Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 16 May 2014
Received in revised form 26 August 2014
Accepted 23 September 2014
Available online 12 November 2014
Keywords:
Compression strength
Tensile strength
Maximum dry density
Thermal conductivity
Soil stabilization
Aggregates of cork
Thermal insulation
a b s t r a c t
In this paper, mechanical and thermal properties of compressed earth blocks stabilized (soilsand dune
cement) with and without aggregates of cork have been studied, with the use of some models that predict
thermal conductivity for comparison of experimental results. The rst part highlights the inuence of the
percentage by weight of cement and of sand dune on the maximum dry density, optimum moisture content and mechanical resistance. The results showed that mass content of 30% sand dune and 12% cement
signicantly improves these properties more in the wet conditions than dry, and therefore gives the optimal mixture (58% of soil30% of sand dune 12% of cement). However, the composite materials used for
building must present sufcient mechanical strength to be suitable for constructions. For that the optimal
composition has undergone a static compaction (2.557.510 MPa) thus showing further improvement
on the same properties. Incorporating the aggregates of cork (3/8) in the optimal mixture, improves signicantly the thermal performance with little inuence of compaction, while remaining within the range
of acceptable strength. Lastly the study was extended to the search for theory capable of predicting the
effective thermal conductivity of a dry blend considered like a two-phase system, which shows that linear model and some theoretical models give the best concordance with experimental results.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Environmental concerns can discover the qualities of earth
material. Its use is not involved in the depletion of resources and
increased pollution (water, air, soil) and waste, biological changes.
260
This material has become more and more economically competitive because of raw material availability and simplicity in the production process. Soil stabilization with hydraulic binders was
started in 1917 and that many researchers focused their research
in this direction [113]. The hardening of the soil is generally
affected by the cement hydrates in the presence of water to form
complex carbohydrates. The cement induces the consolidation
(creation of a skeleton) that coats the grains and opposes the
movement of the material. The main reactions taking place in the
consolidation of the cement itself between the stabilizer and the
sand fraction of the earth. However, side reactions are observed
between the stabilizer and the clay fraction of soil. The clay acts
on the effectiveness of the stabilization process and modies the
mechanical behavior of the earth. Several studies have investigated
the behavior of stabilized earth blocks facing a number of physical
constraints. And the effect of the type of cement that presents a
level of reactive silica, plays a vital role in reducing the porosity
and consuming a portlandite generated by the selected cement,
This is conrmed by [1416], different hydrates responsible for
the hardening of the cement that bind the clay particles to form
a solid block [1,17,19], and also the mechanical strength increases
with the gradual addition of cement [7,8]. A study by Guettala et al.
[20] shows the effect of the mass of sand and a content of 30%
affects positively the mechanical strength for 30% of sand in dry
medium and a 36% in wet. Venkatarama Reddy et al. [21] also show
that the resistance changes signicantly with the dry density, and
that it operates independently of the content of water and cement;
But many authors restrict the dry density in the range of 1500
2000 kg/m3 and determined according to the standard procedure
as ASTM C 140 and BS 1924-2 (1990) standard and others
[1,15,22,23]. The compressive strength and the dry density, change
with the increase of the static compacting [1,17,18]. One of the
major concerns of a designer is to provide a well-insulated building
providing comfort at the least cost to the user both in winter and
summer. Bahar et al. [1] proclaimed in a study that the addition
of cement and sand may slightly decrease the conductivity of the
brick; however; moisture increases the thermal conductivity of
the sample relative to its dry state [1,17]. In the same way Meukam
et al. [24,25] show that the thermal conductivity signicantly
increases with the content of the water in mixture. Indeed,
increased the wetting of materials, results a replacement the pores
progressive of air by the water. Several studies have been made on
the integration aggregates of cork in cement and plaster to obtain a
best thermally insulating [2630]. Based on the experiences
reported by Castro et al. [31,32], the concrete blocks containing
cork exhibit a reduction in the thermal conductivity rate of 45% relative to the blocks without cork. Panesar et al. [33,34], also show
that the thermal conductivity is affected by the bulk density of
the composite of cork that provides additional volume in void.
The apparent thermal conductivity of porous material depends
on many parameters; the thermal conductivities of the solid and
uid, the degree of porosity, the size, shape and distribution of
the pores. The thermal study of a sample of porous materials
requires good knowledge of the microstructure on the one hand
and on the other hand has the analytical or numerical tools for processing data required. There are analytical models considered predictions tools developed to understand the heat transfer
mechanisms in the multiphasiques middles. These should allow
the incorporation of the microstructure (particle shape, the contact
areas) and the microstructure (boundary conditions, porosity).
Many analytical models are used to calculate the apparent thermal
conductivity of materials biphasic according to the solid middle
and uid of the two present phases and also of their porosity and
their compactness. The actual thermal conductivity of the medium
and whatever the model used, is always between two extreme values, the lower bound (series model) is an environment where the
Table 1
Characteristics of the soil used.
Property
Atterbergs limits
Liquid limit WL
Plasticity index Ip
70.4
43.2
2.3
6.4
91.3
Chemical characteristics
14.6
33.0
0.15
0.20
42.2
9.0
1680
Sand equivalent
14.8
17.6
261
specimens were demolded 1 min after the completion of the compaction and
were stored in two environments (in the free air and wet wrapped in thin plastic
lm). We have thought to the treatment of aggregates of cork before addition in
the earth concrete stabilized and compressed. The treatment is a supercial cover
to the cement selected from the literature [42]. The aggregates of cork are coated
with a cement milk (cement + water) and allowed to dry completely before their
use so that the aggregates of cork do not absorb water during incorporation in
the cement-stabilized compressed earth blocks.
100
Soil
Dune sand (0/0.63)
Cork aggregates (3/8)
80
60
40
2.3.1. Proctor compaction test
The Proctor test is used to determine the optimal water content that leads to the
maximum density. This test uses a soil sample with less than 4.76 mm (sieve no. 4)
to which an increasing water content is added. The soil sample is compressed into
three layers with 25 blows per layer. Proctor standard compaction test, according to
BS 1377-1990: Part 4 [43] was applied to determine the maximum dry density
(MDD) and the optimal water content (OWC) of soil.
20
0
1E-4
1E-3
0,01
0,1
10
100
Fig. 1. Grading curves of soil, the sand dune and the cork granules.
Table 2
Chemical composition of clinker (%).
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
Na2O
K2O
Cl
LOI
17.49
4.51
3.02
62.78
2.15
2.38
0.05
0.64
0.02
8.10
Table 3
Mineralogical composition of clinker (%).
C3S
C2S
C3A
C4AF
55.41
13.65
2.25
14.83
on the mechanical properties, maximum dry density and the thermal conductivity, as well the effect of the curing methods (dry-humid) on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of optimized mixture. In this study, the
Table 4
Physical characteristics of sand dune (0/0.63 mm).
Fineness
modulus
Apparent density
(kg/m3)
Specic density
(kg/m3)
Porosity
(%)
1.13
1491.13
2517
41
Sand equivalent
By sight (%)
97.58
96.58
Table 5
Characteristics of aggregates of cork (3/8 mm).
Thermal conductivity (W/m K)
Porosity (%)
Absorption (%)
0.036
71
145
51
2.3
Table 6
Mixtures proportions.
Mixture (soilsand dunecement)
(100-p)% S + 0%
(90-p)% S + 10%
(80-p)% S + 20%
(70-p)% S + 30%
(60-p)% S + 40%
(50-p)% S + 50%
(40-p)% S + 60%
(30-p)% S + 70%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
DS + p%
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Water (%)
p = 0% cement
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
16.20
15.80
15.40
14.60
15.20
16.05
16.58
16.80
16.10
16.40
16.02
15.08
15.60
15.88
16.65
16.88
17.40
16.50
16.05
15.10
15.90
16.20
16.74
17.05
17.60
16.90
16.08
15.80
16.02
16.26
16.88
17.25
18.20
17.50
16.50
16.14
16.25
16.36
17.12
17.32
18.60
17.80
16.90
16.23
16.32
16.62
17.62
17.48
18.70
17.90
17.05
16.80
16.42
16.74
17.87
17.54
262
wssd wd
100
wssd ww
Heat flux
where p is the porosity (100%), wssd is the specimen weight in the saturated surface
dry (SSD) condition (g), wd is the specimen dry weight after 24 h in oven (g), and ww
is the weight of saturated specimen (g). This method has been used to measure the
porosity of the cement-based materials successfully [4649].
2.3.6. Principle of measuring the thermal conductivity by the hot wire method
The hot wire method is a standard transient dynamic technique based on the
measurement of the temperature rise in a dened distance from a linear heat source
(hot wire) embedded in the test material; the device used for measuring the thermal conductivity is illustrated in Fig. 2. If the heat source is assumed to have a constant and uniform output along the length of test sample, the thermal conductivity
can be derived directly from the resulting change in the temperature over a known
time interval [50]. The hot wire probe method utilizes the principle of the transient
hot wire method. Here the heating wire as well as the temperature sensor (thermocouple) is encapsulated in a probe that electrically insulates the hot wire and the
temperature sensor from the test material [51]. The ideal mathematical model of
the method is based on the assumption that the hot wire is an ideal, innite thin
and long line heat source, which is in an innite surrounding from homogeneous
and isotropic material with constant initial temperature. If q is the constant quantity of heat production per unit time and per unit length of the heating wire
(W m1), initiated at the time t = 0, the radial heat ow around the wire occurs.
Then the temperature rise DT(r,t) at radial position r from the heat source conforms
to the simplied formula:
DTr; t
Heat flux
q
4at
In
4pk r2 C
where k is the thermal conductivity (W m1 K1), a thermal diffusivity (m2 s1)
(a qkC p , with r is the density (kg m3) and Cp the heat capacity (J kg1 K1) of the test
material and C = Exp (c), c = 0.5772157 is the Eulers constant. Eq. (2) is valid only
r2
when 4at
1 is fullled, i.e. for a sufciently long time t larger than certain minimum
time tmin and for a small distance r. Thus the measurement of temperature rise
DT(r,t) as a function of time is employed to determine the thermal conductivity k,
by calculating the slope A of the linear portion of temperature relative to natural logarithm of the time (lnt) evolution from the following:
q
4pA
kparallel a ks e kf
where kseries ; kparallel is the effective thermal conductivity in parallel and in series
respectively; kf is the thermal conductivity of the uid phase (W m1 K1); ks is
the thermal conductivity of the solid phase (W m1 K1); e is the porosity of the
medium (volume fraction of the uid phase); and a is the compactness of the middle
(volume fraction of the solid phase).
2.4.2. Hashin and Shtrikman [37]
Hashin and Shtrikman [37] give a model that frames for the values of thermal
conductivity of multiphase materials. In general, the lower limit of the conductivity
corresponds to the case where the inclusion, has higher thermal properties than
matrix (conversely, for the upper bound). These terminals are valid regardless of
the morphology of the inclusion phase of the material. Where kHS ; kHS the effective
thermal conductivity in upper and lower respectively.
kHS
a
1 1
kf
3e
ks
1
kseries
e
kf
1
kas
kf
kHS
ks
kf
1
1kks
f
3aks
kf
kapp
kseries kparallel
nkr kseries 1 nkr kparallel
263
Heat flux
1 (1)
2 (2)
1-
(1-
3 (3)
kapp
nw ks
e kkfs a
1 nw aks ekf
10
kapp
11
kapp
6
6
6
6
6
k3 6
61
6
6
1b
6
4
3
b
1
k1
1
k3
k1
1
k2
3
k1
1
k2
k
2 2 1
k3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
12
Heat flux
3
V2
R2
V3
R3
d1
3
R1
R2
13
14
(1-
(1-
In this part, the impact of the increase in pressure static compaction from 2.5 to 10 MPa and the curing method (dry-humid)
on the properties of optimal mixture has been studied. The results
presented in Fig. 10 show an increase in compressive strength
264
Fig. 8. Effects of sand dune and cement content on the maximum dry density and optimum water content of the mixtures.
Fig. 9. Variation in the compression strength and the tensile strength by splitting as a function of cement content for each percentage of sand.
Fig. 10. Effects of static compaction energy and the humidity degree on the compressive strength and the tensile strength by splitting of optimal mixture.
265
Fig. 12. Effect of incorporation of aggregates of cork on the maximum dry density of
the optimal mixture for the different energy levels of static compaction.
2,00
Static compaction=sc
sc=2.5 MPa
sc=5 MPa
sc=7.5 MPa
sc=10 MPa
2
Model = 0.017. + 1.5 : R =0.98
Model of Hashin and Shtrikman (Max) [35]
Series model [35]
Model of Hashin and Shtrikman (Min) [37]
Model of Krischer [38]:
Model of Maxwell [40]
Modeling by auto-coherent homogenization [41]
Parallel model [35]
Thermal conductivity in
dry state (w/m.k)
1,75
1,50
1,25
1,00
0,75
0,50
0,25
0,00
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Fig. 11. Effects of incorporation of aggregates of cork and the humidity degree on the mechanical strengths of the optimal mixture for the different energy levels of static
compaction.
266
References
[1] Bahar R, Benazzoug M, Kenai S. Performance of compacted cement-stabilised
soil. Cem Concr Compos 2004;26(7):81120.
[2] Al-Amoudi OSB, Khan K, Al-Kahtani NS. Stabilization of a Saudi calcareous marl
soil. Constr Build Mater 2010;24(10):184854.
[3] Basha EA, Hashim R, Mahmud HB, Muntohar AS. Stabilization of residual soil
with rice husk ash and cement. Constr Build Mater 2005;19(6):44853.
[4] Horpibulsuk S, Rachan R, Chinkulkijniwat A, Raksachon Y, Suddeepong A.
Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay from
microstructural considerations. Constr Build Mater 2010;24(10):201121.
[5] Horpibulsuk S, Katkan W, Naramitkornburee A. Modied Ohios curves: a rapid
estimation of compaction curves for coarse- and ne-grained soils. Geotech
Test J ASTM 2009;32(1):6475.
[6] Horpibulsuk S, Katkan W, Apichatvullop A. An approach for assessment of
compaction curves of ne-grained soils at various energies using a one point
test. Soils Found 2008;48(1):11525.
[7] Horpibulsuk S, Katkan W, Sirilerdwattana W, Rachan R. Strength development
in cement stabilized low plasticity and coarse grained soils: laboratory and
eld study. Soils Found 2006;46(3):35166.
267