Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
VERN McKINLEY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-01263 (ESH)
)
) Judge Ellen S. Huvelle (ESH)
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE )
CORPORATION, )
)
and )
)
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF )
THE FEDERAL RESERVE )
SYSTEM, )
)
Defendants. )
)
Pursuant to LCvR 56.1, Defendant Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(“Board”) submits the following statement of material facts as to which there is no genuine issue
for trial.
1. On or around January 17, 2008, Plaintiff Vern McKinley (“Plaintiff”) sent a FOIA
request by e-mail (the “Bear Request”) to the FOIA office of defendant Board. The Bear
Request sought “further detail on information contained in the . . . minutes of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve dated March 14, 2008 [including] any supporting
memos or other information that detail „the expected contagion that would result from the
immediate failure of Bear Stearns‟ and the related conclusion that „this action was
1
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 9
2. By letter dated January 16, 2009, the Board informed the Plaintiff that the deadline for
the Board‟s response was extended to February 2, 2009. Thro Decl., ¶ 7 and Exh. B. By
letter dated June 11, 2009, the Board informed the Plaintiff that it was continuing to
process the Bear Request, and provided links to some publicly available sources of
3. Board staff conducted a thorough and adequate search for documents responsive to the
Bear Request. That search included reviewing a document repository containing over
28,000 pages of information created in response to FOIA and other requests for
information concerning, among other things, the Board‟s March 14, 2008 decision to
authorize the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) to extend a loan to Bear
Stearns & Co. (“Bear Stearns”) through JP Morgan Chase & Co. (“JPMC”) (the
“Temporary Loan”), and the Board‟s March 16, 2008 decision to authorize the FRBNY
to extend a loan to JPMC in connection with its acquisition of Bear Stearns (the
updated, contained all documents reasonably likely to be responsive to the Bear Request,
as well as many documents that had no relevance to the Bear Request. Thro Decl., ¶¶ 5,
12. The Board‟s most senior attorney responsible for the processing of FOIA requests
personally searched the repository for documents responsive to the Bear Request. Thro
Decl., ¶ 12. That attorney conducted multiple layers of review to identify potentially
responsive documents, and, along with at least two other attorneys, reviewed potentially
2
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 9
Request. Thro Decl., ¶¶ 13, 14. Each page determined to be responsive was carefully
reviewed, and exempt information was redacted, and all reasonably segregable, non-
4. Board staff identified approximately 358 pages of information responsive to the Bear
Request. Thro Decl., ¶ 16. Of this responsive information, Board staff provided
letter dated August 11, 2009. Thro Decl., ¶ 9 and Exh. D. That letter also informed the
Plaintiff that staff was continuing to review the remaining responsive documents. Id.
5. By letter dated September 30, 2009, the Board responded in full to the Bear Request.
Thro Decl., ¶ 10 and Exh. E. In addition to the 120 full pages provided on August 11,
2009, the Board provided an additional 48 full pages of responsive information (with
bates numbers ending in 00002-03, 06, 10, 14-16, 18-19, 24-28, 36-37, 40, 42, 45-50 and
215-238), and 27 partial pages with exempt information redacted, to the Plaintiff pursuant
to the September 30, 2009 letter. Id. and ¶ 15. The September 30, 2009 letter informed
the Plaintiff that the Board had determined that the remaining documents, totaling 163
full pages and information redacted from the 27 pages partially produced to Plaintiff,
552(b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (b)(8). Thro Decl., ¶ 10 and Exh. E. On January 28, 2010,
the Board produced one additional page (with bates number ending in 00046) to the
6. By letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) dated September 30, 2009,
the Board referred to the SEC for disposition portions of seven pages and one full page of
3
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 4 of 9
Board staff and staff of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”), regarding
the financial condition of Bear Stearns. Thro Decl., ¶¶ 10, 16; Declaration of Margaret
Celia Winter, executed January 21, 2010 (“Winter Decl.”), ¶ 4 and Attachment A. By
letter to the Plaintiff dated January 7, 2010, with a copy to the Board, the SEC informed
the Plaintiff that it would withhold the information referred by the Board in full under
FOIA exemptions 5 and 8, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(5) and (b)(8). Winter Decl., ¶ 5 and
Attachment B.
7. Information referred by the Board to the SEC regarding the financial condition of Bear
Stearns was provided by SEC staff to Board and FRBNY staff on an inter-agency basis
prior to the Board‟s March 14, 2008 decision to authorize the Temporary Loan for the
purpose of informing Board and FRBNY staffs‟ and the Board‟s pre-decisional
deliberations and analyses regarding whether to take action in response to news of Bear
Stearns‟ possible bankruptcy filing and whether to authorize the Temporary Loan.
Winter Decl., ¶¶ 6-8; see Thro Decl., ¶¶ 3, 13. In addition, the withheld information was
obtained by the SEC in its capacity as Bear Stearns‟ supervisor under the Consolidated
Supervised Entity (“CSE”) program, a voluntary program that allowed the SEC to
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of the SEC in connection with its
8. On or around March 10, 2008, the Board began to receive information and hear rumors
that Bear Stearns was experiencing severe liquidity problems and might have to declare
4
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 5 of 9
executed January 29, 2010 (“Stefansson Decl.”), ¶ 7. Although Bear Stearns was a
securities broker-dealer and holding company, Winter Decl., ¶¶ 10-11, and not a financial
institution regulated by the Board, the Board was concerned that both large and small
financial institutions it regulated, as well as other financial institutions and the broader
9. In response to the rapidly evolving crisis, Board staff and staff of the FRBNY began
collecting and sharing real-time data on the exposure of various financial institutions to
Bear Stearns, as well as other information and analyses, to assess the gravity of Bear
institutions and markets, and the Board‟s possible policy responses. Stefansson Decl., ¶¶
7-10. All of this data, as on the Vaughn index attached as Exh. F to the Thro declaration,
was used by the Board, and Board and FRBNY staff members advising the Board, in the
process of deliberation and decision making that preceded the Board‟s ultimate decision,
on March 14, 2008, to extend the Temporary Loan to Bear Stearns through JPMC. Thro
Decl., ¶¶ 17, 19, 22; Stefansson Decl., ¶¶ 7-14. While the vast majority of this
information was exchanged among Board and FRBNY staff and the Board in the days
immediately preceding, or on the day of, authorization of the Temporary Loan (see Thro
Decl., Exh. F, items 1-31, 37), because of the exigencies of time, items 33, 35, 36 and 38
contain information and analyses presented orally to the Board before the decision as part
of the ongoing decision making process that were later reduced to writing. Thro Decl., ¶
22; Stefansson Decl., ¶¶ 7-10, 12. Item 38 is a draft affidavit prepared by an FRBNY
5
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 6 of 9
from the Board‟s decision to authorize the Temporary Loan. Thro Decl., ¶ 22. For the
reasons stated above in paragraphs 7-9, the Federal Reserve withheld this information
pursuant to exemption 5.
10. Some withheld information, identified as items 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, and 24
on the Vaughn index, consisted of data gathered by Reserve Bank examiners concerning
supervised financial institutions and their exposure to Bear Stearns. Thro Decl., ¶ 17;
Stefansson Decl., ¶¶ 13-15. Information gathered by the Board through the bank
examination process is considered by the Board and the regulated financial institutions to
which are corporations or partnerships, that, if released, would likely cause substantial
competitive harm to the institutions that supplied it. Thro Decl., ¶ 17; Stefansson Decl.,
¶¶ 13-15. In particular, a financial institution‟s competitors could: use the data to assess
sensitive trading relationships and credit relationships which could potentially harm the
weaken a specific entity and cause weaknesses in its liquidity position; pull or accelerate
funding facilities the competitor had outstanding to the institution; or use the data to
underbid the institution in the private funding markets. Stefansson Decl., ¶ 15. A
competitor also could inform the institution‟s customers and market analysts that the
institution faced a funding shortage, which likely would cause some retail and
commercial customers to move their business to other banks and may cause analysts to
downgrade the institution‟s stock. Id. Disclosure of this information also is likely to
6
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 7 of 9
impair the Board‟s ability to obtain necessary information in the future as some highly
upon the banks‟ understanding that regulators will maintain its confidentiality, and
they knew it would be publicly disclosed. Id. For these reasons, the Federal Reserve
11. Some commercial or financial information regarding the identities and amount of
exposure of certain institutions to Bear Stearns, current and historic pricing information
in the repo market, and related information, identified as items 7, 12, 14, 15, 20, 30, 31, a
portion of item 37 (described in the Vaughn index as Annex A)), and item 38, on the
Vaughn index, was obtained from market participants on a voluntary and strictly
confidential basis on the understanding that the Board and FRBNY would maintain the
data in strictest confidence. Thro Decl., ¶ 20. These market participants do not
customarily disclosed this information to the public. Id. Disclosure of this information is
likely to cause substantial competitive injury to the market participants who provided it
and, because it was provided on a voluntary basis on the assurance that it would remain
confidential, disclosure is likely to impair the Board‟s and FRBNY‟s ability to obtain
similar necessary information in the future. Id. For these reasons, the Federal Reserve
12. Some withheld information, identified as item 32 and a portion of item 37 (described in
(proprietary databases of market data) obtained by the FRBNY in its capacity as a client
of two financial institutions. Thro Decl., ¶ 21. These entities provide this information to
7
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 8 of 9
use of the data outside of the Federal Reserve System. Id. These entities do not
customarily disclose this information to the public and, because of the contractual
FRBNY‟s ability to enter into similar contracts, or obtain similar necessary information,
in the future. Id. For these reasons, the Federal Reserve withheld this information
pursuant to exemption 4.
13. Some of the withheld data collected by Board and FRBNY bank examination staffs,
identified as items 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 21, 22, and 24 on the Vaughn index, was
gathered by the Board, a federal financial institutions supervisory agency, and the
FRBNY, to which the Board has delegated certain supervisory authority, from supervised
which the Board monitors and regulates the condition of financial institutions.
Stefansson Decl., ¶¶ 4, 13-15; Thro Decl., ¶ 17. This information relates to examination,
operating or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of or for the use of an agency (the
considered highly confidential by the Board and financial institutions because it was
obtained through the supervisory process. Id. For these reasons, the Federal Reserve
Respectfully submitted,
8
Case 1:09-cv-01263-ESH Document 28 Filed 02/01/10 Page 9 of 9