Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
The static configuration of a building represents in
all configurations a spatial system capable of
transmitting to the foundations the effect of vertical
loads , own weight, live load and also the effects of
the horizontal forces that act on the structure from
wind and seismic loading.
The effect of spatial interaction is assured by both
the type of connection between the component
elements, columns, beams, and bracings or by
reinforced concrete diaphragms as well as by the
floor slabs of each floor which form horizontal
diaphragms and give high rigidity in their own
plane.
Steel frame structures generally fall into 3 main
categories according to the way they resist to the
action of lateral forces:
- un-braced frames
(moment resisting
frames) (MRF)
- centrically braced frames (CBF)
- eccentrically braced frames (EBF)
For an optimal design of these structures one must
find a compromise between the strength , rigidity,
ductility and architectural demands.
For checking at ultimate limit states, the
methodology of dimensioning of structures situated
in seismic areas can lead to the following types of
structural design concepts:
- dissipative structures
- structures isolated from seismic action
- structures with supplemental damping
For structures isolated from seismic action and those
with supplemental damping the structure is
conceived either not to enter plastic domain or by
ISSN: 1790-2769
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
381
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2
ISSN: 1790-2769
382
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Drift +
Drift -
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
ISSN: 1790-2769
383
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2
800
600
400
200
-2
-4
-6
-8
Kinematic
SERB
-200
Fig.6.
-400
-600
-800
600
400
200
Fig.7.
10
-2
-4
-6
-8
TAKEDA
SERB
-200
-400
-600
-800
Fig.8
The first 2 loops Kinematic and Takeda were used to
try an approximation of the hysteretic curve supplied
by the manufacturer as mentioned above. In reality
the devices are only placed at the base of the bracing
but for the ongoing analysis the whole bracing was
replaced using an equivalent rigidity Kech resulting
from connecting in series the 2 elements the bracing
and the damping with their rigidities accordingly.
Consecutive push over tests with displacement
control at +/- 2, +/- 4, +/- 6 were done. The results
are presented graphically in terms of ForceDisplacement as follows :
ISSN: 1790-2769
384
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2
2.5
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Drift +
1.5
Dift +
Drift -
Drift -
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.5
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
4 Conclusion
Comparing drift curves in the two structural
configurations a first observation is that they have
almost the same shape. This shows that the
modeling of the behavior of the structure using link
type elements can be used for studying the global
behavior of the structure. This type of analysis can
therefore be used later on to determine the
performance of the structures under seismic loading
in different structural configurations and different
acceleration types. Following the values of inter
story drift you can observe close values for both
Kinematic and Takeda type behaviors .
For small values of the acceleration multiplier there
are no significant differences between the two
models with and without dampers the ones with
dampers having a slightly larger displacement
values due to reduction of the rigidity. The
advantage of dampers appears at large values of the
period of vibration ( for a multiplier of over 1.4)
when the braced structure reaches failure . The
structure with dampers records smaller deformations
and collapse is prevented .Figure 15
The use of dampers leads to improvement of ductile
characteristics of the structure avoiding a brittle
failure.
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Dift +
Drift -
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
600
400
200
10
-2
-4
-6
-8
Kinematic
SERB
-200
-400
-600
-800
ISSN: 1790-2769
385
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
Disipatori
CBF
0.8
0.6
0.4
References:
0.2
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Fig.16
ISSN: 1790-2769
386
ISBN: 978-960-474-080-2