Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S03
Family Story
Select a story, legacy, or ritual from your own family experience and analyze its meanings in
terms of what it reveals about yourself, your family, or your family's history. Due 5Feb.
3.
Mini-Interpretive Project
Interview a class member about some aspect of their life history. Specifically, prepare an indepth interview guide of questions to ask your respondent, conduct the interview using a tape
recorder, transcribe the tape, conduct a content analysis of the interview identifying major
themes. Discuss the written interpretation with your respondent for feedback, revise as
necessary, then write a paper on the major themes as well as your preconceptions and the
interview process itself. Since class members are the subjects for this project, you will
serve
as a respondent for another student's interview. Due 2Apr.
4.
5.
Required Readings:
Selected articles on electronic reserves in Jackson Library. See references for complete
citations.
Course Outline:
Date
Topics
Readings
_____________________________________________________________________
1/15
introduction
1/22 feminist frameworks
Pearsall value theory
Jaggar feminist frameworks
Bergh renaming
Flax, 1986 women do theory
Hartsock revolutionary strategy
Gross what is feminist theory
Gordon whats new in womens history
1/29
epistemology
Nielsen introduction
Stanley & Wise back into the personal
Hawkesworth knowers
Lather deconstructing inquiry
Harding, 1992 instabilities of FT categories
2/5
diversity of thought
2/12
2/19
2/26
interviewing women
interviewing women
3/5
passionate scholarship
collaborative research
interviews in class
alternative modes of inquiry
criteria for research
3/12
Spring Break
3/19
interpretive inquiry
3/26
critical science
4/2
research as praxis
4/9
issues
race and class bias
4/16
4/23
4/16
4/23
4/30
S03
Acker, J., Barry, K. and Esseveld, Johanna. (1983). Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist
research. Women's Studies International Forum, 6(4), 423-235.
Anderson, K., Armitage, S., Jack, D., & Witter, J. (1990). Beginning where we are: Feminist methodology
in oral history. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (94-112). Boulder, CO: Westview
Press.
Armstead, C. (1995). Writing contradictions: Feminist research and feminist writing. Womens Studies
International Forum, 18(5/6), 627-636.
Bhavnani, K. (1993). Tracing the contours: Feminist research and feminist objectivity. Womens Studies
International Forum, 16(2), 95-104.
Blaisure, K. & Allen, K. (1995). Feminists and the ideology and practice of marital equality. Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 57 (5-19).
Brayboy, M.E. & Morgan, M.Y. (1998). Voices of Indianness: The lived world of Native American women.
Women's Studies International Forum, 21(4), 341-354.
Bergh, N.V.D. (1987). Renaming: Vehicle for empowerment. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in
transition (pp. 130-136). Albany: SUNY Press.
Brown, M. (1989). What are the qualities of good research? In F. Hultgren & D. Coomer (Eds.),
Alternative modes of inquiry in home economics research (pp. 257-297). Peoria, IL: Glencoe
Publishing Company.
Cannon, L.W., Higginbotham, E., & Leung, M. (1988). Race and class bias in qualitative research on
women. Gender and Society, 2(4), 449-462.
Chase, S.E. (1995). Taking narrative seriously: Consequences for method and theory in interview studies.
In R. Josselson, R. & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives (pp. 126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Collins, P.H. (1991). The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women and
Culture, 14(4), 745-773.
Comstock, D.E. (1982). A method for critical research. In E. Buedo & W. Feinberg (Eds.), Knowledge and
values in social and educational research (pp. 370-390). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Cook, J.A. & Fonow, M.M. (1990). Knowledge and womens interests: Issues of epistemology and
methodology in feminist sociological research. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (6993). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Coomer, D.L. (1989). Introduction to critical inquiry. In F. Hultgren & D. Coomer (Eds.), Alternative modes
of inquiry in home economics research (pp. 167-184). Peoria, IL: Glencoe Publishing Company.
Cotterill, P. (1992). Interviewing women: Issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Womens Studies
International Forum, 15(5/6), 593-606.
Du Bois, B. (l983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social
science. In G. Bowles & R.D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 105-116). London:
Routledge.
Dyck, I., Lynam, J. & Anderson, J. (1995). Women talking: Creating knowledge through difference in
cross-cultural research. Womens Studies International Forum, 18(5/6), 611-626.
Edwards, R. (1990). Connecting method and epistemology: A white woman interviewing Black women.
Women's Studies International Forum, 13(5), 477-490.
Flax, J. (1986). Women do theory. In M. Pearsall (Ed.), Women and values: Readings in recent feminist
philosophy, pp. 2-7. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
Ferree, M.M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 52, 866-884.
Gross, E. (1992). What is feminist theory? In H. Crowley & S. Himmelweit (Eds.), Knowing women:
Feminism and knowledge, (pp. 355-369). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
Harding, S.G. (1992). The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. In H. Crowley & S.
Himmelweit (Eds.) Knowing women: Feminism and knowledge (pp. 338-354). Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Polity Press. [originally published in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
11(4), Summer 1986]
Harding, S.G. (1986). From the woman question in science to the science question in feminism. The
science questions in feminism (pp. 15-29). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hartsock, N. (1986). Feminist theory and the development of revolutionary strategy. In M. Pearsall (Ed.),
Women and values: Readings in recent feminist philosophy (pp. 8-18). Belmont: Wadsworth
Publishing.
Hawkesworth, M.E. (l989). Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs, 14(3),
533-557.
Hoff, L.A. (1988). Collaborative feminist research and the myth of objectivity. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd
(Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 269-281). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hughes, D. (1995). Significant differences: The construction of knowledge, objectivity, and dominance.
Womens Studies International Forum, 18(4), 395-406.
Hultgren, F.H. (1989). Introduction to interpretive inquiry. In F. Hultgren & D. Coomer (Eds.), Alternative
modes of inquiry in home economics research (pp. 37-59). Peoria, IL: Glencoe Publishing Company.
Hurtado, A. (l988). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and
women of color. Signs: Journal of Women and Culture, 14, 833-855.
Jagger, A. & Struhl, P. (1986). Alternative feminist frameworks: The roots of oppression, Feminist
frameworks (pp. 79-85). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Keller, E.F. (1990). Gender and science. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (41-57). Boulder,
CO: Westview Press.
King, D.K. (1989). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. In
M. Malson, J. O'Barr, S. Westphal-Wihl, & M. Wyer (Eds.), Feminist theory in practice and process
(pp. 75-105). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Klein, R.D. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles &
R. Klein (Eds.), Towards a methodology for feminist research (pp.88-104). London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
LaRossa, R., Bennet, L.A. & Gelles, R.J. (l981). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research. Journal
of Marriage and the Family, 43, 303-313.
Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women's Studies
International Forum, 11(6), 569-581.
Lather, P. (1991). Deconstructing/deconstructive inquiry: The politics of knowing and being known.
Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern (pp. 86-101). New York:
Routledge.
Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257-277.
Lugones, M.C. & Spelman, E.V. (l986). Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural
imperialism and the demand for "the woman's voice". In M. Pearsall (Ed.), Women and values:
Readings in recent feminist philosophy (pp. 19-31). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Measor, L. (1985). Interviewing: A strategy in qualitative research. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Strategies of
educational research: Qualitative methods (pp. 55-77). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Mies, M. (1983). Towards a methodology for feminist research. In G. Bowles & R. Klein (Eds.), Theories
of women's studies (pp. 117-139). London: Routledge.
Morgan, M.Y. (1998). The process of critical science in exploring racism and sexism with black college
women. In K. Conway-Turner, Cherrin, Schiffman, & Turkel (Eds.), Women's studies in transition: The
pursuit of interdisciplarity (pp. 156-172). Delaware, MJ: University of Delaware Press.
Morgan, M.Y. & Opiyo, F.A. (2000). Rural Kenyan Luo womens daily lives: Reflections of
interdependence and multiplicity. Submitted to Womens Studies Quarterly.
Morgan, M.Y. & Rhoden, J.L. (1995). Change in white college women's understanding of sexism:
Empowerment through critical reflection. National Women's Studies Association Journal, 7(2), 35-57.
Namenwirth, M. (1986). Science seen through a feminist prism. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches
to science (pp. 18-41). New York: Pergamon Press.
Nielsen, J.M. (1990). Introduction. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods (1-37). Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Oakley. A. (l981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist
research (pp. 30-55). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Odero, D.A. & Morgan, M.Y. (2000). The paradox of Luo womens groups in urban Kenya. Submitted to
Womens Studies International Forum.
Pearsall, M. (1986). Toward a feminist transvaluation of value theory: Feminist theory and practice.
Women and values: Readings in recent feminist philosophy (pp. xi-xv, 1-2). Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Peterat, L. (1987). Review of Being feminist: Living with a man by H. C. Bain: Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 5(1), 76-79.
Pugh, A. (1990). My statistics and feminism - A true story. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis (pp.103112). New York: Routledge.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist action research. Feminist methods in social research (pp. 175-196). New
York: Oxford University Press.
Roberts C., Kippax, S., Waldby, C. & Crawford J. (1995). Faking it: The story of Ohh! Womens Studies
International Forum, 18(5/6), 523-532.
Shields, V.R. & Dervin, B. (1993). Sense-making in feminist social science research: A call to enlarge the
methodological options of feminist studies. Womens Studies International Forum, 16(1), 65-81.
Shostak, M. (1989). "What the wind won't take away": The genesis of Nisa--The life and words of a !Kung
woman. In Personal Narratives Group (Eds.), Interpreting women's lives (pp. 228-240). Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
Small, S. (1995). Action-oriented research: Models and methods. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57,
941-955.
Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1983). 'Back into the personal' or: Our attempt to construct 'feminist research'. In
G. Bowles & R. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies II (pp.192-209). London: Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Stanley, L. & Wise, S. (1979). Feminist research, feminist consciousness, and experiences of sexism.
Women's Studies International Quarterly, 2, 359-374.
Stinson, S., Blumenfield-Jones, D., & Van Dyke, J. (1990). Voices of young women dance students: An
interpretive study of meaning in dance. Dance Research Journal, 22(2), 13-22.
Suransky, V. (1980). Phenomenology: An alternative research paradigm and a force for social change.
Journal of British Society for Phenomenology, 11(2), 163-179.
Tesch, R. (1987). Emerging themes: The research experience. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 6(3), 230241.
Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family,
54(1), 3-18.
Thompson, L. & Walker, A. (1995). The place of feminism in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the
Family, 57, 847-865.
van Manen, M. (1984). Practicing phenomenological writing. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 2(1), 36-69.
Weber, S.J. (1986). The nature of interviewing. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 4(2), 65-72.
Weiler, K. (1988). Feminist methodology. Women teaching for change (pp.57-72). South Hadley, MA:
Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
Westkott, M. (1990). Feminist criticism of the social sciences. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research
methods (58-68). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.