Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODOLOGY
The Box-Behnken design is an independent quadratic design that does not contain
combinations are at the midpoints of edges of the process space and at the center. These
designs are rotatable (or near rotatable) and require 3 levels of each factor. The designs
have limited capability for orthogonal blocking compared to the central composite
designs.
Figure 2: This figure shows the Box and Behnken Design for Three Factors
The geometry of this design suggests a sphere within the process space such that
the surface of the sphere protrudes through each face with the surface of the sphere
For three factors, the Box-Behnken design offers some advantage in requiring a
56
Table 5: This table shows the Camote Flour, Fat, Cake Flour and its parameters
Coded
Table 6: This table shows the Coded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different
formulations
X1 X2 X3
1 +1 -1 0
2 -1 -1 0
3 +1 0 +1
4 -1 +1 +1
5 +1 +1 +1
6 -1 0 0
7 0 +1 -1
8 0 -1 +1
9 0 0 0
10 -1 -1 -1
11 -1 +1 0
12 0 -1 -1
13 0 +1 +1
14 0 +1 +1
15 0 +1 +1
57
Uncoded
Table 7: This table shows the Uncoded samples of Camote flour, Fat, Cake Flour and the different
formulations
X1 X2 X3
1 45 15 40
2 35 15 40
3 45 20 45
4 35 25 45
5 45 25 45
6 35 20 40
7 40 25 35
8 40 15 45
9 40 20 40
10 35 15 35
11 35 25 40
12 40 15 35
13 40 25 45
14 40 25 45
15 40 25 45
58
3.2 Materials
Table 8: This table shows the Raw Materials, Quantity, Unit and Specifications
Sweet Potato
The sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), commonly
called a yam in parts of the United States (especially in the
southern and western portions of the country; this
terminology causes some confusion with true yams), is a
crop plant whose large, starchy, sweet tasting tuberous
roots are an important root vegetable.
Figure 3: Shows the raw sweet potato
Cake Flour
Soft flour is comparatively low in gluten and so results in a
finer texture. Soft flour is usually divided into cake flour,
which is the lowest in gluten, and pastry flour, which has
slightly more gluten than cake flour.
Figure 4: Shows the cake flour
Sugar
Sugar (the word stems from the Sanskrit sharkara) consists
of a class of edible crystalline substances including sucrose,
59
lactose, and fructose. Human taste-buds interpret its flavor
as sweet.
Figure 5: Shows the sugar
Baking Powder
Baking powder is a dry chemical used in cookery, mainly
baking. Traditional baking powder was composed of a
mixture of tartaric acid and bicarbonate of soda (baking
soda), a quantity of flour usually being added to reduce the
strength.
Figure 6: Shows the baking powder
Salt
Salt is a dietary mineral essential for animal life, composed
primarily of sodium chloride. Salt for human consumption
is produced in different forms: unrefined salt (such as sea
salt), refined salt (table salt), and iodised salt. It is a
crystalline solid, white, pale pink or light grey in color,
normally obtained from sea water or rock deposits. Edible
rock salts may be slightly greyish in color due to this
mineral content.
Figure 7: Shows the salt
Egg
An egg is a round or oval body laid by the female of many
animals, consisting of an ovum surrounded by layers of
membranes and an outer casing, which acts to nourish and
protect a developing embryo and its nutrient reserves.
Figure 8: Shows the chicken egg
Milk
Milk is an opaque white liquid produced by the mammary
glands of female mammals (including monotremes).
60
Figure 9: Shows the milk
Butter
Butter is a dairy product made by churning fresh or
fermented cream or milk.
Muffin
A muffin is somewhat like a small cake, and though it does
resemble a cupcake: they have cylindrical bases, rounded
conical tops, and are usually not as sweet as cupcakes;
savory varieties (such as cornbread muffins) also exist.
They generally fit in the palm of an adult hand, and are
intended to be consumed by an individual in a single
sitting.
Figure 11: Shows the muffin
Table 9: This table shows the utensils and equipment that are used in sweet potato muffin.
61
Knife 2 pcs. PFP storage room
The raw materials used were of good quality fresh sweet potato of Ipomoea
Batatas specie, of medium size and yellow color; cake flour, refined sugar, baking
powder, salt, fresh egg, evaporated milk and butter. The utensils were borrowed from
62
Peeling
Slicing
Soaking
Sun Drying
Oven Drying
Sorting
Grinding
Mixing
Baking
Cooling
Packing
Labeling
Storing
Figure 12: This figure shows the Process Flow of Sweet potato muffin
63
Quality assurance was employed in checking the quality of the raw sweet
potato that will be used in making sweet potato noodles. It was test according to
Any soil on the roots must be removed before the root is peeled using a
clean kitchen knife. Any damaged parts of the raw sweet potato should be
trimmed off.
3.4.2 Peeling
After washing, the sweet potatoes are dried in a clean place in the sun for
slicer is then used to cut the sweet potato into uniform pieces.
3.4.4 Soaking
Slices are soaked in clean tap water for 5-10 minutes. The volume of water
used is twice the weight of the slices and is just enough to cover all the slices.
64
The slices are then either sun dried on a raised tray for approximately 4-6
hours if weather conditions are suitable, or in an oven dryer. The drying tray
should be raised off the ground to prevent dust and dirt contaminating the chips. If
drying rate will depend on the thickness of the slices, rate of turning chips as they
The dried sweet potato chips can now be milled into flour. The dried sweet
potato chips can be sorted for uniformity before packaging or further processing,
3.4.7 Mixing
In a large bowl, combine sweet potato flour, cake flour, sugar, baking
3.4.8 Baking
65
Pre-heat the oven. Bake the muffin at 200˚C (400˚F) for 20-25 minutes.
3.4.9 Cooling
Sweet potato muffin can be safely packed and stored in polythene bags as
The different finished products of muffin made from the sweet potato flour were
evaluated. The formulations were different in percentage of the three (3) variables (Sweet
potato flour, Fat and Cake Flour). Finished products were subjected to sensory
evaluation.
The fifteen (15) experimental samples were coded with random numbers. All the
product samples including the Control were presented to a panel of ten (10) students for
sensory evaluation. Samples were labeled identically and were placed in identical paper
plates and each panelist were asked to evaluate the experimental samples according to the
paneling parameters namely; color, texture, taste / flavor, tenderness, odor / aroma, and
firmness.
66
Panelists were asked to strictly follow the instruction given in the score sheet. It
was important that the panelist drank or gargled with water to remove any lingering taste
67
Flow Chart
Selection of Raw Materials
Peeling
Slicing
Soaking
Sun Drying
Oven Drying
Sorting
Grinding
Mixing
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Baking
Cooling
Packing
Labeling
Storing
Figure 13: This figure shows the flow chart of Sweet Potato Muffin
68
3.7 Objective Evaluation
One gram of sample was weighed and dissolved in 99 ml. distilled water in an
Erlenmeyer flask, serial dilution was made by transferring one ml of diluted sample to a 9
ml. of distilled water as 1:10. Further dilution were made as 1:1000, one ml. of each
dilution was transferred into a petrifilm. Incubated for 24 hrs. at 25˚C in incubator. After
significant figures. Then, was multiplied by the dilution of the water (Bryan, 1973).
3.7.1.2 pH Count
pH can be measured:
• by addition of a pH indicator into the solution under study. The indicator color
varies depending on the pH of the solution. Using indicators, qualitative determin-
ations can be made with universal indicators that have broad color variability over
a wide pH range and quantitative determinations can be made using indicators
that have strong color variability over a small pH range. Precise measurements
can be made over a wide pH range using indicators that have multiple equilibri-
ums in conjunction with spectrophotometric methods to determine the relative
abundance of each pH-dependent component that make up the color of solution,
or
69
• by using a pH meter together with pH-selective electrodes (pH glass electrode,
hydrogen electrode, quinhydrone electrode, ion sensitive field effect transistor and
others).
• by using pH paper, indicator paper that turns color corresponding to a pH on a
color key. pH paper is usually small strips of paper (or a continuous tape that can
be torn) that has been soaked in an indicator solution, and is used for approxima-
tions.
3.7.2.1 Ash
Ash is the inorganic residue remaining after the water and organic matter have
been removed by heating in the presence of oxidizing agents, which provides a measure
of the total amount of minerals within a food. Analytical techniques for providing
information about the total mineral content are based on the fact that the minerals can be
distinguished from all the other components within a food in some measurable way. The
most widely used methods are based on the fact that minerals are not destroyed by
heating, and that they have a low volatility compared to other food components. The
three main types of analytical procedure used to determine the ash content of foods are
based on this principle: dry ashing, wet ashing and low temperature plasma dry ashing.
The method chosen for a particular analysis depends on the reason for carrying out the
analysis, the type of food analyzed and the equipment available. Ashing may also be used
as the first step in preparing samples for analysis of specific minerals, by atomic
spectroscopy or the various traditional methods described below. Ash contents of fresh
foods rarely exceed 5%, although some processed foods can have ash contents as high as
12%, e.g., dried beef.
3.7.2.2 Moisture
Weigh out 5 g of sample into a tared porcelain crucible or aluminum drying dish
spreading the sample as thin as possible over the base of the dish. Put the dish and
contents in an oven maintained at 105°C and dry for 4 hrs. Remove cool in a dessicator
70
and weigh.Return the dish to the oven and ready for a further 30 minutes. Remove, cool
and weigh. Continue drying until a constant weigh has been reached. Calculate the
moisture content from the weight loss of the sample.
Calculation:
% Moisture = Initial Weight – Final Weight x 100
Weight of Sample Used
Laboratories measure the nitrogen (N) content of the forage and calculate crude
protein using the formula: CP = % N x 6.25. Crude protein will include both true protein
and non-protein nitrogen. Cattle can use both types to some varying degree. Crude
protein values give no indication if heat damage has occurred, which may alter protein
availability.
The traditional method for the analysis of fat was developed by German chemist
Franz von Soxhlet in 1879. Essentially, the sample is suspended between a flask of
boiling solvent and a condenser. The solvent evaporates, is condensed onto the sample,
and thereby extracts the fatty matter en route back to the bulk solvent. Since freshly
distilled solvent is continually contracting the sample, the solute's affinity for the solvent
continues until the extraction is complete. By evaporating the excess solvent, the residual
matter is quantified gravimetrically as fat. Soxhlet's procedure was significantly
improved in 1974 by American chemist Edward Randall. The Randall technique
immerses the sample in boiling solvent and then continuously elutes the sample with
freshly condensed solvent.
71
3.7.2.5 Total Carbohydrates
By difference :
This involves obtaining the variable carbohydrates content by calculation having
estimated all the other fractions by proximate analysis as shown below:
The cost of the product must be evaluated based on raw materials used in the
preparation including utilities and packaging material, production cost and mark-up
Table 10: This Table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato flour
Unit Cost Quantity Actual Cost
Sweet Potato 28.00 / kg 3 kg 84.00
Overhead Cost
Labor (minimum) 15.00 / hr 3 hrs 45.00
Electricity 5.00 5.00
Water 2.00 2.00
Fuel 10.00 10.00
Packaging 5.00 5.00
Total Cost 67.00
72
Table 11: This table shows the cost analysis of sweet potato muffin
S-45 S-35 S-45 S-35 S-45 S-35 S-40 S-40 S-40 S-35 S-35 S-40 S-40 S-45 S-40
C-40 C-40 C-45 C-45 C-45 C-40 C-35 C-45 C-40 C-35 C-40 C-35 C-45 C-40 C-40
F-15 F-15 F-20 F-25 F-25 F-20 F-25 F-15 F-20 F-15 F-25 F-15 F-25 F-25 F-25
Unit Quantity F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 F13 F14 F15
Cost
Sweet Potato 166.1 / 7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 7.5 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 7.5 6.6
Flour kg
Cake Flour 38 / /kg 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.5 1.5
Sugar 35 / kg 50 g 1.75
Baking 16 / 100 2g 0.32
Powder g
Salt 6 / kg 0.5 g 0.00
3
Egg (137.5 / 35 / pc 55 g 1.4
pc)
Milk 20/100 100 ml 20
ml
Butter 35 / kg 0.53 0.53 0.7 0.88 0.88 0.7 0.88 0.53 0.7 0.53 0.88 0.53 0.88 0.88 0.88
Total Cost of 33.0 31.3 33.3 31.8 33.5 31.4 32.2 32.3 32.2 31.1 31.6 31.9 32.6 33.3 32.45
Ingredients 0 7 5 5 7 5 7 5 5 5
Overhead Cost
Labor 15.00 / 1 hr 15.0
(minimum) hr 0
Electricity 5.00 5.00
Water 2.00 2.00
Fuel 8.00 8.00
Packaging 5.00 5.00
Total Cost 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unit Price 68.0 66.3 68.3 66.8 68.5 66.4 67.2 67.3 67.2 66.1 66.6 66.9 67.6 68.3 67.45
0 7 5 5 7 5 7 5 5 5
10% mark-up 6.80 6.63 6.83 6.68 6.85 6.64 6.72 6.73 6.72 6.61 6.66 6.69 6.76 6.83 6.745
7 5 5 7 5 7 5 5 5
7
Selling Price 74.8 72.9 75.2 73.5 75.4 73.1 73.9 74.0 74 72.7 73.3 73.5 74.4 75.1 74.2
per 12 pcs. 3 1 4 1 2 8 3 1 2 9 2 9
Selling Price 6.23 6.08 6.27 6.13 6.28 6.09 6.17 6.17 6.17 6.06 6.11 6.13 6.2 6.27 6.18
per pc.
7
3.9 Data Analysis and Evaluation
The data were tabulated and the rating was based on the total sum of both rows and
columns. Statistical hypothesis based on the objective of the study was identified. The
identified level of significance was at 5%. Correction Factor (CF) was computed by
squaring the grand total divided by the number of rows multiplied to the number of
columns. Then, sum of the square for panelist was divided by the number of judgments for
each sample subtracted by the correction factor. The results are the total sum of squares for
Degree of Freedom (df) was computed for sample, panelist and error by subtracting
their factors minus 1. Mean square for sample, panelist, and error was computed by
75