Reflection and refraction of a plane wave at oblique incidence

Let us consider a plane wave that obliquely incidents at the boundary of two media that
are characterized by their permittivity and permeability (see Figure 1). The plane
containing both the normal to the surface and the direction of propagation of the incident
wave is known as the plane of incidence.

We consider two different cases:

Case A: The electric field of the incident wave is perpendicular to the plane of
incidence.
Case B: The electric field of the incident wave is in the plane of incidence.
Any other incident wave can be decomposed into linear combination of these two.
Fig. 1 shows a wave of either polarization incident on the boundary of two media. In this
Figure, the angle i between the normal to the boundary and the propagation direction is

the angle of incidence. We choose the plane of incidence to be the x z plane with the
axes directions shown in the Figure1, the y-axes is out of the page.
There may also be reflected and refracted (transmitted) waves, as shown in Fig. 1.
Directions of propagation of these waves have angles
r and

t with the normal to the

boundary. The unit wave vectors of the incident, reflected and transmitted waves can be
written as the following:

ki [sin i ,0,cosi ]

(1)

kr [sin r ,0,cosr ]

(2)

kt [sin t ,0,cost ]

(3)

The phasors of the traveling incident, reflected, and refracted plane waves can be written
in the following form


Ei (r ) E0 exp( iki r ) ,

Er (r ) E1 exp( ikr r ) ,

and

Et (r ) E2 exp( ikt r )

correspondingly. If the wave fields depend on coordinate as exp(ik r ) , then Maxwell

equations for phasors

E iH

H iE

(4)

can be written in the form:

i(k E ) iH

(4)

i(k H ) iE

(5)

Now we can write the wave fields for the cases A and B,

Ei , H i ~ exp{ik1 ( x sin i z cos i )}
Incident wave,
Case A ( E perpendicular to plane of incidence)

Ei jE0 exp{iki r }

1
sin ) exp{ik r}
H

E
(

i
cos

k
0
i
i
i
i

(6)

Case B ( E in plane of incidence)

Ei E0 (i cos i k sin i ) exp{iki r }

jE0 1 exp{iki r}
H

(7)

Reflected wave,

Er , H r ~ exp{ik1 ( x sin r z cos r )}

Case A ( E perpendicular to plane of incidence)

Er jE1 exp{ik r r }

1
sin ) exp{ik r}
H

E
(
i
cos

k
r
1
r
r
r

(8)

Case B ( E in plane of incidence)

Er E1 (i cos r k sin r ) exp{ik r r }

exp{ik r r }
H r jE1

(10)

Refracted (transmitted) wave,

Et , H t ~ exp{ik 2 ( x sin t z cos t )}

Case A ( E perpendicular to plane of incidence)

Et jE2 exp{ikti r }

2
sin ) exp{ik r}
H

E
(

i
cos

k
t
2
t
t
t

(11)

Case B ( E in plane of incidence)

Et E2 (i cos t k sin t ) exp{ikt r }

jE0 2 exp{ikt r}
H

(12)

We introduced unit vectors i, j, k along x, y, z axes in Eqs. (6)-(12).

Case B: Let us consider a plane wave with electric field E in the plane of incidence

incident on the discontinuity between two dielectrics ( 1 , 1 ),( 2 , 2 )

The boundary conditions at z 0 are continuity of tangential components of electric and

magnetic fields Etan and H tan :

E0 cos i exp( ik1 x sin i ) E1 cos r exp( ik1 x sin r ) E2 cos t exp( ik 2 x sin t )

2
E0 exp( ik1 x sin i ) 1 E1 exp( ik1 x sin r )
E exp( ik 2 x sin t )
1
1
2 2

(13)

Eqs. (13) must hold for all values of x , which is possible only if
k1 sin i k1 sin r k2 sin t

(14)

We see that

i r (angle of refraction equals angle of incidence)

(15)

and
( 2)
sin t k1 11 v ph
n

(1) 1
sin i k 2 2 2 v ph n2

(16)

Here n is index of refraction.

Eq. (16) is the familiar Snells law.
Canceling the exponential terms in (13), (14) by means of (15), we obtain
E0 cos i E1 cos i E2 cos t

2
E0 1 E1
E
1
1
2 2

(17)

We can now solve Eqs. (17) for E1 and E2 with the result

cos t 2 2 cos i
E1
1 1
E0
1 1 cos t 2 2 cos i
2 1 1 cos i
E2

E0
1 1 cos t 2 2 cos i

(18)