Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quantification
The most likely result of the
hazard / event being realized
Has a good chance of
occurring and is not unusual
Might be occur at some time
in future
Has not been known to
occur after many years
Is practically impossible and
has never occurred
Rating
5
4
3
2
1
Fatal
Serious
Minor
Negligible
Quantification
Numerous fatalities,
irrecoverable properly
damage and productivity
Approximately one single
fatality, major property
damage if hazard is realized
Non-fatal injury, permanent
disability
Disabling but not permanent
injury
Minor abrasions, bruises,
cuts, first aid type injury
Rating
5
3
2
1
Likelihood (L)
3
1
2
3
4
5
2
4
6
8
10
3
6
9
12
15
4
8
12
16
20
5
10
15
20
25
Based on the table above, the level of risk can be determined by multiply the
likelihood with the severity. The product of the multiplication will indicates the risk level.
Higher number indicates the higher risk and lower number indicates the lower risk. Table
below determines the priority of the risk.
Table 4.4.3(b) indicates the priority of the risk
Risk
1-4
Description
Low
5-12
Medium
15-25
High
Action
A LOW risk may be considered as acceptable
and further reduction is unnecessary. If the risk
can be resolved quickly and efficiently, control
measures should be recorded and implemented
A MEDIUM risk need an approach to control
the hazard and apply temporary measure if
needed. Action taken and date of completion
must be recorded on the risk assessment form.
A HIGH risk requires fast action in order to
control the hazard. Actions taken and date of
completion need to be recorded on the risk
assessment.
There are some hazard that have been identified in the Food Processing Quality
Laboratory. The hazard contributes to risk which can affect the safety. These risks are
tabulated in table below by using semi-quantitative assessment method. The level of risks can
start from 1 and continue up to 25.
Activities/
Conditions
Hazard
Danger/
Possible
Injury
Hazardous
odor/
respiratory
system
Penetrate to
human skin
or
blood
system.
Fire/Burn
Paralysis/De
ath.
1.
Chemical
storing
Equipment
stored in
messy and
untidy
condition.
2.
Heating,
scattered
electric wire
3.
Equipment
keeping
4.
Mechanical
hazard
5.
Vibrating
equipment
Electrical
shock
Short
circuit.
Equipment
Accumulati
kept or
on of dust
stored in
and growth
messy and
of molds or
untidy
bacterial
condition
caused
which may
breaking out
cause worker of disease or
falling down. illness.
Accumulati
on of dust
The
Death,
equipment
physical
has
injury
uncovered
(pinching or
moving parts crushing of
which
body organs)
present
pinching or
crushing.
Vibration of Cumulative
the
trauma
equipment
disorders.
Likelihood
Severity
Risk
8
Medium
9
Medium
6
Medium
12
Medium
6
Medium
Activities/
Conditions
Hazard
Danger/
Possible
Injury
Fall
Bruise/
broken body
part
Cut / bruise
or broken
body part
Trip/ fall
Likelihood
Severity
Risk
6
Medium
6
Medium
3
Low
Bump
Bruise/ cut
when it falls
Cut / small
injury
8
Medium
2
Low
4
Low
8
Medium
Delaying
small injury
treatment.
2
Low
Bump,
bruise, cut
and
laceration.
2
Low
1.
Climbing
ladder
Improper
ladder
placement
2.
Mixing using
mixer
Rotating
mixer blade
3.
Scattered
wire on the
floor
Scattered
tools and
equipment
Improper
placement of
glass
apparatus
Slippery
floor
Wire
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Limited
workplace
area
Broken
surface of
glass
Fire
distinguisher
placed in
hidden area/
blocked by
other
equipment
First aid kit
put at
unnoticeable
place
Sharp edge of Sharp edge
table and
equipment
No
Activities/
Conditions
1.
Spilling
waste in sink
Hazard
Hazardous
waste
Danger/
Possible
Injury
Clogging in
sink
Waste flow
through
drain system.
Likelihood
Severity
Risk
6
Medium
Risk assessment protocol have been used in this case. Firstly, the scope of project or
experiment is determined followed by determination of the laboratory and the equipment
used in the project. The substances and processes or techniques are identified and the
potential hazard involve is determined. The inspection of the lab is not only to identify the
hazard, but it also to evaluate the possibility of hazard occurrence and severity of an
undesired occurrence.
From the tables above, the level of hazard in Food Processing Quality Lab classify
into 2 groups which are low and medium. Most of the risks are classified in medium level.
The most critical hazard involve is mechanical hazard where the equipment has uncovered
moving parts which present pinching or crushing. This hazard can cause death or physical
injury (pinching or crushing of body organs). The risk level is equal to 12 or equivalent to
medium level with likelihood=3 and the severity=4. The injuries from this hazard can cause
fatality or permanent disability.
To assign the likelihood of occurrence and severity of consequence for each hazard,
the preliminary hazard technique analysis and what-if analysis are required. The preliminary
hazard analysis is used to identify the potential hazards and provide priority by using the
likelihood of accidents due to the hazards and the severity of consequences if the hazard
occur. The what-if analysis is used in order to identify the hazards that may bring accidents or
have risks.