Professional Documents
Culture Documents
then
called
the
police
and
argued
with
an
officer
for
nearly
20
minutes
before
leaving
the
premises.
As
you
will
see
in
the
narrative
below,
Julie
has
repeatedly
used
the
police
and
child
protective
services
in
an
effort
to
harass
and
intimidate
me.
She
has
never
produced
a
single
piece
of
documentary
evidence
to
back
up
any
of
her
claims,
nor
has
any
law
enforcement
officer,
child
protection
case
worker,
guardian
ad
litem,
or
Family
Court
judge
taken
a
single
action
against
me.
Each
time,
they
have
found
her
claims
baseless,
which
they
are.
Now
I
will
respond
to
each
allegation
in
turn:
Allegation:
Julie
has
full
custody
of
the
children
and
Tony
has
the
minimum
allowable
visitation
accorded
by
state
law.
Julie McMahon September 16, 2014 at 8:39 pm
My 3 kids are wonderful, brave and courageous. They live with me full time due
to the discoveries in the custody evaluation and psych evals. MN law awarded
the minimum visitation.
Julie McMahon September 25, 2014 at 6:55 pm
He has regular visitation. Originally he asked that I have sole legal and sole
physical I countered with shared legal because kids need a dad. Yes, I agree it
would appear differently. Skilled people can make things appear not what they
are.
Documented
Fact:
Tony
and
Julie
have
joint
legal
custody,
and
Julie
has
sole
physical
custody,
which
in
Minnesota
means
that
Tony
has
less
than
45%
parenting
time.
Tony
has
the
children
every
Tuesday
night,
every
other
weekend,
for
three
weeks
in
the
summer,
and
various
holidays
on
rotation.
Most
years,
it
comes
out
to
between
35%
and
40%
parenting
time
for
Tony
[Joint
Marital
Termination
Agreement
and
Judgment
and
Decree
of
Dissolution,
File
27-FA-08-5921,
filed
in
Hennepin
County
on
November
17,
2009].
Tony
never
asked
that
Julie
would
have
sole
legal
and
sole
physical
custody,
and
Julie
will
produce
no
evidence
to
that
effect.
A
guardian
ad
litem
reported
to
the
court
that
Tony
and
Julie
should
have
joint
legal
and
joint
physical
custody
[Guardian
Ad
Litem
Report,
July
26,
2010].
Allegation:
Tony
retained
a
lawyer
before
Julie
and
planned
a
divorce.
Julie McMahon September 25, 2014 at 8:22 pm
Yes, Kate. I am beginning to think that some of them got played and were pawns
in a strategic plan. Especially since it was discovered in a canceled check that a
lawyer was already retained when he made the group believe that he was doing
everything in his power to save his marriage.
Documented
Fact:
Julie
contacted
Karen
Schreiber,
Esq.,
of
Lindquist
&
Vennum,
PLLP,
via
email
on
July
21,
2008
[email
correspondence,
July
21,
2008].
On
July
24,
Julie
wrote
Tony
an
email,
copying
her
correspondence
with
Schreiber,
adding,
Papers
will
be
waiting
for
you
[email
correspondence,
July
24,
2008].
Julie
first
threatened
to
divorce
Tony
in
2001
if
Tony
did
not
put
a
fence
in
their
back
yard.
She
threatened
him
with
divorce
dozens
of
times
after
that
[email
correspondence
May
8,
2008;
June
1,
2008;
June
4,
2008;
June
16,
2008;
June
17,
2008;
June
27,
2008;
et
al].
Tony
met
with
a
lawyer
once
for
a
consultation
in
June,
2008,
to
discuss
Julies
threats
of
divorce.
He
retained
that
attorney
in
late
August,
2008.
Tony
never
threatened
divorce
until
he
ultimately
served
divorce
papers
on
August
29,
2008.
On
July
28,
2008,
Julie
wrote
an
email
to
Tony,
Mark
Scandrette,
and
Doug
Pagitt
entitled,
This
is
my
attorney
and
I
would
like
the
name
of
yours
ASAP-yes,
it
is
inconvenient
to
get
divorced
and
you
may
have
to
make
it
a
priority;
the
body
of
the
email
was
a
list
of
Karen
Schreibers
credentials
[email
correspondence,
July
28,
2008].
On
July
30,
2008,
Julie
emailed
Tony
that
she
had
divorce
papers
in
front
of
her,
drawn
up
by
Karen
Schreiber
[email
correspondence,
July
30,
2008].
On
August
3,
Julie
again
sent
an
email
to
Tony
with
Karen
Schreibers
credentials
and
wrote,
I
am
going
for
full
custody,
spousal
support,
restraining
order
for
mental
and
emotional
abuse
and
harassment
of
your
cult
members.
Supervised
visitation
is
what
you
can
hope
for
[email
correspondence,
August
3,
2008].
On
July
28,
2008,
Julie
sent
an
email
to
Doug
Pagitt
stating
that
her
lawyer
had
discovered
that
Tony,
in
fact,
did
not
have
a
lawyer
on
retainer
[email
correspondence,
July
28,
2008],
yet
she
continues
to
claim
online
that
Tony
had
a
lawyer
before
she
did.
Allegation:
There
was
phone
contact
in
phone
records
between
Tony
and
Courtney
Perry
in
May
2008.
Julie McMahon September 25, 2014 at 8:22 pm
It is very difficult to believe Danielle Shroyer (her pastor at Journey church) and
the church where the dissertation was being written about, knew and observed
nothing in those frequent trips to Dallas? If she had no idea, then I wish she
should say so. I am not sure because only Brad is talking [] Did you know there
were daily phone calls between the two starting May 2008?
Documented
Fact:
Prior
to
September,
2008,
Tony
and
Courtney
were
merely
distant
acquaintances,
and
they
did
not
even
have
one
anothers
phone
numbers.
Julie
will
not
produce
these
phone
records,
because
they
do
not
exist.
Any
214
area
code
calls
from
Tonys
phone
are
to
Danielle
Shroyer
or
Brad
Cecil
or
others
involved
in
his
2008
book
tour.
Julie
was
served
with
divorce
papers
on
August
29,
2008.
On
September
3,
2008,
Courtney
was
in
Minneapolis,
covering
the
Republican
National
Convention
for
the
Dallas
Morning
News.
Courtney
had
gotten
Tonys
phone
number
from
an
email,
and
she
texted
Tony
to
see
if
he
happened
to
work
in
downtown
Minneapolis.
Tony
was
downtown
at
the
time,
having
just
been
granted
a
harassment
restraining
order
against
Julie
[Hennepin
County
Court
File
HA
27-CV-0821651].
Tony
and
Courtney
had
lunch
that
day.
They
kept
in
touch
that
fall;
they
saw
each
other
again
for
New
Years
Eve,
2008.
Courtney
lived
in
Dallas
until
2011,
when
she
moved
to
Minnesota
and
she
and
Tony
were
married.
Allegation:
Tony
and
Courtney
were
in
a
relationship
before
divorce
papers
were
served,
as
proven
by
an
email.
Julie McMahon September 15, 2014 at 8:58 am
I tried to "transcend" blogging with these people who "through hours of prayer
and discernment" decided I was crazy while their crony was having an affair.
Then when I had evidence sex emails.
Documented
Fact:
Tony
served
Julie
with
divorce
papers
in
August,
2008.
Those
papers
were
filed
September,
2008.
Julie
illegally
entered
Tonys
rental
home
on
December
27,
2008
and
obtained
an
email
written
between
Courtney
and
Tony
on
December
27,
2008
regarding
Tonys
flight
to
Dallas
[email
correspondence,
December
27,
2008;
Edina
Police
Report,
December
27,
2008].
Tony
and
Courtney
began
communicating
after
Tony
filed
for
divorce,
and
after
he
had
moved
out
of
the
house
with
Julie.
There
was
no
relationship
between
Tony
and
Courtney
prior
to
the
divorce
proceedings.
In
a
text
message
on
August
22,
2009,
months
before
the
divorce
was
final,
Julie
texted
Tony
that
she
was
dating
someone
[text
message,
August
22,
2009].
Allegation:
Tony
tore
a
ligament
on
Julies
shoulder
in
an
act
of
abuse
and
has
MRI
to
prove
it.
Julie McMahon September 17, 2014 at 9:01 pm
I will show you the MRI with the Doctor notes and you can see the tear on the Xray I have.
Documented
Fact:
On
the
night
that
Julie
was
served
with
divorce
papers,
she
called
911
and
attempted
to
have
Tony
arrested.
The
police
report
indicates
no
harm
to
Julie
[Edina
Police
Case
#08-002672].
Several
days
later,
Julie
went
to
the
Edina
Police
station
claiming
contusions
to
her
shoulder
and
again
attempted
to
have
Tony
arrested.
The
police
report
makes
no
mention
of
an
X-Ray
or
MRI,
and
no
action
was
taken
against
Tony.
No
X-Ray
or
MRI
has
ever
been
produced
in
the
child
custody
evaluation
or
in
any
subsequent
court
action.
Allegation:
Tony
is
an
abuser.
Twitter bio of JMac6301: A survivor of spiritual, phyisical [sic] and emotional
abuse at the hands of a diagnosed narcissist. I believe in love, redemption and
healing. Truth and justice.
Julie McMahon September 24, 2014 at 1:34 am
My abuser who had an inside as police chaplain for my city told police I had "split
personality and would slip into other voices." A-maz-ing shameless lengths to
discredit! Oh, I recognize what you are describing all too well.
Documented
Fact:
Tony
never
abused
Julie.
Tony
never
abused
his
children.
Abuse
was
never
mentioned
in
any
divorce
settlement,
mediation,
custody,
or
financial
discussions.
Tony
and
Julie
have
had
nearly
a
dozen
appearances
in
Family
Court,
and
never
once
has
Julie
or
her
attorney
alleged
abuse
in
any
form.
Since
the
divorce,
Julie
has
used
allegations
of
abuse
to
threaten
and
intimidate
Tony,
and
to
drive
a
wedge
between
Tony
and
the
children.
She
has
made
numerous
false
reports
to
law
enforcement
and
child
protection
personnel.
Some
of
those
incidents
include:
On
the
night
that
Julie
was
served
with
divorce
papers,
she
called
the
police
and
attempted
to
get
Tony
arrested
for
pushing
her.
The
police
report
states
that
there
was
no
evidence
of
injury.
The
police
officers
suggested
that
Tony
leave
the
house.
Tony
left
the
home
[Edina
Police
Case
#08-002672].
Julie
then
took
the
children
to
a
family
cabin
in
Wisconsin
for
two
days.
Several
days
later,
Julie
went
back
to
the
police,
again
alleging
a
shoulder
injury,
and
attempted
to
have
Tony
arrested.
When
the
police
would
not
take
action,
Julie
came
to
the
home
of
Tonys
parents
several
times.
She
banged
on
doors
and
windows,
demanding
to
speak
to
Tony,
and
she
called
his
phone
dozens
of
times,
threatening
to
ruin
his
life
and
career
[Edina
Police
Case
#08-002672,
Officers
Supplemental
Report].
On
the
advice
of
his
attorney,
Tony
filed
for
and
received
a
restraining
order
against
Julie
the
following
day
[Hennepin
County
Court
File
HA
27-CV-0821651].
On
June
12,
2009,
Julie
reported
Tony
as
an
abuser
to
the
regional
office
of
the
Boy
Scouts
of
America.
Tony
was
serving
as
a
Cub
Scout
den
leader
for
their
sons
den.
The
Boy
Scouts
of
America
investigated
Tony
and
allowed
him
to
continue
in
leadership
[email
correspondence,
June
12,
2009;
June
15,
2009;
June
27,
2009;
June
29,
2009].
On
June
19,
2009,
while
driving
the
children
to
the
family
lake
cabin
in
Crow
Wing
Country,
two
deputies
pulled
Tony
over.
One
made
Tony
stand
with
his
hands
on
a
squad
car
where
the
children
could
see
him
while
the
other
got
in
Tonys
car
and
questioned
the
children
about
whether
their
father
hit
them
or
touched
their
genitals.
Julie
had
called
in
a
report
of
child
endangerment.
The
deputies
took
no
action
[Crow
Wing
County
Sheriff
dispatch
log].
On
December
30,
2010,
while
at
a
waterpark
with
the
children
in
Alexandria,
Minnesota,
a
sheriff's
deputy
showed
up
and
questioned
Tony.
Julie
had
called
in
a
report
of
child
endangerment.
The
police
took
no
action
[Douglas
County
Sheriff
dispatch
log].
Four
times
since
the
divorce,
Julie
has
reported
Tony
to
Hennepin
County
Child
Protection
[Case
#214917089:
September
11,
2008,
SISS
Intake
#214879329;
December
31,
2009,
SISS
Intake
#259006841;
May
1,
2011,
SSIS
Intake
#263432344;
October
25,
2011,
SSIS
Intake
#271265352].
Each
time,
caseworkers
pulled
the
children
out
of
school
and
also
interviewed
Tony.
Each
of
the
cases
was
closed
with
no
action
taken
and
no
support
services
recommended
for
the
family.
Allegation:
Tony
is
a
deadbeat
dad
who
does
not
pay
child
support.
Julie McMahon October 29, 2014 at 9:45 am
He has never once willingly given a penny for his kids but money has been pried
from his cold hands through the county collections. His income streams are
craftily covered up through his various and there are many revenue streams.
Documented
Fact:
Tony
has
overpaid
child
support
to
Julie
and
receives
reimbursement
checks
every
month
from
Hennepin
County
for
that
overpayment.
Julie
currently
owes
Tony
$2821.76
[Hennepin
County
Child
Support
Online,
case
0015157632-01].
In
2013,
Tony
brought
a
motion
before
the
Family
Court,
requesting
a
reduction
in
child
support
and
spousal
maintenance
payments,
based
on
ability
to
pay
and
loss
of
income.
The
Court
found
a
clerical
error
in
the
original
divorce
decree
[Joint
Marital
Termination
Agreement
and
Judgment
and
Decree
of
Dissolution,
File
27-FA-08-
5921].
Tony
was
not
represented
by
an
attorney
at
the
time
of
the
initial
divorce
settlement.
Julies
attorney,
whether
by
error
or
design,
incorrectly
calculated
Tonys
support
payments
in
the
settlement.
The
Court
ruled
that
the
amounts
ordered
had
been
too
high,
and
reduced
payment
amounts
retroactively
[Amended
Documented
Fact:
Tony
did
not
orchestrate
the
arrest.
This
is
a
lie.
Julie
called
the
police,
as
both
the
police
report
and
her
own
emails
to
Tony
indicate.
When
she
arrived
at
the
house,
she
banged
on
the
door
and
screamed
that
the
police
were
on
their
way.
Tony
also
called
the
police
once
the
situation
became
frightening.
Julie
had
informed
Tony
that
she
was
having
surgery,
would
be
on
two
weeks
bedrest,
and
could
not
care
for
the
children.
She
agreed
to
let
Tony
keep
the
children
for
those
two
weeks
[Our
Family
Wizard
messages,
June
26,
2013].
She
also
communicated
this
through
the
children.
On
June
28,
2013
at
6:59am,
Julie
called
Tonys
phone
and
said
that
she
was
coming
over
to
get
the
children.
She
also
sent
Our
Family
Wizard
messages
at
6:55am,
7:09am,
7:25am,
7:30am,
7:51am,
and
8:12am.
In
the
7:51am
message,
she
wrote
that
she
was
calling
the
police.
The
police
dispatch
record
shows
that
Julie
called
911.
Tony
responded
to
these
messages
with
an
Our
Family
Wizard
message
at
7:19am
that
reads,
Glad
you're
feeling
better.
I
am
taking
[name
redacted]
to
his
dentist
appointment
in
a
few
minutes.
Then
[name
redacted]
has
soccer
practice.
I
will
bring
the
kids
to
you
later
this
morning.
[Name
redacted]
will
ride
his
bike.
Julie
then
came
to
Tonys
house,
in
violation
of
a
harassment
restraining
order
[Hennepin
County
Court
File
27-CV-12-24195,
filed
December
7,
2012].
Julie
banged
on
the
door
and
screamed
until
the
police
arrived.
The
police
arrived,
assessed
the
situation,
and
repeatedly
asked
Julie
to
leave
the
premises.
Julie
refused
to
leave
and
was
arrested
[Edina
Police
Report
13001399].
The
children
did
not
witness
this
incident.
As
soon
as
Julie
showed
up
at
the
house,
Courtney
took
two
of
the
children
to
the
basement
office,
turned
on
loud
music,
and
let
them
play
video
games.
The
other
child
slept
through
the
entire
incident.
Julie
was
taken
to
Hennepin
County
Jail
and
processed.
She
was
released
later
that
day
on
bail.
She
is
currently
facing
charges
for
this
arrest.
On
December
3,
2014,
Tony
was
granted
a
new
harassment
restraining
order
against
Julie
[Hennepin
County
Court
File
27-CV-12-24195].
Julie
filed
a
harassment
restraining
order
against
Tony
in
late
2013
[Hennepin
County
Case
#27-CO-13-8209].
That
order
was
contested
at
a
hearing
on
May
13,
2014
[court
transcripts
available],
and
that
restraining
was
dismissed
and
vacated
for
lacking
evidence
and
not
meeting
the
legal
burden
of
proof
[Hennepin
County
Case
#27-CO-13-8209,
filed
May
16,
2014].
Allegation:
Tony
had
pre-planned
to
get
custody
of
the
children
when
Julie
was
arrested.
Julie McMahon September 18, 2014 at 3:48 pm
THE KICKER??? He had a pre written an Ex Parte Legal document in his hand
asking the family courts to "Immediately change custody because their mother is
in jail." This was written BEFORE I arrived to pick up my children. Bone chilling...I
know! Sociopath behavior. Luckily, the wise judge saw straight through it
immediately and with a red marker x'd it out and wrote DENIED.
Documented
Fact:
After
Julie
was
arrested,
Tony
emailed
his
lawyer
and
asked
for
her
advice
[email
correspondence,
June
28,
2013].
She
recommended
that
they
petition
the
Family
Court
for
an
ex
parte
order
giving
Tony
sole
custody
for
21
days.
That
motion
was
denied.
Allegation:
Tony
suffers
from
Narcissistic
Personality
Disorder,
and
that
makes
him
unfit
as
a
father
and
spiritual
leader.
Julie McMahon September 18, 2014 at 3:48 pm
Cornerstone a battered women's shelter was called by him and he told them he
needed this conviction because he and his wife do not feel safe. Further, the
Edina prosecuting attorney told us he wrote her letters touting the "crazy
campaign" and please help me I AM THE VICTIM. This very young advocate
woman with presumably little experience with diagnosed narcissist, wrote a letter
to the prosecuting attorney on his behalf stating you must convict because she is
crazy....JUST because he said so.
Julie McMahon September 22, 2014 at 7:59 pm
I experienced first hand spiritual abuse cleverly orchestrated by a diagnosed
narcissist.
Julie McMahon October 29, 2014 at 9:45 am
I was told early on when the self employed are also diagnosed narcissist....your
basically screwed.
Documented
Fact:
As
part
of
the
divorce
proceedings,
Tony
and
Julie
underwent
psychological
examinations.
Tony
was
diagnosed
with
an
Axis
I
diagnosis
of
NPD
(DSM-IV
301.81).
Tony
took
this
diagnosis
seriously
and
immediately
commenced
therapy.
Tony
is
still
under
the
care
of
the
same
therapist,
and
she
has
recently
diagnosed
him
with
Acute
Stress
Disorder
(DSM-V
308.30).
Tony
took
an
anti-
depressant,
Wellbutrin,
for
a
year
during
the
divorce,
but
he
is
no
longer
taking
any
medication.
Tony
is
voluntarily
submitting
himself
for
another
psychological
evaluation
in
2015.
Julie
received
Axis
I
and
Axis
II
diagnoses
during
the
initial
psychological
evaluation.
She
was
subsequently
ordered
by
the
Family
Court
to
undergo
individual
therapy
and
dialectical
behavioral
therapy
[Court
Order,
File
27-FA-08-5921,
filed
May
14,
2009].
When
Julie
was
arrested
on
June
28,
2013,
Tony
was
automatically
assigned
a
victims
rights
advocate
at
Cornerstone.
Allegation:
Tony
and
Doug
Pagitt
concocted
the
categories
of
legal
wife
and
spiritual
wife
in
order
to
cover
up
Tonys
affair.
Julie McMahon September 15, 2014 at 8:58 am
Then when I had evidence sex emails and a 22 page psychological evaluation to
share with the 6 Emergent leaders who "discerned" my family needed to break
up so he could be with his "spiritual wife" not 1 of those....NOT 1 wanted to
"discern" that or anything else. Disgusting! Transcend that!
Documented
Fact:
There
was
no
affair.
Neither
Tony
nor
Doug
has
ever
used
the
category
spiritual
wife
or
spiritual
marriage.
Julie
was
the
first
to
use
the
categories
of
spiritual
marriage
and
spiritual
wife
[text
messages,
September
30,
2008,
10:24pm;
October
1,
2008,
5:16am;
Our
Family
Wizard
messages,
September
30,
2008,
11:41pm;
October
1,
2008,
8:30pm;
email,
October
1,
8:05pm].
In
those
messages,
she
refers
to
herself
as
Tonys
spiritual
wife,
and
asserts
that
they
are
still
spiritually
married,
even
though
legal
divorce
proceedings
have
commenced.
In
reference
to
her
Catholic
belief
about
marriage,
Julie
has
often
told
Tony
that
they
will
always
be
spiritually
married.
Tony
neither
uses
nor
subscribes
to
the
idea
of
spiritual
marriage.
Doug
and
Tony
have
never
spoken
about
legal
marriage
versus
spiritual
marriage.
Solomons
Porch
as
a
church
does
not
subscribe
to
these
categories
either.
(Tony
published
an
e-book
essay
on
marriage,
arguing
on
theological
grounds
that
clergy
should
stop
signing
marriage
licenses
so
that
they
would
no
longer
serve
as
agents
of
the
state;
this
is
a
traditional
position
taken
by
many
Anabaptist
and
other
clergy,
and
it
is
the
pattern
of
marriage
ceremonies
in
much
of
Europe.)
Julie
fabricated
these
categories
in
the
first
month
of
the
divorce
proceedings,
but
she
now
brazenly
attributes
them
to
Tony.
***
Conclusion
Many
others
have
been
implicated
by
Julie
McMahon
Joness
online
postings,
including
but
not
limited
to
Doug
Pagitt,
Mark
Scandrette,
Danielle
Shroyer,
Brad
Cecil,
Mike
King,
Brian
McLaren
and
Phyllis
Tickle.
I
will
not
speak
for
them.
Each
of
the
allegations
that
Julie
has
made
against
them
is
a
lie,
and
they
have
ample
documentary
evidence
to
show
that.
10
It
makes
me
very
unhappy
to
release
this
document.
It
is
not
something
I
ever
thought
I
would
have
to
do.
But
I
am
doing
it
now
because
the
rumors,
lies,
and
false
allegations
have
become
rampant.
Even
my
own
children
have
read
terrible
things
about
me
on
the
Internet
falsehoods
that
will
stay
online
indefinitely.
Abuse
is
a
deadly
serious
issue.
Many
persons
especially
women
and
children
have
been
abused.
In
my
nearly
two
decades
as
a
youth
pastor
and
police
chaplain,
I
witnessed
many
incidents
of
abuse,
and
I
reported
several
to
law
enforcement.
When
someone
makes
an
allegation
of
abuse,
that
allegation
should
be
taken
seriously.
Julies
allegations,
like
all
allegations,
should
and
must
be
taken
seriously.
But
when
these
claims
have
no
basis
in
fact
and
can
be
refuted
with
actual
evidence,
then
those
allegations
should
be
dropped
and
stricken
from
the
record.
Every
time
someone
falsely
claims
abuse,
it
harms
actual
victims.
To
all
the
actual
victims
of
abuse,
please
be
assured
that
I
know
that
the
suffering
I
have
endured
over
this
controversy
is
nothing
compared
to
the
suffering
that
you
have
endured
at
the
hands
of
real
abusers.
For
legal
questions,
please
contact
Simon
J.
Trautmann,
Esq.,
612-644-3837
For
media
questions,
please
contact
Blois
Olson,
612-276-1678
11