You are on page 1of 7

2009 STANDARD PROGRESS REPORT FOR UNFPA 7TH CP

INDONESIA DISTRICTS AND PROVINCES

DISTRICT: -
PROVINCE: WEST JAVA PROVINCE
DISTRICT/PROVINCE MANAGER NAME: WIWIN WINARNI
DATE OF SUBMITTING THIS REPORT: 20 JANUARY – PARTIALLY COMPLETED

PURPOSE
1. To report on the progress achieved in 2009 as per the approved Country Programme Action Plan and
Annual Work Plan.
2. To accompany the Annual Workplan Monitoring Tool as a narrative and provide an assessment of
progress made in achieving CP outputs, challenges faced and obstacles met.

Section 1: Outcome and Output indictors reporting


Please fill in the excel file to inform us about the progress that was made in 2009. If you don’t have the
information just write down Information not available. If for 2009 in your district you didn’t work on this
area just right down Not Applicable.

Section 2. Summary of 2009 Programme (max 2.5 page and KEEP IT SIMPLE and TO THE POINT)
Summarize the main constraining and facilitating factors affecting implementation and the achievement of
results. Identify key lessons learned in addressing constraints and taking advantage of facilitating factors.

Output R101

A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on
achievements (so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)

CCS Team has been established based on SK Gubernur No.050/Kep. 119-Bappeda/2009 dated
24 June 2009. POA has been identified and will be supported by APBD, APBN and UNFPA at 2010.
Even this team’s task is working how to guarantee contraceptive for non poor user, based on RH
costing advocacy team will support data to access APBD Perubahan 2010 for allocating
Contraceptives for poor since no initiative for contraceptive allocation at 2010.

ARH guidelines (Provincial Strategic Planning on ARH) is agreed to be endorsed net February 2010.
All related team still in the process of reviewing final draft

On PAC and HIV-AIDS program and prevention, UNFPA and IFPPD take a lead to initiate local law
on HIV-AIDS that is agreed to be parliament initiative

On ARH integration into curriculum, West Java Province MONE has been introduced technical guide
to integrate ARH into material biologi, Pendidikan agama islam, sociology, civic education, bahasa
Indonesia, pendidikan kesehataan dan olah raga. This guideline is prepared to be guidline that
applicable at all 26 district/munipalcity at West Java.

B. Constraints and obstacles faced in trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big
issues such as lack of time, lack of commitment from politicians and policy makers unclear targets,
not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support, etc)

1
a. On CCS problem is no involvement from Badan Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Keluarga
Berencana (BPPKB), provincial FP institution on this team. Meanwhile BKKBN could not be
supported by provincial government since BKKBN is centralized institution. What need to
be conducted is that try to invite more BPPKB to be actively take a lead on CCS issues.
b. On ARH Guideline, we found some challenges due to and policy makers unclear target,
vision and understanding on this issues, indicated no reference at planning document dealing
with youth issues, no national reference as legal aspect of the strategic plans.
c. On ARH integration into curriculum, there is so far fine. Guideline form Ibu Iwu is
supportive in term framing developer team to developed technical guideline for ARH into
curriculum
d. On PAC, no constraints since we do provide comprehensive support to this only M&E visit.
Results of the mission has been followed up by responsible stakeholders
e. On RH forecasting, training conducted is not really good since participants could not share
result on this. Its better trainer needed, qualified participants, more technical support by
central BKKBN when conducting monitoring to district and province

C. Lessons learned and recommendations


Lessons learned:
 CCS and ARH should be advocated as integrated issue on effort to eliminate MMR
and IMR to be supported by local government. So potencial support on CCS
would be very wide since focus of provincial dev agenda in that achieving Human
Dev Index.
 Even though all local government admitted as autonomous at decentralization,
central/MONE/BKKB/etc UNFPA should ensure that we provide technical
reference and information on our respective mandate to enable local government
respond to public policy needed along with those RH, population and gender issues

Some recommendation is embedded at constraint

Output R105
A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on
achievements (so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)

Achievement on this output is that acknowledgment to UNFPA/IFPPD initiative to conduct advocacy


to related key/target stakeholders so we could access other sources to do advocacy to ensure that RH,
Population and gender are mainstreaming at provincial and district level.

B. Constraints, obstacles and opportunities (such as supportive environment from legislatures) faced in
trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big issues such as lack of time, unclear
targets, not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support,
etc)
Provincial support to religious leaders on mainstreaming UNFPA Mandate issues has only little
impact. Regular meeting among religious leader is one of opportunity to be conducted to have semi
permanent working group that could be also conducted at district level (to forming Forum Ulama
Peduli Kespro, KB dan Gender).
We found also that guideline from PCM BKKBN on R105 and R301 some are inconsistent with
annual target. Take for example some of stakeholder that not identifies at CPAP/Annual target were
indicated at TOR guideline. So province and district followed the guide. However, based on spot
check that was not inconsistence to target want to achieved.

2
C. Lessons learned and recommendations
Lesson Learned:
 Under this output some UNFPA initiative/support activity is successfully
leveraging impact to widen advocacy that enable us reaching more parliaments,
bupati/walikota and decision makers and other target audience and all district at
west java. One of these are: we have media platform, monthly meeting among
media, to launch issues of RH, Population and gender

Some recommendation is embedded at constraint

Output R301
A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on
achievements (so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)

We produced IEC material (CD on Facing 50 Million West Java inhabitants year 2025) that
widely used by relating stakeholder at province and districts to call more support from
target audience.

SALT approach has been introducing at Manonjaya district (supported also by R205) that has
successfully improving knowledge and awareness among community member on ARH issues and
working together to ensure that youths at the sub district are able to access information and
services on RH.

B. Constraints and obstacles faced in trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big
issues such as lack of time, lack of commitment from politicians and policy makers unclear targets,
not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support, etc)

Strategy on airing information on RH, Pop and gender at provincial level need to be reviewed since
we found that this implication is not really significant. What is it needed is that improving in
frequency this support at district level.

C. Lessons learned and recommendations

Lesson learned:
Community need intensified and sustained facilitation to improve their demand on RH, FP and
gender info and services. SALT as way of working is better introduced at least to puskesmas model
as UNFPA projcet’s window that could encourage other member society to be aware that they indeed
has demand on RH, FP and GBV services.
Recomendadtions:
 BKKBN as implementing partner suggests UNFPA to open networking to
university (expert, young lecturer, researcher ) to have new ages (young adults)
supportive group that has wider access to man and women at reproductive age,
educated and urban style that could mainstreaming reproductive, population and
gender issues. This could back up community gathering to midwives, PLKB etc at
village level.
 They suggest using students who will Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) at villages as RP.
Population and gender embassy to attract villager’s interest on the respective issues

Output R205

3
A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on
achievements (so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)
PHO facilitation training, TA and data analysis on IERH implementation at 6 selected puskesmas.
We proud that 6 selected puskesmas had been improving their capacity at specific RH services
Tasikmalaya: Pusk Manonjaya (ARH issues) Ciawi (STI) Tineuwati (GBV)
Indramayu: Pusk Karangample (ARH issues), Kandanghaur (STI), Margadadi (-).

As a process, IERH services will be improved and maintained at 2010

B. Constraints and obstacles faced in trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big
issues such as lack of time, lack of commitment from politicians and policy makers unclear targets,
not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support, etc)

As admitted by PHO officer, RH is not obligation/prioritized task from MOH to be implemented by


POH that is why support on IERH implementation is only rely on UNFPA fund. Its totally rely on
PHO officer’s awareness to access and using budget provided by APBD, APBN to at least maintained
UNFPA initiate support. No guarantee to scaling up this IERH into other pusk/districts.

C. Lessons learned and recommendations


- Recommendation: to have IERH facilitator (consist of lintas program at PHO anf MOH) at
provincial level combined with MOH, so facilitation will be conducted by the team. This will enable
they plan POA among themselves to maintain UNFPA initiative on IERH.

Output P101
A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on
achievements (so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)

Integrating 22 table of aggregated data/indicator into DDA 2009. Printing and distributing 43 books
and CD into partners.

Forum data start reviewing published DDA 2009 and feeding some input to BPS on tables presenting.
However, no SK as reference to this forum. However this forum will be permanent working task at
Unit Pelaksana Teknis Badan Pusat Data dan Alisa Pembangunan under Bappeda initiation. The
forum will be such an SC for the UPTB at social and health issues

Web at BPS was up dated so DDA could be widely accessed.

B. Constraints and obstacles faced in trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big
issues such as lack of time, lack of commitment from politicians and policy makers unclear targets,
not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support, etc)

Delayed publication of DDA 2009 at WJ resulted delayed completion on UNFOA supporting activity.
Need better methodology /attractive on training for planner/decision makers instead of classical
method on data utilization.

It was planned initially 4 times at 2009 to do regular meeting of forum data, however only two times
conducted. This make the forum could not yet motivate inter-sector capacity, willing and conscience
to have better understanding on data, providing timely manner data and quality data to BPS staff.

4
C. Lessons learned and recommendations
Lesson learned:
Periodical Training and meeting at central level positively improve awareness of BPS staffs on
integrating aggregated data/indicator at DDA.

Output G101
A. Results of programme in 2009 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on Results
of programme in 2008 (please refer to Progress Towards Target file and elaborate on achievements
(so don’t summarize all activities just mention how the progress has been achieved)

Initiation of P2TP2A province could be strengthened by regular meeting at province. The P2TP2A
will be run at February 2009.

B. Constraints and obstacles faced in trying to achieving the annual targets (you can mention here big
issues such as lack of time, lack of commitment from politicians and policy makers unclear targets,
not enough IEC material available, better trainers needed, need for more technical support, etc)

Initiation on GRB could not be conducted well since PP at province has no willing and commitment
on this due their lack capacity.

C. Lessons learned and recommendations


Recommendation
: UNFPA could play critical role on supporting data of GBV trough P2TP2A along with improving
this capacity on handling GBV issues

Section 3: Monitoring

Summarize what knowledge and insights you have gained from monitoring activities conducted in the course
of the year and assess how this knowledge was used to improve project performance (keep it short and to the
point).

I’ve been learning some technical information, knowledge and understanding on IERH services and its
integration. Moreover on how to do step by step integration of ARH into curriculum

At advocacy, I could identify specific issues applicable at such district (TSM: maternal/IERH and ARH
integration into curriculum) (IMY: FP and ARH) and framing advocacy strategy to mainstreaming this
issues with partners at district

This could improve project performance in term of:


 now for sure that output to be achieved is standardized based on SOP from related
institution (IERH from MOH, ARH from Mone)
 to boost local regulation, commitment and support from district on UNFPA
mandate issues as one ways of exit strategy
 Using recommendation of program spot check as reference to management and
administration requirement as project/Pedum recommendation

5
PLEASE ALSOM WRITE SOMETHING ABOUT YOUR FIELD MONITORING VISITS?
WHERE DID U GO, WHAT WERE YOUR MAIN OBSERVATIONS, HOW WAS THE
PROGRESS OF THE PROGRAMS?

Section 4: Trainings and workshops all components:

1. How many people were trained for each output? (if not available just write down NA)
Indicator Planned to be Actually trained
Output trained
Male Female Total
RH forecasting 1 1
(demography
R101 program) 1
TOT for teacher on 10 10 20
ARH integration into
curriculum 15
R301 Na

religious leaders are 21 9 30


improved at RH, Pop
R105 and Gender issues 25
Head of KUA at sub 29 10 39
district are improved
at RH, Pop and
Gender issues 25

STI to support IERH 10 9 19


R205 services at Pusk 11
EMOC on supporting 9 4 13
maternal services at
district hospital 18

Planner on data 11 9 19
P101 utilization 20

Implementation of 24 16 40
GRB at local planning
G101 mechanism 25

2. How many workshops/trainings/meetings were held in 2009


Workshops Coordination Total
Trainings meetings
R101 3 2 6 11

R301 1 1

R105 2 2

R205 1 2 3

6
P101 1 2 3

G101 1 1 2
Programme Management (such as 6 6
quarterly coordination meeting with
Bappeda and PPMs

SECTION 4. Financial implementation

Budget Expenses
Received by accepted by Implementation
Output IPs Agency Rate
R101 114,995,000 114,995,000 100%
R301 59,475,000 59,175,000 99%
R105 103,765,000 97,890,000 94%
R205 184,459,125 141,334,925 77%
P101 100,035,000 93,435,000 93%
G101 420,533,375 373,963,100 89%
Total 883,227,500 787,358,025 92%

Before submitting please check whether you have attached all the required attachments.

You might also like