Professional Documents
Culture Documents
, petitioner,
vs.
FACTS:
Petitioner Ang Yu Asuncion and Keh Tiong leased a property of respondents
Bobby Cu Unjieng, Rose Cu Unjieng and Jose Tan in Binondo Manila.
Respondents informed plaintiffs that they are offering to sell the premises and
are giving them priority to acquire the same.
Respondents 6M for the property but petitioners offered 5M. Respondents
acceted and asked petitioners to put in writing the terms and conditions but
the latter never provided such.
When defendants were about to sell the property, plaintiffs were compelled to
file the complaint to compel defendants to sell the property to them. Court
recognizes the right of first refusal of the petitioner. Notwithstanding the courts
decision, respondent sold the property to Buen Realty and Development
Corporation.
ISSUE:
WON petitioners can demand specific performance to the respondents to sell
to them the property.
HELD:
The petitioners never accepted the offer when they refused to make the terms
and condition of the sale. As such, respondents has the right to sell the
property to other parties.
Even if petitioners are aggrieved by the failure of private respondents to honor
the right of first refusal, the remedy is not a writ of execution on the judgment,
since there is none to execute, but an action for damages in a proper forum
for the purpose.
HELD:
The contract must be interpreted together with the intention of the parties. The
letter of the plaintiff to the respondent requesting for an extension is sufficient
proof of his intent to avail of the option of sale.
In contractual relations, the law allows the parties reasonable leeway on the
terms of their agreement, which is the law between them. When petitioner
made his intention to buy known to the buyer one month after the expiration of
contract is within a reasonable time- frame.
Petitioner may buy the property but not anymore to the price stated in the
contract. As such, respondent may increase the price of the land but only to a
reasonable and fair market value.
An option is a preparatory contract in which one party grants to the other, for a
fixed period and under specified conditions, the power to decide, whether or
not to enter into a principal contract. It binds the party who has given the
option, not to enter into the principal contract with any other person during the
period designated, and, within that period, to enter into such contract with the
one to whom the option was granted, if the latter should decide to use the
option. It is a separate agreement distinct from the contract which the parties
may enter into upon the consummation of the option.