responsible role in relation to the rest of the world. So, fairness,
tolerance and an openness to the world may be British values that
go beyond the civic ones, even though they are clearly related to
them.
Lord Parekh has been critical of the stress on values by Gordon
Brown and others. He suggests that it is a sense of common
identity that is needed, and that if we had that we could live with
different values. He thought it more important to identify the
interests, projects and loves that we have in common, for it is these
that have shaped our identity. The problem is that we are a nation
made up of a whole variety of subcultures, not just ones formed by
religion or ethnicity, but by tastes in entertainment and music, by
education and class, by wealth and poverty. Even mass popular
entertainment only unites a small part of the population. Twelve
million people may watch a TV series, but that means that 50
million are not doing so. The fact is that the number of factors
which give the country a common sense of belonging together
today are very few. When asked what they love about their
16
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 16
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 17 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 360C800F
country, people are likely to give very different answers. When,

much to the surprise of his friends, the poet Edward Thomas,
volunteered in his forties to fight in World War I, and they asked
him the reason, he simply bent down and picked up some soil.For
this, he said. It was the landscape, over which he had walked for so
many hundreds of miles that he cared for, as well as all that it stood
for. That is not an answer everyone will give. So it is important to
try to identify those fundamental features of our life together
which are not just a matter of personal preference but which are
symbolic of our shared life.
First among them, of course, is the Sovereign, not simply as the
apex of our political system, but as a focus of identity for the
nation. One of the features of the monarchy, at least since Victorian times, is that it has not been racist.Victoria as Queen Empress
insisted that there should be no discrimination on the grounds of
race with her imperial subjects.This tradition has continued to our
own times and is a marked feature of the rule of present Queen.
The case has been similar in the case of religion. In 1809 all the
places of worship were open to celebrate the Jubilee, including
synagogues. The sons of George III made a point of visiting the
more fashionable synagogues.This was no doubt due in part to the
fact that the war debt was being financed by Jewish bankers, but
whatever the motive, official visits took place.19 In our own time
the Queen has not only visited many places of worship of religions
other than her own, she has strongly supported events like the
multi-faith Commonwealth Observance in Westminster Abbey, in
which leaders of all the main religions take part. It was an aspect of
her role she emphasised in her speech to Church of England
bishops on 15 February 2012. The Queen said:
Here at Lambeth Palace we should remind ourselves of the
significant position of the Church of England in our nations
life. The concept of our established church is occasionally
misunderstood and, I believe, commonly under-appreciated.
Its role is not to defend Anglicanism to the exclusion of
Introduction
17
Division: text
Sequential 17
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 18 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3704402A
other religions. Instead, the church has a duty to protect the

free practise of all faiths in this country.
It certainly provides an identity and spiritual dimension for its own

many adherents. But also, gently and assuredly, the Church of
England has created an environment for other faith communities
and indeed people of no faith to live freely. Woven into the fabric
of this country, the church has helped to build a better society
more and more in active co-operation for the common good with
those of other faiths.
One important consideration in relation to the monarch will be
the next Coronation service, which will assuredly be different
from the last one and reflect that fact that we are a multi-faith
society. In respect of this it is important to note that there is
nothing fixed and final about the service or even the oath, which
has sometimes been reformulated to respond to the circumstances
of the time. After the experience of James II and the fear of a
Catholic monarch coming to the throne, the oath for William and
Mary in 1689 was rewritten so that they had to promise to rule
according to the profession of the Gospel and the Protestant
religion established by law. They were handed a bible with the
wordsto put you in mind of this rule and that you may follow it. A
few years later, in 1702, Anne had to make a declaration against
transubstantiation.20
Beyond the monarch, however, it is important to identify civic
events in which the country can give public expression to its own
distinctive character and sense of itself. In the same way that a
family will have certain events when it expresses and celebrates its
life, so do nations. In the United States this is Thanksgiving Day,
which succeeds in a remarkable way at bringing the nation to a
halt, so that members of families can gather together from hundreds of miles away to express what it is to be American. For
Americans too, the flag has an almost sacred quality as a sign of
multiple races, religions and communities belonging to one polity.
After 9/11 there was hardly a house in the United States that did
not have the flag flying outside.
18
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 18
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 19 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 37912A07
Some have suggested that in Britain we too should have a

national day, but at the present juncture this would only be an
artificial creation with no hope of taking off. Much more positive,
from the point of view of national solidarity, is the evolution of
Christian festivals, especially Christmas, to become periods of
celebration for everyone, regardless of their religion. The loss of a
distinctive Christian message may be distressing for Christians, but
in terms of social solidarity it is a gain. Jonathan Freedland, writing
from a Jewish point of view, says that when he grew up his family
studiously avoided anything to do with Christmas, with a great
aunt not even allowing the word to pass on her lips. Now, he says,
It is a kind of collective Sabbath for his family, with turkey,
seasonal music and all.21 It is another example of the evolutionary
approach, so characteristic of British life, of osmosis and crosscultural fertilisation.
This process has in fact been going on for many years. Not just
events like the Commonwealth Service already mentioned, but in
many acts of practical co-operation. During recent decades the
public good has been served by initiatives, usually taken by the
Church of England and working through the good relationships
built up with other faith leaders. For example it was such relationships that helped to quieten the unrest in Northern cities in 2001.
Civic authorities have a role in this evolution by ensuring that
all faiths are properly represented on civic occasions, but because
of its historic position, so does the Church of England. The
Mayoral service for example, in most communities, still takes place
in the major Anglican Church, and this can be so designed as to
reflect the religious makeup of the area.
In the autumn of 2013 I had to preach at the service marking
the beginning of the legal year for the Western Division in Bristol
Cathedral. A similar service for judges, lawyers, magistrates and
civic authorities takes place in every part of the country at this time
of the year. In Bristol both the High Sheriff and the Mayor were
Muslims, the High Sheriff being very devout. She asked that
passages from the Quran be read, including the opening verse.
The Bishop of Bristol acceded to her request, and it was arranged
Introduction
19
Division: text
Sequential 19
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 20 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3A9EA2A5
that they be read in the Cathedral, when everyone had been seated
and welcomed but before the actual Christian service began. It
was a brilliant decision that made the Muslim High Sheriff feel, as
she said, embraced, but did not alienate the core congregation or
indeed Muslims, by any blurring of boundaries.
I believe that starting where we are, but seeing how this can
evolve in an ever more inclusive way, is the one best suited to our
nation, and the one most likely to achieve the goal we desire. The
difficulty with starting again from scratch is illustrated in a tiny way
by the prayers that are said in the House of Lords every day, prayers
which are voluntary but which are in fact attended by believers
from all the main faiths.These are highly traditional prayers for the
Queen, the Royal Family and the work of parliament not prayers
anyone would say in their personal life. From time to time the call
has come to update them, or to include other subjects, or to let
people other than Bishops in the Church of England say them.
Every time this happens, the Procedure Committee of the Lords,
before whom such requests comes, resists them.Tiny changes have
been agreed, a greater choice of psalms and Prayer Book collects,
but nothing fundamental because as the committee knows, it
really would be a Pandoras Box, and nothing would be agreed.
That is a situation of stasis, but there are other contexts where
greater development and latitude is I believe possible.
It has been argued that being British is one of the most
successful examples of inclusive civic nationalism in the world.22
This is borne out by opinion polls in which people are asked about
the importance of different aspects of being British. The replies
indicate that to speak English, being a British citizen and respect
for law and institutions associated with it are key, all scoring over
80 per cent. Sharing customs and traditions rated only 52 per cent
and being Christian a mere 31 per cent.23 This suggests that being
British is indeed primarily a civic identity, and that people are very
happy for this to co-exist with a variety of religions, customs and
traditions. In so far as being British involves more than this, it
means fleshing out those values of fair mindedness, tolerance and
openness, which are implicit in our institutions and common life
20
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 20
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 21 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 4085F33A
with a multi-faith undergirding. It also means identifying, affirming and developing the unifying symbols connected with our
national institutions in a multi-faith direction. Beyond this, what it
means to be British is a matter of organic growth, and this cannot
be forced. I believe that the Church of England (but not only the
Church of England) is helping to facilitate that evolution in an
inclusive way.
At the moment in England we have an established Church,
which as many leaders of other faiths have said, is a help to them in
taking their place in public life. Perhaps we should see the Church
of England as a gnarled old oak, maybe no longer with the strength
and vigour of its youth, but still standing and able to support the
rambling roses growing up all over its leaves and branches. Cut the
oak down, and what do you have?Vigorous growth perhaps, but a
scramble for the light, and nothing to hold on to. Like all analogies
this one is not exact. But my point is that a broadly tolerant
religious body like the Church of England can play a significant
role in shaping an evolving narrative for our society that is more
inclusive of other faiths. My vision for our society from this point
of view is of a society at ease with itself. A society in which
individuals and communities:
Feel part of an ongoing national story

In which they are free to practise their religion and express
their beliefs
In which they are treated with equal concern and respect
by the state
In which their culture and religion are respected as part of a
continuing process of mutual enrichment
In which their contribution to the texture of our common
life is valued
In which they are confident in helping to shape public
policy
In which they are challenged to respond to the many
manifest ills in the society itself and the world as a whole.
Introduction
21
Division: text
Sequential 21
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 22 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3863B456
In short, a society in which they feel at home and to which

they want to contribute.
During 2014 the underlying alienation of so many from our

political system came together with issues of identity in two
dramatic ways.The first was the European elections in May. UKIP
came out top with 27 per cent beating Labour on 25 per cent, the
Conservatives on 24 per cent and the Liberal Democrats on
7 per cent. It was the first time in our lifetime that neither Labour
nor Conservative topped a national election. Commenting on this
result Sir Anthony Seldon wrote:
When the earthquake subsides, what will be left is a deep distrust
in Britain and across Europe of the EU, and a reassertion of
national interest. This question of national sovereignty has been
the biggest question in British politics for the past 50 years.24
This is part of the truth. But the vote for UKIP is not just about
national sovereignty; it is the expression of disenchantment with
the prevailing political order, a feeling that the major parties are all
part of an establishment which is not taking into account the
feelings and interests of ordinary working people.
This was further reinforced with the result of the bye-election
held on 9 October 2014. Clapton, a formerly safe Conservative
seat, fell to UKIP, who achieved a majority of nearly 60 per cent of
those voting. No less significant was the result of the other
bye-election on that day, the former safe Labour seat of Heywood
and Middleton. Labour retained the seat by only 617 votes,
indicating that a number of Labour seats in the North of England
will be vulnerable in the General Election. Overall it was predicted
that in the light of these results UKIP are likely to win 5 seats at the
General Election with another 25 possible.
The second focus for this combination of nationalism and
discontent was the Scottish Referendum on independence on
18 September, an event which aroused more genuine political
passion than any other in living memory.
22
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 22
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 23 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 398F0A76
Although the Scottish people voted 55 per cent to 45 per cent

against independence and agreed that it was better to stay part of
the United Kingdom, everyone is agreed that the referendum will
act as a catalyst for the political reform which is so necessary for the
whole of the UK. It will of course lead first to more devolved
powers to Scotland and then to Wales. But in England there is a
huge imbalance between London and the regions which needs to
be addressed, as well as the issue of England itself in an increasingly
federal United Kingdom. Not least there is the issue of local
government whose powers have become increasingly attenuated
over the years. All this will be difficult and controversial, but for the
moment anyway, politics has come alive for many though not for
all. In Scotland although the turnout as a whole was a substantial
85 per cent there was the familiar contrast between areas where it
was much higher and others where it was much lower, revealing a
subclass still disenchanted even over a major issue like independence.
As a result of the promises made to the Scottish people by all
major parties before the vote on the referendum, and the widespread realisation that this has huge implications not just for the
four nations but for the whole political structure of the UK there is
likely to be a Commission on the Constitution in 2015. The knee
jerk response to the referendum result has been to call for English
votes for English laws (Evel). However the prospective imbalance
of Scottish MPs being able to vote on English Laws whilst at the
same time English MPs would not be able to vote on ones
devolved to the Scottish Parliament is only one aspect of a much
wider imbalance. This is caused by the fact that England provides
84 per cent of UK MPs, reflecting the size of the population,
Scotland 8 per cent, Wales 5 per cent and Northern Ireland
3 per cent. If the UK is to remain united with those elected as MPs
all having equal powers and status it will be necessary to consider
something similar to that which operates in a number of countries
where voting power does not simply reflect the size of the
constituency. For example California has 2 members of the US
senate to represent its 38 million citizens, the same number as
Introduction
23
Division: text
Sequential 23
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 24 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 33ABC99C
Wyoming, which only has 583,000 people. A similar principle

operates in Australia regarding the relation between New South
Wales and Tasmania. To achieve lasting unity special arrangements
have been made to recognise the needs of minorities.
One key reason why many people believe it is crucial for
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to stay together, and for the
whole of the United Kingdom to be a strong player in Europe, is
because of the devastating power of globalisation, especially its
economic consequences. Individual nations are increasingly helpless before an international financial elite who can move money
and industry round the world at will. The only way in which
international capitalism can be ordered for the good of both the
individual nation and the whole is by intensive cooperation
between states and the building of strong continental and worldwide institutions. As Gordon Brown put it in an article before the
Scottish referendum:
In years to come getting control of your economic destiny
will involve new, more intense relationships with your
neighbours, your geographical region, your continent and
the wider world, and will inevitably mean layer on layer of
cooperation with regional and global institutions,
recognising that there are global problems such as climate
change, open trade and development that need global
solutions. One example suffices: no country today can
secure its tax base without international cooperation to root
out tax havens.25
One implication of this is that the euro scepticism so favoured in

some quarters needs to be resisted. A stronger Europe, not a
weaker one, is the only way the individual nations of Europe make
their proper contribution in a globalised world. This applies in
every area of life, not just the economic sphere, but no less on
climate change and foreign policy.The case for a more, rather than
a less, integrated Europe has recently been powerfully restated by
Anthony Giddens.26 In all the forthcoming talk about a new
constitutional settlement in the United Kingdom this European
24
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 24
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 25 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 378DC9AD
dimension must not be lost sight of. We need a federal Britain in a

confederal Europe to use Timothy Garton Ashs phrase.27
Whilst there are compelling economic arguments for this
future, I believe it also carries a moral and Christian imperative.
For nationalism, on a Christian perspective, and even when not
distorted, is only a partial, limited, and finite good. From a
Christian point of view we find our identity first and foremost as
members of the body of Christ and within the family of humanity.
Other identities are subordinate to these. The emergence of
nationalism, racism and right wing policies seen all over Europe in
recent years is a reflection of the alienation felt by so many with the
political process, and this is in turn fuelled by the economic
consequences of globalisation. Globalisation is a fundamental
feature of our time, and if it is to serve and not just devastate local
and national economies, active co-operation between nations is
crucial. A book which made huge waves in 2014 was Capital in the
Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty which analysed the
growth of inequality in our times. He wrote,If democracy is some
day to regain control of capitalism, it must start by recognising that
the concrete institutions in which democracy and capitalism are
embodied need to be reinvented again and again.28 This for me
points to the desperate need not just for political reform within the
UK but for much stronger intergovernmental institutions and
organisations working across continents and internationally. I
dont see how else the money now rapidly circulating round the
globe can be controlled and channelled to serve people as a whole,
and make the world more a reflection of that universal banquet in
which everyone has a place.
CHAPTER 6 FURTHERING THE
COMMON GOOD
The Common Good is a fundamental category of Catholic social
teaching which came to prominence in the United Kingdom with
a thoughtful document issued by the Roman Catholic Bishops of
England and Wales in 1996, prior to the election. More recently
there has been an attempt to carry this forward with a new
Introduction
25
Division: text
Sequential 25
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 26 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 39CF2435
approach to politics which has included other Christians and those

of other faiths.29
In Western society today it is generally held that there is no
shared understanding of the common good; rather, each individual will have their own ideas about this. There are also many
influential thinkers who argue that this is not just what society
happens to be like at the moment, but what it should be like. What
we share is the rule of law, and providing we act lawfully each
individual should be free to make their own choices about the
nature of the good life. Apart from the law there are certain public
goods, such as the provision of clean air, which the normal market
mechanisms cannot control and which therefore the state provides
on the basis of taxation. Such public goods include a basic security
provided by the police and the armed services. This view of
society, a nomocracy (from the Greek word for law), is often
contrasted with a telocracy (from the Greek word for goal or
purpose), in which a society is united by a common understanding
of what life together is about.30 Britain before the Reformation
was a telocracy, with its common goal provided by a widely shared
understanding of the Christian faith which was imposed by the
state.The problem with telocracies, as we see in the world today, is
that the scope for individual freedom can be non-existent or
marginal, especially the freedom to practise a religion or ideology
different from the one imposed by the state. For this reason many
religious people, for whom belief is fundamental to their whole
being, have often placed freedom to practise the religion of their
choice above a shared understanding of the common good, as we
see in the foundation and history of the United States. However,
no less significant from a Christian perspective is the conviction
that we belong together and that a shared common life rooted in
justice is fundamental to human wellbeing.
I noted in the 2010 edition of this book that there were some
signs that the tectonic plates of our society were beginning to shift,
that the ideology which put the individual pursuit of gain and
pleasure above the well-being of society as a whole, and which had
dominated Western society for thirty or more years, was beginning
26
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 26
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 27 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 39F0C8D0
to be questioned. In 2009 for example we saw some major

challenges to this by Michael Sandel and Amartya Sen. Since then
this challenge has become even more insistent.
In his Reith Lectures and subsequent book based on them
Michael Sandel showed in a range of examples that neither
economic liberalism nor social liberalism is enough.31 We need to
find other values, in addition to free choice, for society to function
as, in our better moments, we want it to. So why have we been
reluctant to admit to this for the last fifty years? The first reason is
that we all have such different ideas of the good that it would seem
impossible for society as a whole to agree on any common
notions. Secondly, we fear that if there was a societal notion of the
good, it would be one dominated by fundamentalists. But as
Sandel pertinently remarked fundamentalists rush in where liberals fear to tread.
Liberals stress the notion of each to their own understanding of
the good, indeed it has come to be seen as one of the defining
characteristics of a neo-liberal. But Sandel rightly points out that if
they do not engage in the debate about a common good the
ground will be occupied by others.
Michael Sandel has since then worked out his thesis in another
important book, What Money Cant Buy: The Moral Limits of
Markets.32 In a serious of vivid examples he shows how we have
gone from using the market as an efficient mechanism for the
distribution of goods and services, to being a market society where
almost everything can be bought. He shows how in some areas this
not only fails to work from an economic point of view, but how it
crowds out precious non-market values. To take just one example:
in Israel on a designated donation day students go from door to
door collecting money for good causes. An experiment was
conducted by two economists. One group of students was given a
short motivational speech about the good causes. The second
group were given the speech and promised a 1 per cent personal
bonus on what they collected. The third group were given the
speech and a 10 per cent bonus. The bonuses were not deducted
from the amount collected. It turned out that the unpaid students
Introduction
27
Division: text
Sequential 27
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 28 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3724822A
collected 55 per cent more in donations than those who received a

1 per cent reward and 9 per cent more than those who received
10 per cent. Overall Sandel argues that if we believe in non-market
values we will have to champion them in the public sphere.
Economics is not neutral and we cannot leave everything to
financial incentives. At the moment many of the values that we
cherished thirty years ago are being undermined and crowded out.
Michael Sandels work is just one example of an intense disquiet
with the underlying philosophy of Western society today. Another,
mentioned in the first edition, is the work of the Nobel Prize
winner Amartya Sen.33 Similarly, shortly before he died the much
respected thinker Tony Judt wrote a book called Ill Fares the Land.
He begins, Something is profoundly wrong with the way we live
today.34 He then points to the growing inequalities in wealth,
health and life expectancy in almost every country in the world,
and the world as a whole. He notices how in recent decades there
has been a preoccupation with the pursuit of wealth combined
with an excessive individualism. Everything has been seen in
economic terms. We cannot go on like this he says. We cannot
continue to evaluate our world and the choices we make in a
moral vacuum.35
As many have done before he points out that markets need
values such as trust, honesty, and restraint and that, Far from
inhering in the nature of capitalism itself, values such as these
derived from long standing religious or communitarian practises.36
Judt laments the unbearable lightness of politics, dominated as
it is by the ideas of self-expression and freedom of the individual.
What we lack is a moral narrative: an internally coherent
account that ascribes purposes to our actions in a way that
transcends them37
A no less striking example of something shifting in the secular
world is the work of the German Sociologist, Jurgen Habermas.
What is remarkable about his work is not only his stress on the debt
he thinks European society owes to religion in the past for its most
28
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 28
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 29 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 3BCA219E
fundamental public values but his thesis that religion still has an
indispensable role to play.
There is a profound underlying anxiety in Habermas which is
expressed in the title of his book An Awareness of What is Missing.
For all its achievements, he argues, the modern secular state cannot
of itself arouse in people a sense of solidarity with all humanity,
motivate people to act for the common good, or even give
undergirding reasons why a people should feel loyalty to a political
community. Here, clearly, faith communities have a role to play,
not least because, he suggests, they encourage community action,
whereas secular morality is primarily directed towards the individual as such.
All this, however welcome, might seem obvious enough. But
Habermas wants more from religion, as expressed by his reference
to the unexhausted force (das Unabgegoltene) of religious traditions. By this he does not just mean the contribution of faith
communities to the tasks indicated in the above paragraph, but the
possibility of secular reason assimilating, in its own terms, more of
what was once thought of in exclusively religious ways.
Habermas readily affirms that concepts like person, freedom,
community and solidarity are infused with experiences and connotations which stem from the biblical teaching and tradition.38
He then argues that this process needs to continue, because
something crucial is now missing in secular discourse. There is of
course a qualification. What counts is the persuasiveness which
translations of religious concepts have for the secular environment.
Does this understanding of religion put forward by Habermas
imply that its future is to be fully assimilated in secular terms until
it is totally attenuated? In short, is it being treated in purely
instrumental terms? Habermas strongly denies this, for he maintains that despite the process of assimilation, the basic truth claims
of religion will quite properly remain strange and other to secular
reasoning. Faith remains opaque for knowledge in a way which
may neither be denied nor simply accepted.39
More recently Robert Skidelsky and William Skidelsky have
offered another powerful critique of the assumptions underlying
Introduction
29
Division: text
Sequential 29
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 30 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 39C50012
our present economic policies.40 They begin by criticising the

notion of a liberal state held by people like John Rawls, arguing
that it rests on a misconception of liberalism as being neutral and
devoid of any positive purpose. Classic liberalism took it for
granted that upholding civilisation was among the functions of the
state. In any case, neutrality is a fiction. A neutral state simply
hands power to the guardians of capital to manipulate public taste
in their own interests.41 They argue that neither money nor
increasing the GDP are ends in themselves. The state exists for
something. Nor is it enough just to say that we need various
primary goods which are necessary for any choice about the
nature of the good life.The state itself should be characterised by a
range of goods, without which it is seriously lacking. These are
basic goods, defined as those which are universal, that is fundamental to any conceivable society; final, that is, an end in themselves and not just a means to an end; sui generis,that is, not just part
of some other good and indispensable. The authors select seven
goods which they argue meet these criteria, health, security,
respect, personality, harmony with nature, friendship and leisure.
These seven could be argued about. For example, a more
Aristotelian view was held by T. S. Eliot, one which I discuss,
namely that the purpose or goal of humanity is virtue and
well-being in community. There is, however, a fundamental
agreement that we need goods other than a respect for free choice
above all others.
Given these pleas by highly distinguished secular thinkers like
Sandel, Judt, Amartya Sen, Habermas and the Skidelskys, to which
could be added others such as Will Hutton and David Marquand, I
believe that people of Christian and other faiths should work more
closely with secular thinkers to build up a much thicker moral
framework for our public and economic life, one that includes but
goes beyond a simple emphasis on the free choice of the individual. We need to work at what John Rawls calls an overlapping
consensus. Rawls believed that we have to keep our overall world
views out of this consensus, we have to proceed by public reasoning. As is made clear in this book, there is no problem with the
30
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 30
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 31 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 390950B4
concept of public reasoning in principle. It is entirely congruous

with what the Christian church has taught about our capacity
simply as human beings to agree on certain basic moral truths.
That said, the concept of public reasoning is not as neutral as it
might at first suggest. We bring our world view into public
reasoning whether we are aware of it or not, (and we ought to be
aware of it), by how we select the evidence and how we weight the
arguments.
But whether or not there is total agreement about the telos of
society, we need to co-operate in the goal of achieving an
overlapping consensus for a much more robust framework for our
economic and public life than we have at the moment. For what is
clear from the cri de coeur of these leading secular thinkers that have
been quoted is that there is an emptiness at the heart of our public
life in the West. However important freedom of choice might be,
it is not the only value, nor should it always be the overriding one.
We need a much richer concept of the common good. Religious
people and institutions of all faiths have an important role to play
in thickening and deepening that concept.
What has gone wrong, as we might suspect, is in the end a
reflection of what has gone wrong with our whole understanding
of what it is to be a human being in society. Since the seventeenth
century our culture has been dominated and shaped by an excessively individualistic view of what it is to be a human being. But
mind is a social reality. We are persons only in and through our
relationships with other persons. The Africans have a good word
for it: Ubuntu. Christianity, Judaism and Islam, in their different
ways, share this essentially inter-relational understanding of what it
is to be human.
Before we are isolated individuals, making our lonely existential
choices, we belong together in a common life, a life characterised
by interdependence, a changing mixture of dependence and
independence; of helping and being helped. Life in families,
communities and societies is fundamental to who we are. This
means there is a common good and a public good which is not just
the sum of our individual preferences. So also there are civic values
Introduction
31
Division: text
Sequential 31
JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 32 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 1EF87124
and virtues which reflect this belonging together; a societal solidarity giving rise to non-market norms. These are norms and
values that need to be struggled for in a world increasingly
dominated by a market trying to crowd them out. Faith communities are rooted in these values. We need to stand by them, and we
can do so not only with one another, but with serious-minded
secular thinkers.
If those outside the church too often have a false view of
religion as something that is only to do with the individual, there
are those within faith communities who fail to understand that
being religious is not just about going back to the source documents, usually in a highly selective manner, but is about inhabiting
a tradition, to use a phrase of Rowan Williams. It is out of their
respective traditions of shared habit and wisdom that religious
communities have the resources to contribute to an ongoing
debate about the common good. From these traditions they will
make their contribution in an argumentative democracy.
Richard Harries
Kings College, London
October 2014
32
Introduction
Division: text
Sequential 32

Introductiontothesecond Edition: Faith in Politics? - With A Question Mark at The End, One

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Introductiontothesecond Edition: Faith in Politics? - With A Question Mark at The End, One

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JOBNAME: DartonLongmanTodd PAGE: 1 SESS: 23 OUTPUT: Mon Nov 3 14:27:38 2014 SUM: 2C971B91

I NTROD UCTIO N TO THE SECO ND

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

The Way We Live Now is the title of Anthony Trollopes 1875

Whatever view we take on whether the political scene in the

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

For example, in 2004, 31 per cent of respondents believed that

Amongst this exceedingly gloomy data two bright spots appear.

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

campaigners as had happened in the United States. Charities and

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

period from 11 per cent to 28 per cent. This is a serious situation,

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

mayed by the behaviour of tabloid journalists. Apart from this, the

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

operates. Matthew Carney, the new Governor of the Bank of

What has emerged, and is continuing to be revealed, about the

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

liked to go out in the street simply to look at and talk to a

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

continue to press home their indispensability in all areas of our

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

The book is a much needed corrective which provides a solid

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

an opponent of the rights which we now take for granted.

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

living in a multi-faith society, albeit one still with an Established

He went on to suggest that these values live in the popularity of

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

reticent about their religious beliefs. Scratch an Englishman and

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

country, people are likely to give very different answers. When,

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

other religions. Instead, the church has a duty to protect the

It certainly provides an identity and spiritual dimension for its own

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Some have suggested that in Britain we too should have a

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Feel part of an ongoing national story

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

In short, a society in which they feel at home and to which

During 2014 the underlying alienation of so many from our

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Although the Scottish people voted 55 per cent to 45 per cent

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Wyoming, which only has 583,000 people. A similar principle

One implication of this is that the euro scepticism so favoured in

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

dimension must not be lost sight of. We need a federal Britain in a

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

approach to politics which has included other Christians and those

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

to be questioned. In 2009 for example we saw some major

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

collected 55 per cent more in donations than those who received a

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML

our present economic policies.40 They begin by criticising the

Kerrypress Ltd Typeset in XML