Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Semester I. AY 2012/13
dr. Gyorgy Komaromi, Professor of Finance
gyorgy@komaromi.net
Probability
P
Return
A
Recession
0.20
4%
-10%
Normal
0.50
10%
14%
Boom
0.30
14%
30%
Example
State of
economy
Probability
P
Return
A
Recession
0.20
4%
-10%
Normal
0.50
10%
14%
Boom
0.30
14%
30%
Company A
R* = P(R1) x R1 + P(R2) x R2 + + P(Rn) x Rn
RA* = 0.2 x 4% + 0.5 x 10% + 0.3 x 14% = 10%
Example
State of
economy
Probability
P
Return
A
Recession
0.20
4%
-10%
Normal
0.50
10%
14%
Boom
0.30
14%
30%
Company B
R* = P(R1) x R1 + P(R2) x R2 + + P(Rn) x Rn
RB* = 0.2 x -10% + 0.5 x 14% + 0.3 x 30% = 14%
Opportunity cost
Investment A
Investment B
Return
10%
12%
No other investment is possible
What is the opportunity cost for Investment A?
Opportunity cost
Investment A
Investment B
Return
10%
12%
No other investment is possible
What is the opportunity cost for Investment A?
12%
What is the opportunity cost for Investment B?
Opportunity cost
Investment A
Investment B
Return
10%
12%
No other investment is possible
What is the opportunity cost for Investment A?
12%
What is the opportunity cost for Investment B?
10%
Minimise the opportunity cost
Opportunity cost
Investment A
Investment B
Return
10%
12%
No other investment is possible
What is the opportunity cost for Investment A?
12%
What is the opportunity cost for Investment B?
10%
Minimise the opportunity cost
RISK?
Petty, Keown, Scott Jr., Martin, Burrow, Martin & Nguyen: Financial Management 4e 2006 Pearson Education Australia
Financial Risk
How to measure risk
Variance, standard deviation, beta
What is risk?
Company 1
Company 2
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.05
0.1
0
10
14
return (%)
-10
-5
10
15
return (%)
20
25
30
i =1
( Ri - R* )2 P( Ri )
Risk neutral
Risk seeker
If RA > RB while A = B, A B.
If A > B while RA = RB, A B.
Example
State of
economy
Probability
P
Return
A
Recession
0.20
4%
-10%
Normal
0.50
10%
14%
Boom
0.30
14%
30%
Company A
Company B
R* = 10%
R* = 14%
Example
i =1
( Ri - R* )2 P( Ri )
Company A
( 4% - 10% )2 ( 0.2 )
( 10% - 10% )2 ( 0.5 )
( 14% - 10% )2 ( 0.3 )
Variance = 2
Standard deviation
=
=
=
7.2
0.0
4.8
= 12.0
= 12.0 = 3.46%
Example
i =1
( Ri - R* )2 P( Ri )
Company B
( -10% - 14% )2 ( 0.2 ) =
( 14% - 14% )2 ( 0.5 ) =
( 30% - 14% )2 ( 0.3 ) =
Variance = 2
=
Standard deviation
=
115.2
0.0
76.8
192.0
192.0 = 13.86%
Example summary
Expected return
Standard deviation
Share A
Share B
10%
14%
3.46%
13.86%
Portfolios
Combining
several
securities
in a portfolio
Can
Risk
Simple diversification
Investing in
two securities
to reduce risk
perfectly
positively
correlated
No effect
on risk
perfectly
negatively
correlated
Perfect
diversification.
Risk is
minimised
If
securities
are
Two-share portfolio
Returns
Portfolio
B
Time
Two-share portfolio
Returns
A
Portfolio
B
Time
Returns
Pe
r fe
co c t n
re r re e
g
m
o v l ati o ativ
es n e
r is
k
Two-share portfolio
A
Portfolio
Time
Correlation is measured by
correlation coefficient [-1;1]
EXCEL
EXCEL
Standard deviation of two-share portfolio
+(PrA^2*SDEVA^2+PrB^2*SDEVB^2+
+2*PrA*SDEVA*PrB*SDEVB*RHO)^0.5
Correlation coefficient (RHO)
From -1 To +1
+CORREL(array1,array2)
Portfolio risk
Depends on:
Proportion of funds invested in each asset
The risk associated with each asset in the
portfolio
The relationship between each asset in the
portfolio with respect to risk
No perfect negative correlation in real life
Risky question
$ 50,000 invested in
Cruise Ship Co RCruise= 15%
Cruise= 20%
Car= 30%
Can be eliminated
by diversification
Non-diversifiable risk
Market-related risk
Market risk
Systematic risk
Cannot be
eliminated by
diversification
Unexpected war
Firm-specific risk
A companys labour
force goes on strike
A companys top
management dies in a
plane crash
A huge oil tank bursts
and floods a
companys production
area
Portfolio risk
1
No of different shares
Portfolio risk
Nondiversifiable risk
1
30
No of different shares
Portfolio risk
Diversifiable risk
Nondiversifiable risk
1
30
No of different shares
Portfolio risk
Diversifiable risk
Nondiversifiable risk
1
30
No of different shares
Example
Interest rate changes
affect all firms, but which
would be more affected:
a) Retail food chain
b) Commercial bank
Example
Interest rate changes
affect all firms, but which
would be more affected:
a) Retail food chain
b) Commercial bank
YES
A need
to
measure
market
risk for a
firm
Beta:
A measure of market risk
A measure of:
How an individual
shares returns vary
with market returns
The sensitivity of an
individual shares
returns to changes in
the market
Calculating beta
Company XYZ return (%)
Market
index
return
(%)
Characteristic line
Beta = slope of
characteristic
line
Required
rate of
return
Risk-free
rate of
return
Reason:
Treasury securities are free of default risk
Required
rate of
return
Risk-free
rate of
return
Risk
premium
Risk-free
rate of
+
return
Risk
premium
Market risk
Firm-specific
+
premium
risk premium
Risk
premium
d
ir e
qu ld
re ou et
s sh ark
or n
st tur a m
ve e n ium
in of r tai em
An te on pr
ra ly c isk
on r
Required
rate of
=
return
Market risk
Firm-specific
+
premium
risk premium
Required
rate of
return
Market
return
11%
Risk-free
rate of
return
4%
0
Known as the
CAPM
Beta
Rj = Rf + j ( Rm Rf )
where
Rj = the required return on security j
Example
Suppose the Treasury bond rate is 4%, the average return
on the All Ords Index is 11%, and XYZ has a beta of 1.2.
According to the CAPM, what should be the required rate
of return on XYZ shares?
Rj = Rf + j ( Rm Rf )
Here:
Rf = 4%
Rm
= 11%
j = 1.2
Example
Suppose the Treasury bond rate is 4%, the average return
on the All Ords Index is 11%, and XYZ has a beta of 1.2.
According to the CAPM, what should be the required rate
of return on XYZ shares?
Rj = Rf + j ( Rm Rf )
Here:
Rf = 4%
Rm
= 11%
j = 1.2
Rj = 4% + 1.2 x ( 11% 4% )
= 12.4%
According to the CAPM, XYZ
shares should be priced to
give a 12.4% return
CAPM theory
Theoretically,
every security
should lie on
the SML
Required
rate of
return
SML
11%
If a security is on the
SML, then investors
are being fully
compensated for risk
4%
0
Beta
CAPM theory
SML
Required
rate of
return
11%
4%
0
Beta
CAPM theory
If a security is
above the
SML, it is
underpriced
Required
rate of
return
SML
11%
If a security is
below the SML,
it is overpriced
4%
0
Beta
Theoretical issue
Is it realistic to think
Risk free rate of return that the risk of an
asset can be
Best proxy?
accurately reflected
Beta
by only the one
Measurement issues
variable of market
Changes over time
sensitivity?
Is this observable?
Use of proxy data
Theoretical issue
Is it realistic to think
Risk free rate of return that the risk of an
asset can be
Best proxy?
accurately reflected
Beta
by only the one
Measurement issues
variable of market
Changes over time
sensitivity?
ed
us t
l y t an
de or
wi imp l
A
d
oo
t
an
Is this observable?
Use of proxy data