Annexure-I

Name of the Institution: Malla Reddy Institute of Technology & Science

Visit Date:

27th to 29th March 2015

Name of the Programme: Electronics & communication Engineering

Criterion-1 Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives
ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBOBSERVATION OF VISITING
COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE
NO.
PARAMETERS
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
1.5
Results of assessment of No meetings for redefining PEOs and NO.
achievement of PEOs used for not redefined, just process started.
The Department Advisory committee and
redefining PEOs
Assessment quality committee meetings
were held to redefine the PEOs periodically.
From establishment of institution there were
8 PEOs established by taking advice of
DAB and stakeholders. In 2011, based on
the analyzed data the DAB suggested not to
redefine the PEOs, as the PEOs are
satisfying 80% of the requirement and in
2012, according to the views of stakeholders
the DAB suggests to reduce the PEOs. So 5
PEOs are redefined in 2012. In 2013 as the
PEOs are satisfying 80% of the requirement
there is no change in PEOs.
The details and proofs of PEOs are attached
in Annexure-I.

Criterion-2 Programme Outcomes

ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBNO.
PARAMETERS
2.1
Definition and validation of
course
outcomes
and
programme outcomes
2.4
Use of assessment results
towards improvement of
programme

OBSERVATION OF VISITING
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
2.1.3 Process employed for defining of
the POs
Process is Inadequate
No initiative, just process started

Criterion-3 Programme Curiculum

ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBOBSERVATION OF VISITING
NO.
PARAMETERS
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
3.5
Details of the Processes used
to identify the curricular gaps Gap analysis is not effective
to the attainment of the
COs/POs
Criterion-4 Students Performance
ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBOBSERVATION OF VISITING
NO.
PARAMETERS
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
4.3
Placement and Higher Studies Placement poor in number and not in
core companies
4.4.3
Publication
of
technical
magazines, newsletters, etc.
Few in number

4.4

Professional activities

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

4.4.4. Entrepreneurship initiatives,

Product designs and innovations

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

Very Limited
4.4.5 Publications and awards in
inter-institute events by students of
the programme of study
Very few in number
Criterion-5 Faculty Contributions
ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBNO.
PARAMETERS
5.2
Faculty Cadre Ratio
5.5
Faculty as
participants/resource persons
in faculty development /
training activities
5.6
Faculty Retention
5.7
5.8
5.9

5.10

OBSERVATION OF VISITING
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
Poor

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

Very Little Participation

Faculty Members leaving college

regularly
Faculty Research Publications Very few in number and in paid Journals
Faculty intellectual property Nil
rights
Faculty R&D and cnsultancy No R&D grant in department, no
(FRDC) work
consultancy, one project with company
is initiated
Faculty
interaction
with Very limited
outside world

Criterion-6 Facilities and Technical Support

ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBNO.
PARAMETERS

OBSERVATION OF VISITING
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

6.1

Classrooms

6.2

Faculty Rooms

6.1.2 Teaching aids multimedia

projectors etc
Projectors, OHP not available
6.2.1 Availability of individual faculty
rooms
No individual rooms
6.2.2
Room
equipped
with
white/black board, computer ,
internet,
and
such
other
amenities/facilities
Facilities not available

Criterion-8 Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources

ITEM
PARAMETERS/SUBOBSERVATION OF VISITING
NO.
PARAMETERS
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM
8.1
Campus Infrastructure and 8.1.1 Maintenance of academic
Facility
infrastructure and facilities
Maintenance is very poor

8.2

Organization,
and transparency

8.1.2 Hostel (boys and girls),

transportation facility and canteen
Shared by more than one institutions of
same group
Governance 8.2.1

Criterion-9 Programme Outcomes

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE

ITEM
NO.

PARAMETERS/SUBPARAMETERS

OBSERVATION OF VISITING
TEAM/MODERATION TEAM

COMMENTS OF THE INSTITUTE