Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRICES
O
F GROCERY ITEMS
SUBMITTED BY
Farhan Anwer
Reg#58159
Mohaddis Ali
Reg#58096
Hira Tariq
Reg#58073
Urooj Nazir
Reg#58124
TO:
DATE:
All praises and thanks are for Almighty ALLAH who is the source of
all knowledge and wisdom endowed to mankind and to the humanity
as a whole.
Behind every project is a vision and in order to complete a
successful project we must have a determination to complete that
vision. We would like to say the words of appreciation to our course
instructor Mr. Shahbaz khan for motivating us for going towards
that vision and his abilities to turn that vision into reality.
The encouragement and assistance of our parents, friends &
instructor. We are extremely indebted to the individuals who
supplied us with ample help, guidance and information without
which this report would never have been completed. We regret if we
have forgotten to mention anyone concerned.
Regards,
Students of MBA (Evening)
Farhan Anwer
Mohaddis Ali
Hira Tariq
Urooj Nazir
Objective
Analysis of prices of grocery items of last ten years
Following three items we selected for the analysis.
Sugar
Wheat flour
Pulse (moong)
We collected the data of above mentioned 3 grocery items from
different sources, like federal bureau of statistics, newspapers and web
site of Karachi foods and grocery. The prices of last 10 years have been
collected. The prices of last 10 years have been placed in SPSS for the
purpose of taking out their mean, median, mode, standard deviation
and variance.
Variables
1. Prices of Sugar
2. Price of Wheat Flour
3. Price of Pulse (Moong)
We have taken only the prices of last 10 years and run descriptive
statistics on the data.
Sugar.
Key Facts
No. of Mills
Crushing capacity
Contribution to economy
Share in GDP
Employment
Average yield per hector
Total cane production
Per capita consumption
Contribution to exchequer
More than 82
6.1 million tones
3.0 4.0 million tones
1.9 %
1.5 million (directly & indirectly)
46.8 Tones
45 55 million tones
25.8 kgs per capita
R.s 12.16 billion
During the last crushing season 2012-13, the industry exported about
1.2m tones of sugar and earned precious foreign exchange of $600m
for the country, the letter says. It demands the continuation of the
same export policy and incentives for the current season and removal
of all conditions.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
25.34
35
26
31.80
46.66
70.80
68.74
53.64
52.58
Statistics
Sugar
Valid
10
Missing
Mean
46.3560
Median
49.6200
25.34a
Mode
Std. Deviation
16.43660
Variance
270.162
Skewness
.140
.687
Sum
463.56
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
25.34
10.0
10.0
10.0
26.00
10.0
10.0
20.0
31.80
10.0
10.0
30.0
35.00
10.0
10.0
40.0
46.66
10.0
10.0
50.0
52.58
10.0
10.0
60.0
53.00
10.0
10.0
70.0
53.64
10.0
10.0
80.0
2014March
53
68.74
10.0
10.0
90.0
70.80
10.0
10.0
100.0
Total
10
100.0
100.0
One-Sample Statistics
N
Sugar
Mean
10
Std. Deviation
46.3560
16.43660
5.19771
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 49.62
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Difference
Lower
Sugar
-.628
.546
-3.26400
-17.9290
Upper
11.4010
Conclusion :
The average price of sugar of last ten year is 46.36 & skewness is 0.140 so, it is normally
distributed. P-value is 0.546 which is greater than level of significance (0.02 ) so, accept Null
hypothesis
Missing
Percent
Sugar
10
100.0%
Total
Percent
0
0.0%
Percent
10
100.0%
Descriptives
Statistic
Mean
Sugar
Std. Error
46.3560
Lower Bound
31.6910
Mean
Upper Bound
61.0210
5% Trimmed Mean
46.1656
Median
49.6200
Variance
270.162
Std. Deviation
5.19771
16.43660
Minimum
25.34
Maximum
70.80
Range
45.46
Interquartile Range
27.06
Skewness
Kurtosis
.140
.687
-1.222
1.334
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
Sugar
.155
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
10
Statistic
.200*
.919
df
Sig.
10
.349
Conclusion:
From Shapiro-Wilk test significant value is found to be 0.349 which is greater than level of
significance 0.02 so, accept null hypothesis
2. Pulse (Moong)
Mungbean prices from year 2005 2014 March
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
45
45.52
50
50
60
80
103.2
3
115
123.3
0
125
Statistics
Pulses
Valid
10
Missing
Mean
79.7050
Median
70.0000
Mode
50.00
Std. Deviation
33.79271
Variance
1141.947
Skewness
.327
.687
Sum
797.05
Pulses
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
45.00
10.0
10.0
10.0
45.52
10.0
10.0
20.0
50.00
20.0
20.0
40.0
60.00
10.0
10.0
50.0
80.00
10.0
10.0
60.0
103.23
10.0
10.0
70.0
115.00
10.0
10.0
80.0
123.30
10.0
10.0
90.0
125.00
10.0
10.0
100.0
10
100.0
100.0
Total
One-Sample Statistics
N
Pulses
Mean
10
Std. Deviation
79.7050
33.79271
10.68619
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 70.00
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Pulses
.908
.387
9.70500
-20.4454
Upper
39.8554
Conclusion:
The average price of pulses from last ten years is 79.70& skewness is 0.327 means sample data is
normally distributed. From hypothesis testing P-value is found to be 0.387 which is greater than level of
significance (0.02) so, accept Null hypothesis
Cases
Valid
N
Missing
Percent
Pulses
10
Total
Percent
100.0%
0.0%
Percent
10
100.0%
Descriptives
Statistic
Mean
Pulses
Std. Error
79.7050
Lower Bound
49.5546
Mean
Upper Bound
109.8554
5% Trimmed Mean
79.1167
Median
70.0000
Variance
1141.947
Std. Deviation
33.79271
Minimum
45.00
Maximum
125.00
Range
80.00
Interquartile Range
68.20
Skewness
Kurtosis
10.68619
.327
.687
-1.962
1.334
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
Pulses
.220
df
Sig.
10
Conclusion:
Shapiro-Wilk
.186
Statistic
.837
df
Sig.
10
.041
2006
14
2007
15.55
2008
20
2009
25
2010
28.20
2011
35
Statistics
Wheat
Valid
10
Missing
Mean
28.0450
Median
26.6000
Mode
45.00
Std. Deviation
12.23325
Variance
149.652
Skewness
.252
.687
Sum
280.45
Wheat
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
14.00
10.0
10.0
10.0
14.30
10.0
10.0
20.0
15.55
10.0
10.0
30.0
20.00
10.0
10.0
40.0
25.00
10.0
10.0
50.0
28.20
10.0
10.0
60.0
35.00
10.0
10.0
70.0
38.40
10.0
10.0
80.0
45.00
20.0
20.0
100.0
Total
10
100.0
100.0
2012
38.40
2013
45
2014
45
One-Sample Statistics
N
Wheat
Mean
10
Std. Deviation
28.0450
12.23325
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 26.60
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
Wheat
.374
.717
1.44500
-9.4697
Upper
12.3597
Conclusion:
The average price of wheat from last ten years is 28.04 & skewness is 0.252 it shows sample data
is normally distributed. From hypothesis testing it shows P-value is 0.717 which is greater than
alpha (0.02) so, accept null hypothesis
Missing
Percent
Wheat
10
100.0%
Total
Percent
0
0.0%
Percent
10
100.0%
Descriptives
Statistic
Mean
Wheat
Std. Error
28.0450
Lower Bound
17.1303
Mean
Upper Bound
38.9597
5% Trimmed Mean
27.8833
Median
26.6000
Variance
149.652
Std. Deviation
3.86849
12.23325
Minimum
14.00
Maximum
45.00
Range
31.00
Interquartile Range
24.81
Skewness
Kurtosis
.252
.687
-1.587
1.334
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
Wheat
.146
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
10
.200*
Conclusion:
Statistic
.897
df
Sig.
10
.201