Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. In the introduction you identify the particular work or works you will
consider in the paper. You also formulate the question you will try to an-
swer: What do we learn about motherhood from Toni Morrison’s Beloved—
a novel about a black woman who kills her own infant daughter to save
her from a life of slavery? How does J. D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye
represent the passage from innocence to experience? Why does Mary Woll-
stonecraft attack Rousseau in Vindication of the Rights of Women? Why does
660
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines human 42.4
Velázquez’s Las Meninas include a self-portrait of the artist himself at work?
How does the hard-boiled hero of the American detective novel reflect
American notions of heroism? Here, for instance, is the introduction to a
research paper by a first-year college student:
Individual identity is a cherished ideal, and when institutions
threaten to deny it, they provoke resentment. Nevertheless, in order to
function in a society, individuals must be willing to compromise their per-
sonal moralities and assume certain prescribed roles. This conflict between
the rights of the individual and those of society produces a sense of frus-
tration, creating the need for an outlet. Consequently, we look to heroes,
to strong individuals who will never compromise their values or surrender
their identities. To nineteenth-century individuals, America offered a vast
and challenging frontier—a place where individuals could preserve their
identities. The question I want to answer is how the values of these fron-
tier heroes survive in the hard-boiled heroes of American detective novels.
—Neil Okun, “Heroism in the American Detective Novel”
2. In the body of the paper, you develop an answer to the basic question
in terms of individual works, supplemented by comments drawn from sec-
ondary sources. Secondary sources—books and articles—help you to clarify
the meaning of the works you discuss, to explain the connections between
them, and to sharpen the edge of your argument. But the works them-
selves—not the secondary sources—should be the prime source of evidence
for your argument:
Dashiell Hammett’s first novel, Red Harvest, pits the Continental Op
against a town totally controlled by three mobs and a corrupt police force.
As Robert Parker notes, Personville (pronounced “Poisonville”) is the ulti-
mate “symbol of the end of the frontier . . . a western city, sprung up on
the prairie in the wake of the mines” (95). When the Op arrives in re-
sponse to a call for his services, he discovers a dead client. At this point he
could have left, since he had already received all the pay he would get. But
in leaving, he would have sacrificed his heroic stature, so he stays to fight
for what he sees as justice.
He wins only a limited victory. Though he eventually cleans up the
town by turning the various mobs against each other, the novel lets us see
that evil will return. When the Op leaves, Personville is “nice and clean
and ready to go to the dogs again” (178). Nevertheless, the detective has
endured and upheld his own personal code of morality.
—Neil Okun
661
42.5 cms Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
3. In the conclusion of the paper, you restate the main point of your
argument and indicate what the argument contributes to our understand-
ing of the works of literature you have discussed:
The demand for an individual who will not compromise on questions
of morality produced the wilderness hero, a man who fled the corrupting
influence of society for the freedom and challenge of the frontier. When
the frontier closed, this man no longer had a refuge; he was forced to fight
to retain his individuality and preserve his moral integrity. With a value
system rooted in the nineteenth-century frontier, the hero of the detective
novel must often confront the twentieth-century city. The reaction is
often violent, and the hero can never impose his values on society. Yet he
is personally victorious, for he always leaves uncorrupted, and he continu-
ally restores our faith in what Sisk calls “the American as rugged individu-
alist and shaper of his own destiny” (368).
—Neil Okun
1. This is the note. (Citation numbers within the text are raised, but note numbers are
not.)
662
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cms 42.5
All notes written in CMS style—whether footnotes or endnotes—
should be written as follows. The first reference to any book you cite
should look like this:
Author Comma Title Place of publication
Comma
Publisher Date of publication Parentheses
To cite again a source you have just cited in the previous note, use Ibid.
(Latin for “in the same place”):
2. Ibid., 17.
To cite again a source you have cited more than one note earlier, use the
author’s last name:
3. Heaney, 17.
If your paper cites more than one work by the same author, a follow-up ref-
erence to any of his or her works should include a short version of its title:
663
42.5 cms Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
Bibliographic Goldberg, David Theo. Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics
entries are
formatted as of Meaning. Cambridge: Blackwell, l993.
hanging-indent
paragraphs.
2. BOOK BY TWO AUTHORS
Footnotes,
2. Donald R. Kinder and Lynne M. Sanders, Divided by Color:
endnotes, and
Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals (Chicago:
bibliographic
entries are University of Chicago Press, l996), 6.
single-spaced,
with a double
space between
them. Kinder, Donald R., and Lynne M. Sanders. Divided by Color: Racial
Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, l996.
Medhurst et al. argue that the “cold war, like its ‘hot’ counter-
part, is a contest.”3
For subsequent references in text and footnotes, use Medhurst et al. (Latin et
alia, “and others”).
664
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cms 42.5
4. BOOK , EDITED , WITH FOCUS ON ORIGINAL AUTHOR
Thoreau says “we need to witness our own limits transgressed, and
some life pasturing freely where we never
wander.”4
CMS allows the abbreviations Ed. (Edited by), Trans. (Translated by), and
Comp. (Compiled by).
665
42.5 cms Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
7. CHAPTER IN A BOOK
666
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cms 42.5
8. Michael Petracca and Madeline Sorapure, eds., Common Cul-
ture: Reading and Writing about American Popular Culture, 2nd ed.
(Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998), 3.
9. REPRINT
£ When you cite a reprint of a very old book, give only the year of the
original publication along with full publication facts of the reprint.
£ If, as above, you give all the original publication data, you may omit
the word reprint, though you may also retain it for clarity.
£ Finally, if you give page references and are not certain that both edi-
tions have the same pagination, identify the edition used. For example:
(page citation is to the reprint edition).
667
42.5 cms Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
10. TRANSLATION
668
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cms 42.5
12. Bharati Mukherjee, “A Four-Hundred-Year-Old Woman,” in
The Norton Anthology of Short Fiction, 6th ed., ed. R. V. Cassill
and Richard Bausch (New York: Norton, 2000), 1704.
Volume number
669
42.5 cms Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
670
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cms 42.5
17. Jodi Wilgoren, “Menacing ‘Trench Coat Mafia’ Was Just a
Joke, at First,” New York Times, 25 April 1999,
national edition, sec. A, p. l.
671
42.6 social Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
Research papers in the social sciences are commonly based on the observa-
tion of particular cases or groups. If you are asked to write a case study or to
report your findings on an assigned question, your most important pri-
mary source will be the record of your own observations, including the re-
sults of interviews you may conduct and questionnaires you may distrib-
ute. Together with published sources, these will provide the material for
your paper.
A report of findings in the social sciences normally includes five parts:
1. The introduction states the question you propose to answer and ex-
plains how the methods of a particular social science can help you answer
it. Suppose the question is “Do children with disabilities gain more confi-
dence from competitive sports (such as the Special Olympics) than from
noncompetitive activities?” Having posed this question, the introduction
672
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines social 42.6
explains how the methods of developmental psychology can help you find
and interpret the data needed to answer it.
2. The methods section of the paper indicates how you gathered the
data for your study. Here you describe the particular characteristics of the
group you studied, your methods of study (observation, interview, ques-
tionnaire), the questions you asked, and the printed sources you con-
sulted, such as previous studies of children with disabilities who engage in
competitive sports. You should describe your methods of gathering data
in such a way that someone else can repeat your study and thus test its
results.
3. The results section puts the raw data you have gathered into clearly
organized form: into paragraphs, tabulated listings, illustrations, or graphs.
(On tables and figures, see 42.10.)
4. The discussion section interprets the results of the study and explains
its significance for an understanding of the topic as a whole. With refer-
ence to the sample question above, for instance, it could explain whether
or not competitive sports actually benefit children with disabilities. If
competition threatens their confidence rather than strengthening it, then
programs like the Special Olympics should be reevaluated.
5. The conclusion briefly summarizes what the study has found and
states the implications of its findings, including points to be further
explored.
673
42.7 apa Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
This paragraph illustrates what every effective abstract should be: succinct,
informative, and comprehensive.
First, the paragraph is succinct. Its first four words state one of the
main points of the article: “Pollution knows no frontiers.”
Second, the paragraph is informative. Using highly significant modi-
fiers such as “dumped in rivers or off the coast” and “dirty, inefficient, and
irresponsible,” it tersely reveals how pollution moves from one country to
another. Every sentence, in fact, is richly modified to deliver the maximum
amount of information in a small number of words.
Third, the paragraph is comprehensive. It not only states the main
point of the essay but shows how the point is developed. The recent his-
tory of pollution in Europe, we learn, is presented as a conflict between the
cleanup efforts made by Western European democracies and the messes
made by the socialist countries of Eastern Europe. Just as importantly, we
learn what the article tells us about the latest development in this history:
the fall of socialism may lead to full cooperation in the control of pollu-
tion throughout Western Europe.
674
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines apa 42.7
CAPITALIZATION Within the body of your text, use standard capitaliza-
tion. For the References page, follow this example:
Initials of first and middle names
Author’s last
name Comma Period Capitalize first word of title and subtitle (if any), plus proper nouns.
Levine, J. A. (1976). Who will raise the children? Philadelphia: All lines after
the first are
Lippincott. indented five
spaces.
2. BOOK BY TWO AUTHORS
Double-space
throughout.
If a work has two authors, give both authors’ names each time the refer-
ence occurs in the text.
675
42.7 apa Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
Miller, Dellefield, and Musso (1980) have called for more effec-
tive advertising of financial aid programs.
In later citations give just the first author’s name followed by et al. (Latin
et alia, “and others”):
On your References page, provide complete information for each work and
arrange entries by date, from earliest to most recent. If two or more works
by an author were published the same year, put them in alphabetical order
and assign a lowercase letter to each, placing that letter next to the date.
676
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines apa 42.7
West, C. (1993b). Prophetic reflections: Notes on race and power
in America. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
7. TRANSLATION
One author asks, “How and why is the practice of photography pre-
disposed to a diffusion so wide that there are few households, at
least in towns, which do not possess a camera?” (Bourdieu, 1990,
p. 13).
677
42.7 apa Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
9. ARTICLE IN A MAGAZINE
Issue number
11. ARTICLE IN A NEWSPAPER
678
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines apa 42.7
looming problems . . . an issue that had seemed all
but dead this year” (Stevenson, 1999, p. A23). Page number
in section A
Sims, Pat H. (1999, May 17). When drug trials hurt patients;
light sentence. [Letter to the editor]. The New York Times,
p. A28.
Provide author, year and issue of magazine, article title, magazine title,
URL, and date of access.
†Note that APA hyphenates online, though this handbook and Li and Crane’s Electronic
Styles do not.
679
42.7 apa Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
Follows pattern for magazine except volume and series numbers follow the
journal’s title.
680
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines natur 42.8
The current APA guide provides very limited coverage of online-source docu-
mentation and follows Xia Li and Nancy B. Crane’s Electronic Style (1993).
Our formats are based on the updated version of Li and Crane’s book,
Electronic Styles: A Handbook for Citing Electronic Information (1996) and
on the information at their Web site: <www.uvm.edu/~ncrane/estyles/
apa.html>. Ask your instructor about which style guide you should follow.
Research papers in the natural sciences are generally of two kinds: review
papers, which analyze the current state of knowledge on a specialized
topic, and laboratory reports, which present the results of an actual ex-
periment. Both kinds of papers normally begin with an abstract: a brief,
one-paragraph summary of the paper’s most important points. But the two
kinds of papers differ in many respects.
The primary sources for a review paper are current articles in scientific
journals, and the purpose of a review paper is not to make an argument or
develop an original idea but to survey and explain what laboratory re-
search has recently shown about the topic. A review paper normally does
three things: (1) it introduces its topic, explaining why it is important and
what questions about it have been raised by recent research; (2) it develops
the topic by reviewing that research under a series of subheadings; and
(3) it concludes by summarizing what has been discovered and stating
what remains to be investigated.
A laboratory report explains how an experiment made in a natural
science laboratory answers a question such as “How do changes in temper-
ature affect the conductivity of copper?” Resembling in its format a report
of findings in the social sciences, the lab report usually presents its materi-
als as follows:
1. The title succinctly states what was tested. It might be, for instance,
“The Effect of Temperature Changes on the Conductivity of Copper.”
3. The introduction explains the question that the lab test is designed to
answer.
681
42.9 cbe Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
5. A section on results puts the data into clearly organized form, using
graphs, tables, and illustrations where necessary. (See 42.10 on the pre-
sentation of tables and figures.)
7. A reference list gives any published sources used, including any manuals
or textbooks.
Each subject in the sciences has its own style of documentation, which is
explained in one of the following style manuals:
BIOLOGY
Council of Biology Editors. Scientific Style and Format: The CBE Manual
for Authors, Editors and Publishers. 6th ed. New York: Cambridge UP,
1994.
CHEMISTRY
Dodd, Janet S., ed. The American Chemical Society Style Guide: A Manual
for Authors and Editors. 2nd ed. Washington, 1997.
GEOLOGY
Bates, Robert L., Rex Buchanan, and Marla Adkins-Heljeson, eds.
Geowriting: A Guide to Writing, Editing, and Printing in Earth Science.
5th ed. Alexandria: American Geological Institute, 1995.
LINGUISTICS
Linguistic Society of America. LSA Bulletin, Dec. issue, annually.
MATHEMATICS
American Mathematical Society. The AMS Author Handbook: General
Instructions for Preparing Manuscripts. Providence: AMS, 1997.
MEDICINE
Iverson, Cheryl, et al. American Medical Association Manual of Style. 9th
ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1997.
PHYSICS
American Institute of Physics. AIP Style Manual. 4th ed. New York: AIP,
1990 (updated 1997).
Your instructor will tell you which scientific style of documentation you
are expected to use. What follows is a brief guide to the style recommended
by the Council of Science Editors (CSE), which until January 1, 2000, was
682
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines cbe 42.9
called the Council of Biology Editors (CBE). Complete information on this
style will be found in the CBE manual cited above; for more information
on the CSE, visit <www.councilscienceeditors.org>.
Weiss and Mann2 have shown that folate deficiency retards growth,
causes anemia, and inhibits fertility.
683
42.9 cbe Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
Single-space
each entry, 1. Nagle JJ. Heredity and human affairs. St. Louis: Mosby; 1974.
double-space
between them. 337 p.
Not underlined
2. Weiss MA, Mann AE. Human biology and behaviour: an anthropo-
logical perspective. Boston: Little, Brown; 1985. 274 p.
684
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines table 42.10
7. ONLINE BOOK
8. ONLINE JOURNAL
9. WEB SITE
Research papers in the social and natural sciences often require tables
(tabular data) or figures (graphs and illustrations). Tables and figures
should be numbered consecutively (Table 1, Table 2; Figure 1, Figure 2) and
accompanied by a descriptive caption, as shown below.
PRESENTING TABLES
Put the caption for a table above it as a heading. Use lowercase letters
(a,b,c) for footnotes, and put the footnotes at the bottom of the table—not
at the bottom of the page or the end of the paper. If the table is photo-
685
42.10 table Writing and Research in Different Disciplines
U RBANIZATION (population in urban areas 20,000 and over as percent of total population)
Bulgaria 12.1% (1934) (29.1%)c 39.7%
Czechoslovakia 16.6% (1930) 23.6% 25.3% 31.1%
Hungary 29.1% (1930) 34.3% 37.0%
Poland 17.0% (1931) 25.6% 31.8% 37.3%
Romania 13.4% (1930) 17.1% 19.6% 28.4%
USSR 12.0% (1926) 35.6% 44.3%
Yugoslavia 18.8% 26.0%
a Average of 1956 and 1965 figures
b 1966 figure
c Average of 1956 and 1965 figures
Note. From The East European and Soviet data handbook: Politi-
cal, social, and developmental indicators, 1945–1975 (p. 382),
by P. Shoup, 1981, New York: Columbia University Press.
686
Writing and Research in Different Disciplines table 42.10
copied from a printed source, put a source note under it that follows the
appropriate style for your discipline. (The note for Table 5.1, p. 686, follows
APA style.)
PRESENTING FIGURES
Put the caption for a figure—a graph or an illustration—just below the
figure. The source note should follow the appropriate style. (The note for
Figure 1 below follows APA style.)
100%
M indu
k h ti m
Percentage of
li
us
an
UZB. total state or
TAJIKISTAN
Si hris
union territory
C H I N A
er
population
th
TURKMN.
O
AFGHANISTAN 0
Source: Census
of India. 1981.
Jammu and
Punjab Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Chandigarh
PAKISTAN
Meghalaya Arunachal
Sikkim Pradesh
New NEPAL
Delhi BHUTAN ta)
o da
Assam (n
Uttar Nagaland
Dehi Pradesh
Rajasthan Haryana
Bihar BANGLADESH
Calcutta
Gujarat
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa Manipur
Maharashtra
BURMA
Tripura
West Bengal
Andhra B a y Mizoram
Pradesh
Dadra and o f
Goa Nagar Haveli
B e n g a l Andaman
A r a b i a n
Karnataka Islands
S e a
Andaman
Pondicherry
Sea
Lakshadweep Andaman and
Nicobar Islands
Nicobar
Tamil Islands
Nadu SRI
Lakshadweep LANKA
Kerala 0 200 400 Kilometers
Colombo
0 200 400 Miles
INDONESIA
Maldives
Pop
Note. From From voting to violence: Democratization and
nationalist conflict (p. 288), by J. Snyder, 2000, New York:
Norton. Quiz
back 39
687