Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optimization.
.
I. INTRODUCTION
R+jX
kth line
q
Peff + jQeff
distribution system.
(P
2
2
eff [ q] + Qeff [ q ] .R[ k ]
2
(V [q])
(1)
(P
2
eff [ q ] +
2
Qeff
[q ] . X [k ]
(V [q])2
(2)
(3)
Qlineloss (2 * Qeff [q ] * X [ k ])
=
Qeff
(V [q ])2
(4)
TABLE I
LOSS SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENTS PLACED IN DESCENDING
ORDER OF A 15-BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
Bus
Norm[i]
Base voltage
Plineloss Qeff
No.
V[i]/0.95
(descending)
0.029661
0.016437
0.015485
0.008526
0.006182
0.005266
0.004134
0.003141
0.002966
0.002811
0.001678
0.001613
0.001342
0.001256
2
6
3
11
4
12
9
15
14
7
13
8
10
5
1.0224
1.0086
1.0069
0.9990
1.0009
0.9955
1.0188
0.99835
0.9985
1.0063
0.9942
1.007263
1.01768
0.99985
0.971283
0.958232
0.956669
0.949952
0.949952
0.945829
0.967971
0.94844
0.948608
0.956008
0.944517
0.956954
0.966897
0.949918
V. TEST RESULTS
The proposed method for loss reduction by capacitor
placement is tested on 10bus [15], 15bus [13], 34bus [16], 69
bus [3] and 85bus radial distribution systems. The various
constants used in the proposed algorithm are
capmin=200kvar, capmax=1200kvar, K=0.7259, c1=c2=2.05
and w=1.2.The test results are shown below in various tables.
The 10 bus test system with the proposed method is compared
with the paper [15] in which the total kvar placed is 5500 kvar
with a loss reduction of 10.06% where as the proposed
method for the identified locations the total kvar placed only
3186 kvar that too with a loss reduction of 11.17% as shown
in Table II. When the proposed method is tested on 15 bus
system and compared with the paper [18], nearly similar
results are obtained as shown in Table III. The proposed
method is also tested on 34 bus test system and compared
with the heuristic method [16] and Fuzzy Expert Systems
(FES) approach [20], results obtained are more promising. as
shown in Table IV. In practice the capacitor size should be in
discrete in value. With this in mind, for a 34 bus system, when
buses 19, 22 and 20 are compensated by 800kvar, 800kvar
and 450kvar instead of 781kvar, 803kvar and 479kvar
respectively as shown in Table IV, the load flow results
TABLE II
COMPARISION OF PREVIOUS METHOD [15] AND PROPOSED
METHOD FOR OF 10BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
BASE CASE ACTIVE POWER LOSS=783.77 KW
Fuzzy Reasoning based[15]
Proposed PSO based
Bus No
Size (kvar)
Bus No
Size (kvar)
4
1050
6
1174
5
1050
5
1182
6
1950
9
264
10
900
10
566
Total kvar placed
4950
Total kvar placed
3186
Active power loss(kw)
704.88
Active power loss(kw)
696.21
TABLE III
COMPARISION OF PREVIOUS METHOD [18] AND PROPOSED
METHOD FOR OF 15BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
BASE CASE ACTIVE POWER LOSS=61.79 KW
Method proposed in[18]
Proposed PSO based
Bus No
Size (kvar)
Bus No
Size (kvar)
3
805
3
871
6
388
6
321
Total kvar placed
1193
Total kvar placed
1192
Active power loss(kw)
32.6
Active power loss(kw)
32.7
TABLE IV
COMPARISION OF PREVIOUS METHODS AND PROPOSED METHOD
FOR OF 34BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
BASE CASE ACTIVE POWER LOSS=221.723 KW
Heuristic based [16]
FES based[20]
Proposed PSO based
Bus No
kvar
Bus No
kvar
Bus No
kvar
26
1400
24
1500
19
781
11
750
17
750
22
803
17
300
7
450
20
479
4
250
------------------Total kvar
2700
Total kvar
2700
Total kvar
2063
Power loss(kw) 168.47
Power loss(kw) 168.98
Power loss(kw) 168.8
TABLE V
PROPOSED PSO METHOD TESTED ON 69 BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM.
BASE CASE ACTIVE POWER LOSS=225 KW
Bus No
Kvar
46
241
47
365
50
1015
Total Kvar
1621
Active Power Loss (kw)
152.48
TABLE VI
PROPOSED PSO METHOD TESTED ON 85 BUS RADIAL DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM.
BASE CASE ACTIVE POWER LOSS=315.714 KW
Bus No
Kvar
8
58
7
27
Total Kvar
Active Power Loss (kw)
796
453
314
901
2464
163.32
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, an algorithm that employs Particle Swarm
Optimization, a meta heuristic parallel search technique for
estimation of required level of shunt capacitive compensation
to improve the voltage profile of the system and reduce active
power loss. Loss Sensitivity Factors are used to determine the
optimum locations required for compensation. The main
advantage of this proposed method is that it systematically
decides the locations and size of capacitors to realize the
optimum sizable reduction in active power loss and significant
improvement in voltage profile. Test results on 10, 15, 34, 69
and 85 bus systems are presented. The method places
capacitors at less number of locations with optimum sizes and
offers much saving in initial investment and regular
maintenance.
VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and facilities
extended by the Department of Electrical Engineering,
National Institute of Technology, Warangal and Vaagdevi
College of Engineering, Warangal (A.P) India.
VIII. REFERENCES
[1]
IX. BIOGRAPHIES
K.Prakash received his B.E (Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 1999)
from University of Madras, M.Tech (Power Systems, 2003) from National
Institute of Technology, Warangal. He is currently pursuing his PhD (Power
Systems Engineering) in National Institute of Technology, Warangal, Andhra
Pradesh, INDIA. His areas of interest include Distribution system studies, Meta
Heuristic Techniques in Power Systems and Economic operation of Power
Systems.