Technical Guide

Understanding and Using Additional Utility Data when Performing an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis
Typically, the utility available short circuit currents (three phase and single line to ground) and its
corresponding X/R ratios is the information provided by the utility. However, obtaining the primary
overcurrent protective device information protecting the service transformer and conductor data
from the protective device to the service transformer is also critical when preforming an Arc Flash
Hazard Analysis.
The reason for obtaining this additional Utility information is to analyze the effects of the primary
service transformer protection on the calculated arc flash incident energy at the service
equipment.
At low voltages, this incident energy normally exceeds 40 cal/cm2 rendering this panel unable to
be maintained while energized. However, there exists a possibility of reducing this incident energy
to a manageable level when including the effects of the primary protection.
Below are some examples demonstrating how this additional utility information will affect the arc
flash incident energy results.
No Primary Protection:

Technical Guide

Primary Protection:

The first two circuits have a 4.16 kV (MV) secondary voltage and the last two have a 480 V (LV)
secondary voltage.

Technical Guide

The following shows the incident energy from SE-1 to SE-4, when there is no primary protection:

Notice that for the medium-voltage (MV) service panels, the incident energy corresponds to a
Category 3 level. The low-voltage (LV) service panels have a Category of Dangerous!
The following shows the effect of the primary protection is now being considered in the incident
energy calculations:

The results are quite different compared to the case without primary protection.

Technical Guide

We will now analyze each case in detail to understand the results.

First Case (With Protection):
Primary Protection: Fuse.
Secondary Side Voltage: 4.16 kV
The calculated incident energy is reduced by FU-UTIL-1 at SE-1 from 16 cal/cm2 to 1.9
cal/cm2.

Technical Guide

Second Case (With Protection):

Primary Protection: Relay
Secondary Side Voltage: 4.16 kV
The calculated incident energy is not reduced by REL-UTIL-2 at SE-2. It remained at 21
cal/cm2. Lowering the time delay settings (but sacrificing downstream coordination) could
achieve more mitigation.

Technical Guide

Third Case (With Protection):

Primary Protection: Fuse
Secondary Side Voltage: 480 V
The calculated incident energy is not reduced by FU-UTIL-3 at SE-3. The clearing time of
the fuse is above the maximum arcing time of 2 seconds.

Technical Guide

Fourth Case (With Protection):

Primary Protection: Relay
Secondary Side Voltage: 480 V
The calculated incident energy is reduced by REL-UTIL-4 at SE-4 from 154 cal/cm2 to 24
cal/cm2.

Technical Guide

Summary:
In Case 1 and Case 4, the primary protection had a significant effect on mitigating the
incident energy. In Case 2 and Case 3, the incident energy remained the same.
We can conclude that it is not possible to know if the primary protection will have a
substantial incident energy mitigation effect. The only way to know is to include the
protection and perform the calculations.
Therefore, it is recommended to include the primary protection in the model, especially
when the service panels have a dangerous incident energy level without its inclusion.