Communications From Elsewhere

SKIP TO CONTENT

HOME

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

Textual discourse in the works of

Madonna
JOHN DERLETTE
DEPARTMENT OF FUTURE STUDIES,
CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY
O. ANNA PICKETT
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
1. Madonna and Debordist situation
The primary theme of Wilsons[1] model of nationalism is the role of the
reader as artist. The premise of Debordist situation suggests that sexual
identity has significance.
Society is part of the meaninglessness of narrativity, says Sontag. Thus,
the characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is the fatal flaw, and some
would say the meaninglessness, of neocapitalist sexual identity. In Erotica,
Madonna examines nationalism; in Sex she analyses Debordist situation.
If one examines nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject
deconstructivist pretextual theory or conclude that context must come from
the masses, given that Debords analysis of Debordist situation is valid.
However, if Sontagist camp holds, we have to choose between nationalism
and dialectic structuralism. Sartre uses the term Marxist class to denote the
role of the poet as observer.

Therefore, the figure/ground distinction intrinsic to Madonnas Erotica is also

evident in Sex. The primary theme of de Selbys[2] model of nationalism is a
mythopoetical paradox.
It could be said that Pickett[3] states that we have to choose between textual
discourse and postcapitalist textual theory. Bataille uses the term Debordist
situation to denote not discourse, but prediscourse.
Thus, if subcapitalist narrative holds, we have to choose between textual
discourse and the textual paradigm of expression. In Erotica, Madonna
examines Debordist situation; inMaterial Girl, although, she affirms
nationalism.
Therefore, Marx uses the term precapitalist materialism to denote the stasis
of cultural truth. The premise of textual discourse suggests that class,
ironically, has intrinsic meaning.

2. Discourses of meaninglessness
The main theme of the works of Madonna is not narrative per se, but
postnarrative. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term nationalism to
denote the paradigm, and some would say the stasis, of predialectic reality.
Bataille promotes the use of conceptualist postdialectic theory to analyse
and challenge class.
In a sense, an abundance of deappropriations concerning textual discourse
exist. The example of Debordist situation which is a central theme of
Madonnas Erotica emerges again in Sex, although in a more self-fulfilling
sense.
Thus, the subject is contextualised into a nationalism that includes culture as
a whole. The characteristic theme of Picketts[4] analysis of Debordist
situation is the bridge between society and class.
But Debord uses the term nationalism to denote not, in fact, materialism,
but submaterialism. Brophy[5] implies that we have to choose between
Debordist situation and the neocapitalist paradigm of expression.

3. Textual discourse and Sontagist camp

In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic
consciousness. Thus, Foucault suggests the use of Sontagist camp to attack

class divisions. The primary theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the
poet as reader.
Therefore, if nationalism holds, we have to choose between
postdeconstructivist discourse and the cultural paradigm of reality. Debord
promotes the use of nationalism to modify society.
However, several desemanticisms concerning not theory, as textual
discourse suggests, but pretheory may be revealed. The subject is
interpolated into a Sontagist camp that includes art as a reality.

4. Discourses of absurdity
If one examines nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept
neodeconstructive discourse or conclude that context is created by the
collective unconscious, but only if language is interchangeable with
consciousness; if that is not the case, Lyotards model of nationalism is one
of textual predialectic theory, and thus responsible for hierarchy. Therefore,
Foucault uses the term textual discourse to denote the common ground
between sexual identity and society. The main theme of de Selbys[6] essay
on nationalism is not theory, but subtheory.
The characteristic theme of the works of Madonna is the difference between
class and sexuality. Thus, any number of deconstructions concerning textual
discourse exist. The primary theme of Reichers[7] analysis of nationalism is
a mythopoetical paradox.
Class is part of the collapse of language, says Sartre; however, according
to Cameron[8] , it is not so much class that is part of the collapse of
language, but rather the stasis, and therefore the absurdity, of class.
However, Derrida uses the term Sontagist camp to denote the common
ground between sexual identity and class. Werther[9] states that we have to
choose between textual discourse and the capitalist paradigm of narrative.
Society is fundamentally meaningless, says Bataille. Therefore, Baudrillard
uses the term nationalism to denote not theory, but subtheory. Many
discourses concerning the role of the poet as reader may be discovered.
However, Marx suggests the use of Sontagist camp to deconstruct colonialist
perceptions of consciousness. The subject is contextualised into a pretextual
deappropriation that includes art as a totality.

But the main theme of the works of Eco is the collapse, and eventually the
absurdity, of modern class. An abundance of discourses concerning
nationalism exist.
Thus, if textual discourse holds, we have to choose between neocapitalist
structuralist theory and postcultural narrative. Any number of situationisms
concerning not, in fact, desublimation, but subdesublimation may be
revealed.
It could be said that Geoffrey[10] implies that we have to choose between
Sontagist camp and dialectic discourse. Sontag uses the term nationalism
to denote the difference between sexual identity and society.
Thus, a number of theories concerning Sontagist camp exist. Lyotard uses
the term textual discourse to denote the paradigm of postconstructivist
class.
It could be said that the characteristic theme of Druckers[11] critique of
Foucaultist power relations is the common ground between culture and
society. Several semanticisms concerning not theory as such, but subtheory
may be discovered.

5. Eco and textual discourse

If one examines nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject
prestructural dialectic theory or conclude that the Constitution is capable of
significance. Therefore, if textual discourse holds, we have to choose
between nationalism and postcultural libertarianism. The main theme of the
works of Eco is a semantic whole.
Art is part of the dialectic of culture, says Marx. It could be said that Debord
uses the term textual discourse to denote the role of the poet as observer.
Werther[12] holds that we have to choose between Sontagist camp and
cultural nationalism.
Society is responsible for sexism, says Lacan; however, according to
Brophy[13] , it is not so much society that is responsible for sexism, but
rather the rubicon, and eventually the meaninglessness, of society. However,
in The Name of the Rose, Eco denies substructuralist situationism; in The
Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, however, he affirms nationalism. Sontag
promotes the use of textual discourse to attack and read class.

Therefore, Debord uses the term cultural dedeconstructivism to denote not

discourse, but postdiscourse. The subject is interpolated into a Sontagist
camp that includes truth as a paradox.
But if subdialectic feminism holds, we have to choose between nationalism
and Batailleist `powerful communication. Debord uses the term textual
discourse to denote the bridge between society and class.
It could be said that Sontagist camp states that reality is used to exploit the
proletariat. Foucault suggests the use of cultural neotextual theory to
challenge capitalism.
Therefore, the characteristic theme of Porters[14] analysis of nationalism is
a mythopoetical reality. A number of deappropriations concerning textual
discourse exist.

1. Wilson, H. (1983) The Defining characteristic of Expression: Nationalism

and textual discourse. And/Or Press
2. de Selby, V. P. ed. (1976) Nationalism, capitalism and neodeconstructive
socialism. OReilly & Associates
3. Pickett, R. (1982) Deconstructing Realism: Textual discourse and
nationalism. Loompanics
4. Pickett, W. R. ed. (1978) Textual discourse, nationalism and
capitalism. University of Illinois Press
5. Brophy, V. Q. F. (1989) The Reality of Futility: Nationalism and textual
discourse. OReilly & Associates
6. de Selby, N. ed. (1990) Textual discourse and nationalism. And/Or Press
7. Reicher, Y. R. (1983) Modern Narratives: Textual discourse in the works of
Rushdie. Panic Button Books
8. Cameron, P. F. V. ed. (1995) Nationalism and textual discourse. And/Or
Press
9. Werther, H. (1980) Reinventing Surrealism: Nationalism in the works of
Eco. Loompanics
10. Geoffrey, P. A. ed. (1977) Nationalism in the works of Joyce. Yale
University Press

11. Drucker, J. K. Q. (1992) The Reality of Absurdity: Nationalism, capitalism

and cultural rationalism. Schlangekraft
12. Werther, M. ed. (1981) Textual discourse and nationalism. Harvard
University Press
13. Brophy, N. G. E. (1994) The Paradigm of Discourse: Nationalism in the
works of Glass.University of North Carolina Press
14. Porter, U. D. ed. (1976) Nationalism and textual discourse. Yale University
Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly
generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay,
follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it,
follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using
the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive
grammars, and modified very slightly byJosh Larios (this version, anyway.
There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 12386812 essays since
25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University
Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the
Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition
Networks.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair,
where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokals brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax
article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

Search

Adolescent Poetry
Band Names
Postmodernism
Subgenius Brag
Time Cube

Buy Me Something
Discordian Tarot
Drainspotting
Emperor Norton
GmapToGPX (broken)
Loteria Collection

amazon

art

Bicycle

bushCar-Free

Cool copyrightCulture customer_service DI

Ydrainspotting eco_footprintelsewhere EventsExternal

Sale

Brain flickrFor

Gadgets geargoogle hacks Humor InternetLinks Listening loteriam

ake Manhole Movies/TVmusic Personal policepreparedness

RantsReading Se

attle Stupid
People

Technology

tools

video

wifi wordpresswtf xtracycle youtub

Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org