1.

INTRODUCTION

1.1

Project Brief
Mr. Bong Poh Fong is desirous of developing on lot 7424, Jalan Ciku, Mukim
Bukit Raja, Bukit Cherakah, Daerah Petaling Selangor Darul Ehsan under
Program Pemutihan Kilang Tanpa Kebenaran.

1.2

Objective
This report presents the detailed network analysis for the water supply pipeline
serving the factory includes the following:a.
b.
c.
d.

Total daily water demand.

Network flow analysis for peak flow demand (2.5 x Average flow)
Network flow analysis for fire flow demand
Computation of flow, hydraulic grade line, residual pressure, discharge
and headloss.

The pressure head for the proposed development is 45.0m ODL, given by
SYABAS (ref no: SYA/PTG/DPD/DEVS/DEVU/PJT3/15007/14(3)
2.0

DESIGN OF WATER RETICULATION

2.1

Reference
Reference is made to the MWA design guideline.

2.2

Design Criteria
The water reticulation system consists of pipelines network designed to meet 2
criteria.
The 2 criteria are :
Case 1 : Peak Domestic Demand Condition
( 2.5 x Average Flow )
Case 2 : Average Domestic Demand and 1 Fire Flows
( Fire flow at 300 gpm at each stream )
All piping materials, valves, hydrants, and specials shall be in accordance with
British Standards and SYABASs requirement.

2.3

Analysis of Flow Network

The proposed water supply system is carried out in PipeNet program. Major
friction losses are computed based on Hazen William formula.
Value of Hazen-William coefficient ( C ) of 100 is used for D.I pipe. The peak
factor for peak flow is taken as 2.5 and 1.0 for fire flow. Headloss in pipelines
should not exceed 2 meter head per 1000 meter of pipe length.
Minimal residual pressure for each node during domestic draw-off should not
less than 7.5 metres from the highest supply level for peak flow case if the
source of water is supply from SYABAS main pipe.
Breakdown of water demand is tabulated in Table 1.

Item

Description

Factory

Quantity

Water demand

Total Daily
Demand

Per Day / Unit

(gallon per day)

450

450

TOTAL

450

Table 1

2.4

Result of Flow Analysis

The results of the flow analysis consist of two conditions which are peak flow
analysis and fire flow analysis. The network analysis layout and the results of
analysis are attached in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 respectively. The water
supply layout plan is shown in Figure 1.

TABLE 2 & 3
SUMMARY OF FLOW NETWORK ANALYSIS RESULT

Table 2 : Summary of Peak Flow Network Analysis Results

Case 1 = Peak Flow

Node
No.

Ground
level

Building
Height
Demand

Peak Flow
=2.5
x Pressure at
Average
node
flow
(l/s)
(m)

Residual
Pressure

(m)

(m)

(l/s)

(m)

27

45.00

18.00

27.3

4.4

0.024

0.060

45.00

13.31

27.3

45.00

17.70

27.3

45.00

17.70

Table 3 : Summary of Fire Flow Network Analysis Results

Node
No.

Ground
level

Building
Height

Case 2 = Fire Flow

Demand

Hydrant

Pressure at
node

Residual
Pressure

(m)

(m)

(l/s)

(l/s)

(m)

(m)

27

45.00

18.00

27.3

4.4

0.024

44.67

12.97

27.3

43.39

16.09

27.3

22.7

42.07

14.77

APPENDIX 1
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF PEAK FLOW

OUT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------PIPE NETWORK ANALYSIS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------!@
Job title : 1205
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Number of nodes ........ 4
Number of pipes ........ 3
Minimum flow correction ...... .001 litres/sec
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------E
E
-------------------------------------------------Node data
-------------------------------------------------F
NODE NO.
DRAW OFF
HYDRAULIC HEAD
REDUCED LEVEL
RESIDUAL HEAD
litres/sec
m
m
m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
0.0
45.000 C
27.0
18.000
2
0.1
45.000
31.7
13.310
3
0.0
45.000
27.3
17.700
4
0.0
45.000
27.3
17.700
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------E
-------------------------------------------------Pipe data
-------------------------------------------------F
NA NB
DIA
LGTH
C
R
FLOW
VELOCITY
HD.LOSS HY.GRAD.
mm
m
litres/sec
m/sec
m
m/1000m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
2 150.
17.
100.
0.001
0.
0.00
0.000
0.000
2
3 150.
64.
100.
0.004
-0.
-0.00
-0.000
-0.000
3
4 150.
66.
100.
0.004
-0.
-0.00
-0.000
-0.000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------NUMBER OF REITERATIONS =

69

**End of program execution**

--------------------------------------------------------NUMBER OF REITERATIONS =
69
**End of program ex

Page 1

Analysis of Results for Peak Flow

0.060 l/s
1
17.0 m
m

0 l/s

0 l/s

2
2

64.0 m

3
66.0 m

Pipe Network
Note:
1

Denotes Node Number

150 mm dia Proposed DI Pipe

Denotes Pipe Number

APPENDIX 2
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF FIRE FLOW

OUT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------PIPE NETWORK ANALYSIS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------!@
Job title : 1205
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Number of nodes ........ 4
Number of pipes ........ 3
Minimum flow correction ...... .001 litres/sec
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------E
-------------------------------------------------Node data
-------------------------------------------------F
NODE NO.
DRAW OFF
HYDRAULIC HEAD
REDUCED LEVEL
RESIDUAL HEAD
litres/sec
m
m
m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
0.0
45.000 C
27.0
18.000
2
0.0
44.661
31.7
12.971
3
0.0
43.386
27.3
16.086
4
22.7
42.071
27.3
14.771
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------E
-------------------------------------------------Pipe data
-------------------------------------------------F
NA NB
DIA
LGTH
C
R
FLOW
VELOCITY
HD.LOSS HY.GRAD.
mm
m
litres/sec
m/sec
m
m/1000m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
2 150.
17.
100.
0.001
23.
1.29
0.339
19.958
2
3 150.
64.
100.
0.004
23.
1.28
1.275
19.918
3
4 150.
66.
100.
0.004
23.
1.28
1.315
19.918
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------NUMBER OF REITERATIONS =

34

**End of program execution**

--------------------------------------------------------NUMBER OF REITERATIONS =
34
*

Page 1

Analysis of Results for Fire Flow

0.024 l/s
1
17.0 m
m

0 l/s

22.7 l/s

2
2

64.0 m

3
66.0 m

Pipe Network
Note:
1

Denotes Node Number

150 mm dia Proposed DI Pipe

Denotes Pipe Number

FIGURE 1
WATER RETICULATION LAYOUT PLAN