Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, a California CASE NO. C 07-03261 (PJH)
16 corporation,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
17 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND
18 v. DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
OR ANSWER PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
19 VALUECLICK, INC., dba VC E-COMMERCE
SOLUTIONS, INC., also dba
20 CONSUMERINCENTIVEZONE.COM, also dba
PROMOTIONSGATEWAY.COM, also dba
21 GENEROUSGENIE.COM, also dba
REWARDSGATEWAY.COM, also dba
22 CONSUMERPROMOTIONCENTER.COM,
also dba REWARDAMAZON.COM, also dba
23 GIVEAWAYCAFE.COM and DOES ONE
through FIFTY, inclusive,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff ASIS INTERNET SERVICES (the "Plaintiff") served the Complaint in
3 WHEREAS, the parties previously filed a stipulation and proposed order agreeing to extend
4 the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by thirty (30) days to August
5 29, 2007;
6 WHEREAS, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to extend the time for Defendant
7 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to August 29, 2007, by order dated August 2, 2007;
8 WHEREAS, on August 24, 2007, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order to further
9 extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by ten (10) days to
11 WHEREAS, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to extend the time for Defendant
12 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to September 10, 2007, by order dated August, 27,
13 2007;
14 WHEREAS the parties have reached a settlement in principle, and desire to stipulate to an
15 additional extension of time of eighteen (18) days to September 28, 2007 for Defendant to answer or
16 otherwise respond to the Complaint, to permit sufficient time for the parties to finalize their
19
Defendant VALUECLICK, INC. shall have until September 28, 2007 to answer or otherwise
20
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
21
22
24
25 By: /s/
Jason K. Singleton
26
Counsel for Plaintiff
27
28
3 By: /s/
Michael B. Smith
4
Counsel for Defendant
5
9
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED
10
AND SO ORDERED..
11
12
Dated: __________________, 2007.
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28