Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Case
Case 4:06-cv-00004-WDB
4:06-cv-00004-WDB Document
Document 53 Filed
Filed 01/09/2006
01/11/2006 Page
Page 11 of
of 33
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
16
24
25 This Document Relates To:
26 ALL ACTIONS
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINE
FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR MOTION; C 06 0004-WDB
Dockets.Justia.com
Case
Case 4:06-cv-00004-WDB
4:06-cv-00004-WDB Document
Document 53 Filed
Filed 01/09/2006
01/11/2006 Page
Page 22 of
of 33
2 the above-captioned action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
3 California;
4 Whereas, prior to the removal, Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer set the deadline for
5 the filing of defendants’ answers or other responses to the Consolidated Amended Complaint as
7 Whereas, plaintiffs currently intend to move to remand the action to state court;
8 Whereas, under the current schedule, defendants’ responsive pleadings or motions are
9 due before the time for plaintiffs to file a motion to remand will have elapsed;
10 THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the parties that the deadline for the filing
11 of defendants’ answers or other responses to the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be set
12 as 30 days after the Court decides plaintiffs’ anticipated motion to remand or, if no such motion
14
19 – and –
20 RICHARD J. FAVRETTO
MARK W. RYAN
21 JOSEPH R. BAKER
MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLP
22
1909 K Street NW
23 Washington, DC 20009
Telephone: (202) 263-3000
24 Facsimile: (202) 263-3300
25 Of Counsel for American Standard Companies Inc.
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINE
FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR MOTION; C 06 0004-WDB
Case
Case 4:06-cv-00004-WDB
4:06-cv-00004-WDB Document
Document 53 Filed
Filed 01/09/2006
01/11/2006 Page
Page 33 of
of 33
1
Dated: January 9, 2006 By: /s/ Peter K. Huston
2 PETER K. HUSTON, SBN
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
3
Counsel for Masco Corporation
4
Dated: January 9, 2006 By: /s/ Michael P. Lehmann
5
MICHAEL P. LEHMANN
6 JON T. KING
THE FURTH FIRM LLP
7
Plaintiffs’ Co-Liaison Counsel
8
Dated: January 9, 2006 By: /s/ Mario N. Alioto
9 MARIO N. ALIOTO
10 TRUMP, ALIOTO, TRUMP & PRESCOTT, LLP
12
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), Shirish Gupta hereby
13 attests that the signatories’ concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained.
14
ORDER
15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
S DISTRICT
ATE C
17 T
Dated: January 10, 2006 __________________________________
O
S
U
ED
RT
18 SO ORMagistrate Judge
IT ISStates
United
R NIA
19 Brazil
ayne D.
NO
Judge W
FO
RT
20
LI
ER
H
N C
F
21 D IS T IC T O
R
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEADLINE
FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR MOTION; C 06 0004-WDB