Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_________
--____
The composite material produced in this investigation \\itc an A 3% cat aluminium allq r&forced with i and IO vni.!,,
fraction of glass particulatc~. A 356 aluminium alloy bith no particul;tte rcini;wwm~nt
was also uwd iis a control ;rlloy lix
purposes of comparison. The agcing behaviour of unreinforced and reinforced materials was studied under both nd;ural and
artificial ageing. Aiso. the efiect of deformation before agrinp on the ageing kinetics ~a!, s:udi&. Thr cfl;-ui> uf the i&nf<rrccilt<llt
voIume fraction on the ageing behaviour of AI-based composites \vere s>~stematicallgevaluated by means o!hardness measurements. It was found that the overall age-hardening sequence of the A 356 alloy was not changed by the addition of glass particles.
However, the precipitation kinetics of the matrix alloy were affected by the presence of the reinforcement. the times to achieve
peak hardness being shortened i* the composites. In the case of deformation before ageing, the agcing was faster than that of the
undeformed material. Also. metallographic examination showed that the prcsrncc of glass particulatrs r&inrd the structure OF the
matrix.
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
Commercial A 356 Al-alloy \vas used in thi; study as
the matrix alloy, with the following composition in
wt.%: 6.96 Si, I Mg, 0.374 Fe, 1.94 Cu. 0.0844 Mn,
0.295 Zn. 0.0928 Ni, 0.0165 Cr. 0.1X7 Pb, 0.175 Sn.
0.130 Ti, 0.0484 V, 0.0964 Co, and balance Al. The
glass particulates. of grade 40-50 pm. were added to
the molten alloy using the vortex method, the volume
fraction (Vf) of this reinforcement being 5 and lo%.
Z.M.
74
El-Bradie,
/ Jourrral of Materials
Processing Techology
66 (1997) 73- 75
Hardnese HV
Hardness HV
40
20
0
0
1 __I__-__.
l-l:
A
5
20
Time
Fig. I. Hardness-time curve for the solid solution heat-treatment
the control alloy at 540C.
40
60
60
loo
120
140
of
Fig. 3. Hardness-time
1BO
200
2. The unreinforced
Fig. 2. Microstructure of the reinforced and reinforced material in the cast condition ( x 52): (a) unreinforced alloy; (b) 5% Vf
160
Time Hr
glassparticles,and
lution
Hardnear HV
1801
160 -
-4
e-
--OS0
eferences
R.J. Arsenault. L. Wang and C.R. Feng. rl~cr nk,.. 39 (:OY1)
47.
T. Christman and S. Suresh. Acrcl ilkt.. 16 (1988) 1691.
;I.
;:I M. Vogelseng. R.J. Arsenault and R.M. Fisher. :I!rr. T~CUI.S.
I7 (1986) 379.
[41 R.J. Arsenault. J. Co777p.5.TnA77ol. RLs.. 10 (1988) 140.
PI W.S. Miller and F.J. Humphreys. SU. ~%f~r.,.?5 (1991) 33.
PI R.J. Arsenault. Scr-. Met., 25 (1991) 2617.
R.J. Arscnault and N. Shi. rlftrter. Sci. Errg.. 81 (IYSh) 175.
I; H.L. Lee, W.H. Lu and S.L. Chan. Sw. Alcr.. 26 (1991) 1723.
PI J. Bar, H.G. KlaOmann and H.J. Gudladt. Ser. ki(a/., 2Y (lY93)
787.
A. 25 (1994) 2247.
P0.l F.IH. Samuel and A.M. Samuel. i2lrr. Trc777s.
VI1 Dutta. S.M. Allen and J.L. Hatley. Ain. Tru77.t.A. 22 ( 1991)
7553.
IO f 19941406.
[i21 \d. Song and T.N. Baker. ,Iltrrw. Sci. Td~d..
iI31 A.N. Abd El-Azim, S.F. Moustafa and H. Nasr El-Din. ?77dh77.
[II
Conf:
Fig. 5. Hardness-time
deformation.
Mining
m7d Engineerii7g.
Succ
iY8Y! p. 1.
u41 H.L. Lee. W.H. Lu and S.L. Chan. %r. :2lrr.. 25 (1991) 165.
Cmul.
Eg~pr, (2Ob
Mmh