You are on page 1of 7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hegelianism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hegelianism is the philosophy of G. W. F. Hegel which can be summed up by the dictum that "the rational alone is
real", which means that all reality is capable of being expressed in rational categories. His goal was to reduce reality
to a more synthetic unity within the system of absolute idealism.

Contents
1 Method
2 Doctrine of development
3 Categorization of philosophies
3.1 Division of philosophy
3.2 Philosophy of nature
3.3 Philosophy of mind
3.4 Philosophy of history
3.4.1 Stages of history
3.5 Philosophy of absolute mind
4 Influence
5 The Hegelian schools
5.1 In Germany
5.2 Other nations
6 See also
7 References

Method
Hegel's method in philosophy consists of the triadic development (Entwicklung) in each concept and each thing.
Thus, he hopes, philosophy will not contradict experience, but will give data of experience to the philosophical,
which is the ultimately true explanation. If, for instance, we wish to know what liberty is, we take that concept
where we first find itthe unrestrained action of the savage, who does not feel the need of repressing any thought,
feeling, or tendency to act.
Next, we find that the savage has given up this freedom in exchange for its opposite, the restraint, or, as he
considers it, the tyranny, of civilization and law. Finally, in the citizen under the rule of law, we find the third stage of
development, namely liberty in a higher and a fuller sense than how the savage possessed itthe liberty to do, say,
and think many things beyond the power of the savage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

1/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In this triadic process, the second stage is the direct opposite, the annihilation, or at least the sublation, of the first.
The third stage is the first returned to itself in a higher, truer, richer, and fuller form. The three stages are, therefore,
styled:
in itself (An-sich)
out of itself (Anderssein)
in and for itself (An-und-fr-sich).
These three stages are found succeeding one another throughout the whole realm of thought and being, from the
most abstract logical process up to the most complicated concrete activity of organized mind in the succession of
states or the production of systems of philosophy.

Doctrine of development
In logic which, according to Hegel, is really metaphysic we have to deal with the process of development
applied to reality in its most abstract form. According to Hegel, in logic, we deal in concepts robbed of their
empirical content: in logic we are discussing the process in vacuo, so to speak. Thus, at the very beginning of
Hegel's study of reality, he finds the logical concept of being.
Now, being is not a static concept according to Hegel, as Aristotle supposed it was. It is essentially dynamic,
because it tends by its very nature to pass over into nothing, and then to return to itself in the higher concept,
becoming. For Aristotle, there was nothing more certain than that being equaled being, or, in other words, that
being is identical with itself, that everything is what it is. Hegel does not deny this; but, he adds, it is equally certain
that being tends to become its opposite, nothing, and that both are united in the concept becoming. For instance,
the truth about this table, for Aristotle, is that it is a table. (This is not necessarily true. Aristotle made a
distinction between things made by art and things made by nature. Things made by art--such as a table-follow this description of thinghood. Living things however are self-generating and constantly creating their
own being. Being in the sense of a living thing is highly dynamic and is defined by the thing creating its own
being. He describes life not in terms of being but coming-into-being. For instance a baby's goal is to become
old. It is neither absolutely young or absolutely old and somewhere in the process of being young and
becoming old. It sounds like Hegel made the comparison between being and not being while Aristotle made
the comparison between art and nature.)
For Hegel, the equally important truth is that it was a tree, and it "will be" ashes. The whole truth, for Hegel, is that
the tree became a table and will become ashes. Thus, becoming, not being, is the highest expression of reality. It is
also the highest expression of thought because then only do we attain the fullest knowledge of a thing when we
know what it was, what it is, and what it will be-in a word, when we know the history of its development.
In the same way as "being" and "nothing" develop into the higher concept becoming, so, farther on in the scale of
development, life and mind appear as the third terms of the process and in turn are developed into higher forms of
themselves. (It is interesting here to note that Aristotle saw "being" as superior to "becoming", because anything
which is still becoming something else is imperfect. Hence, God, for Aristotle, is perfect because He never changes,
but is eternally complete.) But one cannot help asking what is it that develops or is developed?
Its name, Hegel answers, is different in each stage. In the lowest form it is "being", higher up it is "life", and in still
higher form it is "mind". The only thing always present is the process (das Werden). We may, however, call the
process by the name of "spirit" (Geist) or "idea" (Begriff). We may even call it God, because at least in the third
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

2/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

term of every triadic development the process is God.

Categorization of philosophies
Division of philosophy
The first and most wide-reaching consideration of the process of spirit, God, or the idea, reveals to us the truth that
the idea must be studied (1) in itself; this is the subject of logic or metaphysics; (2) out of itself, in nature; this is the
subject of the philosophy of nature; and (3) in and for itself, as mind; this is the subject of the philosophy of mind
(Geistesphilosophie).

Philosophy of nature
Passing over the rather abstract considerations by which Hegel shows in his Logik the process of the idea-in-itself
through being to becoming, and finally through essence to notion, we take up the study of the development of the
idea at the point where it enters into otherness in nature. In nature the idea has lost itself, because it has lost its unity
and is splintered, as it were, into a thousand fragments. But the loss of unity is only apparent, because in reality the
idea has merely concealed its unity.
Studied philosophically, nature reveals itself as so many successful attempts of the idea to emerge from the state of
otherness and present itself to us as a better, fuller, richer idea, namely, spirit, or mind. Mind is, therefore, the goal
of nature. It is also the truth of nature. For whatever is in nature is realized in a higher form in the mind which
emerges from nature.

Philosophy of mind
The philosophy of mind begins with the consideration of the individual, or subjective, mind. It is soon perceived,
however, that individual, or subjective, mind is only the first stage, the in-itself stage, of mind. The next stage is
objective mind, or mind objectified in law, morality, and the State. This is mind in the condition of out-of-itself.
There follows the condition of absolute mind, the state in which mind rises above all the limitations of nature and
institutions, and is subjected to itself alone in art, religion, and philosophy. For the essence of mind is freedom, and
its development must consist in breaking away from the restrictions imposed on it in it otherness by nature and
human institutions.

Philosophy of history
Hegel's philosophy of the State, his theory of history, and his account of absolute mind are perhaps the most
interesting portions of his philosophy because it is the most easily understood. The State, he says, is mind
objectified. The individual mind, which, on account of its passions, its prejudices, and its blind impulses, is only
partly free, subjects itself to the yoke of necessitythe opposite of freedomin order to attain a fuller realization
of itself in the freedom of the citizen.
This yoke of necessity is first met with in the recognition of the rights of others, next in morality, and finally in social
morality, of which the primal institution is the family. Aggregates of families form civil society, which, however, is but
an imperfect form of organization compared with the State. The State is the perfect social embodiment of the idea,
and stands in this stage of development for God Himself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

3/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The State, studied in itself, furnishes for our consideration constitutional law. In relation to other States it develops
international law; and in its general course through historical vicissitudes it passes through what Hegel calls the
"Dialectics of History".
Hegel teaches that the constitution is the collective spirit of the nation and that the government and the written
constitution is the embodiment of that spirit. Each nation has its own individual spirit, and the greatest of crimes is
the act by which the tyrant or the conqueror stifles the spirit of a nation.
War, Hegel suggests, can never be ruled out, as one can never know when or if one will occur, an example being
the Napoleonic overrunning of Europe and putting down of Royalist systems. War represents a crisis in the
development of the idea which is embodied in the different States, and out of this crisis usually the State which holds
the more advanced spirit wins out, though it may also suffer a loss, lick its wounds, yet still win in the spiritual sense,
as happened for example when the northerners sacked Rome, its form of legality and religion all "won" out in spite
of the losses on the battlefield.
A peaceful revolution is also possible according to Hegel when the changes required to solve the crisis are
ascertained by thoughtful insight and when this insight spreads throughout the body politic:

If a people [Volk] can no longer accept as implicitly true what its constitution expresses to it as
the truth, if its consciousness or Notion and its actuality are not at one, then the peoples spirit is
torn asunder. Two things may then occur. First, the people may either by a supreme internal
effort dash into fragments this law which still claims authority, or it may more quietly and slowly
effect changes on the yet operative law, which is, however, no longer true morality, but which the
mind has already passed beyond. In the second place, a peoples intelligence and strength may
not suffice for this, and it may hold to the lower law; or it may happen that another nation has
reached its higher constitution, thereby rising in the scale, and the first gives up its nationality and
becomes subject to the other. Therefore it is of essential importance to know what the true
constitution is; for what is in opposition to it has no stability, no truth, and passes away. It has a
temporary existence, but cannot hold its ground; it has been accepted, but cannot secure
permanent acceptance; that it must be cast aside, lies in the very nature of the constitution. This
insight can be reached through Philosophy alone. Revolutions take place in a state without the
slightest violence when the insight becomes universal; institutions, somehow or other, crumble and
disappear, each man agrees to give up his right. A government must, however, recognize that the
time for this has come; should it, on the contrary, knowing not the truth, cling to temporary
institutions, taking what though recognized is unessential, to be a bulwark guarding it from
the essential (and the essential is what is contained in the Idea), that government will fall, along
with its institutions, before the force of mind. The breaking up of its government breaks up the
nation itself; a new government arises, or it may be that the government and the unessential
retain the upper hand.[1]

The "ground" of historical development is, therefore, rational; since the State, if it is not in contradiction, is the
embodiment of reason as spirit. Many, at first considered to be, contingent events of history can become, in reality
or in necessity, stages in the logical unfolding of the sovereign reason which gets embodied in an advanced State.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

4/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Such a "necessary contingency" when expressed in passions, impulse, interest, character, personality, get used by
the "cunning of reason", which, in retrospect, was to its own purpose.
Stages of history
We are, therefore, to understand historical happenings as the stern, reluctant working of reason towards the full
realization of itself in perfect freedom. Consequently, we must interpret history in rational terms, and throw the
succession of events into logical categories and this interpretation is, for Hegel, a mere inference from actual history.
Thus, the widest view of history reveals three most important stages of development: Oriental imperial (the stage of
oneness, of suppression of freedom), Greek social democracy (the stage of expansion, in which freedom was lost in
unstable demagogy), and Christian constitutional monarchy (which represents the reintegration of freedom in
constitutional government).

Philosophy of absolute mind


Even in the State, mind is limited by subjection to other minds. There remains the final step in the process of the
acquisition of freedom, namely, that by which absolute mind in art, religion, and philosophy subjects itself to itself
alone. In art, mind has the intuitive contemplation of itself as realized in the art material, and the development of the
arts has been conditioned by the ever-increasing "docility" with which the art material lends itself to the actualization
of mind or the idea.
In religion, mind feels the superiority of itself to the particularizing limitations of finite things. Here, as in the
philosophy of history, there are three great moments, Oriental religion, which exaggerated the idea of the infinite,
Greek religion, which gave undue importance to the finite, and Christianity, which represents the union of the infinite
and the finite. Last of all, absolute mind, as philosophy, transcends the limitations imposed on it even in religious
feeling, and, discarding representative intuition, attains all truth under the form of reason.
Whatever truth there is in art and in religion is contained in philosophy, in a higher form, and free from all limitations.
Philosophy is, therefore, "the highest, freest and wisest phase of the union of subjective and objective mind, and the
ultimate goal of all development."

Influence
The far reaching influence of Hegel is due in a measure to the undoubted vastness of the scheme of philosophical
synthesis which he conceived and partly realized. A philosophy which undertook to organize under the single
formula of triadic development every department of knowledge, from abstract logic up to the philosophy of history,
has a great deal of attractiveness to those who are metaphysically inclined. But Hegel's influence is due in a still
larger measure to two extrinsic circumstances.
His philosophy is the highest expression of that spirit of collectivism which characterized the nineteenth century. In
theology especially Hegel revolutionized the methods of inquiry. The application of his notion of development to
Biblical criticism and to historical investigation is obvious to anyone who compares the spirit and purpose of
contemporary theology with the spirit and purpose of the theological literature of the first half of the nineteenth
century.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

5/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In science, too, and in literature, the substitution of the category of becoming for the category of being is a very
patent fact, and is due to the influence of Hegel's method. In political economy and political science the effect of
Hegel's collectivistic conception of the State supplanted to a large extent the individualistic conception which was
handed down from the eighteenth century to the nineteenth century.

The Hegelian schools


In Germany
Hegel's immediate followers in Germany are generally divided into the "Right Hegelians" and the "Left Hegelians"
(the latter also referred to as the "Young Hegelians").
The Rightists developed his philosophy along lines which they considered to be in accordance with Christian
theology. They included Karl Friedrich Gschel, Johann Philipp Gabler, Johann Karl Friedrich Rosenkranz, and
Johann Eduard Erdmann.
The Leftists accentuated the anti-Christian tendencies of Hegel's system and developed schools of materialism,
socialism, rationalism, and pantheism. They included Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marx, Bruno Bauer, and David
Strauss. Max Stirner socialized with the left Hegelians but built his own philosophical system largely opposing that
of these thinkers.

Other nations
In Britain, Hegelianism was represented during the nineteenth century by, and largely overlapped the British Idealist
school of James Hutchison Stirling, Thomas Hill Green, William Wallace, John Caird, Edward Caird, Richard
Lewis Nettleship, F.H. Bradley, and J. M. E. McTaggart.
In Denmark, Hegelianism was represented by Johan Ludvig Heiberg and Hans Lassen Martensen from the 1820s
to the 1850s.
In mid-19th century Italy, Hegelianism was represented by Bertrando Spaventa.
Hegelianism in North America was represented by Friedrich August Rauch, Thomas Watson and William T. Harris,
as well as the St. Louis Hegelians. In its most recent form it seems to take its inspiration from Thomas Hill Green,
and whatever influence it exerts is opposed to the prevalent pragmatic tendency.
In Poland, Hegelianism was represented by Karol Libelt, August Cieszkowski and Jzef Kremer.
Benedetto Croce and tienne Vacherot were the leading Hegelians towards the end of the nineteenth century in
Italy and France, respectively. Among Catholic philosophers who were influenced by Hegel the most prominent
were Georg Hermes and Anton Gnther.
Hegelianism also inspired Giovanni Gentile's philosophy of actual idealism and Fascism, the concept that people are
motivated by ideas and that social change is brought by the leaders.

See also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

6/7

7/4/2015

Hegelianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Panlogism

References
1. G. W. F. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol. II, p. 98

This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed.
(1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hegelianism&oldid=643553135"
Categories: Theories of history Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
This page was last modified on 21 January 2015, at 18:48.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark
of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegelianism

7/7

You might also like