Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Physical tness prole in adults with intellectual disabilities: Differences

between levels of sport practice
Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas a,*, Berta Paz-Lourido b, Alejandro Rodriguez c
a

Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Av de Martiricos s/n, 29071 Malaga, Spain

Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Beatriu de Pinos Building, Cra. De Valldemossa, km 7.5,
07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
c
National Health Service of Castilla de la Mancha, Spain
b

A R T I C L E I N F O

A B S T R A C T

Article history:
Received 26 October 2010
Accepted 28 October 2010
Available online 15 December 2010

Neuromuscular and aerobic capacity can be reduced in people with intellectual disabilities
(ID). Previous studies suggest these individuals might be particularly susceptible to losing
basic functions because of poor physical tness. The aim of this study is to describe the
physical tness prole of adult athletes with ID and identify whether there are differences
in the physical performance between the most physically active individuals and less active
individuals. A cross-sectional observational study was developed involving 266 athletes
with mild ID (187 males and 79 females), recruited from the Spanish Special Olympics
Games. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the health status of participants and their
frequency of physical activity practice. A battery of 13 tness tests was applied to assess
exibility, strength/endurance, balance and cardiovascular capabilities. Of the total
participants, 44.3% were classied as sportspersons and the remainder as non sportspersons, taking in consideration the frequency of physical activity. Regarding the scores, a
signicant difference was found in degrees of exibility between genders, higher for
females for one test but higher for males in the other three. A signicant difference was not
encountered between other variables of physical tness, although the mens scores were
higher in strength/endurance and balance. When the scores of the sportspersons and non
sportspersons groups were compared, no signicant difference was found between the
two, with the exception of one test for exibility. Differences among groups and gender
were not statistically signicant in most of the tests. The ndings in this study illustrate an
unclear and inconclusive relation between the scores and the declared level of physical
activity, maybe due to the context in which participants for the study were selected.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:
Physical tness
Intellectual disabilities
Sport
Musculoskeletal development

1. Introduction
The tness of adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) has been found to be signicantly weaker than in individuals
without ID at all stages of life (Angelopoulou, Tsimaras, Christoulas, Kokaridas, & Mandroukas, 1999; Angelopoulou et al.,
2000; Carmeli, Ayalon, Barchad, Sheklow, & Reznick, 2002; Carmeli, Barchad, Lenger, & Coleman, 2002; Carmeli, Kessel,
Coleman, & Ayalon, 2002; Croce, Pitetti, Horvat, & Miller, 1996; Horvat, Pitetti, & Croce, 1997; Pitetti & Boneh, 1995; Pitetti,
Climstein, Mays, & Barrett, 1992; Skowronski, Horvat, Nocera, Roswal, & Croce, 2009). Neuromuscular and aerobic capacity
can be severely reduced in adults with intellectual disabilities (Fernhall & Pitetti, 2001), suggesting that these individuals

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 952137551; fax: +34 971172309.

E-mail addresses: acuesta@uma.es, acuesta.var@gmail.com (A.I. Cuesta-Vargas), bpaz@uib.es (B. Paz-Lourido), novophysio@gmail.com (A. Rodriguez).
0891-4222/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.023

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

789

might be particularly susceptible to a loss of basic functioning because of poor physical tness (Carmeli, Barchad, et al., 2002;
Pitetti & Boneh, 1995).
Despite the benets of physical activity in balance, strength, endurance and health self-perception (Carmeli, ZingerVaknin, Morad, & Merrick, 2005), physical tness has been further related to job opportunities and vocational performance in
adults with ID (Beasley, 1982; Croce & Horvat, 1992; Horvat & Croce, 1995). Other studies with adults with ID show the
positive inuence of employment that requires competitive and high functional work ability, illustrating the relevance of
physical activity in many spheres of life for broader wellbeing (Kober & Eggleton, 2005; Stephens, Collins, & Dodder, 2005).
The demonstrated link between physical tness and time performance of functional tasks of daily living in adults with ID
(Cowley et al., 2010) suggests the importance of studies on the topic.
The participation of children and adults with disabilities in sports and recreational activities has often been addressed to
enhance overall wellbeing and promote social inclusion (Wilson, 2002). However, some barriers to their active
participation in regular exercise have been identied. The individuals functional limitations, the high costs or the lack of
nearby facilities or programmes are some of the reasons for nonparticipation (King et al., 2003). Some literature suggests
that many individuals with ID have poor adherence to physical activity programs or sports (McGuire, Daly, & Smyth, 2007),
what puts this group at relatively high risk for the development of multiple negative consequences of a sedentary lifestyle
(Lotan, Isakov, Kessel, & Merrick, 2004). Nevertheless, data on this topic seems to be insufcient to determine whether
individuals with ID are currently less active than their peers without disabilities (Frey, Stanish, & Temple, 2008; Temple,
Frey, & Stanish, 2006).
Among the institutions that promote wellbeing and empower people with ID through sports, the Special Olympics
organisation (www.specialolympics.com) offers the largest selection of recreational activities, including national and
international competitive sport games. Special Olympics also develops diverse healthcare programmes aimed to screen the
health status of athletes and give them and their families support when needed. One of this is the FUNFitness programme,
which provides screenings to evaluate the physical status of the participants in the games and offers them practical
suggestions to improve their health condition and avoid injuries. After the screening, all athletes are provided with specic
information regarding their physical prole. Health education with emphasis in musculoskeletal issues is also given, using
educational materials tailored for people with lower reading levels when necessary.
The impact of Special Olympics games in the participants health status has been studied at psychosocial and physical
level. Besides the consideration of sport as a signicant life experience for the special olympians (Mharada & Siperstein,
2009), they may benet in perceived competence, self-awareness and social acceptance (Gibbons & Bushakra, 1989; Weiss,
Diamond, Demark, & Lovald, 2003). However, the impact of the games in increasing the physical prole of participants seems
to be low if it is not accompanied by regular training (Machek, Stopka, Tillman, Sneed, & Naugle, 2008; Pitteti, Jackson,
Stubbs, Campbell, & Saraswathy, 1989).
With this research we aimed to describe the physical tness prole of adult athletes with ID and identify whether there
are differences in the physical performance between the most physically active individuals (sportspeople) and the less active
individuals (non sportspeople).
2. Material and methods
2.1. Participants
Participants in this study were 266 individuals with ID (187 males and 79 females) recruited from the Spanish Special
Olympics Games. The mean age of participants was 31.1 with a standard deviation of 7.5 years. All participants had been
medically diagnosed with a mild intellectual disability. General issues regarding the health status were checked before
participation in the study and data regarding their health history was obtained from the participants and their parents and/or
guardians. This health history included questions regarding the level of adherence to sports or regular physical activities. The
hours per week the athletes practice physical activity or sport were recorded to classify the participants regarding their
activeness.
The participants were identied as sportspeople when they practiced physical activities from 3 to 7 h per week, and a non
sportspeople when they practiced from 1 to 2 h per week. Exclusion criteria to participate in the study included: (1) any
contraindications to exercise as assessed by a medical history questionnaire, (2) documented atherosclerotic heart disease,
(3) documented atlantoaxial instability, (4) uncorrected congenital heart disease, and (5) implanted pacemaker.
2.2. Study design and instruments
This cross-sectional observational study employed a battery of 13 tness tests including: the passive knee extension test,
the calf muscle exibility test, the anterior hip exibility test, the functional shoulder rotation test, the timed-stand test, the
partial sit-up test, the seated push-up, the grip test, the single leg stance open and closed eyes, and the 3 min walk test. A
detailed description of the tests and data regarding reliability is given in this section.
The examiners were 10 qualied physiotherapists and 15 trained physiotherapy students from the residency
programmes. A four-hour training session was previously developed for the examiners to become acquainted with the
specic tness tests to be used. Other aspects regarding social interaction with individuals with ID were included in the

790

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

training session. Due to the importance for the athletes to comprehend what was required from them during the screening,
special emphasis was given to communication issues.
Tests were explained to the athletes and repeated several times if necessary. Quite frequently, examiners had to
demonstrate how to perform the tests to check that the participants indeed understood what was required from them. Tests
were performed with at least two examiners to assure that the measure was done correctly but also to give support, to
encourage and to ensure the safety of the athletes during the tests performance.
Passive knee extension (PKE). The athlete was positioned supine on a treatment table with hip and knee exed at 908. The
passive knee extension was measured using a goniometer, with the fulcrum placed over the lateral femoral epicondyle and
its arms in the direction of the greater trochanter and lateral malleolus, respectively. Their ankle remained in a neutral
position or in plantarexion. If the knee was fully extended, the nal value was recorded as 08. If the knee didnt extend, the
value was recorded as negative (e.g., 408). If the knee went beyond the fully straight position into hyperextension, the value
was recorded as positive (e.g., +58). The reliability of the PKE test was explored and compared with other clinical tests for
assessing hamstring muscle as proposed by Gajdoski, Rieck, Sullivan, and Wightman (1993).
Calf muscle exibility (CMF). The athlete was positioned supine on a table, with the hip and knee on the side to be measured
in as much extension as possible. The fulcrum of the goniometer was placed over the lateral malleolus, with one of its arms in
the direction of the bular head and the other one in parallel to the lateral midline of the fth metatarsal. Their ankle was
passively dorsiexed and its angle measured while their knee remained in extension. If the athlete couldnt reach neutral
position, the angle was recorded as negative (e.g., 108). If the athlete went beyond neutral, it was recorded as positive (e.g.,
+108). If the athlete only reached neutral, it was recorded as 08. The reliability of this test can be found in Ekstrand,
Wiktorsonn, Oberg, and Gilquist (1982).
Anterior hip exibility (AHF). The athlete was positioned supine on a table, both hips exed to 908. The hip to be measured
was exed up to 1008 with a hand beneath the lower back to ensure that it remained attened. Opposite hip was kept at 908
and not allowed to move into extension during the test. The fulcrum of the goniometer was placed over the greater
trochanter, with its arms aligned with the lateral midline of the pelvis and with the lateral midline of the femur, respectively.
The degrees of extension between the pelvis and thigh were measured before the pelvis began to move forward. If the thigh
lowered to the table surface, the result was recorded as 08. If the thigh didnt reach the table, the angle was recorded as
negative (e.g., 258). The reliability of this test can be found in Ekstrand et al. (1982).
Functional shoulder rotation (FSR). The athlete stood or was seated facing the back of a chair. The athlete was instructed to
reach one arm behind the head and down the back, while the other arm reached behind the hip and up the back. The athlete
was instructed to try to touch their index ngers together. A tape measure was used to measure the distance in cm
between the index ngers in this position (one arm was in exion/abduction/lateral rotation; the other was in extension/
adduction/medial rotation). The arm on top dened the recorded side (i.e., left arm on top = left; right arm on top = right). If
the ngertips touched, the distance was recorded as 0. If the ngertips could not touch, the separation was recorded as
negative (e.g., 15.2 cm). If the ngers overlap, the overlap was recorded as positive (e.g., +2.5 cm). The FSR is a reproducible
measure of upper extremity function task that was validated in people with disabilities. The reliability of this test can be
found in Bostrom, Harms-Ringdahl, and Nordemar (1991).
The timed-stands test (TST). The timed-stands test was the method to quantify functional lower extremity muscle strength
(hip and knee extension). The test requires the athlete to complete 10 full stands from a seated position as quickly as possible
without the use of their arms. The athlete was seated in a rm straight-backed chair with the elbows exed to 908 during the
test. The athlete had to stand 10 times as quickly as possible and the time to perform the task in minutes and seconds was
recorded. If the athlete could not perform 10 repetitions, the number of repetitions and the time taken was recorded. The TST
is a reproducible measure of lower extremity function that was validated in people with disabilities. The reliability of this
test can be found in Newcomer, Krug, and Mahowald (1993).
Partial sit-up test (PSUT). The partial sit-up test was the method to quantify abdominal muscle strength/endurance. The
test requires the athlete to complete as many sit-ups as possible from a supine position in one minute. The participant was
positioned supine on a table or mat, with the legs placed on a chair or stool to keep their hips and knees bent at 908. Their
arms were placed straight out in front of the chest with the elbows extended during the entire test. Testretest reliability and
validity was established in a previous study (Knudson, 2001).
Seated push-up (SPU). The seated push-up test is a method of assessing the strength of the triceps, shoulder and scapular
muscles. The test involves pushing the body up out of a seated position, and slowly lowering it back into the seat. The athlete
was placed with the knees out straight and the heels resting on the oor or table. The athlete had to push their body up from
the table or oor until the elbows were straight, held for 20 s and then slowly lowered back into the seat. The reliability of
revised push-up test protocol in people without disabilities was 0.900.99 (Baumgartner, Oh, Chung, & Hales, 2002).
Handgrip test (HGT). The handgrip test is a standardized method for assessing strength of the hand and forearm muscles,
as it has been correlated to upper extremity function. The test involved completing three grips on each side (preferred and
non preferred hand) and recording the better of the three trials using an adjustable handgrip dynamometer. The athlete had
to keep the arm and hand at the side with the elbow bent at 908 while squeezing as forcefully as possible. The handgrip
dynamometer have being found to be highly reliable (ICC = 0.98) and valid (ICC = 0.99) for measuring handgrip strength
(Bellace, Healy, Besser, Byron, & Hohman, 2000).
Single-leg stance with eyes open (SLSEO). The single-leg stance test with eyes open is designed to assess balance with the
assistance of visual cues. The test required the athlete to stand on one leg with the eyes open. Balance must be maintained as

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

791

long as possible. The arms were placed at the sides with elbows slightly exed during the test. The test continued until
athlete lost balance, or put the other foot down (maximum time was 30 s).
Single-leg stance with eyes closed (SLSEC). The single-leg stance test with eyes closed is similar to the previous one but
without the assistance of visual cues, so the athletes eyes are kept closed or covered with a blindfold. Interclass correlation
coefcients were moderate to excellent (0.410.91) suggesting that the standing balance tests are appropriate for
distinguishing among group performances (Birmingham, 2000).
Functional reach test (FRT). The test requires the athlete to reach forward beyond the length of his/her arm without loss of
balance. The participant was on two legs, positioned shoulder width apart (or seated if the athlete could not stand). The
athlete was requested to lift one arm up to 908, forward exion and extend ngers. Testretest reliability and validity was
established in a previous study (Duncan, Weiner, Chandler, & Studenski, 1990).
Two-minute step test (2MST). Pre-exercise resting heart rate (RHR) was recorded with the athlete seated before the test and
again two-minute after the test is nished (2MAF). The athlete was located next to a wall, and the minimum stepping height
for the athlete was marked. The test required a running tape measure from the iliac crest to the mid-patella, and to mark the
midway point on the tape. This mark was transferred to the wall. The athlete was requested to march for a maximum of
2 min, bringing each knee alternatively up to the tape mark in the wall. The number of times that the athlete touched the tape
with the right knee was recorded. The 2MST showed a high inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefcient [ICC]
0.900.96) and intra-rater reliability was also high (ICC 0.980.99) in subject with disabilities (Brooks et al., 2002).
2.3. Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics including measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated for all outcome measures.
Normal distribution was evaluated with the KolmogorovSmirnovs test. Depending on the result either a t-test or a
Wilconxons test was applied. Analysis was done using SPSS version 15.0.
2.4. Ethical issues
The institutional review committees at the University of Malaga approved the procedures used in this study and ethical
recommendations were taken into consideration at all stages during the research. All athletes and parents or guardians gave
informed consent before participation.
3. Results
Descriptive data and comparisons are presented in Tables 1 and 2. From a total number of 266 participants in the study,
118 participants declared themselves (or were reported by a parent/guardian) to practice physical activity or sport from 3 to
Table 1
Statistical and mean differences in physical tness variables of male and female athletes with intellectual disabilities.
Mean  SD

PKE_right (8)
PKE_left (8)
CMF_right (8)
CMF_left (8)
AHF_right (8)
AHF_left (8)
FSR_right (cm)
FSR_left (cm)
TST (s)
PSUT (repetitions/1 m)
SPU (s)
HGT_mean_right (kg)
HGT_mean_left (kg)
SLSEO_right (s)
SLSEO_left (s)
SLSEC_right (s)
SLSEC_left (s)
FRT_right (cm)
FRT_left (cm)
RHR (bpm)
2MST(bpm)
2MAF(bpm)
*
**
***

Mean difference between (95% CI)

Males (n = 187)

Females (n = 79)

22.26  15.60
21.24  15.63
6.61  7.66
6.24  8.83
7.40  6.97
7.87  6.72
9.43  12.99
12.05  12.20
19.92  9.48
31.43  24.41
18.97  9.65
29.01  11.15
28.32  10.35
16.72  14.93
17.93  15.97
6.67  9.2
7.34  9.58
36.37  9.88
36.21  19.16
84.58  15.15
123.35  21.57
89.19  16.84

16  15.83
13.86  14.96
8.92  8.61
7.95  10.51
4.42  6.5
4.73  5.37
9.08  10.50
11.33  10.08
22.77  9.71
25.59  12.07
14.05  10.89
17.73  7.74
16.29  7.26
13.54  14  23
12.82  14.02
3.53  4.59
3.43  4.23
34.23  8.47
33.97  9.43
83.32  17.5
118.24  25.01
85.73  20.85

0.05, signicance level (t-test for independents samples).

0.01, signicance level (t-test for independents samples).
0.001, signicance level (t-test for independents samples).

6.21( 10.36 to 2.07)**

7.38( 11.4 to 3.35)***
2.3( 4.41 to 0.20)*
1.74( 4.18 to 0.75)
2.97( 4.78 to 1.17)**
3.13( 4.81 to 145)***
0.35( 3.61 to 2.89)
0.72( 3.57 to 2.12)
2.85( 5.37 to 0.35)*
5.83(0.14 to 11.52)*
4.91(2.25 to 7.57)***
11.25(8.54 to 14.00)***
12.03(9.41 to 14.65)***
3.17( 0.74 to 7.1)
5.10(2.08 to 9.21)**
3.9(1.65 to 6.16)***
3.14(0.95 to 5.33)**
2.14(1.27 to 4.65)
2.23(1.33 to 4.86)
1.26( 2.95 to 5.47)
3.05( 0.89 to 11.11)
3.45( 1.8 to 8.71)

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

792

Table 2
Statistical and mean difference in physical tness variables of athletes with intellectual disabilities as classied by frequency of physical activity.
Mean  SD

PKE_right (8)
PKE_left (8)
CMF_right (8)
CMF_left (8)
AHF_right (8)
AHF_left (8)
FSR_right (cm)
FSR_left (cm)
TST (s)
PST (repetitions/1 m)
SPU (s)
HGT_mean_right (kg)
HGT_mean_left (kg)
SLSEO_right (s)
SLSEO_left (s)
SLSEC_right (s)
SLSEC_left (s)
FRT_right (cm)
FRT_left (cm)
RHR (bpm)
2MST(bpm)
2MAF(bpm)
**

Mean difference between (95% CI)

Sportspersons (n = 118)

Non sportspersons (n = 148)

17.38  15.59
16.44  15.94
8.06  7.87
7.16  9.14
6.57  6.45
6.73  6.23
8.07  11.3
12.03  11.82
20.14  8.54
29.63  12.97
18.71  9.77
25.87  10.7
24.6711.28
16.99  14.82
16.79  15.61
5.48  8.48
6.05  8.72
36.38  8.69
36.37  9.40
82.70  12.36
123.77  20.94
86.77  16.36

23.17  15.75
21.44  15.34
6.76  8.13
6.45  9.61
6.42  7.28
7.19  6.64
10.28  13.06
11.61  11.52
21.51  10.28
29.83  26.62
16.73  10.57
25.86 
25.13  11.29
15.20  14.83
16.35  15.56
5.97  8.05
6.30  8.42
35.54  9.7
34.96  10.01
86.12  16.74
120.86  21.92
89.85  18.03

5.78(1.95 to 9. 2.07)**
4.99(1.18 to 8.8)**
0.99( 065 to 3.25)
0.71( 1.58 to 3.0)
0.03( 1.72 to 1.65)
0.46( 1.70 to 1.63)
2.21( 0.79 to 5.21)
0.41( 3.25 to 2.43)
1.37( 3.7 to 0.95)
0.19( 5.5 to 5.1)
1.98(0.53 to 4.49)
0.95( 3.68 to 1.77)
0.61( 2.74 to 2.62)
1.78( 34 to 4.27)
0.43( 3.4 to 4.27)
0.48( 2.53 to 1.54)
0.25( 2.37 to 1.87)
0.83( 1.4 to 3.11)
1.78( 061 to 4.17)
3.41( 7.08 to 0.26)
2.92( 2.37 to 8.18)
3.08( 7.33 to 1.16)

0.01, signicance level (t-test for independents samples).

7 h per week (44.3%). These participants were considered in this study as sportspeople, including 83 males and 35 females.
The other 148 individuals (55.6%) reported to practice physical activity or sport from 1 to 2 h per week, and were considered
as non sportspeople. From those, 102 were males and 46 were females.
With regard to the scores and gender, males scored higher in exibility tests PKE, AHF, and FSR, all on both sides and
females scored higher in CMF tests, on both sides. Males scored higher in strength/endurance tests such as the TST, the PSUT,
the SPUT and the HGT, all on both sides. Scores in the three balance tests were also higher for males. Values in seconds were
higher for males in the SLSEO, both sides, and also in the SLSEC, both sides, than female scores. In the FRT test, the distance
reached beyond the length of the arm without loss of balance was longer for male participants. 2MST and 2MAF scores were
better for males, but the differences were not statistically signicant.
With regard to the comparison of the scores between the most physically active participants (sportspeople) and less
active participants (non sportspeople), it has been found that the scores were quite similar, with slight differences depending
on the evaluated side. Scores were better for the sportspeople in the exibility tests such as the PKE (both sides) and the CMF
(both sides). The values regarding exibility were also better in the AHF test on the left side but slightly worse in the AHF test
on the right side. The opposite was found in the scores for the FSR test, which were slightly worse for the sportspeople in the
FSR test on the left side.
Regarding to the strength/endurance, the sportspeople scored better in the TST, the PSUT and the HGT tests on the right
side but slightly worse in the PST and the HGT on the left side. Values were better for the sportspeople in the balance tests
such as the FRT (both sides) and the SLSEC (both sides), but the non sportspeople scored slightly better for the SLSEC test
(both sides).
4. Discussion
In this study, the tness level of athletes with intellectual disabilities is described and scores are compared in relation to
their level of regular physical activity. Among the ndings, the rst issue to take into consideration is that the number of
participants that were classied as more physically active (from 3 to 7 h per week of practice) was lower than the less
physically active (from 1 to 2 h per week of practice), although all of them were recruited in a national sport competition
game. This is maybe due to the fact that the Special Olympic Games are not considered a sport competition for elite athletes
with ID. The athletes may have diverse tness prole because there is not a need for any previous qualication or
performance standards that require specic regular training.
Another aspect to take in consideration regarding the cohort in this study is that the number of female participants was
much lower than male participants. These differences have also appeared in other studies regarding physical tness of
individuals with ID where participants were recruited during competition games (Van de Vliet et al., 2006) or in special
schools (Skowronski et al., 2009).
It has been shown that scores in tness tests are inuenced by gender, age level of intellectual disability (Skowronski
et al., 2009), so the gender variable has also been considered in the data comparison. Regarding the age, the participants in

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

793

this study were young adults with mild ID (31.1  7.5 years old) with diverse level of practice of physical activity. It is known
that balance and strength in individuals with ID is considered to decline during adulthood, when also other health risks may
appear such as of overweight and obesity (Lahtiner, Rintala, & Malin, 2007). But aspects such as body weight and BMI of
participants have not been taken into consideration although they may have inuenced the tness test scores (Guidetti, Franciosi,
Gallorta, Emerenziani, & Baldari, 2010).
Balance capabilities are particularly relevant to be checked in individuals with ID, because it is one of the risk factors for
falling. Studies that have analysed the balance capabilities in individuals with ID have found slow motor responses to
postural perturbations (Hale, Bray, & Littmann, 2007). Other authors (Dellavia, Pallavera, Orlando, & Sforza, 2009) have found
differences in body balance in a study with 60 Special Olympics athletes in comparison with 30 adults without ID.
Participants without ID oscillated less than those with ID. From the group with ID those with Down syndrome had larger
body sway than those without this condition highlighting that the differences in the scores can be related to the type and
level of ID, also stated in other research (Franciosi, Baldari, Gallotta, Emerenciani, & Guidetti, 2010; Skowronski et al., 2009).
Participants in our study were athletes with mild intellectual disabilities whose were placed into categories by level of
activity and gender but not by the type of intellectual disability. This factor could be taken into account in future research, as
the issue of recruiting similar number of males and females to better identify the gender inuence.
Regarding the scores by gender, female participants scored better for exibility tests, an expected outcome because
exibility is a gender-related variable. This phenomenon has already been found in other previous studies using the Eurot
Special tests with ID participants. Male athletes in this study scored better than female for strength/endurance and balance,
and this outcome has also been found using the Eurot Special tests (Skowronski et al., 2009).
The scores in the tness tests between the sportspeople and non sportspeople groups, were quite similar but slightly
better for the sportspeople in most of the tests. Nevertheless, differences were not meaningfully different in strength, in
balance, aerobic condition, and in exibility with the exception of the PKE test for exibility. Previous studies using the
EUROFIT tests to investigate the physical tness of elite athletes in comparison with age-matched physical education
students have showed similar or lower scores for individuals with ID (Van de Vliet et al., 2006). They found that for males
(231 participants), the athletes with ID scored better in exibility than the students but worse in strength. In the female
group (82 participants), the athletes with ID had similar scores in exibility but worse in strength when compare with the
students group. For these authors this data in general supports the fact that individuals with ID have limited physical
capacities, especially with regard to strength measures.
Regarding the limitations of our study, we understand that the ndings presented are related to the scores collected
through the previously described tests. Those tests are considered to be reliable to evaluate physical tness in massive
groups in community settings. Nevertheless, we assume that other scores could maybe appear using other specic tests to
evaluate physical tness in individuals with ID.
5. Conclusion
The ndings in this study illustrate an unclear and inconclusive relation between the scores and the declared level of
physical activity, maybe due to the context in which participants for the study were selected.
Further studies could help to determine the concept of tness in this specic population, with practical applications for
the establishment of appropriate community programmes addressed to improve the health status of people with ID. Other
research could be developed to better identify the level of physical activity and tness prole in individuals with ID.
Longitudinal studies are also necessary for a long-term documentation of the performance of individuals with ID.
Randomised controlled trials could be performed to evaluate the inuence of specically designed exercises in the
improvement of physical tness and therefore in the functional tasks of daily living.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants, collaborating physiotherapist and volunteers. This research was partially
funded by grants from the OTRI-UMA ref 806/423505 cod 00334 (A.I. Cuesta-Vargas, PI).
References
Angelopoulou, N., Matziari, C., Tsimaras, V., Sakadamis, A., Souftas, V., & Mandroukas, K. (2000). Bone mineral density and muscle strength in young men with
mental retardation (with and without Down syndrome). Calcied Tissue International, 66(3), 176180.
Angelopoulou, N., Tsimaras, V., Christoulas, K., Kokaridas, D., & Mandroukas, K. (1999). Isokinetic knee muscle strength of individuals with mental retardation, a
comparative study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3 Pt 1), 849855.
Baumgartner, T. A., Oh, S., Chung, H., & Hales, D. (2002). Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education
and Exercise Science, 6(4), 225242.
Beasley, C. R. (1982). Effects of a jogging program on cardiovascular tness and work performance of mentally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental
Deciency, 86(6), 609613.
Bellace, J. V., Healy, D., Besser, M. P., Byron, T., & Hohman, L. (2000). Validity of the Dexter evaluation systems Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of
hand grip strength in a normal population. Journal of Hand Therapy, 13, 4651.
Birmingham, T. B. (2000). Testretest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 10, 264268.
Bostrom, C., Harms-Ringdahl, K., & Nordemar, R. (1991). Clinical reliability of shoulder function assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian
Journal of Rheumatology, 20(1), 3648.

794

A.I. Cuesta-Vargas et al. / Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (2011) 788794

Brooks, D., Hunter, J. P., Parsons, J., Livsey, E., Quirt, J., & Devlin, M. (2002). Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with transtibial amputation.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(11), 15621565.
Carmeli, E., Ayalon, M., Barchad, S., Sheklow, S. L., & Reznick, A. Z. (2002). Isokinetic leg strength of institutionalized older adults with mental retardation with and
without Downs syndrome. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 16(2), 316320.
Carmeli, E., Barchad, S., Lenger, R., & Coleman, R. (2002). Muscle power, locomotor performance and exibility in aging mentally-retarded adults with and without
Downs syndrome. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions, 2(5), 457462.
Carmeli, E., Kessel, S., Coleman, R., & Ayalon, M. (2002). Effects of a treadmill walking program on muscle strength and balance in elderly people with Down
syndrome. Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(2), M106M110.
Carmeli, E., Zinger-Vaknin, T., Morad, M., & Merrick, J. (2005). Can physical training have an effect on well-being in adults with mild intellectual disability?
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 126(2), 299304.
Cowley, P. M., Ploutz-Snyder, L. L., Baynard, T., Heffernan, K., Jae, S. Y., Hsu, S., et al. (2010). Physical tness predicts functional tasks in individuals with Down
syndrome. Medicine and Science in Sports and Medicine, 42(2), 388393.
Croce, R. V., & Horvat, M. (1992). Effects of reinforcement based exercise on tness and work productivity in adults with mental retardation. Adapted Physical
Activity Quarterly, 9, 148178.
Croce, R. V., Pitetti, K. H., Horvat, M., & Miller, J. (1996). Peak torque, average power, and hamstrings/quadriceps ratios in nondisabled adults and adults with
mental retardation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(4), 369372.
Dellavia, C., Pallavera, A., Orlando, F., & Sforza, C. (2009). Postural stability of athletes in Special Olympics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108(2), 608622.
Duncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J., & Studenski, S. (1990). Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. The Journal of Gerontology: Psychology
Sciences, 45, M192M197.
Ekstrand, J., Wiktorsonn, M., Oberg, B., & Gilquist, J. (1982). Lower extremity goniometric measurements: A study to determine their reliability. Archives of Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63(4), 141174.
Fernhall, B., & Pitetti, K. H. (2001). Limitations to work capacity in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Exercise Physiology, 3, 176185.
Franciosi, E., Baldari, C., Gallotta, M. C., Emerenciani, G. P., & Guidetti, L. (2010). Selected factors correlated to athletic performance in adults with mental
retardation. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(4), 10591064.
Frey, G. C., Stanish, H. I., & Temple, V. A. (2008). Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: Review and research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,
25(2), 95117.
Gajdoski, R. L., Rieck, M. A., Sullivan, D. K., & Wightman, S. E. (1993). Comparison of four clinical tests for assessing hamstring muscle length. Journal of Orthopaedic
and Sports Physical Therapy, 18, 614618.
Gibbons, S. L., & Bushakra, F. B. (1989). Effects of Special Olympics participation on the perceived competence and social acceptance of mentally retarded children.
Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 6(1), 4051.
Guidetti, L., Franciosi, E., Gallorta, M. C., Emerenziani, G. P., & Baldari, C. (2010). Could sport specialization inuence tness and health of adults with mental
retardation? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(5), 10701075.
Hale, L., Bray, A., & Littmann, A. (2007). Assessing the balance capabilities of people with profound intellectual disabilities who have experienced a fall. Journal of
Intellectual Disability Research, 51(4), 260268.
Horvat, M., & Croce, R. (1995). Physical rehabilitation of individuals with mental retardation; physical tness and information processing. Critical Reviews in
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 233252.
Horvat, M., Pitetti, K. H., & Croce, R. (1997). Isokinetic torque, average power, and exion/extension ratios in nondisabled adults and adults with mental
retardation. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 25(6), 395399.
King, G., Law, M., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., Kertoy, M. K., & Young, N. L. (2003). A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of
children with disabilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(1), 6390.
Knudson, D. (2001). The validity of recent curl-up tests in young adults. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 15, 8185.
Kober, R., & Eggleton, I. R. (2005). The effect of different types of employment on quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(Pt 10), 756760.
Lahtiner, U., Rintala, P., & Malin, A. (2007). Physical performance of individuals with intellectual disability: A 30 year follow up. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,
24(2), 125143.
Lotan, M., Isakov, E., Kessel, S., & Merrick, J. (2004). Physical tness and functional ability of children with intellectual disability: Effects of a short-term daily
treadmill intervention. The Scientic World Journal, 14(4), 449457.
Machek, M. A., Stopka, C. B., Tillman, M. D., Sneed, S. M., & Naugle, K. E. (2008). The effects of a supervised resistanceTraining program on Special Olympics
athletes. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 17(4), 372379.
McGuire, B. E., Daly, P., & Smyth, F. (2007). Lifestyle and health behaviours of adults with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(7),
497510.
Mharada, C. M., & Siperstein, G. N. (2009). The sport experience of athletes with intellectual disabilities: A national survey of special olympics athletes and their
families. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 26(1), 6885.
Newcomer, K. L., Krug, H. E., & Mahowald, M. L. (1993). Validity and reliability of the timed-stands test for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic
diseases. The Journal of Rheumatology, 20(1), 2127.
Pitetti, K. H., & Boneh, S. (1995). Cardiovascular tness as related to leg strength in adults with mental retardation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Medicine,
27(3), 423428.
Pitetti, K. H., Climstein, M., Mays, M. J., & Barrett, P. J. (1992). Isokinetic arm and leg strength of adults with Down syndrome: A comparative study. Archives of
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(9), 847850.
Pitteti, K. H., Jackson, J. A., Stubbs, N. B., Campbell, K. D., & Saraswathy, S. B. (1989). Fitness levels of adult Special Olympic participants. Adapted Physical Activity
Quarterly, 6(4), 354370.
Skowronski, W., Horvat, M., Nocera, J., Roswal, G., & Croce, R. (2009). Eurot special: European tness battery score variation among individuals with intellectual
disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 26(1), 5467.
Stephens, D. L., Collins, M. D., & Dodder, R. A. (2005). A longitudinal study of employment and skill acquisition among individuals with developmental disabilities.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(5), 469486.
Temple, V. A., Frey, G. C., & Stanish, H. I. (2006). Physical activity of adults with mental retardation: Review and research needs. American Journal of Health
Promotion, 21(1), 212.
Van de Vliet, P., Rintala, P., Frojd, K., Verellen, J., van Houtte, S., Daly, D. J., et al. (2006). Physical tness prole of elite athletes with intellectual disability.
Scandinavian Journal in Medicine and Science in Sports, 16(6), 417425.
Weiss, J., Diamond, T., Demark, J., & Lovald, B. (2003). Involvement in Special Olympics and its relations to self-concept and actual competency in participants with
developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(4), 281305.
Wilson, P. E. (2002). Exercise and sports for children who have disabilities. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 13(4), 907923.