Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In recent years, power systems, worldwide, have grown markedly in size and complexity. In order to maximize efficiency of
generation and distribution of electric power,
the interconnections between individual utilities have increased and the generators have
been required to operate at maximum limits
for extensive periods of time. In addition,
the most economic sites for generation plants
are often remote from load centers and the
power must be transmitted over long distances. The majority of power system interconnections are made through AC transmission lines and the interconnected generators
run synchronously. In a large interconnected
system, such as that in North America, there
may be thousands of synchronous generators
in service to supply the load. Each generator
normally has separate controls that are used
to regulate the real and reactive power supplied by the generator to the system.
Transients in power systems are analyzed
using many levels of modeling detail. At one
extreme is the study of electromagnetic tranDr. Graham J. Rogers is with Ontario Hydro, 700
University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1x6,
Canada.
January 1989
19
20
Interarea Stability
Following both small and large disturbances, a power system experiences low-frequency oscillations, which are associated
with groups of synchronous generators
swinging against other groups of synchronous generators through weak transmission
connections. The frequencies of these interarea modes are lower than those of the local
modes. In general, interarea modal frequencies lie in the range of 0.1 to 0.8 Hz, whereas
the local modal frequency range is from 0.8
to 2.0 Hz. The lower modal frequency and
the fact that many machines participate in
the mode make interarea oscillations more
difficult to control than local oscillations.
Nonetheless, it has not yet been found necessary to use centralized controls to stabilize
these modes.
Power system stabilizers on large generating units can be designed to help damp
interarea modes in which the generators are
significant participants [6]. Thus, it is important that the dynamic compensator associated with each power system stabilizer is
designed to ensure a positive contribution to
damping of all modes having frequencies between 0.1 and 2.0 Hz. This may entail a
slight reduction in the damping of the higherfrequency local modes.
At the lower end of the interarea mode
frequency range, both hydraulic and steam
turbine dynamics can affect the damping of
the mode. The nonminimum-phase characteristic of the hydraulic turbine can cause the
Transient Stability
Following large system disturbances, some
synchronous generators may swing sufficiently to lose synchronism with the system.
This is prevented, for a wide range of specified, severe system faults by the provision
of an adequate transmission system, with
rapid fault clearance facilities, and by setting
system operating limits. The system design
and its operating limits are based on extensive simulation of the nonlinear system electromechanical dynamics. The stability of the
system following a severe fault can be aided
significantly by the installation of fast-acting
AVRs on major generating units. As noted
previously, fast-acting AVRs generally require power system stabilizers to give adequate small-disturbance stability. The power
system stabilizers may not produce the correct control input to the AVR following a
large system disturbance, and additional
ovemding nonlinear controls may be necessary. In Ontario, the Transient System Excitation Control (TSEC) [9] is used to force
up the voltage at the terminals for generators
accelerating following a fault. The maximum voltage is limited by a special fastacting, bang-bang voltage limiter system.
TSEC is operative for only the first swing of
the system oscillation following the fault.
Analysis Tools
Because of the size of power system
models being used in stability analysis, specially developed computer programs are
used. Step-by-step integration of nonlinear
equations of the system is used in the study
of transient stability. For small-signal stability studies, equations are linearized about
an operating point, and eigenvalue and eigenvector techniques are used to perform
modal analysis of the system. Ontario Hydro
currently uses programs in which systems
having up to 12,000 AC network nodes and
1500 synchronous machines may be represented. Up to 1000 of the synchronous machines may be modeled, in detail, with AVR
and governor, leading to, potentially, 15,000
dynamic states [ 121. Clearly, the consistency
of data for such system models is as much a
concern as the mathematical techniques of
modeling and analysis [131.
Fortunately, the stability problems encountered in regular power system design are
often more local in nature, and reduced-order models can be determined that adequately represent the system for their study.
In particular, the design of AVRs, governors, and power system stabilizers for smallsignal stability often can be performed using
January 1989
General Comments
The degree of stability of power systems
is less important than in many other control
problems. What is required is for the power
system to remain stable over a wide range
of operating conditions. Oscillations of about
1 Hz in frequency with a damping ratio of
0.05 are commonly encountered associated
with synchronous machines having slow excitation systems and no power system stabilizers, and which give rise to no stability
problems. There is little need, therefore, for
optimal design of controllers in order to
maximize damping. Indeed, because of the
nonlinear nature of the system dynamics, the
robustness of optimal controls, based on linear analysis, is often suspect [16]. Any design based on linear analysis of a reduced
system should be checked extensively by
nonlinear simulation of the full interconnected system [6].
Conclusions
Control is vital to maintain the stability of
modem interconnected power systems. Although a vast amount of experience has been
accumulated in the last 20 years, the changing nature of the power system continues to
provide challenges to the system designer.
21
References
[I] P. L. Dandeno, A. K. Karas, K. R. McClymont, and W. Watson, Effect of HighSpeed Rectifier Excitation Systems on Generator Stability Limits, IEEE Trans. PAS,
vol. 87, pp. 190-201, 1968.
[2] P. Kundur, D. C. Lee, and H. M. Zein ElDin, Power System Stabilizers for Thermal Units; Analytical Techniques and OnSite Validation, IEEE Trans. PAS, vol.
100, pp. 81-95, 1981.
[3] D. C. Lee, R. E. Beaulieu, and J . A. R .
Service, A Power System Stabilizer Using
Speed and Electrical Power Inputs-Design
and Field Experience, IEEE Trans. PAS,
vol. 100, pp. 41514157, 1981.
141 D. C. Lee, R. E. Beaulieu, and G. J . Rogers, Effects of Governor Characteristicson
Turbogenerator Shaft Torsionals, IEEE
Trans. PAS, vol. 104, pp. 1255-1261,
1985.
[5] P. L. Dandeno, P. Kundur, and J . P. Bayne,
Hydraulic Unit Dynamic Performance
Under Normal and Isolated ConditionsAnalysis and Validation, IEEE Trans.
PAS, vol. 97, pp. 2134-2143, 1978.
[6] P. Kundur, M. Klein, G. J . Rogers, and
M. S. Zywno, Application of Power System Stabilizers for Enhancement of Overall
System Stability, to be presented at IEEE
PES Summer Meeting, 1988.
22
network theory, neurobiological connections, knowledge processing, learning algorithms, and novel applications including vision, robotics, self-organization, communications, control, and speech recognition
and synthesis.
The Conference Chair is Shun-Ichi Amari,
the International Chair is Rolf Eckmiller, and
the Program Committee Chair is Robert
Hecht-Nielsen. The Organizing Committee
Chairs are Wesley Snyder and Allen Stubberud.
Prospective authors should contact Nomi