Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Courts shall (subject to the provisions herein contained) have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil
nature excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.
1[Explanation
I].- A suit in which the right to property or to an office is contested is a suit of a civil
nature, notwithstanding that such right may depend entirely on the decision of questions as to
religious rites or ceremonies.
2[Explanation ll].- For the purposes of this section, it is immaterial whether or not any fees are
attached
to the office referred to in Explanation I or whether or not such office is attached to a particular place.]
Conditions
A civil court has jurisdiction to try a suit if two conditions are fulfilled:
(i)
(ii)
The cognizance of such suit should have been expressly or impliedly barred.(a)
Concise Oxford Dictionary (1990) at p.206; S.A.L. Narayan v. Ishawarlal, AIR 1965 SC 1818
at p.1823.
2
Most Rev.
P.M.A. Metropolitan v. Moran Mar Marthoma, 1995 Supp (4) SCC 286 at pp. 318-19: AIR
1995SC SC 2001 at pp. 2022-23.
Thus, a suit is of a civil nature if the principal question thereinrelates to the determination of a
civil right and enforcement thereof. It is notthe status of the parties to the suit, but the subjectmatter of it whichdetermines whether or not the suit is of a civil nature.
Nature and scope
rights and obligation of a citizen. Political and religious questions are not covered by that
expression. A suit in which the principal question relates to caste or religion is not a suit of a civil
nature. But if the principal question in a suit is of a civil nature (the right to property or to an office)
and the adjudication incidentally involves the determination relating to a caste question or to
religious rights and ceremonies, it does not cease to be a suit of a civil nature and the jurisdiction
of
civil
court
is
not
barred.
The
court
has jurisdiction to adjudicate upon those question also in order to decide theprincipal question
which is of a civil nature. Explanation II has been added by the Amendment Act of 1976. Before,
this Explanation, there was a divergence of judicial opinion as to whether a suit relating to a
religious office to which no fees or emoluments were attached can be said to be as suit of a civil
nature. But the legal position has now been clarified by Explanation II which specifically provides
that a suit relating to a religious office is maintainable whether or not it carries any fees or whether
or not it is attached to a particular place
Test
A suit in which the right to property or to an office is contested is a suitof a civil nature,
notwithstanding that such right may depend entirely on thedecision of a question as to religious
rites or ceremonies
Suits of civil nature: Illustrations. - The following are suits of civil nature:
Suits relating to rights to property;
Suits relating to rights of worship
Suits relating to taking out of religious processions;