Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U1233184
u1233184
Accounting and Finance
Business Management)
Module
Title:
(e.g. Researching in Accounting Seminar
Studying for Business)
Module Code:
and Finance
AC2040
Group
Word
1888
Count
SECTION B:
(to be completed by the tutor marking assignment)
Assessment Criteria:
Evidence of extensive and appropriate reading
Weigh
Mark
tings
20
Achieved
AC2040
U1233184
30
presentation,
including
appropriate 10
referencing
Total mark
100
Comments:
Tutor's Name:
PROVISIONA
L
Date Received:
MARK
AC2040
U1233184
Abstract
The annual statements of companies provide financial information let
users know how well companies are performing, especially external users
like investors. In order to attract investment offers, firms try to give a
good picture of its financial outlook by using non-GAAP earnings that
known as pro forma earnings. Consequently, this research provides three
findings related to the reason firms voluntarily release adjusted earnings
to the public are (1) avoiding reporting loss or reporting earning's
decrease, (2) meet analysts expectations or forecasts and (3) affect
investors perception before equity offering. Additional, this paper also
provide evidence that investors are not misled by pro forma disclosures
even these statements do not meet the acquirement of generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Keywords: non-recurring items, disclosure, pro forma earnings, GAAP,
analysts, investors.
AC2040
U1233184
Content Page
Contents
Page
Abstract.......................................................................................................3
Introduction.................................................................................................5
Literature Review........................................................................................6
2.1. Determinants of disclosure of pro forma earnings.............................6
2. 2. Incomes management responds to predictions of analysist.............7
Research aim and research hypothesis.......................................................8
3. 1 Pro forma earnings encounter analysts forecast..............................8
3. 2 Pro forma earnings mislead nonprofessional investors.....................9
Methods of Data collection and Contribution............................................10
Conclusion.................................................................................................10
References list...........................................................................................11
AC2040
U1233184
Introduction
Each quarter in a year, firms earnings and their financial results are
frequently supplemented by using non-GAAP as known as pro forma
accounting information (Campbell & Pitman, 2009; Zhang & Aheng, 2011).
In order to compute pro forma figures, companies GAAP earnings figures
are adjusted for non-recurring items (Alpert, 2001; Bowen, Davis &
Matsumoto, 2005). A non-recurring item means an incident that occur just
only once and does not happen again, that means the company does not
undergo during its regular business activities such as restructuring
charges or extraordinary items. Based on that, pro forma earnings are the
amount of companies profit that exclude non-recurring items cost (Matt,
2012). In 1972, SSAP6 Extraordinary Items and Prior Year Adjustments
was released and required firms to severally present extraordinary items
after Sales and Expenditure which linked to recurrent activities in earnings
announcements (Weetman, 2001). Whereas, FRS3 Reporting Financial
Performance which was issued by the UK ASB (Accounting Standards
Board) required companies to discriminate non-operating from operating
objects related to exceptional items (Ann, Stephen and Norman, 2011). It
gave a new definition of exceptional items and changed their disclosure
requirements (Acker, Horton and Tonks, 2011). In addition, under FRS3,
firms must provide more information in order to support users in
company's
historical
performance
assessment,
as
well
as
future
AC2040
U1233184
forma earnings figures in their profit and loss statement (Frederickson and
Miller, 2002). While companies state that they disclose pro forma earnings
information to support investors having a better understanding of their
performance (Burns, 2001), others like regulators, Congress, and the
financial press argued that investors might get mislead by that kind of
information that they provide (see, e.g., MacDonald 1999; Alpert 2000;
Burns 2001b; Weil 2001d, 2001b; SEC 2001). There are many U.S
researches indicated that investors acquire the knowledge of the
difference between GAAP earnings and non-GAAP earnings and trade on
non-GAAP earnings. By using UK data of pro forma statement, the purpose
of this research is to determine whether pro forma information can meet
analysts forecast and examine how it affects to investors decisions.
Especially, this study will provide evidence about how the perception
process of investors about adjusted earnings is. That is an essential
stage
regarding
comprehending
how
pro
forma
disclosures
affect
investors assessments.
Literature Review
This section is intended to give a critical analysis of previous studies that
is related to my research's problem, debate and determine the gaps and
restrictions in our knowledge of pro forma information disclosure. Thus, it
delivers the basic foundation for my research hypothesis that I propose in
the next section.
2.1. Determinants of disclosure of pro forma earnings
The literature on causal elements of pro forma information disclosures is
important and get more concern, researching by Joerg-Markus Hitz (Feb
2010). It investigates in the list of large German firms to find out the
determinants of non-GAAP earnings report under IFRS. An incentive score
that arranges from 0 to 4 is gathered by reaching four standards in each
quarter of business. Base on that, the first potential hypothesis is
investigated: Companies that fail in planning incomes standards probable
disclose pro forma information than other companies (Heflin and Hsu,
2008). Empirical evidence also shows that year that is an imitation
6
AC2040
U1233184
forecasts
of
experts
in
earnings
in
managing
incomes
(Athanasakou, Strong and Walker, 2009). They found that, in the period
after the end of the accounting period and prior to the publication of
results; there is the fact that most managers and analysts tend to
eliminate irregular items from profit and classification shifting from centre
costs. That can arise a lot of predictions. They do not find evidence of the
interruption in misleading predictions for the company releasing reports
on losses and profits decreases. In addition, net earnings are not
influenced by classification shifting; hence it is restricted the inspection of
auditors (Nelson et al., 2003; mcVay, 2006). Furthermore, Browns (2001)
found the evidence of remarkable efforts of the profitable company in
meeting expectations of specialists, and the disruption in the incomes
standard is not regular in companies that making losses. Moreover,
Athanasakou and others used descriptive and multivariate analysis
7
AC2040
U1233184
yet
AC2040
U1233184
indicating
that
amateur
investors
are
commonly
short
of
AC2040
U1233184
10
AC2040
U1233184
References list
Abarbanell, J. and Bushee, B. (1997), Fundamental analysis, future
earnings, and stock prices, Journal of Accounting Research 35, pp. 124.
Alpert, B. (2000). The numbers game: Reporting of pro forma earnings is
rising and so is the debate about it, Barrons, pp. 22 - 24.
Alpert, B. (2001). Maybe pro-forma earnings arent so bad after
all, Barrons, pp. 30.
Anderson, K. and Brooks, C. (2006), The Long-Term Price-Earnings Ratio,
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33(7) & (8), pp. 10631086.
Ann, W., Li n, S. and Strong, N. (2011) Earnings components and
the asymmetric timeliness of earnings: the case of FRS3 in the UK,
Accounting
and Business Research,
41(4),
pp.393-410,
doi:
10.1080/00014788.2011.573662.
Athanasakou, V., Strong, N. and Walker, M. (2009) Earnings management
or forecast guidance to meet analyst expectations?, Accounting and
Business Research 39, pp. 3-35.
Beaver, W. (1981) Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Beyer and Guttmany, I. (2010), Voluntary disclosure, disclosure bias and
real effects. California: Stanford University.
Bhattacharya, N., Black, E., Christensen, T. and Larson, C. (2002).
Assessing the relative in formativeness and permanence of pro forma
earnings and GAAP operating earnings, Working Paper, University of
Utah.
Bouwman, M., Frishkoff, P. and Frishkoff, P. (1987). How do financial
analysts make decisions? A process model of the investment screening
decisions, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (1), pp. 1-30.
Bradshaw, M. and Sloan, R. (2002) GAAP versus the street: An empirical
assessment of two alternative definitions of earnings, Journal of
Accounting Research 40, pp. 41-66.
Bradshaw, M. and R. Sloan, R. (2002), GAAP versus the Street: An
Empirical Assessment of Two Alternative Definitions of Earnings. Journal
of Accounting Research, pp. 40, 41-65.
Burns, J. (2001a) SEC official reveals probe into pro forma earnings
cases, Dow Jones Business News.
Burns, J. (2001b) Lawmakers take closer look at pro forma results, Dow
Jones Newswires.
Dignan, L. (2001) Imperfect pro forma, or how to skew the truth without
lying, CNET Investor On-line.
Doyle, J., Lundholm, R. and Soliman, M. (2002) The predictive value of
expenses excluded from pro forma earnings. Working paper, Michigan:
University of Michigan.
Foster, G. (1986) Financial Statement Analysis. 2nd edn. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11
AC2040
U1233184
12