CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC et al v. Google Inc. Doc.

68
Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 68 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 1 of 3

1 DAVID T. BIDERMAN, Bar No. 101577

JUDITH B. GITTERMAN, Bar No. 115661
2 M. CHRISTOPHER JHANG, Bar No. 211463
PERKINS COIE LLP
3 180 Townsend Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94107-1909
4 Telephone: (415) 344-7000
Facsimile: (415) 344-7050
5 Email: DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Email: JGitterman@perkinscoie.com
6 Email: CJhang@perkinscoie.com

7 Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10

11
CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a CASE NO. C O5-03649 JW
12 INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD
STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
13 similarly situated, DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.’S
MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND
14 Plaintiffs, CLARIFY COURT ORDER

15 v.

16 GOOGLE, INC.,

17 Defendant.

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.’s Motion
to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023/BY062060.132]

Dockets.Justia.com
 Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 68 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 2 of 3

1 Defendant Google, Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order is

2 brought pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3. The Court having considered all relevant documents

3 and evidence, and good cause appearing therefore:

4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court

5 Order is granted. The August 6, 2006 deposition deadline set in the Court’s Order Following

6 Case Management Conference (“Order”) is continued to September 8, 2006. Google is entitled

7 to depose both plaintiffs in this action, and plaintiffs shall make themselves available for

8 deposition on dates mutually agreed upon by the parties between August 14 to September 8,

9 2006. The October 6, 2006 partial summary judgment hearing date set in the Court’s Order is

10 continued to November 20, 2006.

11

12 Dated: ____________________, 2006 ___________________________________

Honorable James Ware
13 U.S.D.C., Northern District of California
14 Respectfully submitted:
PERKINS COIE LLP
15

16 By ____________/S/______________
M. Christopher Jhang
17 Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
-1-
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.’s Motion
to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023/BY062060.132]
 Case 5:05-cv-03649-JW Document 68 Filed 07/26/2006 Page 3 of 3

1 PROOF OF SERVICE

2 I, Susan E. Daniels, declare:

3 I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Francisco,

4 State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My

5 business address is Perkins Coie LLP, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400, San Francisco,

6 California 94111. I am personally familiar with the business practice of Perkins Coie LLP. On

7 July 26, 2006, I served the following document(s):

8 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.’S MOTION

9 TO ENLARGE TIME AND CLARIFY COURT ORDER

10 by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the following parties:

11 William M. Audet, Esq.

Ryan M. Hagan, Esq.
12 Jason Baker, Esq.
ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP
13 152 North Third Street, Suite 600
San Jose, CA 95112
14 Tel: (408) 289-1776; Fax: (408) 287-1776
15 XXX (By Hand) I caused each envelope
16 to be delivered by hand to the offices listed
above.
17

18 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
19 is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California.
20 DATED: July 26, 2006 /S/
Susan E. Daniels
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
-1-
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Google, Inc.’s Motion
to Enlarge Time and Clarify Court Order
CASE NO. 05-03649 [41063-0023/BY062060.132]