Professional Documents
Culture Documents
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 19 August 2014
Received in revised form
11 October 2014
Accepted 17 October 2014
Available online 28 October 2014
The effect of heating rate on the mechanical properties, microstructure and texture of AlMgSiCu alloy
during solution treatment was investigated through tensile testing, scanning electron microscope,
scanning transmission electron microscope, metallographic observation and EBSD measurement.
The experimental results reveal that there are great differences in the mechanical properties, microstructures and textures after the solution treatment with two different heating rates. Compared with the
alloy sheet solution treated with slow heating rate, the alloy sheet solution treated with rapid heating
rate possesses weak mechanical property anisotropy and higher average r value. The equiaxed grain is
the main recrystallization microstructure for the case of rapid heating rate, while the elongated grain
appears in the case of slow heating rate. The texture components are also quite different in the two
cases, CubeND orientation is the main texture component for the former case, while the latter one
includes Cube, R, Goss, P and Brass orientations. The relationship between r value, texture components
and microstructure has also been established in this paper.
& 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
AlMgSiCu alloy
Heating rate
Mechanical property
Anisotropy
Recrystallization texture
1. Introduction
There is an increasing demand for the use of age hardenable
AlMgSiCu alloy within the automotive industry, due to its
advantages of high strength-to-weight ratio, good corrosion resistance and formability [16]. The typical thermomechanical processing of AlMgSiCu alloy used as car body sheet mainly
consists of casting, scalping, homogenization, hot rolling, intermediate annealing, cold rolling, solution treatment, pre-aging,
natural aging, forming, painting and paint baking [6]. Since nal
recrystallization texture and microstructure developed during
solution treatment play a critical role in controlling the mechanical
property anisotropy and the deep drawability, it is very important
to optimize them to reduce the mechanical property anisotropy
and improve the deep drawability. Accordingly, it is very necessary
to consider the effect of solution treatment on recrystallization
microstructure and texture.
Two major annealing processes for cold-rolled sheets are
continuous annealing and batch annealing. The main difference
between them is the heating rate. The heating rate of the former
case is fast and that of the latter case is slow. This may result in
different precipitations during the different recrystallization
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.045
0921-5093/& 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2. Experimental
The material used in the present research was a cold-rolled
AlMgSiCu series alloy sheet with a thickness of 1 mm. The
chemical composition of the alloy is Al0.8 Mg0.9Si0.5Cu
0.2Fe0.1Mn (wt%). The sheet was divided into two parts. One
part of the sheet denoted as A was solution treated at 555 oC for
2 min in a salt bath furnace with a heating rate of 60 oC/s and the
other part of the sheet denoted as B was also solution treated at
the same temperature for the same holding time in an air furnace
with the heating rate of 1 oC/min, as shown in Fig. 1. It is worth
noting that in order to clearly understand the differences in the
precipitation, solution and recrystallization during solution treatments with the different heating rates, three cold-rolled samples
were heated up from room temperature to 300 oC, 350 oC and
400 oC with a heating rate of 1 oC/min, respectively, and then they
were taken out from the air furnace and quenched in cold water
(intermediate processes of the slow solution treatment), while
another two cold-rolled samples were directly put into the salt
bath furnace with a temperature of 555 oC, and solution treated at
this temperature for 10 and 15 s, respectively (intermediate
processes of the rapid solution treatment). After the solution
treatments, both the parts were pre-aged at 80 oC for 12 h rst
and then naturally aged for 14 days (T4P treatment).
The mechanical properties of the T4P treated sheets, including
yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation,
n and r values, were investigated at room temperature in the three
directions of 01, 451 and 901 with respect to the rolling direction
using MTS810 testing machine. Among the above parameters,
r value was determined by a tensile strain of 15%.
The microstructure of the alloy sheets in different conditions
was characterized by Carl. ZEISS Axio Imager A2m optical microscope. The polished samples were etched by Keller reagent.
Analysis on large particles distributed in the samples and fracture
morphology of the tensile test samples was conducted through
a SUPRA 55 scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with
X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) systems. The throughthickness recrystallization microstructures and textures of the
solution treated samples were characterized by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis on a SUPRA 55 scanning
electron microscope. EBSD samples were prepared by standard
mechanical grinding and electrolytic polishing. In accordance with
the grain size, the step size of 3 m was applied. The grain
structure and texture were analyzed by HKL Channel 5 software.
Orientation distribution functions (ODFs) were calculated by the
harmonic series expansion method (orthorhombic sample symmetry, lmax 22, Gaussian spread 51).
The size and distribution of particles of the solution treated
samples were investigated through a Tecnai G2 F30 transmission
electron microscope (TEM) equipped with a high angle angular
dark eld (HAADF) detector and X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) systems. TEM samples were mechanically polished to
approximately 100 m and then twin-jet polished in an electrolyte
containing 30% nitric acid and 70% methanol at a temperature of
25 1C.
3. Results
3.1. Mechanical properties characterization
Fig. 2 shows the stressstrain curves of the two T4P treated
alloy sheets. It can be clearly seen that their mechanical properties
are different in three directions. The detailed mechanical properties of the two T4P treated sheets in the three different directions
are summarized in Table 1. The results reveal that the mechanical
property anisotropy in sheet A is weak, and the elongation in the
901 direction is a little lower than that of the other two directions.
But the mechanical property anisotropy is increased in sheet B,
especially for the elongation. The elongation in the 901 direction is
decreased much more as shown in Fig. 2. The lower elongation
should be resulted from the elongated grains formed by the slow
heating solution treatment as shown in the following part. In
addition, LDR (limiting drawing ratio) value is usually used to
evaluate deep drawability. Leu [11] pointed out that LDR value
depends on both r and n values, and can normally be expressed as
follows:
v
"
" r#
r#
u
u
1r
1r
t
LDR exp 2f exp n
exp 2n
1;
2
2
where f is the factor of drawing efciency, and when f equals
0.9, the calculated results are in good agreement with the
Fig. 1. Solution treatment curves of different processes (a) salt bath furnace and (b) air furnace.
10
Fig. 2. Engineering stressstrain curves of the T4P treated sheets in different directions (a) sheet A and (b) sheet B.
Table 1
Mechanical properties of the two T4P treated samples.
AlMgSi
Direction (deg)
Average r
Average n
Elongation (%)
YS (MPa)
UTS (MPa)
0
45
90
0.649
0.623
0.584
0.62
0.007
0.309
0.308
0.307
0.308
26.4
26.7
26
145
138
141
288
276
280
0
45
90
0.579
0.528
0.641
0.569
0.082
0.303
0.308
0.314
0.308
26.6
26.9
25.6
154
137
136
293
273
278
11
Fig. 3. Fracture morphology of T4P treated tensile test sheets in different directions. (a) 01 of sheet A, (b) 901 of sheet A, (c) 01 of sheet B and (d) 901 of sheet B.
Fig. 4. Through-thickness recrystallization microstructure of solution treated alloy sheets (a) sheet A and (b) sheet B.
12
Fig. 5. EBSD maps of the solution treated alloy sheets (a) grain microstructure of sheet A, (b) grain microstructure of sheet B, (c) grain size distribution of sheet A and
(d) grain distribution of sheet B. The grain orientations are presented as: aqua, CubeND; red, Cube; green, R; blue, P and yellow, Brass. (For interpretation of the references to
color in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6. Through-thickness recrystallization textures of the solution treated alloy sheets (a) sheet A and (b) sheet B.
Component
Intensity
CubeND
Cube
Goss
P
R
Brass
3.78
5.18
2.06
1.65
2.21
2.6
11
6.02
3.41
4.15
13.9
5.27
13
4. Discussion
4.1. The effect of heating rate on microstructure
The experimental results have revealed that the heating rate
has a signicant inuence on the microstructure and properties of
AlMgSi series alloy. A similar phenomenon has been observed in
AA3015, AlMn and AlMnMg alloys [10,14,15], which can be
attributed to the effect of concurrent precipitation on recrystallization behavior. In the present alloy, the driving force for recrystallization can be expressed as [7,8]
Gb2 2 b 3F V b
V MP M n P D P C P Z M 0 exp Q =kT
2
R
dP
Fig. 7. SEM micrographs of the cold-rolling alloy sheet. (a, b) Morphology of the particles and (c, d) EDS spectra of white and black particles.
14
Fig. 8. The particles and their SADPs in the cold-rolling alloy sheet (a) BF image, (b) STEM image, (c) [001] SADP from -Al19Fe4MnSiz and (d) [ 120] SADP from
Q (Al19Mg4.1Si3.3Cu).
Fig. 9. Microstructure of rapid heating sample solution treated at 555 1C for different times (a) 10 s and (b) 15 s.
15
Fig. 10. Microstructure of the alloys heated up to different temperatures with a slow heating rate (a) 300 1C, (b) 350 1C and (c) 400 1C.
Fig. 11. SEM micrographs of the alloys heated up to different temperatures with a slow heating rate (a) 300 1C and (b) 350 1C.
4 b
4
b
2
PD PZ
Gb =2 3F V b =dp
From Eq. (2), the critical particle size increases with increasing
PZ, which is strongly inuenced by the volume fraction and sizes of
small particles. In other words, their volume fraction and sizes
have a signicant effect on the evolution of recrystallization
texture. According to Engler's results [6], even a mixture of cube
and PSN recrystallization texture can be obtained through controlling the volume fraction and sizes of small particles. Thus, it is
possible to optimize the texture components by controlling the
precipitation state. According to the results shown above, we can
also nd that it is easier to develop CubeND orientation through
PSN effect as a result of the relatively few small particles in the
sample solution treated with a rapid heating rate, while in the
sample solution treated with a slow heating rate, it is easier to
16
Fig. 12. The distribution of particles in the alloys heated up to different temperatures with a slow heating rate (a) 300 1C, (b) 350 1C, (c) EDS spectra of particle A and (d) EDS
spectra of particle B.
Table 3
Values of average r and r for some texture components.
Designation
Average r
Cube
Goss
R
P
Brass
{001}100
{110}001
{124}211
{011}122
{011}211
0.5
15
1.9
2.8
4.7
1
30
1.2
1.6
8.1
Fig. 13. TEM micrograph of the alloy heated up to a temperature of 400 1C.
17
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National High Technical Research
and Development Program of China (No. 2013AA032403), Beijing
Higher Education Yong Elite Teacher Project in 2013 (YETP0409)
and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51301016).
References
[1] G.B. Burger, A.K. Gupta, P.W. Jeffrey, D.J. Lloyd, Mater. Charact. 35 (1995)
2339.
[2] J. Hirsch, T. Al-Samman, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 818843.
[3] W.S. Miller, L. Zhuang, J. Bottema, A.J. Wittebrood, P. De Smet, A. Haszler,
A. Vieregge, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280 (2000) 3749.
[4] H. Inoue, T. Yamasaki, G. Gottstein, P.V. Houtte, T. Takasugi, Mater. Sci. Forum
495497 (2005) 573578.
[5] M. Ghosh, A. Miroux, R.J. Werkhoven, P.J. Bolt, L.A.I. Kestens, J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 214 (2014) 756766.
[6] O. Engler, J. Hirsch, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 336 (2002) 249262.
[7] F.J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly, Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena,
second ed., Pergamon, Oxford, 2004.
[8] M. Ferry, D. Jones, Scr. Mater. 38 (1998) 177183.
[9] W.C. Liu, Z. Li, C.S. Man, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 478 (2002) 173180.
[10] W.C. Liu, J.G. Morris, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36 (2005) 28292848.
[11] D. Leu, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 37 (1997) 201213.
[12] J. Sidor, R. Petrov, L. Kestens, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2010) 413424.
[13] K.K. Cho, Y.H. Chung, C.W. Lee, S.I. Kwun, M.C. Shin, Scr. Mater. 40 (1999)
651657.
[14] M. Somerday, J. Humphreys, Mater. Sci. Technol. 19 (2003) 2029.
[15] O. Daaland, E. Nes, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 14131435.
[16] O. Engler, J. Hirsch, Mater. Sci. Forum217222 (1996) 479486.
[17] O. Engler, Mater. Sci. Forum273275 (1998) 483488.
[18] R.L. Higginson, M. Aindow, P.S. Bate, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 225 (1997) 921.
[19] R.K. Davies, V. Randle, G.J. Marshall, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 60216032.
[20] T.A. Bennett, R.H. Petrov, L.A.I. Kestens, Scr. Mater. 62 (2010) 7881.
[21] Y.S. Liu, S.B. Kang, H.S. Ko, Scr. Mater. 37 (1997) 411417.
[22] Y.H. Chung, K.K. Cho, J.H. Han, M.C. Shin, Scr. Mater. 43 (2000) 759764.
[23] L. Delannay, M.A. Melchior, J.W. Signorelli, J.F. Remacle, T. Kuwabara, Comput.
Mater. Sci. 45 (2009) 739743.