Professional Documents
Culture Documents
H O L O C E N E G L A C I E R F L U C T U A T I O N S IN S O U T H A M E R I C A A N D A N T A R C T I C A
Chalmers M. Clapperton
INTRODUCTION
This review considers the evidence for Holocene
glacier fluctuations along a unique land-based transect
from equatorial to polar latitudes (Fig. 1). It assesses
the validity of data given in a number of papers
supporting a model of at least four major glacier
advances in the Andes. Difficulties encountered in
identifying and dating equivalent Holocene glacier
advances on the Antarctic continent and on subAntarctic islands are discussed prior to an overview of
the entire Andean-Antarctic transect in an attempt to
discern any synchrony or lack of synchrony in the
emerging chronologies.
SOUTH AMERICA
Early-Mid Holocene
186
7O
,/
60
P/CO BOLIVAR
EL ALTAR
~COROILERA BI.ANCA
HUA$CARAN
SOUTH
AMERICA
Mendoza
~
HIELO
TRONADOR . . _ ~
r , ~ ' ) ~
PATAGONICO SUUR
40oS
50
ANTAI~CTIC
,~ ~ ~ ~ ~'NG GEOR
CONVERGENCE 60
ISLAND
SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS~ - "~
LIVINGSTON ISLAND ~ ' ~ "
GEONaE Vl S O U N O ~
RNTARCT/C
GEORGIA~
1=*P ~
~
~ -
\
MORAINE
F. . . .
HALLEY BAY
ROSS SEA
MCM. . . .
SOUND..~_~ta/ ~
ANTARCTICA
800KM
SCALE t : 3 2 M
187
FIG. 2a. Map of the main Patagonian icefields, Hielo Patagonico Norte and Hielo Patagonico Sur, showinglocation of glaciers
referred to in the text.
.............
19th C. MOR/~
FIRST
-- -
PAC/F/C
NEO(
OC~. W
I~KM
FIG. 2b. Glaciers and Neoglacial moraines in the Laguna de San Rafael area, Patagonia (Chile) (after Heusser, 1960).
radiocarbon age of 3610 + 400 BP (later recalculated
to 3740 + 400 BP - - Mercer, 1982, p. 38). Heusser
(1960) originally estimated the moraine to be ca. 4000
years old, but the data clearly give only an upper
limiting age and the feature could be very much older.
A lower limiting age was assumed from a so-called
'interfluctuational section' where silty peat overlain by
85 cm of till gave a radiocarbon age of 6850 + 200 BP
(Heusser, 1960). Since the site is within the glacier's
19th century moraine limits, the overlying till could be
no more than 100 years old, and one implication is that
Glaciar San Rafael may not have advanced further than
its 19th century limits for more than 7000 years. Thus,
the older moraines enclosing Laguna San Rafael could
be late-glacial in age, as suspected by Muller (1960).
Doubt concerning the Neoglacial history of Glaciar San
188
189
190
Glaciai N a ~ a e z
G l ac ia i T f m p a n 0
t~lat'iar (')flhillrlJ Stir
Glacier Frias
1-2204
1-3508
1-3510
G X 41 64
4120 + 105
~1
D a t e s glacier rc a d v a n c e
P o s td a te s glacier recession
T re e o v e rlid d e n in re a d v a n e e m o r a i n e
Basal peat o n ont~/agh d e h a
P e a t overiddcn b y radvance m o r a i n e
P a t b d l d o ~ d b y glaeix radvanc
HV-8709
wig-1200
gRR*994
1-8441
1215 * 4~
1100 =~ 70
1014 + 45
1675
Chile (Patagonia)
I882
Bolivia
f.)ln~ier 8 ~ R a fa e l,
Hi~lo P a t n g o n l g o N o rt
Glacier S a n Rafaci.
Hlelo Paxagonlco N o t r e
Strollg continuom~ t i n d e r [ e c ~ t n l
s o m e chsappeared
N o r t h e r n AndL-s o r P e r u
V e ~ i c a l t ~ ra~s$ion of 500 m
Central Andes of p e ~
1862-1942
Recession f r o m p r e s u m e d L l l d e Ice A g e
moraines
Cordillera R e a l
B~I
Al)
Cordillera C e n t r a l
C~rdilfera Binned
Crro C u c h p a n g a
Cordillera B la n c a
A D 1260 + 50 (HV-8703)
Pera
10&q
Husscr, 1960
Heu~r,
H e us s e r, 1960
C l a p p e r t o n , 1981
B t o g g i , 1943
Broggi. 1943
O p p e n h e i m a n d S p a n n . 1940
W r i g h t . 1984
F. R 6 t h h s b e [ g e r (pers. c o m m u n . ,
1982)
H a s t e n r a t h . 19@1
W o o d . 1970
E a s t a n d W e s t Cordilleras
third
R e d u c t i o n o f ice ~ e r
Hl~tofi~d o ] ~ r v a h o n o1 snow a n d ~
carver: *am glaciers disappeared
Sierra N e v a d a dc S a n t a M a r i a
1939--1969
by o ~
H e r d . 1974
T e p h r a f r o m 1595 e r u p d o n a b s e n t fro m
moraines
1595
H e r d . 1974
P e a t i n ~ r f a ~ r a t e d in m o r a i n e - radi~rbon dated
Ecuador
Schubert. 1972
1420
C o l o mb i a
M e rc e r a nd Palacios. 1977
C l a p p e r t o n . 1981
l gt h - - 1 9 t h C e n n l r y
1885-19"72
W r i g h t 198~
F. R6thlisbcrgcr (per$. c o m r a u n . ,
19821
F. R0thlisberger ( p e r s . c o m m u n . ,
1982)
F. R6thlisberger ( p e t s e o m m u n . ,
19821
m e r e ~ r , 1070
Ml~cl. 1970
M e rc e r. 19o5
M c l c c t . 1970
F . u r t h Neoglaeial A d v n ~ :
Vcnc~ela
905 100
D a t e s glacier reaOvanee
T re e t r u n k tn s o u . o v e rrid e n b y
~advanee moraine
H V -8 71 0
1325 --+ 75
D a t e s g l ~ i e r readvance
F ~ i l w o o d I r a g m ~ n t in s u p e r p o s e d
friar ainc
HV-ffT08
H a m m i e k glacier
1-3S03
23t~J =k 110
H a m m i c k glacier
1-350d
2800 1~)
O r g a n i c near-basal s e d i m e n t m pOnd o n
moraine
1-~85
lb~3 Z IU0
POStdalS glacier r c c ~ i o n
P~~sil,ly d a t ~ a i eadvallce
U l ~ a l a g l a ~ e r , l.ago Argerlthlu
1-988
F. g 6 t h h s b ~ r g e r (peea. c o m m u n . ,
1082)
Soil i n t e r b c d d c d within s u p c r p o s a d
~raine
H V 8705
1995 60
2310 ~- 120
F. ROthksL~rgcr ( p e r s c o m m u a . ,
19821
H V -8 70 6
T h i r d Ne~.laelal A g v ~ e e : l~00--Ii00 BP
Pe r u
1365 + 60
Chile ( P a t a g o n i a )
A r g e n t i n a (P at ag o n i a)
C l a p p e r t o n . 1986
Soil i n t c r b c d d e d within su p e rp o se d
moraine
SRR-2587
3~70 -Y 215
2170 _+ 50
Ecuador
Peru
T h o u r e t a n d van de r H a m m e n .
1981
M e r ~ r . 1976
Mert-er, 1970
Postdats glacial a d v a n ~
W o o d n e a r bae~ o f o r g a n i c ~ d i m e n t in
M e rc e r. 1970
Basal p e a t o n s e d i m e n t o f f o r m e r
m o ra in a l lake
PIISIdZIeS glat:ier rel~ssilm
M l e r ~ r . 1968
Postdates glaciel r e ~ i o n
Basal p e a t in b o g o n o u t e r m o s t m a r anie
oldest l n o r a i n e
NIcro~r. 1960
3 ha--2 k a B P
2700
Se~and Neo81aclal A d v t . :
Colombia
3465 130
B a ~ l I l e a l nil ~ l l d
(31aiax ~ a n L o r c l g o Eatc
1-2208
H e ns s e r. 1960
F. R6thlisberger ( p e t s . c o m m u n .
in C l a p p e r t o n . 19831
F R6thlixberger(pers commun.
in C l a p p e r t o n . 19831
C l a p F c r t o n . 1983
T h o i o t ~ d va n dor H a m m e n .
1981
Reference
O ~ l i c v ~ to d a te g l a c ~ t rcadvanco
Nooglacial m o r a i n e
Argentina (Patagonia)
M i n i m u m age for t h e m o r a i n e
N e a r basal p e a t in p o n d o r o u t e r
L a g u n a d e San Rafael
Y-738-2
3740 400
Palae0sol within s u p e r p o s e d m o r a i n e
HV-8706
3470 + 215
U n ~ r t a i n . b u t m a y give u p p e r or lower
llmRlng age for NeOglaeml r e a a v a n e e
Cordillera B la n c a
HV-8707
O u c b t a d a L l a n g a n u ~ s . Cordillera Blana
SRR-996
3560 1(30
Indicates a s h o r t ~ l d period
Significance
Description o f deposit
Locality
4287 +_ 90
g k a r l ka BP
4750
R a d i o c a r b o n d at e (BP)
Chile
Peru
Fir~-t N ~g l ae i ~l A d v ~ t
Colombia
Country
Whaiebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Sealbone
Whalebone
(eollagen)
Livingston Island
King George Island
Livingston Island
Whalebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Seaweed
Tree trunk
(Southern beech)
Whalebone
(collagen)
Seaweed
Whalebone
(eollagen~
Whalebone
(collagen)
Whalebone
(eollagen)
Penguin bone
Penguin bone
Material
Byer~ Peninsula,
Livingston Island
Maxwell Bay.
King George Island
Maxwell Bay,
King George Island
Barton Peninsula,
King George Island
Marian Cove,
King George Island
Marian Cove
King George Island
Maxwell Bay,
King George Island
Maxwell Bay,
King George Island
Nelson Island
Fildes Peninsula,
King George Island
Fildca Peninsula,
King George Island
Byers Penimula,
Livingston Bland
Byers Peninsula,
Livingston Island
Liviagsto~ Bland
Location
Material
no.
DIC-370
Birm.496
DIC-372
DIC-367
DIC-369
DIC-368
Birm-S)
DIC-371
DIC-373
Birm.17
Birm.16
Birm-22A
Birm-14
1-7870
SRR-1087
SRR-1086
HD8426-9106
HD9425-9100
Lab.
143(I _+470*"
360 _+ 55
350 + 110
206 + 130
510 -+ 165
590 _+ 55
9493 - 370
9280 -- 60
6647 + 120
6040 _+ 40
2000 - 50
1700 -- 50
1460 ___60
1000 _ 50
910 - 50
2210 _+ 50
950 - 50
2012 _ 45
2230 __. 70
33311 _+ 120
1590 + 30
1540 "4-70*
SRR-3004
SRK-578
SRR-3000
SRl~-2760(b)
SIGR-2760(a)
SRR-2998
SRR-2996
SRR-2997
SRg-3001
SRR-S)02
SRR-739
SRR-2704
SRR-2705
SRR-1497
SRR-49
SRR-736
Lab. no.
970 --. 50
674 --_ 66
840 _ 75
1000 + 45'
1210 + 55
1200 + 110
1056 + 130
1360-165
1440 _+ 55
540 _+ 140
1450-1540
1440-1660
1520-180
1285-1510
1295-1410
1280-1465
1223 + 81~
1390 + 140
1215-1260
1680 _ 85
2271 + 35
1973 4- 40
5710 + 55
580C + 90
802 + 43
2530 4- 85
3121 --. 35
2893, 4- 40
6560 4- 55
6500 4" 90
Uncorrected age
(BP)
TABLE 2. Key Holocene radiocm'bon dates from the South Shetland Islands
*Correction factor ot -850 and calibration to calen&r yem AD gives 1265-1380 AD.
Loeatinn
Modern
2.5-3
2.5-3
6--5
6--5
6-7
6--5
7.6
10.13
10.3
ca. 18
ca. lg
Beach Altitude
(m)
Reference
Harkness, 1979
Harkness, 1979
Reference
Curl, 19g0
Sugden and John, 1973
Cud, 1980
Curl, 1980
Curl, 1980
Curl, 1980
Curl, 1980
Curl, 1980
Curl, 1~0
Hansom, 1979
Hansom, 1979
1986
1985
1985
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
1986
191
3). The moraines dearly represent a readvance rather Beaches above 6 m range in age from 1680 to 5800 yr
than a recessional still-stand because the glaciers BP, being progressively older with increasing altitude.
overrode and entrained beach sediments and deposited Four dates suggest that the 6 m beach formed ca.
till over early Holocene shell-bearing marine deposits 510-800 14C years BP, while three others suggest the
(Potter Cover). Because the sea was unable to pen- 3 m beach formed ca. 200-360 14C years BP. One of the
etrate within the moraine limits and form beaches at dates for the 6 m beach is from a tree trunk (Nothoequivalent and lower altitudes, the glaciers must have fagus antarctica - - Southern Beech) and requires no
been at the site of the terminal moraines while the 6 m correction, yet it corresponds well with the corrected
beach formed. This suggests that when glaciers stood whalebone dates associated with the same beach.
at the moraine limits relative sea level was 6 m lower Bearing in mind the number of different workers and
than now. Within the fjords there is another moraine laboratories involved and the variety of different
linked with a raised beach at 2.5-3 m. This beach is materials used, the consistency of the pattern is
present outside the moraine but not within it. The striking. If the high-precision calibration curves derived
moraine indicates an advance of 0.25-1 km beyond the by Stuiver and Pearson (1986) are applied to the last
present glacier margins. Organic remains associated seven radiocarbon dates, using a one sigma range, then
with the raised beach series allow the two moraines to a first approximation of the calendar age span of the
be dated. Altogether, several workers have obtained 14 6 m beach would be late 13th-early 16th centuries
radiocarbon dates from penguin, seal, whale, and A.D. This implies that the 2-3 km glacier readvance
seaweed remains (Table 2). A problem relating to associated with the beach culminated at some time
radiocarbon dates on marine animals in the Antarctic is close to this period. On a similar basis, the 3 m beach
the significant depletion in radiocarbon activity in the and the glacier readvance of 250-1000 m would have an
sea which leads to falsely old dates relative to the approximate calendar age most probably in the range of
terrestrial time scale (Broecker, 1963). Harkness the 15th-17th centuries A.D.
(1979) and Gordon (1987) have considered the problem
The chronology based on radiocarbon dating of
in the West Antarctic seas and on the basis of dates on raised beaches is supported by independent lichenomarine organisms which died this century suggest that a metric dating of moraines on both Livingston Island
correction factor of 750 years may apply widely in and King George Island. Using Rhizocarpon geoAntarctica. However, there appear to be regional graphicum thalli calibrated by measurements on a
variations in radiocarbon activity and in an attempt to sealer's hut thought to have been built about 1820derive its value for the South Shetland Islands an 1825, Curl (1980) gave a minimum age of ca. A.D. 1720
approximate value of 850 years was estimated from to recent moraines at False Bay and Elephant Point on
dates on four modem whale and seal bones (Table 2, Livingston Island. In addition, Birkenmajer (1981)
bottom). This figure should be regarded as no more used the same growth curve to approximate a minimum
than a provisional guide, however, and the corrected age of A.D. 1240 for a moraine contemporaneous with
dates could easily differ by more than 100 years either the 6 m beach in front of Ferrar Glacier, King George
way.
Island. Again this agrees with the raised-beach chronolIf the same correction factor is used for all the ogy. Birkenmajer also used lichenometry to derive
marine-based dates, then the overall pattern of the 14 minimal ages for two other moraines as A.D. 1780 and
radiocarbon ages is remarkably consistent (Fig. 3). A.D. 1825. Somewhat later limiting dates of A.D. 1837
lSm
'0
O0
O0
1240 A.D.
'__-i( Lichen
7.6rn
4 L
"~'~" O O 0
6nl
O O O O O O O~ O O O O O O
(I Date )
1215 - 1510A.0. (
( 40stu )
510 )
802
B+P.
~
1720 A,O.
~ y ' ~ , ~( Uchen )
IP /~
0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O OO
0 0 0 00'
O O O O O 'O ~ - - O O
t8rn
O O O O O O O O O~O O
Moraine ~
3rn
0 0 ~ 0
00~
0
~
O0
PresentBeach
Raised beach
FIG. 3. Schematic diagram showing the relationship of Holocene glacier readvance moraines with radiocarbon dated raised
beaches, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica.
192
South Georgia
In South Georgia evidence of Holocene glacier
advances is demonstrated by arcuate morainic ridges
extending beyond most glaciers on the lee northeastern
side of the island (Fig. 4). The moraines are distinguished from glacial deposits outside their limits by
freshness of form, continuity, association with sea level
close to the present, the presence of boulders on their
tops, and by the lack of iron staining. Some fjord
glaciers, such as those terminating in Moraine Fjord
(Fig. 5) and Antarctica Bay, advanced more than 6 km
and produced morainic ridges over 30 m high, while
land-based glaciers advanced only several tens or
hundreds of metres and produced ridges generally less
than 5 m high. Within the clear outer moraine limit are
two other moraines usually occurring within a few
hundred metres of the present glacier margins. In
contrast to the outer moraine which is well-vegetated,
the inner moraines are poorly vegetated, blocky and, in
the case of some innermost ridges, ice-cored and
unstable. Two sets of inner moraines have been
mapped around the margins of many South Georgian
glaciers (Clapperton, 1971; Clapperton and Sugden,
1980).
The most extensive Holocene moraine is tightly
dated in Moraine Fjord (Fig. 4) where a series of three
to four lobate terminal ridges 3-5 m high form superficial topography on a massive accumulation of till
more than 35 m thick. On the eastern side of the fjord
mouth, an actively eroding sea cliff 8 m high exposes
3-5 m of till which covers a layer of plant remains
(compressed Acaena stems) overlying a thin organic
soil. This, in turn, had developed on a lower till, the
base of which is not exposed. Radiocarbon dates of
1700 + 50 and 2000 + 50 BP were obtained for the
plant and soil material, respectively, suggesting that the
last glacier advance to the mouth of Moraine Fjord
occurred shortly after ca. 1700 years ago. Upper
bracketing dates for glacier recession were obtained
from basal peat overlying outwash on the eastern side
of the moraine and from basal organic sediments in a
kettle pond just inside the end moraine on the western
side of the fjord (Fig. 6). These gave radiocarbon dates
of 1000 + 50 and 1460 + 60 BP, respectively, suggesting that the Moraine Fjord glacier probably receded
from the moraine complex sometime before 1000 BP.
Since the dated soil is only a thin skeletal layer, the
glacial sediments on which it is developed possibly date
from an earlier Holocene advance. Such an opinion is
supported by the fact that peat up to 3 m thick and
6000-9000 years old covers ground immediately outside the moraine limit. Furthermore, the moraine is a
massive complex of four major ridges suggesting that it
may be a composite feature constructed by several
advances to approximately the same point, a place
where a rock threshold crosses the fjord as it widens
abruptly into Cumberland Bay (Fig. 4). Thus, although
radiocarbon dating confirms that the last advance in
Moraine Fjord culminated shortly after ca. 1700 BP,
advances may also have occurred earlier and later in
the Holocene.
Three other radiocarbon dates close to this age range
come from adjacent glaciers. Two are from basal peats
immediately outside and inside equivalent moraines in
the Hamberg Lakes valley where a distributary lobe of
the Moraine Fjord glacier system advanced to form
three well-defined arcuate ridges (Fig. 7). The outer
and inner peats gave dates of 2210 + 50 and 950 + 50
BP, respectively. The other site is in Doris Bay some
25 km to the southeast where well-vegetated moraines
terminate at the coast approximately 1.7 km from
Nachtigal glacier (Fig. 4). Basal peat dug from a kettle
hollow ca. 400 m inside the moraine limit gave a
radiocarbon age of 2012 + 45 BP (Clapperton and
Sugden, 1980). This is a limiting date for an advance of
Nachtigal glacier reaching its furthest Neoglacial extent
some time before ca. 2 ka BP. Near the eastern side of
Nordenskjrld glacier, which calves into water over
200 m deep in Cumberland East Bay, a meltwater
stream had in 1982 exposed a 6 cm thick bed of peat
extending 10 m away from beneath the glacier's landbased terminus. The peat rests on till, is compacted,
and is partly covered by freshly deposited till; the peat
also exists as large blocks in the innermost moraine.
Radiocarbon dates of 2230 + 70 and 3330 + 120 BP
were obtained for the top and bottom in situ layers
respectively, suggesting ice-free conditions at the site
between calendar ages 2122-2334 and 3395-2689 BP
(Gordon, 1987). This suggests that if Nordenskjrld
glacier advanced in response to an early Neoglacial (say
2700-2200 BP) climatic deterioration, possibly extending as far as the outermost 'inner moraine', it lagged
several hundred years behind the forcing, similar to
Moraine Fjord glacier.
The younger moraines are most closely dated at
Nordenskjrld glacier where Clapperton (1971) mapped
three ridges 2-5 m high on the western side. The
outermost moraine lies no more than ca. 800 m from
the glacier margin. In 1968 the innermost ridge was still
ice-cored and may have formed during an advance
culminating about 1957 (Hayward, 1983). It had become much lower (1-2 m) and ice-free by 1985. The
two outer ridges have a sparse but stable vegetation
193
GLACIAL MORAINE
.....
NEOGLACIAL
---
2 0 t h c . MORAINE
MORAINE
PEAKS OVER
2000m
('~
11'00BP "1~
1450 BP~
807m
/ I, i
11420 S -
490m
i
BP
,,
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
i:i:i:i:i~i::::'~:il $ ~ , ..:.::::iSi:
(" - - ~
~|. . . . . .
." .,..:.::i:!:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
iI :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
IIi1 ===========================================
A,t
,.,,,...,.,....,,,,.,,.,..,.........................................
ill:. pdle~ ~ i i i i i ~ i i ! i i ! i i i ! i i i i i ! i ! i i i i i i
~ -~
~=============================
' ~ ~ i : : : " " ========================
~
ak ',
Z_..
.35.
~~.:i~:i:i:!:!:i:!:i::."
.%
. o~,._,
;"'"/_....
,,
~4~0C-
( . " I--1525l
~J
0
5KM
/& i
FIG. 4. Map of the Cumberland East Bay area, South Georgia, showing Neoglacial moraines and some radiocarbon dated sites.
FIG. 5. Hamberg and Harker glaciers calving into Moraine Fjord, South Georgia. Moraines and trimfines mark the former
extent of these glaciers during the Little Ice Age.
194
FIG. 6. Neoglacialmoraine complex at the mouth of Moraine Fjord, South Georgia, which may have been deposited by more
than one glacier readvance. Radiocarbon dates bracket one readvance between ca. 1700 and ca. 1460 BP.
FIG. 7. Neoglacialmoraines m Hamberg Lakes Valley, South Georgia, probable equivalentsof those in Moraine Fjord (Fig. 6).
Younger moraines are contiguous -~th the glacier and older till is in the foreground.
cover, but the seaward end of the inner one is largely
composed of beach shingle rich in seal remains and
whalebone, apparently bulldozed by a readvanee of the
land-based western edge of the glacier. A radiocarbon
age of 1540 + 70 BP obtained from a whalebone gives
a corrected calendar age of A D 1265-1380, suggesting
that the readvance may have culminated in the early
14th century. This appears to correspond reasonably
well with the advance identified in the South Shetland
IslandS. Equivalent moraines mapped at other glaciers
on South Georgia have a similar vegetation cover and
degree of relative weathering (Clapperton, 1971),
195
Period of wan,nth:
glaciers withdrawn(BP)
9400-8600
ca. 8400
ca. 8000
ca. 7500
Before ca. 6500
ca. 6300-6000
ca. 5000-4800
ca. 5200
ca. 4700-4200
ca. 3330-2230
ca. 3200
ca. 2700-2000
ca. 12th century-early 20th century
Place
Southern Andes, South Georgia
Pata Andes
Trop Andes
Trop Andes only
George VI Sound
Trop Andes
South Georgia
Pata Andes
Trop + Pata Andes, South Georgia?
South Georgia
Trop Andes, E. Antarctica
Trop + Pata Andes, South Georgia
All Andes, South Georgia, Sub-Antarctic islands
196
extent sometime about 800 BP. Raised beaches outside fluctuations during the Neoglacial in Patagonia
moraine limits contiguous with the 6 m beach are proposed by Mercer (1976) corresponds well with that
consistently higher and older than ca. 1700 BP but do emerging for Scandinavia and the European Alps
not seem to be linked with moraines. One possible (Denton et al., 1986; Rbthlisberger, 1987), much of it is
explanation is that older moraines and equivalent based on radiocarbon dates that give only minimal ages
beaches (higher than 6 m) formerly existed in the bays for the moraines with which they are associated. Other
but were removed by a more extensive advance radiocarbon dates are from soil or trees buried in
peaking at ca. 400-800 BP. The higher elevation of the lateral moraines where glacier thickening could have
older beaches outside the 800 year moraine limit is been caused by variations in the local catchment rather
explained by continuing isostatic recovery (and possibly than by regional climatic change. Also, much of
tectonic uplift) of the islands since the last glaciation Mercer's data come from calving glaciers which may
maximum. Because uplift constantly reduced water fluctuate in position because of their dynamics in
depth at the calving glacier termini, the glaciers are addition to climatic forcing. One problem in Patagonia
more likely to have advanced further recently than that has not yet been addressed is why outlet glaciers
formerly. This is clearly a hypothesis that requires from the northern and southern icefields reached their
testing since it implies that the Holocene extent of maximal Holocene limits at different times. For
glaciers in the South Shetland Islands is controlled example, of the glaciers studied by Mercer, most of
more by relative sea level than by climatic parameters, those flowing westwards attained their maximal limits
although these presumably may also force glacier at ca. 4200-4700 BP, whereas those flowing eastwards
advances.
did so at ca. 2000-2200 BP. It also remains unknown
A third problem concerns South Georgia, where the why some, such as Glaciar Moreno and Glacier
maximum Holocene extent of glaciers appears to have Bruggen, are presently more extensive than at any time
peaked shortly before ca. 2200 BP. Since fluctuations earlier in the Holocene (J.H. Mercer, pers. c o m m u n . ,
of glaciers on the island during the 20th century (as 1987).
described by Hayward, 1983) closely match those in the
CONCLUSIONS
Northern Hemisphere (Porter, 1986, Fig.~ 1, p. 30), it
might be expected that fluctuations earlier in the
This review concludes that much of the evidence on
Holocene would also have corresponded with those in
Europe. The glacial geologic record on South Georgia which the chronology of glacier fluctuations in South
is still incompletely known and lacks the dating control America and Antarctica is based appears to be very
necessary to permit a rigorous comparison with the tenuous and, in places, highly ambiguous. Many more
Northern Hemisphere, but some supporting data are radiocarbon dates tightly bracketing Holocene
emerging from the palaeoecological record. For moraines and sedimentary sequences are clearly reexample, analyses of variations in pollen, vegetation quired before a more reliable sequence of glacier
macrofossils, diatoms, and inorganic sediment content fluctuations may be established. Data now available
in cores from lakes and bogs suggest (with radiocarbon nevertheless suggest that during the last 5000 years, at
dating) a period of mid-Holocene warmth peaking least, glaciers in the Andes may have advanced more or
between 5600 and 4800 BP followed by a trend towards less synchronously with glaciers in the Northern
cooling; pronounced environmental deterioration is Hemisphere. Although glacier fluctuations on South
registered between 2700 and 2100 BP and during the Georgia may also have followed closely those of
last 1000 years by disruption of the fragile vegetation Patagonia, the precise pattern of glacier oscillations
cover and by higher input of inorganic sediment to and their forcing mechanisms on sub-Antarctic islands,
lakes and bogs (Clapperton et al., in press). A related the West Antarctic peninsula, and East Antarctica
problem emerging from South Georgia is that fjord remain obscure.
glaciers are unreliable for the precise dating of
climatically-forced advances since their response may
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
lag by several hundred years. Despite this problem,
however, calculations of a permissible calving rate at
We are pleased to acknowledge the Natural Environment ReMoraine Fjord glacier and estimation of its rate of search Council who supported the work in South Georgia (GR
advance on a moraine bank suggests that its radio- 3/5199) and The Royal Society, The Carnegie Trust, and Aberdeen
carbon-dated Holocene advance of 1460-1700 BP was University for grants towards research in South America. Mauri
Pelto has been most helpful in discussingthe climaticenvironment of
a delayed response to the pulse of global glacier the sub-Antarctic. The late John Mercerkindlyprovidedunpublished
expansion at 2200-3200 BP (Clapperton et al., 1987). information and reviewers G.H. Denton and S.C. Porter made
Temperature depression in South Georgia, estimated helpful suggestions.
from ELAs calculated for the early Neoglacial and
REFERENCES
Little Ice Age periods, amount to ca. IC and 0.5C
respectively, and correspond well with those estimated
Adamson, D.A. and Pickard, J. (1986). Cainozoic history of the
for the Northern Hemisphere (Porter, 1986).
Vestford Hills. In: Pickard, J. (ed.), Antarctic Oasis. Terrestrial
A fourth issue concerns the reliability of the data
Environments and History of the Vestfold Hills, pp. 63-98.
Academic Press, London.
from South America. Although the sequence of glacier
197
198