Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NO. 11-12, S. 2012, AND FURTHER AMENDED BY NLRC EN BANC RES. NO 05-14, S.
2014, PUBLISHED ON MAY 30, 2014
14. 1 Complaint; Cause of Action; Real parties in
interest; Amendment of complaint; suppletory
application of the Rules of Court
Rule 3, SECTION 1, NLRC RULES OF PROCEDURE.
COMPLAINT. - a) A complaint or petition is a
pleading alleging the cause or causes of action of
the complainant or petitioner. The names and
addresses of all complainants or petitioners and
respondents must be stated in the complaint or
petition. It shall be signed under oath by the
complainant or petitioner, with a declaration of
non- forum shopping. b) A party having more than
one cause of action against the other party, arising
out of the same relationship, shall include all of
them in one complaint or petition.
Contents:
1. Names and addresses of all complainants or
petitioners
2. Names and addresses of the respondents
3. It must be signed under oath by the
complainants or petitioners
4. With a certificate of non-forum shopping
Where to file?
Appropriate docketing unit of the Regional
Arbitration Branch or the Commission.
CAUSE OF ACTION
Rule 2, Section 2. Rules of Court. Cause of action,
defined. A cause of action is the act or omission
by which a party violates a right of another.
REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST
Rule 3, Section 2. Rules of Court. Parties in interest.
A real party in interest is the party who stands to
be benefited or injured by the judgment in the suit,
or the party entitled to the avails of the suit. Unless
otherwise authorized by law or these Rules, every
action must be prosecuted or defended in the name
of the real party in interest.
AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT
Section 11, Rule V. NLRC En Banc Re. No. 11-12. An
amended complaint or petition may be filed before
the Labor Arbiter at any time before the filing of
position paper, with proof of service of a copy
thereof to the opposing party/ies. If the amendment
of the complaint or petition involves impleading
additional respondent/s, service of another
and after due notice, to hear and decide any matter involving the recovery of wages and other
monetary claims and benefits, including legal interest, owing to an employee or person
employed in domestic or household service or househelper under this Code, arising from
employer-employee relations: Provided, That such complaint does not include a claim for
reinstatement: Provided further, That the aggregate money claims of each employee or
househelper does not exceed Five thousand pesos (P5,000.00). The Regional Director or hearing
officer shall decide or resolve the complaint within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the
filing of the same. Any sum thus recovered on behalf of any employee or househelper pursuant
to this Article shall be held in a special deposit account by, and shall be paid on order of, the
Secretary of Labor and Employment or the Regional Director directly to the employee or
househelper concerned. Any such sum not paid to the employee or househelper because he
cannot be located after diligent and reasonable effort to locate him within a period of three (3)
years, shall be held as a special fund of the Department of Labor and Employment to be used
exclusively for the amelioration and benefit of workers.
Any decision or resolution of the Regional Director
or hearing officer pursuant to this provision may be
appealed on the same grounds provided in Article
223 of this Code, within five (5) calendar days from
receipt of a copy of said decision or resolution, to
the National Labor Relations Commission which
shall resolve the appeal within ten (10) calendar
days from the submission of the last pleading
required or allowed under its rules.
The Secretary of Labor and Employment or his duly
authorized representative may supervise the
payment of unpaid wages and other monetary
claims and benefits, including legal interest, found
owing to any employee or househelper under this
Code. (As amended by Section 2, Republic Act No.
6715, March 21, 1989)
Article 217. Jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiters and the Commission.
Except as otherwise provided under this Code, the Labor Arbiters shall have original and
exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide, within thirty (30) calendar days after the submission of
the case by the parties for decision without extension, even in the absence of stenographic
notes, the following cases involving all workers, whether agricultural or non-agricultural:Unfair
labor practice cases;termination disputes; If accompanied with a claim for reinstatement, those
cases that workers may file involving wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and
conditions of employment;Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages
arising from the employer-employee relations; Cases arising from any violation of Article 264 of
this Code, including questions involving the legality of strikes and lockouts; and
Except claims for Employees Compensation, Social Security, Medicare and maternity benefits, all
other claims arising from employer-employee relations, including those of persons in domestic or
household service, involving an amount exceeding five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) regardless of
whether accompanied with a claim for reinstatement.
The Commission shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases decided by Labor
Arbiters.
Cases arising from the interpretation or implementation of collective bargaining agreements and
those arising from the interpretation or enforcement of company personnel policies shall be
disposed of by the Labor Arbiter by referring the same to the grievance machinery and voluntary
arbitration as may be provided in said agreements. (As amended by Section 9, Republic Act No.
6715, March 21, 1989)
RULE V
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE LABOR ARBITERS
SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OF LABOR ARBITERS.
Labor Arbiters shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide the following
cases involving all
workers, whether agricultural or non-agricultural:
a) Unfair labor practice cases;
b) Termination disputes;
c) If accompanied with a claim for reinstatement, those cases that workers may file involving
wages, rates of pay, hours of work and other terms and conditions of employment;
d) Claims for actual, moral, exemplary and other forms of damages arising from employeremployee relations;
e) Cases arising from any violation of Article 264 of the Labor Code, as amended, including
questions involving the legality of strikes and lockouts;
f)Except claims for employees compensation not included in the next succeeding paragraph,
social security, medicare, and maternity benefits, all other claims arising from employeremployee relations, including those of persons IN domestic or household service, involving an
amount exceeding Five Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00), whether or not accompanied with a claim
for reinstatement;
g) Wage distortion disputes in unorganized establishments not voluntarily settled by the parties
pursuant to Republic Act No. 6727;
h) Enforcement of compromise agreements when there is non-compliance by any of the parties
pursuant to Article 227 of the Labor Code, as amended;
i) Money claims arising out of employer-employee relationship or by virtue of any law or
contract, involving Filipino workers for overseas deployment, including claims for actual, moral,
exemplary and other forms of damages as provided by Section 10 of RA 8042, as amended by
RA 10022; and
j) Other cases as may be provided by law. Cases arising from the interpretation or
implementation of collective bargaining agreements and those arising from the interpretation or
enforcement of company personnel policies shall be disposed of by the Labor Arbiter by
referring the same to the grievance machinery and voluntary arbitration, as may be provided in
said agreements.
Article 128. Visitorial and enforcement power.
The Secretary of Labor and Employment or his duly
authorized representatives, including labor
regulation officers, shall have access to employers
records and premises at any time of the day or
night whenever work is being undertaken therein,
and the right to copy therefrom, to question any
employee and investigate any fact, condition or
matter which may be necessary to determine
violations or which may aid in the enforcement of
this Code and of any labor law, wage order or rules
and regulations issued pursuant thereto.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 129 and
217 of this Code to the contrary, and in cases
where the relationship of employer-employee still
exists, the Secretary of Labor and Employment or
his duly authorized representatives shall have the
PAPER;
CONTENTS
OF
POSITION
PAPER;
(IRAH)
14.9 QUANTUM OF EVIDENCE & BURDEN OF PROOF; TECHNICAL RULES OF PROCEDURE
( ART 221)
Art. 221. Technical rules not binding and prior resort to amicable settlement. In any
proceeding before the Commission or any of the Labor Arbiters, the rules of evidence prevailing
in courts of law or equity shall not be controlling and it is
the spirit and intention of this Code that the Commission and its members and the Labor Arbiters
shall use every and all reasonable means to ascertain the facts in each case speedily and
objectively and without regard to technicalities of law or procedure, all in the interest of due
process. In any proceeding before the Commission or any Labor Arbiter, the parties may be
represented by legal counsel but it shall be the duty of the Chairman, any Presiding
Commissioner or Commissioner or any Labor Arbiter to exercise complete control of the
proceedings at all stages. Any provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the Labor Arbiter
shall exert all efforts towards the amicable settlement of a labor dispute within his jurisdiction on
or before the first hearing. The same rule shall apply to the Commission in the exercise of its
original jurisdiction.
14.10. APPEAL PROCEDURE ( ART 223) ; APPEAL FEE & POSTING OF BOND; FRIVOLOUS
OR DILATORY APPEALS
APPEAL
Art. 223. Appeal. Decisions, awards, or orders of the Labor Arbiter are final and executory
unless appealed to the Commission by any or both parties within ten (10) calendar days from
receipt of such decisions, awards, or orders. Such appeal may be entertained only on any of the
following grounds:
1. If there is prima facie evidence of abuse of discretion on the part of the Labor Arbiter;
2. If the decision, order or award was secured through fraud or coercion, including graft and
corruption;
3. If made purely on questions of law; and
4. If serious errors in the findings of facts are raised which would cause grave or irreparable
damage or injury to the appellant.
In case of a judgment involving a monetary award, an appeal by the employer may be perfected
only upon the posting of a cash or surety bond issued by a reputable bonding company duly
accredited by the Commission in the amount equivalent to the monetary award in the judgment
appealed from.
In any event, the decision of the Labor Arbiter reinstating a dismissed or separated employee,
insofar as the reinstatement aspect is concerned, shall immediately be executory, even pending
appeal. The employee shall either be admitted back to work under the same terms and
conditions prevailing prior to his dismissal or separation or, at the option of the employer, merely
reinstated in the payroll. The posting of a bond by the employer shall not stay the execution for
reinstatement provided herein.
To discourage frivolous or dilatory appeals, the Commission or the Labor Arbiter shall impose
reasonable penalty, including fines or censures, upon the erring parties.
In all cases, the appellant shall furnish a copy of the memorandum of appeal to the other party
who shall file an answer not later than ten (10) calendar days from receipt thereof.
The Commission shall decide all cases within twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of the
answer of the appellee. The decision of the Commission shall be final and executory after ten
(10) calendar days from receipt thereof by the parties.
Any law enforcement agency may be deputized by the Secretary of Labor and Employment or
the Commission in the enforcement of decisions, awards or orders. (As amended by Section 12,
Republic Act No. 6715, March 21, 1989)
(NLRC REVISED RULES OF PROCEDURE)
SECTION 5. APPEAL FEE. The appellant shall pay the prevailing appeal fee and legal research
fee to the Regional Arbitration Branch or Regional Office of origin, and the official receipt of such
payment shall form part of the records of the case. (5a)
SECTION 6. BOND. In case the decision of the Labor Arbiter or the Regional Director involves
a monetary award, an appeal by the employer may be perfected only upon the posting of a
bond, which shall either be in the form of cash deposit or surety bond equivalent in amount to
the monetary award, exclusive of damages and attorneys fees. In case of surety bond, the same
shall be issued by a reputable bonding company duly accredited by the Commission or the
Supreme Court, and shall be accompanied by original or certified true copies of the following: (a)
a joint declaration under oath by the employer, his/her counsel, and the bonding company,
attesting that the bond posted is genuine, and shall be in effect until final disposition of the case;
(b) an indemnity agreement between the employer-appellant and bonding company; (c) proof of
security deposit or collateral securing the bond: provided, that a check shall not be considered as
an acceptable security; (d) a certificate of authority from the Insurance Commission; (e)
certificate of registration from the Securities and Exchange Commission; (f) certificate of
accreditation and authority from the Supreme Court; and (g) notarized board resolution or
secretarys certificate from the bonding company showing its authorized signatories and their
specimen signatures. The Commission through the Chairman may on justifiable grounds blacklist
a bonding company, notwithstanding its accreditation by the Supreme Court. A cash or surety
bond shall be valid and effective from the date of deposit or posting, until the case is finally
decided, resolved or terminated, or the award satisfied. This condition shall be deemed
incorporated in the terms and conditions of the surety bond, and shall be binding on the
appellants and the bonding company. The appellant shall furnish the appellee with a certified
true copy of the said surety bond with all the above-mentioned supporting documents. The
appellee shall verify the regularity and genuineness thereof and immediately report any
irregularity to the Commission. Upon verification by the Commission that the bond is irregular or
not genuine, the Commission shall cause the immediate dismissal of the appeal, and censure the
responsible parties and their counsels, or subject them to reasonable fine or penalty, and the
bonding company may be blacklisted. No motion to reduce bond shall be entertained except on
meritorious grounds, and only upon the posting of a bond in a reasonable amount in relation to
the monetary award. The mere filing of a motion to reduce bond without complying with the
requisites in the preceding paragraphs shall not stop the running of the period to perfect an
appeal. (6a)
SECTION 10. FRIVOLOUS OR DILATORY APPEALS. No appeal from an interlocutory order
shall be entertained. To discourage frivolous or dilatory appeals, including those taken from
interlocutory orders, the Commission after hearing may censure or cite in contempt the erring
parties and their counsels, or subject them to reasonable fine or penalty.
14. 11. NLRC; COMPOSITION, POWERS AND FUNCTIONS
ART. 220 [213].1 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION
There shall be a National Labor Relations
Commission which shall be attached to the
Department of Labor and Employment solely for
program and policy coordination only, composed of
a
Chairman
and
twenty-three
(23) members.
Eight (8) members each shall be chosen only from
among the nominees of the workers and employers
organizations, respectively. The Chairman and the
seven (7) remaining members shall come from the
public sector, with the latter to be chosen
preferably from among the incumbent labor
arbiters.
Upon assumption into office, the members
nominated by the workers and employers
organizations shall divest themselves of any
affiliation with or interest in the federation or
association to which they belong.
any
duly
time
No extension of time to file the petition shall be granted except for compelling reason and in no
case exceeding fifteen (15) days. (4a) (Bar Matter No. 803, 21 July 1998; A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC)
5.Respondents and costs in certain cases. When the petition filed relates to the acts or
omissions of a judge, court, quasi-judicial agency, tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person,
the petitioner shall join, as private respondent or respondents with such public respondent or
respondents, the person or persons interested in sustaining the proceedings in the court; and it
shall be the duty of such private respondents to appear and defend, both in his or their own
behalf and in behalf of the public respondent or respondents affected by the proceedings, and
the costs awarded in such proceedings in favor of the petitioner shall be against the private
respondents only, and not against the judge, court, quasi-judicial agency, tribunal, corporation,
board, officer or person impleaded as public respondent or respondents.
Unless otherwise specifically directed by the court where the petition is pending, the public
respondents shall not appear in or file an answer or comment to the petition or any pleading
therein. If the case is elevated to a higher court by either party, the public respondents shall be
included therein as nominal parties. However, unless otherwise specifically directed by the
court, they shall not appear or participate in the proceedings therein. (5a)
Section 6.Order to comment. If the petition is sufficient in form and substance to justify such
process, the court shall issue an order requiring the respondent or respondents to comment on
the petition within ten (10) days from receipt of a copy thereof. Such order shall be served on
the respondents in such manner as the court may direct together with a copy of the petition and
any annexes thereto.
In petitions for certiorari before the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, the provisions of
section 2, Rule 56, shall be observed. Before giving due course thereto, the court may require
the respondents to file their comment to, and not a motion to dismiss, the petition. Thereafter,
the court may require the filing of a reply and such other responsive or other pleadings as it
may deem necessary and proper. (6a)
Section 7.Expediting proceedings; injunctive relief. The court in which the petition is filed
may issue orders expediting the proceedings, and it may also grant a temporary restraining
order or a writ of preliminary injunction for the preservation of the rights of the parties pending
such proceedings. The petition shall not interrupt the course of the principal case unless a
temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary injunction has been issued against the
public respondent from further proceeding in the case. (7a)
Section 8.Proceedings after comment is filed. After the comment or other pleadings required
by the court are filed, or the time for the filing thereof has expired, the court may hear the case
or require the parties to submit memoranda. If after such hearing or submission of memoranda
or the expiration of the period for the filing thereof the court finds that the allegations of the
petition are true, it shall render judgment for the relief prayed for or to which the petitioner is
entitled.
The court, however, may dismiss the petition if it finds the same to be patently without merit,
prosecuted manifestly for delay, or that the questions raised therein are too unsubstantial to
require consideration. (8a)
Section 9.Service and enforcement of order or judgment. A certified copy of the judgment
rendered in accordance with the last preceding section shall be served upon the court, quasijudicial agency, tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person concerned in such manner as the
court may direct, and disobedience thereto shall be punished as contempt. An execution may
issue for any damages or costs awarded in accordance with section 1 of Rule 39. (9a)
RULE 43
Appeals From the Court of Tax Appeals and
Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of
Appeals
Section 1.Scope. This Rule shall apply to
appeals from judgments or final orders of the Court
of Tax Appeals and from awards, judgments, final
orders or resolutions of or authorized by any quasijudicial agency in the exercise of its quasi-judicial
functions. Among these agencies are the Civil
Service Commission, Central Board of Assessment
Appeals, Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of the President, Land Registration Authority,
Social Security Commission, Civil Aeronautics
Board, Bureau of Patents, Trademarks and
Technology
Transfer,
National
Electrification
Administration, Energy Regulatory Board, National
Telecommunications Commission, Department of
Agrarian Reform under Republic Act No. 6657,
Government Service Insurance System, Employees
Compensation Commission, Agricultural Invention
Board, Insurance Commission, Philippine Atomic
Energy Commission, Board of Investments,
Construction Industry Arbitration Commission, and
voluntary arbitrators authorized by law. (n)
Section 2.Cases not covered. This Rule shall not
apply to judgments or final orders issued under the
Labor Code of the Philippines. (n)
Section 3.Where to appeal. An appeal under
this Rule may be taken to the Court of Appeals
within the period and in the manner herein
provided, whether the appeal involves questions of
fact, of law, or mixed questions of fact and law. (n)
Section 4.Period of appeal. The appeal shall be
taken within fifteen (15) days from notice of the
award, judgment, final order or resolution, or from
the date of its last publication, if publication is
required by law for its effectivity, or of the denial of
petitioner's motion for new trial or reconsideration
duly filed in accordance with the governing law of
the court or agency a quo. Only one (1) motion for
reconsideration shall be allowed. Upon proper
motion and the payment of the full amount of the
docket fee before the expiration of the
reglementary period, the Court of Appeals may
grant an additional period of fifteen (15) days only
within which to file the petition for review. No
further extension shall be granted except for the
following, while neither controlling nor fully measuring the court's discretion, indicate the
character of the reasons which will be considered:
(a) When the court a quo has decided a question of substance, not theretofore determined by
the Supreme Court, or has decided it in a way probably not in accord with law or with the
applicable decisions of the Supreme Court; or
(b) When the court a quo has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial
proceedings, or so far sanctioned such departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of
the power of supervision. (4a)
Section 7.Pleadings and documents that may be required; sanctions. For purposes of
determining whether the petition should bedismissed or denied pursuant to section 5 of this
Rule, or where the petition is given due course under section 8 hereof, the Supreme Court may
require or allow the filing of such pleadings, briefs, memoranda or documents as it may deem
necessary within such periods and under such conditions as it may consider appropriate, and
impose the corresponding sanctions in case of non-filing or unauthorized filing of such pleadings
and documents or non-compliance with the conditions therefor. (n)
Section 8.Due course; elevation of records. If the petition is given due course, the Supreme
Court may require the elevation of the complete record of the case or specified parts thereof
within fifteen (15) days from notice. (2a)
Section 9.Rule applicable to both civil and criminal cases. The mode of appeal prescribed in
this Rule shall be applicable to both civil and criminal cases, except in criminal cases where the
penalty imposed is death, reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment. (n)
14.18 SUPREME COURT PROCEDURE ( RULE 45, CIVIL PROCEDURE)
Rule 45- Appeal by certiorari to the Supreme Court
Section 1. Filing of petition with Supreme Court. A party desiring to appeal by certiorari from
a judgment or final order or resolution of the Court of Appeals, the Sandiganbayan, the Regional
Trial Court or other courts whenever authorized by law, may file with the Supreme Court a
verified petition for review on certiorari. The petition shall raise only questions of law which
must be distinctly set forth.
Section 2. Time for filing; extension. The petition shall be filed within fifteen (15) days from
notice of the judgment or final order or resolution appealed from, or of the denial of the
petitioner's motion for new trial or reconsideration filed in due time after notice of the judgment.
On motion duly filed and served, with full payment of the docket and other lawful fees and the
deposit for costs before the expiration of the reglementary period, the Supreme Court may for
justifiable reasons grant an extension of thirty (30) days only within which to file the petition.
Section 5. Dismissal or denial of petition. The failure of the petitioner to comply with any of
the foregoing requirements regarding the payment of the docket and other lawful fees, deposit
for costs, proof of service of the petition, and the contents of and the documents which should
accompany the petition shall be sufficient ground for the dismissal thereof.
The Supreme Court may on its own initiative deny the petition on the ground that the appeal is
without merit, or is prosecuted manifestly for delay, or that the questions raised therein are too
unsubstantial to require consideration.
Section 6. Review discretionary. A review is not a matter of right, but of sound judicial
discretion, and will be granted only when there are special and important reasons thereof. The
following, while neither controlling nor fully measuring the court's discretion, indicate the
character of the reasons which will be considered:
(a) When the court a quo has decided a question of substance, not theretofore determined by
the Supreme Court, or has decided it in a way probably not in accord with law or with the
applicable decisions of the Supreme Court; or
(b) When the court a quo has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial
proceedings, or so far sanctioned such departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of
the power of supervision.
14. 19 COMPULSORY ARBITRATION ; DISTINGUISHED FROM VOLUNTARY ARBITRATION;
DOLE DO NO 107-10, S. 2010 ( GUIDELINES ON THE SINGLE ENTRY APPROACH
PRESCRIBING A 30 DAY MANDATORY CONCILIATION MEDIATION SERVICES FOR ALL
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES) AND DOLE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE
SINGLE ENTRY APPROACH , DATED FEB 25, 2011; SEE HOWEVER, RA 10396
( STRENGTHENING CONCILIATION-MEDIATION AS VOLUNTARY MODE OF DISPUTE
SETTLEMENT FOR ALL LABOR CASES, AMENDING ART 228 LABOR CODE)
Compulsory Arbitration distinguished from
voluntary arbitration
Voluntary arbitration has been defined as a
contractual proceeding whereby the parties to any
dispute or controversy, in order to obtain a speedy
and inexpensive final disposition of the matter
involved, select a judge of their own choice and by
consent submit their controversy to him for
determination. Under voluntary arbitration, referral
of a dispute by the parties is made, pursuant to a
voluntary arbitration clause in their collective
agreement, to an impartial third person for a final
and binding resolution.
Ideally, arbitration awards are supposed to be
complied with by both parties without delay, such
that once an award has been rendered by an
arbitrator, nothing is left to be done by both parties
but to comply with the same. After all, they are
presumed to have freely chosen arbitration as the
mode of settlement for that particular dispute.
Pursuant thereto, they have chosen a mutually
acceptable arbitrator who shall hear and decide
their case. Above all, they have mutually agreed to
be bound by said arbitrators decision.
Compulsory arbitration is the process of
settlement of labor disputes by a government
agency (or other means provided by the
government) which has the power to investigate
and make an award binding upon the parties. It is a
system whereby the parties to a dispute are
compelled by the government to forego their right
to strike and are compelled to accept the resolution