Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting
Principles & Issues
KABIR TAHIR
This course is designed to introduce students to the fundamentals of oil and gas
accounting, different accounting principles and procedures prevalent in the petroleum
industry and accounting framework of the Nigerian petroleum industry.
B. COURSE OBJECTIVES
i)
To develop an understanding of the nature and historical development of oil and
gas accounting.
To develop an understanding of the basic characteristics and differences
between the downstream and the upstream sectors and their activities.
iii)
To develop an understanding of accounting for exploration, ditching, and
development costs.
iv)
To develop an understanding of petroleum products pricing, accounting
standards and financial statement disclosures in the oil and gas industry.
C. COURSE CONTENTS
1. History and Nature of Oil and Gas Operations
1.1 Definition of Petroleum
1.2 Origin of Petroleum, Its Industry Characteristic and Activities
1.3 The History of the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry
1.4 The Nature of Petroleum Assets and the Process of Acquiring It
1.5 Accounting Dilemmas in Oil and Gas Accounting
1.6 The Upstream and the Downstream Sectors of the Nigerian Oil industry
1.7 NNPC and DPR and Their Roles
1.8 PPPRA and the Proposed Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) 2011
2. Oil Prospecting and Reserves Valuation
2.1 Steps in Prospecting for Oil and Gas
2.2 Types of Oil and Gas Wells
2.3 Estimation and Valuation of Oil and Gas Reserves
2.4 Classification of Reserves
2.5 Oil and Gas Reserves Estimation
ii)
E. METHODOLOGY
Discussion papers, covering the theoretical aspects of each topic, would be prepared and
presented in the class, to be followed by discussion exercises. Some of the exercises would
be attempted in the class, while the rest would be left to the students to practice on their own.
F. GRADING FORMULA
Continuous Assessment
40%
Semesters Examination
60%
Aggregate
100%
The continuous assessment marks are to be absorbed through snap test (s) to be given
without notice, scheduled test(s) and/or assignment(s).
observable and is the source of energy and minerals for today's modern industrial societies. On the
other hand, geophysics is the science that studies the earth by quantitative physical methods.
Over the last two centuries, two theoriesthe inorganic theory and the organic theoryhave been
advanced to explain the formation of oil and gas. Although no one theory has achieved universal
acceptance, most scientists and professionals believe in the organic origin of petroleum. The
inorganic theory recognizes that hydrogen and carbon are present in natural form below the surface
of the earth (diamonds, for example, indicate the presence of carbon in the earth's mantle). Different
related theories explain the combination of the two elements into hydrocarbons. These include the
alkali theory, carbide theory, volcanic emanation theory, hydrogeneration theory, and the high
temperature intrusion theory. Except for the intrusion theory, most of the inorganic theories have
been largely discounted. The intrusion theory argues that high temperatures applied to carbonate
rocks can produce methane gas and/or carbon dioxide. This theory applies only to gas, not to the
heavier hydrocarbons (oil).
Based on abundant direct and indirect evidence, most scientists accept the organic theory of
evolution of oil and gas. According to geological research, the earth was barren of vegetation and
animal life for roughly one half of an estimated five billion years of the earth's existence.
Approximately 600 million years ago, an abundance of life in various forms began in the earth's
oceans. This development marks the beginning of the Cambrian period in the Paleozoic era. Nearly
200 million years later (in the Devonian period), vegetation and animal life had spread to the
landmasses. The Paleozoic (roughly 350 million years), Mesozoic (roughly 150 million years), and
Cenozoic (roughly 1000 million years), eras have been labeled as successive and definitive
geological time periods by geologists, which brings us up to the present. These time periods are
shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Geologic Time Period
Era
Cenozoic
"Modern Life"
Mesozoic
"Middle Life"
Paleozoic
"Ancient Life"
Period
Quaternary
Tertiary
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Approx.
Duration in
million yrs.
3
63
71
54
35
55
65
50
35
70
70
Indicative New
Life Forms
Large Mammals
Large Dinosaurs
Early Reptiles,
Amphibians and
Fish
Bacteria, Algae
and Jellyfish
Crypotozoic or Precambrian
4,000
4,600,000,000 years
The basic premise is that oil and gas are formed from chemical changes taking place in plant and
animal remains. Through the process of erosion and transportation, sediments are carried from the
land down the rivers and, together with some forms of marine life, settle into the ocean floor. Most
hydrocarbons are believed to be derived from tremendous volumes of plankton, algae, and bacteria
5
common in ocean basins and lakes, and other marine lives that lived millions years ago in low land
areas, usually in the oceans. The theory posits that the remains of plants and animals were deposited
along with the eroded particles of igneous rocks, which have been weathered through physical and
chemical reactions. The weight and pressure of layer upon layer of the eroded particles of the
igneous rocks resulted in the formation of sedimentary rocks, and some chemical and bacterial
processes turned the organic substances in the sedimentary rock into oil and gas. The sedimentation
process can be observed even within an individual's lifetime. For example, the delta area at the
mouth of a large river is formed by sedimentation. Layer after layer of silt, mud, particles of sand,
and plant and animal life are deposited on the ocean floor, with a great portion of the plant and
animal life coming from the ocean itself. Anaerobic bacteria in the sediment aid in breaking up the
organic material and releasing oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur from the organic material,
leaving the balance with a much higher percentage content of hydrogen and carbon and, thus, a more
petroleum-like composition.
After formation, oil and gas move upward through the layers of the sedimentary rock due to pressure
and the natural tendency of oil to rise through water. The petroleum migrates upwards towards the
earth surface through the porous rock formations until it becomes trapped by an impervious layer of
rocks. When this occurs, the oil remains there and forms a petroleum reservoir. A reservoir is a rock
formation with adequate porosity and permeability to allow oil and gas to migrate to a well bore at a
rate sufficient as to be economically producible (most geologists believe the earth initially formed
from molten rock, or magma, and cooled into solid igneous rocks. During the cooling and
contraction processes, some rock solidified beneath the surface). The impervious layer formed a seal
which prevent hydrocarbons from leaking to the surface. If the seal is inadequate, little quantity of
the hydrocarbon escapes to the surface. This is known as oil seeps. Seeps at the surface are often
used as indicator of potential hydrocarbon reservoirs in the subsurface.
In some instances, oil and gas migrate directly to the reservoir area. More often, however,
movements in the earth's crust caused additional shifting, folding, bends, and fissures, and a
secondary migration of the oil and gas took place through porous layers until another impermeable
seal was reached. This may occur when an area is subjected to new tectonic forces, earth quakes,
tsunami, etc. To search for new oil and gas fields, therefore, geologists and geophysicists devote
their efforts to understanding the distribution of rocks that could be sources, seals, and reservoirs in
an attempt to develop locations for potential traps within petroleum systems. While it can be seen
that oil and gas are formed through the sedimentary process, this does not necessarily mean that the
oil and gas have remained in the source beds or places of origin. Hydrocarbons are known to have
been preserved for hundreds of millions of years and the process of hydrocarbon formation is
undoubtedly continuing, but much more slowly than is the rate of consumption of hydrocarbons.
Generally, marine and lacustrine source rocks generate oil whereas coal source rocks commonly
generate natural gas.
The impervious rock that prevents further movement of the oil and gas is known as trap. There are
four broad classifications of traps, namely:
(1) structural strap
(2) truncation trap
(3) stratigraphic trap, and
(4) a combination trap.
Structural trap is a result of upheavals of the earth and may take the form of an anticline, fault or
dome. Anticlines are the most significant reservoirs of hydrocarbons and are estimated to contain
around 80 per cent of the worlds oil. However, in order for an oil and gas reservoir to have been
formed, four necessary conditions must have been met. These conditions are:
(1) there must have been a source of oil and gas, i.e. the remains of plants and animals;
(2) heat and pressure resulting in the transformation of the organic substances of the remains of
plants and animals into oil and gas;
(3) Porous and permeable sedimentary rock formations through which the oil and gas was able to
migrate upwards after formation.
Porosity is the measure of the pore openings in a rock in which petroleum can collect; none of
the sedimentary rocks are completely solid. The greater the porosity, the more petroleum the
rock can hold, and the closer the rock is to the surface, the more the porosity. It is within the
pore spaces that the oil and gas initially accumulated, together with some water called connate
water. The pore spaces may constitute up to 30 percent of the volume of the reservoir rocks
that are relatively close to the surface. As depths increase, the porosity of the formation tends
to decrease as the result of compaction from the weight of the overlying layers of sediment.
Permeability, on the other hand, measures the relative ease with which the oil and gas can flow
through the rocks and is expressed in millidarcies. The flow of oil and gas through a reservoir
takes place in microscopic channels between pore spaces. In some cases fractures are also
present that provide greater permeability. If there is high permeability, oil and gas can move
through the formation with relative ease. Low permeability will decrease or even block the
movement of fluids through the formation. Though, permeability may be improved through
fracturing (i.e. introduction of a mixture of sand and water or oil into the formation under high
pressure to clean the channels between the pores) and acidizing (i.e. introduction of
hydrochloric acid into the formation to enlarge and clean the channels between the pores),
porosity is difficult, if it impossible to be improved.
There are two types of producing reservoirs, namely (1) oil reservoir and (2) gas reservoir.
While the components of oil reservoir are crude oil, basic sediment, water and associated gas,
the components of gas reservoir are non-associated gas, condensates and natural gas. To be
commercially viable therefore, a petroleum reservoir must have adequate porosity and
permeability and must have a sufficient physical area of rock that contains hydrocarbons. In
other words, the reservoir must contain high quantity of oil and gas, so that when produced and
sold, cover the cost of production (including payment of royalties to the government) and leave
some profit margin for the producing company and tax revenue to the government. Condensate
are hydrocarbons that are in a gaseous state at reserviour conditions but condense into liquids
as they travel up the wellbore and reach surface conditions.
(4) an impervious rock formations that a prevents the oil and gas from further migration, thereby
enabling the oil to collect.
biodegradable industrial and municipal waste) support the proposition that hydrocarbon
itself is most likely to have been originated from the remain of plants and animals.
1.2.2 Characteristics of the Petroleum Industry
Although the primary purpose of this course is to deal with the accounting principles and practices in
the oil and gas industry, it is considered that the appreciation of operational aspects of the industry is
important for a better understanding of accounting practices in the industry. Basically, the objective
of the oil and gas industry is to exploit and recover hydrocarbons (crude oil and gas) in its natural
form from large sub-surface reservoirs, subject it to changes through chemical and physical
processes in a refinery, gas plant or petrochemical plant in order to obtain products such as gasoline,
diesel, kerosene, jet fuel, lubricants, asphalt, bitumen, petrochemicals and treated natural gas.
It is important to add that although Exploration and Production (E&P) procedures and processes are
more important to geologists and geophysicists, the knowledge of the procedures and steps involved
in locating and acquiring mineral interest, drilling and completion oil and gas wells and producing,
processing and selling petroleum products is necessary in order to understand their accounting
implications. Hence, it is important that accounting students and accounting practitioners become
familiar with the process.
Oil and Gas industry is one of the vital industries in the world, largely because of its strategic role in
every economy and the world, at large. The distinctive features that characterized the industry are
derived from the nature of crude oil, its operations and commercial arrangements. Some of these
characteristics of the oil and gas industry may include the following:
1. High Level of Risk and Uncertainty: The level of risk in oil and gas operations can be both
substantial in amount and wide in scope, and locating new well sites even in already
established field is surrounded with high level of uncertainties. Exploration operations are
risky because oil is hidden underground and the only conclusive evidence of its presence in
any form, quantity and quality is drilling. There is therefore a geological risk of drilling and
hitting a dry hole. In addition, there are market risk (the risk of not finding an outlet for
production at a satisfactory price), sovereign/political risk (the risks of nationalization of
operations, currency devaluation, licensing and exploration agreements), partner risk (the risk
of partner default, distrust, unwillingness, inability or delay in paying due shares of cost of
exploration and development), youth militancy risk (the risk of kidnapping of personnel and
vandalisation of equipments by militant youths) and tax risk (the risk of unexpected change
in tax provisions) . Consequently, the risk of loss of capital is very high.
2. Dominance of the World Economy: The second feature of oil and gas industry is its
dominance of the world economy, in terms of financial figures, unlimited potentials as raw
material, global economy development and international politics and touches the lives of
people in any more ways, anywhere on earth. Exxon Mobil, Saudi Aramco, Chevron and
Shell B.P. are one of the largest companies in the World today in terms of financial figures
and profitability.
3. Long Lead-Time between Investment and Returns: Even in normal circumstances,
upstream activities can take several years, thereby complicating the risk further in oil and gas
operations. The operations are highly capital intensive, requiring large amounts of capital
investment up-front. The lead-time therefore stretches the capital outlay and brought about
long gestation period between investment and return from the investment.
4. Significant Regulation by Government Authorities: The petroleum industry, in any part of
the world is subject to involvement, participation, intervention and regulation by various
governments and its agencies. This is as a result of the indispensability of oil, its depletable
nature and its influence in international politics.
5. Technical and Operational Complexity: Finding oil has proved to be a difficult task and
therefore demands the best technology possible. This results from the complexity of
operations, especially in the offshore terrain.
6. Specialized Accounting Rules for Reporting and Complex Tax Rules: There are
fundamental dissimilarity between financial/tax accounting in the oil and gas industry and
other industries. This arises from the nature of oil and gas industry, its highly technical
operations and specialized activities.
7. Lack of Correlation between Investment and the Value of Reserves: The amount
invested in oil and gas operations usually does not bear any relationship with the value of oil
and gas reserve, as a result of the inherent difficulties in estimating the value of reserves and
the need for up-front large investments in petroleum exploration and production.
Although, these characteristics are most evident in Exploration and Production (E&P) functions of
the oil and gas industry, they are found in other segments of the industry in varying degrees.
1.2.3 Activities/Segments in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry
Nigerian oil and gas companies may be involved in four different types of functions or segments,
namely Exploration and Production (E&P), storage and transportation, refining and hydro
processing, and distribution and marketing. A company may decide to operate in any of the four
segments or a combination thereof. The four segments are briefly explained below:
1. Exploration and Production (E&P): Exploration is the search for oil with a view to
discovering oil-in-place, while production is the removal of oil from the ground and surface
treatment. In this segment, companies explore from underground reservoirs of oil and gas
and produce the discovered oil and gas using drilled wells, through which the reservoir oil,
gas and water are brought to the surface and separated. Companies that are involved in E&P
are only to explore and produced the discovered oil and gas and sell it depending on the
nature and conditions of the contract, i.e. concession, joint venture or production sharing
contracts. This segment is an upstream activity.
2. Storage and Transportation: This segment encompasses the storing and moving of
petroleum from the production field to crude oil refineries and gas processing plants. Once
crude oil and gas produced and treated, it is stored in tanks and later transported to refineries
and gas processing plants by road tankers, railway tankers, sea oil tankers, and pipelines.
3. Refining and Hydro Processing: Refining is the treatment of crude oil in order to form
finished products and may extend to the production of petrochemicals. This segment
required plants to be put in place for the separation and processing of hydrocarbon fluids and
gases into various marketable products such as gasoline, diesel, kerosene, jet fuel, lubricants,
asphalt, bitumen, petrochemicals and treated natural gas.
Crude oil refining involves the breaking down of hydrocarbon mixture into useful products,
through distillations, cracking, reforming and extraction process. The factors that determine
the refinery configuration are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Petrochemical is a substance produced commercially from the feedstock derived from oil and
gas. The functions of petrochemical plants, therefore, is to turn outputs of the refining
process either in form of crude oil fractions or their cracked or processed derivatives into
feedstock that will ultimately be used in the manufacture of a number of other products, e.g.
plastics, detergents, nitrogen fertilizers, etc.
The gas mixtures consist largely of methane (the smallest natural hydrocarbon molecule
consisting of one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms). Natural gas usually contains some
of the next smallest hydrocarbon molecules commonly found in nature:
Ethane (two carbon, six hydrogen atoms, abbreviated C2H6),
Propane (C3H8),
Butane (C4H10), and
Natural gasolines (C5H12 to C10H22).
These four types of hydrocarbons are collectively called natural gas liquids (abbreviated
NGL) which are valuable feedstock for the petrochemical industry. When removed from the
natural gas mixture, these larger, heavier molecules become liquid under various
combinations of increased pressure and lower temperature. Liquefied petroleum gas
(abbreviated LPG) usually refers to an NGL mix of primarily propane and butane typically
stored in a liquid state under pressure. LPG (alias bottled gas) is the fuel in those pressurized
tanks used in portable "gas" barbeque grills. Sometimes the term LPG is used loosely to
refer to NGL or propane. The more natural gas liquids in the gas mixture the greater the
energy, and the "richer" or "wetter" the gas. For various economic reasons, wet gas is
commonly sent by pipeline to a gas processing plant for removal of substantially all natural
gas liquids, before sale. The remaining gas mixture, called residue gas or dry gas, is over 90
percent methane and is the natural gas burned for home heating, gas fireplaces, and many
other uses.
Crude oil can be many different mixtures of liquid hydrocarbons. Crude oil is classified as
light or heavy, depending on the density of the mixture. Density is measured in API degree
(which is a measure of how heavy or light a petroleum liquid is compared with water).
Heavy crude oil has more of the longer, larger hydrocarbon molecules and, thus, has greater
density than light crude oil. Heavy crude oil may be so dense and thick that it is difficult to
produce and transport to market. Heavy crude oil is also more expensive to process into
valuable products such as gasoline. Consequently, heavy crude oils sell for much less per
barrel than light crude oils but weigh more per barrel. Both natural gas and crude oil may
contain contaminants, such as sulphur compounds and carbon dioxide (CO), that must be
substantially removed before marketing the oil and gas. The contaminant hydrogen sulfide
(H22S) is poisonous and, when dissolved in water, corrosive to metals. Some crude oils
contain small amounts of metals that require special equipment for refining the crude.
10
Controller
Field
Clerical
and
Services
Equipment
and
Supplies
Inventory
Accounts
Payable
Property
Accounting
11
Joint
Interest
Accounting
Revenue
Accounting
General
Accounting
Taxes and
Regulatory
Compliance
Revenue Accounting
1. Accounts for volumes sold and establishes or checks prices reflected in revenues received.
2. Maintains oil and gas revenue records for each property.
3. Maintains records related to properties for purposes of regulatory compliance and production
taxes.
4. Computes production taxes.
5. Maintains Division of Interest master files, with guidance from the land department, as to how
revenue is allocated among the company, royalty owners, and others.
6. Computes amounts due to royalty owners and joint interest owners and prepares reports to those
parties.
7. Invoices purchasers for sales of natural gas.
8. Maintains ledgers of undistributed royalty payments for owners with unsigned division orders,
owners whose interests are suspended because of estate issues, and other undistributed production
payments.
9. Prepares revenue accruals.
12
General Accounting
1. Keeps the general ledger.
2. Maintains voucher register and cash receipts and disbursements records.
3. prepares financial statements.
4. Prepares special statements and reports.
5. Assembles and compiles budgets and budget reports.
Taxes and Regulatory Compliance
1. Prepares required federal, state and local tax returns for income taxes, production taxes, property
taxes, and employment taxes.
2. May prepare other regulatory reports.
3. Addresses allowable options for minimizing taxes
Figure II: Organization of Accounting Functions in Small Integrated Oil Company
Corporate
Controller
Financial
Accounting
&
Budget,
Cost
Analysis &
Reports
Considerations
Pipeline
Corporate
Tax
Accounting
Policy &
Research
Production
Accounting
&
Crude oil
Trading
Accounting
Refining
Accounting
Marketing
Accounting
Compliance
&
Taxation
Budgets
Revenue
Accounting
Policy Planning
& Support
Financial
Accounting &
Investments
Regulatory
Compliance
Oil
Recruitment and
Development
General
Accounting
Taxes
Gas
Administrative
Support
Investments
Internal Reports
Performance
Management
Management
Information
System
Accounting
Policies
Internal Control
13
Joint Interests
External Reports
Britain or any of its protectorates the right to prospect for oil in Nigeria. Except for a brief disruption
of operations of the company in 1941 to 1946 because of the Second World War, it continued as the
sole concessionaire in Nigeria until 1959 when exploration rights became available to oil companies
of other nationalities.
The first deep exploration well was in 1951 at Iho, 10 miles North-east of Owerri to a depth of
11,228 feet, but it was a dry hole. Shell discovered oil in a commercial quantity at Oloibiri, Rivers
State (presently in Bayelsa State), in 1956, after half a century of exploration, with an equivalent
investment of N120 million. This oil field came on stream in 1958 producing 5,100 bpd. From 1938
to 1956, almost the entire country was covered by concession granted to the Company (Shell-BP) to
explore for petroleum resources. This dominant role of Shell in the Nigerian oil and gas industry
continued for many years, until Nigerias membership of the Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting -Countries (OPEC) in 1971. After which the country began to take firmer control of its oil
and gas resources, in line with the practice of other members of OPEC.
In 1960 the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) was formed by Saudi Arabia,
Kuwait, Iran, Iraq, and Venezuela. Later, eight other countries joined OPECthe United Arab
Emirates and Qatar in the Middle East; the African countries of Algeria, Gabon, Libya and Nigeria;
and the countries of Indonesia and Ecuador. Ecuador, who joined OPEC in 1973, suspended its
membership from December 1992 to October, 2007. By 1973 OPEC members produced 80 percent
of world oil exports, and OPEC had become a world oil cartel. Member countries began to
nationalize oil production within their borders.
Name of Country
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Algeria
Angola
Ecuador (**)
Indonesia
Iran*
Iraq*
Kuwait*
Libya
Nigeria
Qatar
Saudi Arabia*
United Arab
Emirates
Venezuela*
13.
Date joined
OPEC
1969
2007
Rejoined 2007
1962
1960
1960
1960
1962
1971
1961
1960
1967
Location
Africa
Africa
South America
Asia
Middle East
Middle East
Middle East
Africa
Africa
Middle East
Middle East
Middle East
1960
South America
15
Figure IV:
2010/2011 statistics shows that the bulk of OPEC oil reserve is located in Venezuela with 24.8% and
Saudi Arabia with 22.2% , followed by four middle East countries, namely Iran 12.7%, Iraq 12.0%,
Kuwait 8.50% and United Arab Emirates 8.2%. The statistics show that two third of the OPEC oi
reserve (65.70%) is located in the Middle East countries. OPEC (2011) shows that Nigeria has
proven oil reserve of 3.1% of total OPEC reserve.
Figure V:
However, as against what obtains in some OPEC member countries where National Oil Companies
(NOCs) took direct control of production operations, in Nigeria, the Multi-National Oil Companies
(MNOCs) were allowed to continue with such operations under Joint Operating Agreements (JOA),
clearly specifying the respective stakes of the companies and the Government of Nigeria in the
ventures. As a result, this period also witnessed the arrival on the scene of MNOCs such as the Gulf
16
Oil and Texaco (now ChevronTexaco), Elf Petroleum (now Total), Mobil (now ExxonMobil), and
Agip, in addition to Shell, which was already playing a dominant role in the industry. To date, these
companies constitute the major players in the Nigerian oil industry, with Shell still maintaining a
leading role. Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs) and Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) also
dominate the production agreements between the oil companies and the NNPC. Similarly, it is worth
noting that the exploration of oil and gas in Nigeria had taken place in five major sedimentary
basins, namely, the Niger Delta, the Anambra Basin, the Benue Trough, the Chad Basin and the
Benin Basin. But, the most prospective basin is the Niger Delta which includes the continental shelf
and which makes up most of the proven and possible reserves. All oil production to date has
occurred in this basin.
In 1971, as oil became more important to the economy, the country established the Nigerian
National Oil Corporation (NNOC) and joined OPEC as the 11th member. It acquired 33 /3% in
Nigerian Agip and 35% in Elf. NNOC ran as an upstream and downstream company and the
petroleum ministry had a regulatory function. On April 1, 1977, a merger between NNOC and the
ministry of petroleum created Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). This was to
combine the ministrys regulatory role and NNOCs commercial functions: exploration, production,
transportation, processing, oil refining and marketing. The Nigerian National Petroleum Company
(NNPC) was established as a state owned and controlled company, as a dominant player in the
downstream sector and a major player in the upstream sector through joint venture agreements with
all major international players. The regulatory role was later to be assumed by the Petroleum
Inspectorate, a unit of NNPC. Through the years, NNPC has been active in seismic exploration
onshore and offshore. Its seismic crew, known as Party X, has made several discoveries such as a
field in block OPL- 110 in the Niger Delta, the Oredo field, etc. It also carried out work on contract
for Phillips Petroleum and other E&P companies in the Chad, Anambra and Benue Basins. But
NNPC has depended on the technological capabilities of the major operators, like Shell, Mobil, Gulf
(Chevron) and others, which produced the bulk of Nigerian oil and did most of the exploration work.
The NNPC in 2010 developed a comprehensive framework designed to herald the intensification of
exploration activities in the Chad Basin. The move was seen as a fresh boost to the Federal
Government's efforts to build up the nation's proven oil reserve through exploration of new frontiers
for oil and gas production. Oil may be found in commercial quantity in the Chad Basin, because of
the discoveries of commercial hydrocarbon deposits in neighboring countries of Chad, Niger and
Sudan which have similar structural settings with the Chad Basin. Discoveries made in
neighbouring countries in basins with similar structural settings are: Doba, Doseo and Bongor all in
Chad amounts to over 2 Billion barrels (Bbbls); Logone Birni in Southern Chad and Northern
Cameroun, over 100 Bbbls; and Termit-Agadem Basin in Niger totals over 1bbbls. The search was
not limited to the Chad Basin alone but covers extensive inquest in the entire Nigerian Frontier
Sedimentary Basins which include- The Anambra, Bida, Dahomey, Gongola/Yola and the Sokota
Basins alongside the Middle/Lower Benue Trough. Petroleum has recently (i.e. in 2012) discovered
in Anambra Basin, which is now to join the league of oil producing states.
The NNPC New Frontier Exploration Services (NFES) Division which is leading the search for
crude oil find in the entire Inland Basins acquired 3,550 sq km of 3- D seismic data for processing
and interpretation in addition to the already acquired 6000km of 2-D data that was reprocessed. Over
600,000 seismic section and 30,000 well logs were scanned and vectorised for the eventual drilling.
Before, 2010, 23 wells have been drilled with two of the wells, Wadi-1 and Kinasar encountering
non-commercial gas.
17
plugging and abandonment costs of onshore wells so that net DR&A costs are zero. However,
for some offshore wells, estimated future net DR&A costs may exceed $1 million per well due
to the cost of removing offshore platforms, equipment, and perhaps pipelines. When a leased
property is no longer productive, the lease expires and the oil company plugs the wells and
abandons the property. All rights to exploit the minerals revert back to the lessor as the
mineral rights owner.
1.5 Accounting Dilemmas in Oil and Gas Accounting
The nature, complexity, and importance of the petroleum E&P industry have caused the creation of
an unusual and complex set of rules and practices for petroleum accounting and financial
presentation. The nature of petroleum exploration and production raises numerous Accounting
problems. Here are a few:
(1) Should the cost of preliminary exploration be recorded as an asset or an expense when no
right or lease might be obtained?
(2) Given the low success rates for exploratory wells should the well costs be treated as assets or
as expenses? Should the cost of a dry hole be capitalized as a cost of finding oil and gas
reserves? Suppose a company drills five exploratory wells costing $1 million each, but only
one well finds a reservoir and that reservoir is worth $20 million to the company. Should the
company recognize an asset for the total $5 million of cost, the $1 million cost of the
successful well, the $20 million value of the productive property, or some other amount?
(3) The sales prices of oil and gas can fluctuate widely over time. Hence, the value of rights to
produce oil and gas may fluctuate widely. Should such value fluctuations affect the amount
of the related assets presented in financial statements?
(4) If production declines over time and productive life varies by property, how should
capitalized costs be amortized and depreciated?
(5) Should DR&A costs be recognized when incurred, or should an estimate of future DR&A
costs be amortized over the well's estimated productive life?
(6) If the oil company forms a joint venture and sells portions of the lease to its venture partners,
should gain or loss be recognized on the sale?
1.6 The Upstream and the Downstream Sectors of the Nigerian Oil Industry
As earlier stated, Shell DArcy was the first to discover oil in commercial quantity in Nigeria at
Oloibiri, Rivers State (presently, Bayelsa State) in 1956. However intensified search for oil from
1957 to 1959 resulted in discovery of Ebubu and Bomu oil fields in Rivers State, and Ughelli in
Delta State, which was the first hydrocarbons find, west of the Niger. By 1961 Mobil, Gulf (now
Chevron), Agip, Tenneco and Amoseas (now Texaco) etc joined the search for both onshore and
offshore oil and gas in Nigeria. This led to the first offshore discovery in 1964 in Okan field in Delta
State. Currently, all the early explorers have discovered oil and are producing it, with an upwards of
3,000 producing oil wells in the country.
Prior to 1971, the Government had no joint venture participation in the operations of oil companies
in Nigeria. By 1971 all concessions earlier granted to the companies were converted to joint venture
agreements. In 1973, production sharing contract emerged between the NNPC and Ashland,
followed by risk service contract between NNPC and Agip Energy and Natural Resources in 1979
and agreements involving these types of contracts were entered into between the NNPC and the oil
companies. Foreign oil companies largely dominated the upstream sector until the first discretionary
allocation of acreages to indigenous companies in 1990. Oil blocks were allocated to eleven (11)
indigenous companies. The companies who operated sole risk contracts, were encourage farm-out
(i.e. to assign an interest in a licence to another party) 40 per cent of their interest to foreign
19
companies, mainly for financial and technological back-up (the foreign companies who acquire
interest in a licence from another party, are said to have farm-in in indigenous companies minning
interest). More allocations were made between 1991 and 1993 and there are now an upwards of forty
(40) indigenous private sector companies licensed to prospect for oil in Nigerias upstream sector.
Some of the companies, including Summit Oil, Consolidated Oil and Amni Petroleum Development
Company have made commercial discoveries and are already producing oil, while others are at
various stages of exploration and production.
In addition the NNPC through two of its subsidiaries- the Nigerian Petroleum Development
Company (NPDC) and Direct Exploration Services of the National Petroleum Investment
Management Services undertake oil exploration and production. In total, an upwards of 55
companies are operating in Nigeria under joint venture, production sharing contract, service contract,
sole risk contract and NNPC direct exploration efforts.
Nigerias expertise in the upstream sector in the African Subregion, which is relatively superior, had
attracted a number of African countries to look up to it for assistance. For example in 2010 Uganda
and Nigeria have signed MOU on oil and gas industry. The agreement covers human resource
training, technological transfer, joint projects and offering support on evaluation of the crude oil.
Crude oil and gas production is expected to start by 2012. There will also be construction of a
refinery with a capacity of 150,000 to 200,000 barrels of oil a day. Four companies, including
Heritage, Dominion, Neptune and Tullow Oil, are exploring for oil and gas in the Lake Albert basin.
The MOU signed between Nigeria and Uganda is a positive development. With increased E&P
activities in the region, more countries would be fortunate to discover Oil and Gas reserves in their
territories.
Activities in the downstream sector were given boast in 1965 with the construction of the first
refinery in Port Harcourt by Shell-BP, with an initial capacity of 35,000 bpd, which was later
increased. As the economy grew, demand for petroleum products grew along with it necessitating
the establishment of Warri refinery in 1978, Kaduna refinery in 1980, and subsequently, another
refinery, which is the forth refinery, was built at Port Harcourt to supplement the old one. However,
these refineries at various points in time have been bedeviled with problems of sabotage, fire out
breaks, poor management and lack of regular turnaround maintenance, thereby making it difficult for
the refineries to meet local demands for petroleum products.
In similar vein, petrochemical plants were built in Warri and Kaduna in 1988 and subsequently,
another company was built in Eleme, near Port Harcourt. These companies were meant to produce
polypropylene, carbon black, linear alkyl benzene (LAB), heavy alkylate, benzene, polyethylene and
chlorine, among others.
Table 3: Installed Capacity of Nigerian Refineries
S/N
NAME OF THE COMPANY
1
2
3
4
Total
Date
Installed
Commissioned Capacity (bpd)
1980
110,000
1979
125,000
1965
1989
35,000
150,000
445,000
20
21
1. The Nigerian Petroleum Development Company Limited (NPDC) charged with the
responsibility for exploration, development and production of petroleum.
2. The integrated Data Services Limited (IDSL) charged with the responsibility of seismic
data acquisition, processing and interpretation, petroleum reservoir engineering and data
evaluation for NNPC and other oil and gas companies in Nigeria and West Africa.
3. Warri Refinery and Petrochemicals Company Limited (WRPC) charged with the
responsibility of refining petroleum and the production of carbon black and polypropylene
petrochemicals.
4. Kaduna Refinery and Petrochemicals Company Limited (KRPC) charged with the
responsibility of refining petroleum and the production of linear alkyl benzene and heavy
alkylalates.
5. Port Harcourt Refining Company Limited (PHRC) charged with the responsibility of
refining petroleum especially for export.
6. Pipelines and Products Marketing Company Limited (PPMC) charged with the
responsibility of transporting crude oil to the refineries and refined products through its
pipelines and deports to markets both locally and internationally.
7. Nigerian Gas Development Company Limited (NGC) charged with the responsibility of
gathering, treating and developing gas resources for transmission to major industrial and
utility gas companies in Nigeria and neighbouring countries.
8. Eleme Petrochemicals Company Limited (EPCL) charged with the responsibility of
manufacturing a range of petrochemicals products such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride
etc from natural gas and refinery by-products and market them locally and internationally.
9. Nigerian Engineering Technical Company Limited (NETCO) charged with the
responsibility of providing engineering services to the NNPC group and other oil companies
in the country.
The three other subsidiaries that are jointly own with foreign oil companies are:
10. Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG) owned jointly by the NNPC, Shell, Elf,
Agip and International Finance Corporation (IFC) charged with the responsibility of
harnessing, processing and marketing gas resources.
11. Calson (Bermuda) Limited initially owned jointly by the NNPC and Chevron (but the
Government has now divested from the company). Calson is charged with the responsibility
of marketing the countrys excess petroleum products abroad.
12. Hydrocarbon Services Nigeria Limited (HYSON Limited) owned jointly by the NNPC
and Chevron, and charged with the responsibility of providing logistics and support services
to Calson (Bermuda) Limited.
In addition to these subsidiaries, the industry is also regulated by the Department of Petroleum
Resources (DPR), a department within the Ministry of Petroleum Resources. The DPR ensures
compliance with industry regulations; processes applications for licenses, leases and permits,
establishes and enforces environmental regulations. The DPR, and NAPIMS (National Petroleum
Investment Management Services), play a very crucial role in the day to day activities throughout the
industry. In order to realize its vision and mission as well as provide optimal service to its customers,
the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has been structured as follows:
22
MD NETCO
MD HYSON
MD PPMC
GGM CSLD
GGM ITD
MD NIKORMA
GED E&P
GGM NAPIMS
MD IDSL
MD NPDC
GED R&P
GED F&A
GGM ACCOUNTS
MD PHRC
MD WRPC
MD KRPC
GED CS
GGM HR
GGM FINANCE
GGM MEDICAL
GM TREASURY
GGM P&G
MD NGC
GM INSURANCE
GGM COMD
GGM LONDON
OFFICE
23
1. supervising all petroleum industry operations being carried out under 1iences and leases in
the country, with a view to ensuring compliance with the established laws and regulations;
2. monitoring the petroleum industry in order to ensure that operations are in line with national
policies and goals;
3. enforcing safety regulations and ensuring that operations conform to national, as well as,
international industry practices and standards;
4. keeping and updating records on petroleum industry operations relating to reserves,
production/exports, licences and leases, as well as rendering regular reports of them to the
Government;
5. advising the Government and relevant agencies on technical matters and public policies,
which may have impact on the administration and control of petroleum;
6. processing all applications for licences to ensure compliance with laid down guidelines
before making recommendations to the Minister of Petroleum Resources; and
7. ensuring timely and adequate payments of all rents and royalties as and when due.
1.8 PPPRA and the Proposed Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) 2011
1.8.1 Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA)
The Government on 14th August 2000 set up a 34 member Special Committee on the review of
Petroleum Products Supply and Distribution drawn from various Stakeholders and other interest
groups to look into the problems of the downstream petroleum sector. It mission is to reposition
Nigeria's downstream sub-sector for improved efficiency and transparency. Its vision is to attain a
strong, vibrant downstream sub-sector of the petroleum industry, where refining, supply, and
distribution of petroleum products are self-financing and self-sustaining. Prior to the setting up of the
Committee, the downstream sector was characterized by the following problems:
1. Scarcity of petroleum products leading to long queues at the service stations
2. Low capacity utilization and refining activities at the nation's refineries (poor state of the
refineries)
3. Rampant fire accidents as a result of mishandling of products- products adulteration
4. Pipelines vandalisation
5. Large scale smuggling due to unfavourable economic products borders' prices with the
neighbouring countries
6. Low investment opportunities in the sector.
Functions of PPPRA
1. To determine the pricing policy of petroleum products;
2. To regulate the supply and distribution of petroleum products;
3. To create an information databank through liaison with all relevant agencies to facilitate the
making of informed and realistic decisions on pricing policies;
4. To oversee the implementation of the relevant recommendations and programmes of the
Federal Government as contained in the White Paper on the Report of the Special Committee
24
on the Review of the Petroleum Products Supply and Distribution, taking cognizance of the
phasing of specific proposals;
5. To moderate volatility in petroleum products prices, while ensuring reasonable returns to
operators.
6. To establish parameters and codes of conduct for all operators in the downstream petroleum
sector;
1.8 Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) 2011
The Petroleum Industry Bill is an attempt to bring under one law the various legislative, regulatory,
and fiscal policies, instruments and institutions that govern the Nigerian petroleum industry. The Bill
is expected to establish and clarify the rules, procedures and institutions that would entrench good
governance, transparency and accountability in the oil and gas sector. It aims to introduce new
operational and fiscal terms for revenue management to enable the Nigerian government to retain a
higher proportion of the revenues derived from operations in the petroleum industry. The
government argues that, since the commencement of oil and gas production in Nigeria in 1958 after
the discovery of oil in 1956 in Oloibiri (Bayelsa State), no comprehensive law has been put in place
for effective administration of the Nigerian petroleum industry. The PIB therefore seeks to replace
sixteen (16) petroleum industry Acts, which have many inadequacies, with an omnibus Act that
provides for better fiscal and regulatory management of the oil and gas sector.
Oil and gas production commenced in Nigeria in 1958 after the discovery of oil in Oloibiri (Bayelsa
State) two years earlier. By the 1990s Nigeria engaged in a number of unincorporated joint ventures
with international oil companies to develop the industry. However, the country had challenges
funding its commitments to the joint ventures. As a result, Production Sharing Contracts (PSC) were
introduced as alternative funding mechanisms. However, PSCs lack transparency, good governance
practices, and are not in line with international best practices. For instance, Nigeria does not capture
any part of windfall profits from increases in crude oil prices. Additionally, cost controls, accounting
procedures, and acreage management are inadequate.
In response to these challenges, the Obasanjo government in 2000 constituted the first Oil and Gas
Reform Implementation Committee (OGIC) to recommend a policy for reforming the sector. The
recommendations defined the need to separate the commercial institutions in the sector from the
regulatory and policymaking institutions. In 2007, the YarAdua government reconstituted OGIC
under the chairmanship of Dr. Rilwan Lukman to use the provisions of the National Oil and Gas
Policy to setup legal, regulatory, and institutional structures for managing the oil and gas sector.The
Lukman Report, submitted in 2008, recommended regulatory and institutional frameworks that when
implemented will guarantee greater transparency and accountability. This report formed the basis for
the first Petroleum Industry Bill (HB 159) that was submitted in 2008 as an Executive Bill.
The controversy raised by the Bill prompted the constitution of a federal interagency team headed
by Dr. Tim Okon (former NNPCs Group General Manager on Strategy) to review the Bill. The
teams report submitted in 2010 (IAT 2010) is at the crux of the controversies around the PIB
because it introduced more stringent fiscal provisions that guarantee a higher share of oil revenues to
Nigeria.In 2011, the Senate submitted its version of the Bill (SB 236) that is seen as a
muchweakened version. Subsequently, the House of Representatives submitted its version of the
Bill (HB. 54) in 2011. The Bill was sponsored by six Honourable Members.
The draft Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) was designed to act as an all-encompassing piece of
legislation and as a result, some 15 pieces of existing legislation will be revoked upon ratification. It
25
will create a number of new institutions with mandates over the upstream sector. Specifically, the
policy making function will reside with the Petroleum Directorate. The Petroleum Inspectorate will
replace the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), currently within the Ministry of Energy.
This commission will act as the independent regulatory body and licensing agency for the upstream
sector. On the operational side, NNPC will be replaced by the Nigerian National Petroleum
Company Limited (NOC). The vision is to turn NNPC into an integrated oil and gas NOC, and a
limited liability company. The National Petroleum Investment Management Services (NAPIMS),
currently part of NNPC, will be replaced by the National Petroleum Assets Management Agency
(NAPAMA). This body will monitor and approve all upstream costs and manage tax/royalty oil (but
not profit oil). NAPAMA will exist outside of the NOC as a separate and independent agency. The
Research and Development division within NNPC will be carved out into an independent entity, the
National Petroleum Research Center. A separate Frontier Service will also be created. The key
objectives of the PIB include:
1. Enhance exploration, exploitation and production of oil and gas: The PIB will eliminate
funding bottlenecks, increase investments by comprehensive deregulation of the downstream
sector to make it attractive to investors, and increase acreage available for investment by
reclaim acreage that is not being developed by the current owners.
2. Increase domestic gas supplies: The Bill provides that all existing and future petroleum
mining lessees shall meet their domestic gas supply obligations for the specified periods as the
gas will be used for power generation and industrial development. Failure to meet this
obligation attracts a stiff penalty.
3. Create a peaceful business environment: The Bill seeks to align the interest of the host
communities to those of the oil companies and the government. The Petroleum Host
Communities Fund, which will be funded with 10% of the net profit of the oil companies
operating in the communities, shall be used to develop the economic and social infrastructure
of the host communities. Communities will forfeit contributions in the Fund when vandalism or
unrest causes damage to upstream facilities.
4. Fiscal Framework for increased revenue: The PIB establishes a progressive fiscal framework
that encourages further investment in the industry whilst increasing accruable revenues to
government. The Bill simplifies collection of government revenues from the oil assets,
increases the share of royalties in the case of high oil prices, etc.
5. Create a commercially viable National Oil Company: The Bill provides for the full
commercialisation of NNPC and the creation of other institutions that will ensure a
restructuring of the sector for improved efficiency.
6. Deregulate petroleum product prices: The Bill proposes the full deregulation of the
downstream oil sector. A number of the institutions will be responsible for developing the
infrastructure to support the sector, funding concessionaires and facility management operators.
The Petroleum Equalisation Fund will be phased out in line with the development of the
support infrastructure.
7. Create efficient regulatory entities: The Bill provides for the creation of eight institutions to
drive greater transparency and accountability.
8. Create transparency: The Bill makes public the terms of the licenses, leases, contracts and
payments in the petroleum sector. When passed, the legislature will transform Nigeria from
being one of the most opaque oil industries in the world to one that sets the standards of
transparency.
9. Promote Nigeria content: The PIB has farreaching local content components. No project
will be approved without a comprehensive Nigeria Content Plan including obligations of the
investor to purchase local goods and services, engage local companies, employ Nigerians,
26
ensure knowledge transfer and encourage Research and Development. The Nigeria Content
Monitoring Board will regularly verify compliance. Through the local content provisions in the
Bill and the opportunity to develop small indigenous oil and gas companies, Nigerians will
begin to participate more actively in the industry and jobs will be created.
10. Protect health, safety and environment: Every company requiring a license, lease or permit
in the upstream and downstream petroleum industry in Nigeria shall conduct their operations in
accordance with internationally accepted principles of sustainable development which includes
the necessity to ensure that the constitutional rights of present and future generations to a
healthy environment is protected.
Controversies in the PIB 2011
Different stakeholders have raised concerns about certain provisions of the Bill. Below is a list of
the most controversial issues.
1. Fiscal provisions may increase cost of doing business: The Bill provides for multiple taxes
(Nigeria Hydrocarbon Tax, Company Income Tax), higher rents and royalties, and levies (Niger
Delta Commission Levy, Petroleum Host Community Fund, Education Tax). This is most
noticeable in the deep offshore operations.
2. Retroactive reversal of contracts: The PIB advocates reversal of provisions of prior
agreements and contracts, and introduces new fiscal regimes even for old Petroleum Sharing
Contracts.
3. Relinquish acreage: The PIB provides for the revocation of acreage that is yet to be developed
by the allocated owners. Opponents of this provision claim that it is an infringement on earlier
agreements while its proponents argue that it is required to bringing new investment to the
industry.
4. Calculating payments: The Bill advocates that oil companies will pay for quantities produced
instead of quantities exported. The oil companies have argued that solving the security
challenge and fixing sabotage of logistics infrastructure is the core responsibility of
government.
5. Duplication of roles: There are overlaps of roles and responsibilities with a number of the
institutions created under this Bill. For instance, the Nigerian Petroleum Inspectorate, Petroleum
Products Regulatory Agency, and Petroleum Infrastructure Development Fund have conflicting
responsibility for funding the development of infrastructure especially for the downstream
sector of the petroleum industry.
6. Deadline for Gas flaring: According to the PIB (HB.54), December 31st 2012 is the deadline
for gas flaring. The integrity of this date is questioned given that the Bill is yet to be passed.
7. Too much power to Minister of Petroleum: The Bill provides the Minister of Petroleum too
much power to grant, revoke and reallocate licenses.
8. Lack of Regulatory Independence: Regulators need to be fully independent and not under the
supervision of the Minister of Petroleum.
9. Potential delays in passing the Bill and its Consequences on Nigerian economy: Can the 7th
National Assembly continue debates from where the last Assembly stopped? This is possible
according to Rule 111 of the Senate but there are voices in the Senate that dissent to this
interpretation and want the Bill to be reintroduced and for the process to be started all over
again. There is also the challenge of harmonizing the different versions of the Bill (Executive,
Senate, and House). Failure to pass the PIB has and will lead to a reduction of investments in
the Nigeria petroleum industry. To date, most of the oil companies have ceased investments in
the sector until there is clarity as to what provisions will be contained in the final Bill and how it
27
will affect the industry. With the rise of other attractive petroleum industries in Africa (Angola,
Ghana, etc), Nigeria must understand that investments are fungible and will eventually flow to
alternative countries that are more receptive.
2. Oil and Gas Drilling, Cost Classification and Reserves Valuation
2.1 Oil and Gas Drilling
Oil and gas drilling is highly capital intensive, requiring a large number of technocrats with fantastic
remuneration, thus necessitating pre-drilling operations, before actual drilling. Drilling operations
basically comprised of: (i) staking (locating oil well site after dues consideration of a number of
natural surface attributes-terrain, body of water, marshy environment, etc) (ii) compliance with
regulatory requirements on spacing of oil wells (iii) providing access road to the drilling location,
leveling of drill site for placement of working equipments and erection of field offices, and
increasing permeability through fracturing, acidizing and thermal process.
Two methods of drilling have been used in the oil and gas industry, namely rotary-rig drilling and
cable-tool drilling. The cable-tool method is one of the oldest mechanical means known for drilling
into the earth's surface. Cable-tool rigs have long been used for drilling water wells and salt brine
wells.
Cable-Tool Drilling
In the cable-tool method of drilling, a heavy piece of forged steel is lowered into the hole. The bit,
which weighs several hundred pounds, is raised and then dropped in the hole, literally pounding a
hole in the earth. Water is pumped into the hole to float the cuttings of rock away from the bottom of
the hole.
Rotary Rig Drilling
Rotary drilling is by far the most widely used method of drilling for oil and gas today. In rotary
operations, the hole is drilled by rotating a drill bit downward through the formations.
The usual oil and gas drilling practice entails the engagement of an independent drilling
contractor, who can do the drilling more effectively, efficiently and economically because of
experience. Drilling contracts may take the form of (i) footage rate contract (requiring installment
payment per foot of hole drilled until the required depth is reached), (ii) day rate contract
(requiring daily payment of specified amount respect of the number of feet drilled) or (iii) turnkey
contract (where the contractor is paid only after satisfactory drilling of well to the required depth and
other conditions specified in the contract). Presently, footage rate contracts are the most popular
although day rate contracts are also common, while turnkey contracts are less common.
Some of the major problems encountered in oil and gas drilling may include the following:
1. the excess of formation pressure which may lead to blowout which is dangerous to the
ecosystem. For example on 22 April 2010 estimated 550-900 kb of oil leaked into the sea in US
very significantly affecting local economic activities like fishing, farming and tourism. Similarly,
in 1982, a high profile blowout at Amoco Canada killed 2 workers and hundreds of cattle.
2. twisting off of part of drill string which may lead to the abandonment of oil well and the drilling
of another well;
3. collapse of part of the drilled hole may be experienced, leaving the pipe trapped in the depths;
and
28
4. the formation may exude hydrogen sulphide, which is a gas with a very foul odour, thereby
necessitating abandonment of well. For example In 2003, 243 people in China were killed, and 3
workers of Abu Dhabi Company operating at Shah Oilfield in Iran were killed by the toxic
hydrogen sulphide gas emitted from crude oil. The gas is heavier than air, and even at low
concentrations it can cause respiratory failure and brain damage.
2.2 Types of Oil and Gas Wells
There are different types of oil and gas wells and the drilling methods and logistics usually depend
on the type of well to be drilled. Eight types of oil and gas wells can be identified. These are:
(1) Wildcat (exploratory) well (an oil well that is drilled to establish the presence or otherwise of oil
and gas, which may result in proved reserves or dry hole);
(2) discovery well (this is a wildcat well in which hydrocarbons is discovered in commercial
quantity);
(3) appraisal well (this is a well that is drilled after successful exploratory drilling, to provide
information about the volume-customarily measured in acre-feet- and its commercial viability);
(4) development (production) well (this is a well that is drilled with a view to obtaining access to
proved reserved and to produce oil).
Other types of oil and gas wells include:
(5) deviated well (a well that is progressively digresses from the vertical due to inability to access the
site selected with a view to meeting the location that is most likely to yield oil);
(6) injection well (a well that is drilled to injecting subsurface water or gas for the purpose of using
secondary drilling methods;
(7) observation well (a well that is drilled in order to permit further survey and study of a reservoir
as production continues); and
(8) obligatory well (an exploratory well that is obligatorily drilled as part of the conditions for
granting a mineral licence).
However, it is important to note that the volume of oil-in-place can be estimated after determining
the (i) thickness the oil zone (also called the pay zone), (ii) the porosity and permeability.
This estimate will provide the basis for the desirability of further investment or the plugging or the
abandonment of the well. If indications show that further investment is justifiable because revenues
will exceeds the additional cost of completion, the operator would go ahead to complete the well.
Well completion refers to the preparations and installations made in a well in order to get it ready for
oil and gas production. Thus, at the completion of the drilling operations, the hole drilled is cased to
ensure that it does not collapse and that it does not flow to the surface or to other formations. The
flow of oil and gas to the surface is made possible with the help of reservoirs Bottom Hole Pressure
(BHP). However, if the flow of oil and gas is not possible due to low BHP, installation of artificial
pumps may be necessary. In order to control the flow at the surface, a number of valves, fittings,
choke and pressure gauges are mounted on the wellhead. A flow line is connected to the pressure
gauges through which the oil is evacuated to a storage and processing centre.
As a single well will not permit timely and economical extraction of oil, development wells will
have to be drilled, after the successful drilling of exploratory wells. Because the fluids from the wells
may contain oil, gas, water, sand and other impurities such as hydrogen sulphide, the crude oil must
have to be cleaned to remove all impurities before it is piped to the refinery or gas plants.
Equipments found in oil storage centre are test separators, production filters, tank batteries,
circulating pumps, gas metres, and salt water disposal pits, etc. Crude oil is sold or transmitted to
refineries and gas is piped to gas plant. BHP that enables oil and gas to flow to the surface
diminishes as the reservoir is depleted.
29
Recovery of hydrocarbons that occur by BHP or simple artificial lift is known as primary recovery.
When the oil can no longer flow to the surface due to diminishing BHP, more complex techniques
known as secondary and tertiary recovery methods may have to be applied to enhance recovery from
the reservoir oil. The enhancement techniques used may be broadly grouped in to two, namely
injection projects (which include water flooding, high pressure gas drive, enriched gas drive, etc)
and thermal processes (which include fire flooding and steam heating). In 2007,2008 and 2009
improved recovery increased oil volumes by 20, 37 and 86 million barrels worldwide, respectively.
In 2009, the largest addition was related to improved secondary recovery in Nigeria.
2.3 Classification of Costs in the Oil and Gas industry
In the oil and gas industry, costs are classified either by nature and function of the costs (namely (i)
acquisition cost, (ii) exploration and appraisal costs, (iii) development costs, (iii) production costs
and (iv) supporting facilities and equipments costs) or by the physical characteristics of the assets
acquired (namely (i) tangible and (ii) intangible costs).
Acquisition Costs: These are incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire a property (whether
proved or unproved). Example includes the cost of signature or lease bonuses, options to purchase or
lease properties, brokerage, legal fees, etc.
Exploration and Appraisal Costs: These are cost incurred to prospect for oil, before oil reservoir is
developed. Examples include costs associated with geological, geophysical and other pre-drilling
costs, including remuneration of personnel involved. It also include costs of drilling, dry hole and
bottom hole pressure enhancement. They also include depreciation, amortization and allocated
operating costs of support equipment facilities.
Development Costs: These are costs incurred to gain access to proved reserves and provide
facilities for drilling, lifting, treating, gathering and storing oil and gas. They include depreciation
and allocated operating costs of support equipment facilities.
Production Costs: These are costs incurred in lifting, treating, gathering and storing oil and gas.
They include costs of personnel engaged in operation of wells and related equipment facilities, repair
and maintenance of production facilities, materials, supplies, insurance, services and fuel consumed
in such operations. They also include allocated operating costs of support equipment facilities, but
do not include DD&A of license acquisition, exploration and development costs and cost of
decommissioning.
Supporting Facilities and Equipment Costs: These are cost relating to trucks, drilling equipments,
workshops, warehouses, camps division and field offices. Usually, these facilities and equipment
serve one or more activity relation to acquisition, exploration, development and production. These
costs are therefore capitalized and apportioned to the different activities.
Tangible and Intangible Costs
Tangible costs are cost of assets, like machinery, equipment, vehicles, which have physical
properties (including the costs of labour to install them even though those costs do not result in a
physical asset). On the other hand, intangible cost is cost that result in assets that have no physical
properties, or assets that have physical properties but that cannot be salvaged at the end of an
operation e.g. cost of drilling paid to contractor, labour for clearing services such as acidizing,
fracturing and thermal processes.
30
(vii)
32
33
and an exclusive exploration right. Others like Mobil, Gulf (now Chevron), Safrap (now Elf),
Tenneco and Amoseas (now Texaco) also operated under the concession agreement.
3.1.2 Joint Venture (JV): A JV is defined as a situation where one or more foreign oil companies
enter into agreement with the host government (through its agent like the NNPC) for joint
development of jointly held oil mining licenses and facilities. Each partner in the joint venture
contributes to the costs and shares the benefits or losses of the operation, in accordance with its
proportionate equity interest in the venture. One company is designated as the operator and is
responsible for the day-today running of the venture, and all budgets, work programmes and any
contract awarded must, however, be agreed by all parties. Joint ventures are the agreements in place
for shallow water and onshore exploration and for downstream ventures. Production from JV
accounts for approximately 95 percent of the Nigerias crude oil production. The largest JV operated
by Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd and NNPC, produces nearly half of
Nigerias crude oil, with average daily production of approximately 1.1 million bpd.
In JV arrangement, the government (NNPC) is a non-operating partner with the oil company as the
operator of the concessions. The Government contributes proportionately to the costs of carrying out
the oil and gas operating and lifts its equity share of the crude oil won. In addition, Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU), governs the manner in which revenues from the venture are allocated
between the partners, including payment of taxes, royalties and industry margin. The income derived
from the operations is also shared in proportion to the equity interests of the parties to the JV, with
each party bearing the cost of its royalty and tax obligations in the same proportion. Allocations are
also made from the revenue to take care of operating cost.
Some of the constraints associated with JV are namely (i) poor funding and consequential loss in
revenue; (ii) allegations of gold plating of operating costs by the non-operators of the venture
leading to mutual suspicious; and (iii) pressure on the operator to meet incessant demands by oil
producing communities.
However, the emergence of offshore oil and gas operations in Nigeria has witnessed a shift from
JVA regimes to Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs). This shift is attributed to a number of factors
ranging from the complexity of operations in the offshore terrain to (which makes regulations under
the JVA more difficult); to dwindling resources of the country (which makes funding under JVAs
precarious for the government).
3.1.3 Production Sharing Contract (PSC): Production sharing contract (PSC) on the other hand,
focuses on the sharing of the output of oil and gas operations in agreed proportions between the Oil
company, as a contractor to the Government, and the NNPC as the representative of government
interests in the venture. This form of contract which originates from Indonesian in 1996, was
modeled along the lines of share cropping in agriculture, where the landlord grants a farmer the
rights to grow crops on his land and shares the proceeds with the farmer in agreed proportions after
the harvests. This type of agreement was first signed in Nigeria with Ashland oil in June 1973. From
the proceeds, up to 40 percent was set aside to amortize the companys investment and pay royalties
(cost oil), and about 55 percent was set aside for the payment of Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) (Tax
oil). The remaining proceeds of 5 percent called profit oil are then shared between the Government
and the company in crude oil in a ratio of 65:35 respectively. There was a proviso for the
Governments percentage share of profit oil to increase to 70 percent when production reaches
50,000 or more barrels per day. A barrel is a measure representing 35 Imperial gallons or 42 US
gallons. Companies engage in PSC in Nigeria include Statoil, Snepco, Elf, Model, Chevron etc.
34
In PSC, host government (through its agent) engages a competent contractor to carry out petroleum
operations Governments wholly owned acreage (oil block). The contractor undertakes the initial
exploration risks and recovers his costs only when oil is discovered in commercial quantities. If no
oil is found, the company receives no compensation. Under the PSC, royalty oil is a first-charge item
assigned to the government free of any exploration, development and production costs. Thereafter,
the contractor has the full right to only cost oil (i.e. oil to guarantee return on investment). He can
also dispose of the tax oil (oil to defray tax obligations) on Governments behalf. The residual oil is
the profit oil, if any, and the company shares with the concession holder in some agreed percentage.
The main law which regulates the operation of PSCs in Nigeria is the deep Offshore and Inland
Basin Product Sharing contracts Act N0.9, LFN, 1999. This law provides for payment of a flat rate
of 50% tax on petroleum profits by PSC operators, and sets different royalty regimes, depending on
the water depth in which the operation is carried out, ranging from 12% for water depths of 200500m, to 10% for water depths in excess of 1,000m. PSCs in inland basins attract a flat rate of 10%.
Some of the advantages of PSC include relative flexibility in the management of the operations, no
financial burden on the host country, payment to the contractor is made in oil after a commercial
find, reliance on the technical know-how and experience of the contractor oil company, etc. some of
its drawbacks include risky nature of operations due to non-transferability of costs from now
acreage to another when no oil is found and the allegations of gold plaiting costs by the host
country.
3.1.4 Service Contract with or without Risk: Service contract (SC) is an operating arrangement
similar to PSC whereby service contractor provides all the funds for exploration, development and
production activities, while the title to the oil is owned by the NNPC. Like in PSC, the initial
duration of the contract is usually 5 to 6 years and the contract terminates automatically of no
commercial discovery is made. In the event of such termination both the NNPC and the contractor
owe each other no further obligation with respect to the contract. If exploration is successful and
production commences, the contractors Exploration and development (E&D) costs are recovered in
accordance with the conditions stipulated in the contract. Usually the E&D costs are paid
installmentally over an agreed period of time, usually 5 years. Unlike PSC, the contractor has no
little to any of the portion of the crude oil produce, but may be allowed the option to be given
reimbursement and remuneration in oil as an additional incentive for the risk taking. Similar, the
contractor has the first option to purchase certain fixed quantities of crude oil produced from Sc
areas. At a point in time there was only one SC in place in Nigeria between the NNPC and Agip
Energy and natural resources, which covers only one oil mining lease.
Service Contract without risk is a contract agreement whereby an oil company carries out
exploration, development and production activities on behalf of and on account of the national oil
company, with the state bearing all risks and the exclusive right to all resources discovered. While,
service contract with risk is similar to service contract without risk, except that if no discovery is
made, the contractor is negated and the oil company loses all its investments. Similarly, if oil is
located, the contractor oil company receives monetary compensation, usually payment in crude oil.
3.1.5 Indigenous Contracts: Indigenous Contract is an arrangement whereby concessions are
owned by the NNPC but allocated to indigenous companies to operate. The NNPC regulate and
approve technical aspects of the operations and make no financial contribution to E&D activities.
Unlike JV or PSC where the NNPC is entitled to crude oil in one form or the other, the indigenous
companies only pay royalties and petroleum profits tax to the Government. It is a step taken by the
Government to encourage indigenous participation in the E&P of oil and gas in the country. There
are an upwards of 38 companies that are engage in this arrangement, among which are Summit oil,
35
consolidated oil, General, Sufra, Union dubri and Amni Petroleum development Company. Some of
the companies have made commercial discoveries and are already producing oil, while others are at
various stages of exploration and production.
3.1.6 NNPCs Direct Exploration: The NNPC through its subsidiaries (NAPIMS and NPDC) carry
out all operations associated with the search, development and production of oil and gas resources in
Nigeria.
3.1.7 Hybrid Agreement: It is usually common to find a hybrid agreement that combine elements
of different agreements. For example NNPC worked out an alternative funding arrangement with the
oil companies known as PSC hybrid NNPC carry arrangement, due to the inability of the Nigerian
Government to fund JVAs as a result of dwindling revenue. In this arrangement, which is a hybrid of
JV and PSC, the oil companies in the JV carry the NNP share of capital costs while the NNPC
continues to be cash called for operating expenses.
3.2 Financial and Fiscal Monitoring Mechanisms in the petroleum Industry
Monitoring mechanism can be defined as the procedures and controls (both internal and external) put
in place by the Government with the support of the operating partner with a view to ensuring that
exploration, development and production activities are hitch-free and are carried out efficiently and
effectively in the upstream sector. The monitoring mechanisms for the various types of contract
arrangements (i.e. JV, PSC and SC) are similar in nature and can be grouped into three broad
categories, as follows:
(i)Administrative Monitoring Mechanism (AMM);
(ii)Technical Monitoring Mechanism (TMM); and
(iii)Financial and Fiscal Monitoring Mechanism (F&FMM)
Administrative monitoring mechanism is mainly about ensuring due process, mutually beneficial
negotiations, appropriateness of contractual arrangement and appointment of the right contractor.
Technical monitoring mechanisms are meant to ensure that the production and development of oil is
done efficiently and is carried out in a hitch-free operating upstream sector. While financial and
fiscal monitoring mechanisms are instituted to ensure financial and fiscal accountability of oil and
gas operations, through the following measures:
(i)
Yearly Budget Preparation and Approval: Yearly budgets are prepared and submitted
for scrutiny and approval of the management committee, which is made up of
representatives of the operators, the Government and other parties that are involved,
based on the participating agreement. The committee is responsible for betting the
budget, recommending for approval (after amendments if any suggested by the
committee), providing supervisory control and monitoring on the implementation of the
budget and comparing the actual budget results against the standard at the end of the
budget period. While the NNPC appoint the committees chairman, the operator appoints
the secretary. The committee is responsible for creating sub-committees to take care of
finance, budget monitoring and other similar issues.
(ii)
Book-keeping, Financial Reports and Returns: The operator or contractor is
responsible for keeping proper books of accounts in line with modern petroleum industry
accounting practices and procedures and reports such information in accordance with
stipulated format of reporting in the industry. Members of the management committee
have the right to access such books and accounts which must be kept at the registered
office of the contractor in Nigeria, along with the statement of account in the stipulated
format, within 60 days from the end of each month and each quarter and 90 days from the
end of the financial year. The operator must not omit or amend any item of the budget
36
without a written approval of the management committee and its relevant subcommittee(s).
(iii) Internal Audit: The operator is obligated to establish an effective system of internal audit
base on well establish internal control system in respect of operations. Members of the
management committee have right of access to all the internal audit reports and replies to
audit queries raised by the internal auditor in respect of the operations.
(iv) External or Statutory Audit: The operators financial statements with respect to the
operations must be audited by the operators statutory auditors as examined and verified
by each of the non operators appointed auditors.
(v) Non-Operators Right of Audit: A non-operator may carry out or course to be carried out,
periodic audit of the books of accounts and all accounting records relating to the operation.
Any discrepancies in the account must be queried within 36 days from the date of receipt of
the account by the non-operator. This time limit does not apply in the case of fraud. The
NNPC today carry out value for money audit with a view to ascertaining the effectiveness,
economical and efficiency of all JV operations in which it is a partner.
(vi) Cost Oil Approval: In the case of PSC petroleum won from operation are classified into
royalty oil, cost oil, equity oil, tax oil and profit oil. While profit oil stipulates the
percentage of allocation of profit oil base on monthly average production, the contractor
cannot recover any cost oil unless there is prior approval by the NNPC.
(vii) Over Expenditure of Work Programme and Budget: When it is necessary to carry out
agreed work programme, an operator may during any calendar year over-expend any
budget line item by an amount not exceeding:
(a) 10% of the amount budgeted;
(b) In case of JV operation, either 10% of the amount budgeted or 2 million US Dollars,
whichever is less.
However, the foregoing shall not authorize the operator to over-expend the total amount of the
budget for any calendar year by more than 5%, without informing the other parties to obtain
approval, as soon as the over-expenditure is foreseen by the operator.
4. Accounting Principles and Standards in the Oil and Gas industry
4.1 Petroleum Accounting and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAPs)
Accounting principles could be defined as those rules of action or conduct, which are adopted by the
Accountants universally while recording accounting transactions. IAS I defined Accounting
principles as a body of doctrines commonly associated with theory and procedures of accounting,
serving as an explanation of current practices and as a guide for selection of conventions or
procedures where alternatives exist. The principles that impact most on oil and gas accounting
practices can be classified into two categories, namely:
a) accounting concepts; and
b) accounting conventions.
4.1.1 Accounting Concepts
This refers to those basic assumptions or conditions upon which the science of Accounting is based.
They are usually rules and conventions that lay down the way in which activities of a business are
recorded. These are:
1) Entity Concept: According to the standard, every economic entity regardless of its legal
form of existence is treated as a separate entity from parties having propriety or economic
interest in it. In Accounting, business is considered to be a separate entity from the
proprietor(s). This concept is applicable to all forms of business organizations, including the
oil and gas companies.
37
2) Going-Concern Concept: This is the assumption that a business will continue to operate
indefinitely into the foreseeable future; that is, the business is not expected to liquidate in the
near future. The economic environment of oil and gas industry is highly political and the risk
of nationalization is high. Also, companies may be nearing the expiration of their lease
periods without any hope for renewal of the lease or obtaining another lease. Such events
must be taken into account in determining their going concern status.
3) Periodicity Concept: According to this concept, the life of the business should be divided
into appropriate segments for the purpose of determining its financial performance. In
accounting, such a segment or time interval is called accounting period. It is usually a
period of twelve months, which can start any time and end any time, without necessarily
required to be in line of a calendar year, which must start January and end 31st December. In
the oil and gas industry, the financial year is line with government fiscal year which must
starts January 1 and ends December 31st and companies do not mostly have the discretion to
vary it.
4) Realization Concept: This concept states that revenue is recognized when a sale is made.
Sale is considered complete at the point when the property in the goods passes to the buyer
and he becomes legally liable to pay. The specific application of this principle is that in the
petroleum industry, crude oil is deemed sold as produced and therefore revenue may be
recognized on crude oil produced. However, on the basis of this principle, revenue cannot be
recognized on oil and gas reserves.
5) Matching Concept: According to this concept, the earned revenue and all the incurred costs
that generate that revenue must be matched and reported for the period with a view to
determining the net financial performance of a business. The term matching means
appropriate association of related revenues and expenses. This concept applied in oil and gas
accounting more especially in accounting for impairment and in computation of depreciation,
depletion and amortization.
6) Historical Cost Concept: This concept states that the basis for initial accounting recognition
of all assets acquisitions, services rendered or received, expenses incurred, creditors and
owners interests is the actual cost for the transaction(s). This principle is greatly applied in
computing depreciation, depletion and amortization, allowances for impairments, and
recognition of gain or loss on conveyances. An extension of this principle in oil and gas
accounting is the ceiling test concept, which stipulates that the total capitalised cost in the oil
and gas company books should not exceed the estimated value of reserves at the reporting
date, since the oil reserves are the most important economic assets own by the company. The
whole essence is to ensure that cots are not capitalized in the books that are not backed up by
economic assets.
7) Money Measurement: Accounting is only concern with those activities that can be
measured in money terms with fair degree of accuracy and objectivity. The peculiar nature of
oil and gas accounting is that its major economic asset, oil and gas reserves are not reflected
in the balance sheet, yet the final accounts provide a true and fair representation of the
financial results.
8) Dual Aspect Concept: This states that there are two aspects of accounting; one represented
by the resources owned by a business and the other, by the claim against them. Double entry
is therefore meant to uphold this concept. This concept is applicable to all forms of business
organizations, including the oil and gas companies.
4.1.2 Accounting Conventions
These are customs or traditions, which guide the Accountant while preparing the accounting
statements. In other words, accounting conventions are approaches to the application of accounting
concepts. These include:
38
1) Conservatism/Prudence: This states that greater care in the recognition of profit should be
exercised whilst all known expenses, even those that cannot be accurately calculated with fair
degree of accuracy and objectivity should be adequately provided for by way of provision.
Prudence runs through the whole gamut oil and gas accounting and should be effectively
applied because oil operations are particularly more risky and has higher potentials for loss.
Prudence in oil and gas accounting requires that reserves should he estimated objectively
and only the latest reserve estimates should be used. It is also prudent to recognize
impairment in the cost of unproved properties and ensure that only valuable costs are
retained in the books.
2) Materiality: The principle holds that only items of material values are accorded their strict
accounting treatment. This means that perfect accounting treatment may not be applied to
transactions that are of insignificant value both in amount, intention and effect on the user. In
this respect, a purely capital item may be expensed if it is not material. This convention
applies to oil and gas accounting.
3) Consistency Concept: This concept holds that when an enterprise has adopted an accounting
method of treating transactions, it should continue to use that method in subsequent periods
so that comparison of accounting figures overtime could be made possible. Oil and gas
accounting principles accommodate different practices based on defined assumptions,
though the consistency principle states that once an oil company adopts FC or SE, it should
stick to the method, and disclosure is required when change in an accounting method
becomes inevitable, and the consequences of such change on the financial statements should
also be disclosed.
4) Substance over Form: This convention states that business transaction should be accounted
for and presented in accordance with their substance and financial reality and not merely with
their legal form. This convention applies in the oil and gas industry.
5) Objectivity/Fairness: According to this convention, data presented on the financial
statements should be supported by verifiable evidence and demand the independence of
judgment on the part of the Accountant preparing the financial statements. Similarly, it is
required that accounting reports should be prepared not to favour any group or segment of
society. Because of its peculiarities, financial statements of oil and gas companies require
far more disclosures than that of other industries. These disclosures are expected to
corroborate the statements, provide supporting information and provide details for the
numbers on the financial statements.
4.2 Method of Accounting in the Oil and Gas Industry
Two methods of accounting are now generally accepted for the oil and gas industry. These are
Successful Efforts Method (SEM) and Full Cost Method (FCM). SEM is the method where all
exploration costs (namely acreage cost, costs of geological and geophysical surveys, cost of dry
holes etc) are charged to expenses, while those that lead to discovery of reserves are capitalized. It
gives due cognizance to the accounting concept of conservatism/prudence. On the other hand, the
FCM is a method in which all acquisition, exploration and development costs are capitalized
whether they lead to the discovery of oil reserves or not. Proponents of FCM are of the view that
finding commercially producible hydrocarbons is an overall objective that should not be evaluated
on well by well basis, as such all costs incurred are part of the cost of whatever reserves are found,
because the good must support the bad. While advocates of successful efforts method held that any
drilling effort that proves to be unsuccessful is a loss that must be expense immediately.
39
Prior to 1950, most oil and gas companies used some form of SEM to account for oil and gas
exploration, development and production. Generally, the practice was to expense dry hole costs and
intangible drilling costs on productive wells and capitalizes the costs of property acquisition, wells
and equipment. These capitalized costs are amortized if reverse were found or charged to expense if
reserve were not discovered. However, with emergence of more sophisticated exploration
technology in the 1960s a new method of accounting oil and gas activities know as full cost
method, in which all cost incurred in exploration and development of oil and gas reserves were
capitalized in a cost centre regardless of whether reserves were discovered or not.
While controversy raged, practical application of each of the two methods varied from company to
company. Some users of SEM capitalized all geological and geographical exploration costs, others
expense them. Similarly, while some users expense dry exploration wells, others capitalize dry
development wells, etc. In an attempt to ensure a decision-relevant financial reporting, the FASB
issue an explore draft in 1977 titled: Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing
Companies: which indicated the need for all companies to use the SEM in their reports. However,
the FASBs effort was scuttled by US SEC and other government agencies; and their argument were
simply on the fact that; not until the viability of the SEM over the FCM is proved, the call for
adopting the SEM was uncalled for.
Therefore, oil and gas reporting practice has been a source of concern to stakeholders since the
1970s and the recent accounting scandals of the 1990s have once again brought the issue into the
limelight. One of the major issues bedeviling the industry is the fact that the conventional cost
accounting does not cater for the information needs of various stakeholders. The non appearance of
the most valuable assets i.e. oil reserves, on oil and gas companies financial reports is unique to the
industry. Consequently, since such assets constitute the basis for determining the companys
performance and the fact that the cost of such assets are accounted for, differently by different
companies puts the value-relevance of the reports into question. The two methods used to account
for costs in the industry result to a number of inconsistencies: thus ensued the debate on which of the
methods is most suitable to be used by the oil and gas companies.
Unlike many other industries, costs here are classified based on the nature of operations rather than
the nature of a particular cost itself. As such the costs that characterized the operations of the
industry are basically incurred at four stages which include (i) the costs incurred in acquiring the
mineral interest in property (leasing), (ii) exploring the property (drilling), (iii) developing the
proved reserves, and (iv) producing (lifting) the oil and gas.
However, the fundamental accounting issue lies at the exploration stage, i.e. whether to capitalize or
expense the exploration cost which do not result to proved reserves. Since all other costs are treated
alike by all companies, companies that capitalize only the exploration cost which result to proved
reserves are called SE companies, whereas companies that capitalize all exploration costs, even
those that do not result to proved reserves, are called FC companies. This is obviously a source of
concern, since the two methods used to account for exploration costs differ significantly.
Consequently, accounting standard setters are faced with a serious challenge that bedeviled the
profession for decades. The choice of either of the methods generated a heated debate amongst
stakeholders; including the following;
1.
Economic Perspective
The proponent of the FCM argued that because the FC companies are smaller than the SE
companies, switching from SEM would reduce their reported earning; increase the possibility for
them to default on their loan servicing; making it difficult for them to assess capital which will
40
reduce the companies competitiveness. Also, they contend that the FC companies are most
aggressive in exploration activities. Hence, the method offers higher value-relevance than the SEM.
On the other hand, the need for the adoption of the SEM is based on the fact that the method better
reflects the realities (risk and failures) associated with the industrys operations. Hence, the method
would eliminate the inconsistencies bedeviling the industry, offer better means for comparison
among the oil and gas companies, and provide reliable economic information to all stakeholders.
2.
Accounting Perspective
SEM can be justified based on its adherence to matching and conservatism concepts hence, the
debate seems to carry weight on its side compared to FCM which does not adhere to any of the two
concepts. Accounting principles are not adhered to in the case of FCM. FC companies have
flagrantly ignored the fundamental accounting principles that ought to be observed by all and sundry
by matching cost with an income that does not exist. More so, from the asset point of view, asset
capitalization under the FC methods is flawed, because the so-called asset capitalized does not
possess the features of an asset i.e. there is no future benefit from it; because it (the so-called asset)
does not even exist. Hence, the fundamental accounting concepts have been, temporarily, discarded
by companies in an attempts to gain investors confidence. Overall, since the controversy centres on
either capitalizing or expensing cost and based on the fact that expenditure ought to be capitalized
only if it meet the definition of an asset; then the FCM is fundamentally flawed. This is because
companies reports should not purport to show the companies value, but rather provide stakeholders
with all the necessary information for them to determine the companys performance over a specific
period of time and the value of the companies at a particular point in time.
3.
Political Perspective
In an attempt to ensure a decision-relevant financial reporting, FASB issued an exposure Draft (ED)
in 1977, titled: Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies: where
indicated the need for all companies to use the SEM in their reports. However, the FASBs effort
was scuttled by US SEC and other government agencies. Politics and lobbying played a big role in
this decision, as different stakeholders responded to the ED in the way it would serve their interest
the most. Although, it is difficult to attribute the decision of SEC, for overriding the outcome of the
ED, as a single factor, but it is aptly argued that the problem was a consequence of the political clout
of oil and gas producers and dissention among accounting standard setters. Indeed, oil and gas
industry operations have been influenced by politicking for long and this has been one of the factors
for failure to agree on a single acceptable method of accounting in the industry.
4.3 Reserve Recognition Accounting (RRA)
Some concerned accounting practitioners were against the recommendation of FAS 19, which allow
companies to use either FCM or SEM. This made SEC to propose the development of a new method
of accounting for oil and gas known as RRA, with a view to remedy, the inherent weakness of SEM
and FCM. Under the RRA, companies would be allowed to recognize the value of proved oil and gas
reserves as assets and changes in such reserve values as earnings in the financial statement. Just like
FCM or SEM, RRA came under severe criticisms, because it ignore the fact that measurement of oil
and gas reserves are imprecise and merely an estimate, and the projected revenue and cost may not
materialize. Similarly, RRA is criticized for ignoring the realization concept, thereby recognizing
revenue before receiving it.
4.5
Development of Accounting Standard in the Oil and Gas Industry
An accounting standard is a statement issued by the appropriate standard-setting body locally or
internationally on a specific area or topic in financial accounting, the acceptance/application of
which is mandatory for preparers and users of financial statements. Criticisms of FCM and SEM and
41
RRA, triggered SEC to search for solution, thus culminating in FAS 69 by FASB in November,
1982. Similarly, the UK Oil industry Accounting Committee published four statements of
recommended practice (SOR) to be used by oil and gas companies. These statements are: (1)
Disclosures of oil and gas E & P activities; (2) accounting for oil and gas E & D activities (3)
accounting for abandonment costs; and (4) accounting for various financing revenue and other
transactions of oil and gas E & P companies.
The Nigeria Accounting Standard Board (NASB) followed suit by issuing SAS 14 (Accounting in
the Petroleum Industry: Upstream Activities) through Chief R.U. Uches Committee. The standard
came into effect from January 1, 1994. Similarly, through the effort of the same committee, NASB
issue SAS 17 (Accounting in the Petroleum Industry: Downstream Activities) which came into
effect on January 1, 1998.
The standards which are applicable in Nigeria are Statement of Accounting Standards (SAS) issued
by the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board (NASB), International Accounting Standards (IAS)
issued by the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) and the International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). All the
standards, IAS, IFRS and SAS are applicable in Nigeria except that if an IAS/IFRS is inconsistent
with an SAS, the IAS/IFRS would be inapplicable to the extent of the inconsistency. This implies
that on any matter on which an IAS/IFRS and an SAS make conflicting pronouncements, the SAS
shall supersede the IAS/IFRS in Nigeria. However, with effect from first January 2012, when
Nigeria adopts IFRS in financial reporting, the reverse is the case. In other words, with effect from
first January, 2012, IAS/IFRS will be adopted in Nigeria, and SAS will only be applicable where no
IAS or IFRS is issued on the same item. Sequel to this, SAS 14 and 17 are still applicable in Nigeria.
4.5.1 Required Practice and Disclosure by SAS 14
1. Method of accounting for cost incurred and the manner of disposing capitalized costs.
2. Policy on accounting for restoration and total amount relating to each.
3. Method of accounting use either FCM or SEM, which should be consistently applied and
disclosed.
4. Cost should be classified by nature and function of cost element e.g. mineral interest in
proved and unproved properties, wells and related equipment and facilities, wells and
equipment in progress etc.
5. For FC companies: (i) initial costs incurred relating to mineral rights acquisition, exploration,
appraisal and development activities should be capitalized; (ii) all capitalized costs (on
country-wide basis) are to be depreciated on unit of production basis, using proved reserves;
(iii) ceiling tests should be conducted (using discounted values for revenue, costs, taxes and
future development costs) at least annually at balance sheet date, on a country-wide basis,
using proved reserves and price ruling as at the date of the balance sheet; (iv) where accounts
are prepared in US Dollars cash flows shall be discounted at 10%, otherwise if Naira is used,
the CBN rediscount rate should be used; (v) if net discounted revenue is lower than the
capitalized costs, the difference should be written off.
6. For SE companies: (i) initial costs incurred prior to acquisition of mineral rights not
specifically directed to an identifiable structure should be expensed in the period they are
incurred; (ii) all costs incurred relating to mineral rights acquisition, exploration, appraisal
and development activities should be capitalized initially on the basis of wells, fields or
exploration cost centres, pending determination and written off later if the well is dry; (iii)
maximum of 3 years in offshore and 2 years in onshore are allowed as retention period for
further appraisal cost pending determination; (iv) capitalized costs should be amortized over
the remaining life of the licence and the balance should be reviewed annually for impairment
42
on wells basis, and any impairment should be written off; (v) drilling costs are to be
amortized using unit-of-production basis using proved developed reserves.
7. Cost of providing amenities for communities in areas of operation should be written off as
incurred.
8. Treatment of carrying interest and amount of carried expenditure to date.
9. Treatment of farmouts and similar arrangements.
10. Treatment of unitization and redetermination arrangements.
11. Treatment of joint venture
12. Accounting for over-lifts and under-lifts
13. Provision for restoration and abandonment cost
14. Recognition of gains or losses under conveyances/surrender/sold of unproved property.
15. Information on proved oil and gas reserve quantity.
16. Disclosure of standardize measure of discounting future net cash flows relating to proved oil
and gas reserves.
4.5.2 Required Practice and Disclosure by SAS17
The Accounting Standard comprises paragraph 44-59 of this statement covers the provisions as
follows:
Accounting policies
44. All companies engaged in downstream activities in the petroleum industries shall state in their
financial statement all significant accounting policies adopted in the preparation of those statements.
45. The accounting policies should be prominently disclosed under one caption rather than as notes
to individual items in the financial statements.
Refining and petrochemicals operations
Catalysts
46. Costs of short life catalyst should be expensed in the year in which they are incurred while costs
of long life catalysts should be capitalised and written off over the life of the refinery. Where long
life catalysts are generated, the costs of regeneration should be capitalised and amortised over the
life of regeneration.
Turn-Around Maintenance
47. Turn-around maintenance costs should be capitalised and amortised over the expected period
before the next turn around maintenance will be due.
Stand-by Equipment
48. Stand-by Equipments should be depreciated over the expected useful life of similar equipment in
use.
Depreciation of plants and Equipment
49. The costs of refining or petrochemicals plants and equipments should be depreciated on a
straight line basis over the useful life of the assets or, if operating at normal levels of production, on
the basis of expected throughput. The method used should be disclosed and consistently applied.
Debottlenecking, Major Plant Rehabilitation and Replacement of Major Components
50. Where major plant rehabilitation, debottlenecking or replacement of major components result in
a significant and identifiable increase in output or betterment of the plant, the cost should be
capitalised and amortised over the period over which the benefits is expected to last. In any other
case, it should be expensed as incurred.
43
prepayment.
44
58. The requirements of this standard are complementary to any accounting and disclosure
requirements of the companies and Allied Matters Decree, 1990 and relevant laws and
regulations
5.0 Procedures in Oil and Gas Accounting
5.1 Impact of Order of Drilling on Petroleum Accounting Methods
There are two methods of accounting used in the oil and gas industry. These are SEM and FCM. The
SEM and FCM of accounting give significantly different results based on purely chance factors like
the order or chronology of successful and unsuccessful wells. Assuming that, a company in an
attempt to develop an oil reservoir, drills a total of four wells. The first two wells (A and B) are
successful while the last two wells (C and D) are unsuccessful. Under the SEM, the four wells will
be capitalized as wells C and D are now development wells. The income statement will show a
buoyant picture. However, if the first two wells drilled are unsuccessful and the last two wells are
successful, the cost of wells A & B will be charged to expense while the cost of wells C & D will be
capitalized. Thus, merely changing the order in which wells are drilled will result in a vast difference
in the financial statements. With increased exploration drilling, net income drops under the SEM
when compared to the full cost accounting method. When there is an increased rate of discovery,
that is, a greater percentage of successful wells rather than dry holes, this result in increasing net
income under the SEM as fewer dry holes are written off. However, all these have no effect on FCM
companies.
5.2 Similarities and Differences between SEM and FCM
Two of the very few similarities between the two methods are in the treatment of development costs
and production costs. Development costs in both cases are capitalized whether successful or not
while production costs are expensed.
Table 5: Comparison between SEM and FCM and Compliance with GAAPs
Basis of
S/No. Comparison
1 Presenting a true
and fair view of the
result
of
the
operations of the
business.
2 Return on assets
Share values
Investment
Lenders.
45
Basis of
S/No. Comparison
Successful Efforts Method
5 Survival of the new New
entrants
and
growing
entrants and growing companies cannot afford the huge
companies.
write offs of the exploration losses
of initial years and their corporate
survival is threatened.
6 Production
of Information on the performance of
information
for individual wells is more readily
managerial decision available to support managerial
making.
decision making.
7 Performance
Enables the performance of
evaluation
of managers to be evaluated.
managers
8 Comparison
of Because of the erratic movement of
financial statements. the net profit results, meaningful
comparison of the financial
performance over years is impaired.
9 Dividend decisions
Since all losses are recognized
before the net profit results are
arrived at, dividend decisions are
more prudent.
10
Compliance
GAAPs
with
12
13
Ceiling Test
Ceiling test is not mandatory.
Exploration
and Potential effect-of writing off dry
drilling activities
hole
expenses
may
affect
exploration and drilling activities.
Figure VI and VII give the accounting procedure of FCM and SEM.
46
47
48
5.3 Differences in Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account of FCM and SEM
FCM
SEM
Balance Sheet
(Capitalized amounts)
Geological and geophysical costs
xx
--Carrying costs and overhead
xx
--Surrendered and impaired leases
xx
--Unimpaired leases
xx
xx
Exploratory wells
Successful
xx
xx
Unsuccessful
xx
-Development wells
xx
xx
DD& A
xxH
xxL
FCM
SEM
Profit And Loss Account
(Expensed amounts)
Geological and geophysical costs
-xx
Carrying costs and overhead
-xx
Surrendered and impaired leases
-xx
Unimpaired leases
--Exploratory wells
Successful
--Unsuccessful
-xx
Development wells
--xxL
DD & A
xxH
xxH Comparably higher
xxL Comparably lower
5.4 Differences between Tangible Costs and Intangible Costs
Tangible costs relate to costs of assets that have physical properties. Tangible is said to have been
derived from the Latin word tangere meaning to touch, impling that such assets can be touched or
felt. They include machinery, equipment vehicles etc. Tangible costs also include labour to install
equipment etc. even though such costs do not result in a physical asset. Intangible costs relate to
costs that result in an asset that has no physical properties. Examples are contract costs paid to a
contract driller for drilling a well, mud pits etc. In oil and gas operations and accounting, a
distinguishing feature between classification as tangible and intangible is salvageability. If the
property can be salvaged at the end of operations, such properties are usually classified as tangible
whereas those properties (the underlying costs) that cannot be salvaged at the end of an operation are
classified as intangible. The distinction between both types of costs is usually important for tax
purposes.
Examples of Intangible Drilling Costs
Drilling contractors charges
Site preparation, roads, pits
Bits, reamers, tools
Labour
Fuel, power and water
Drill stem tests
49
Coring analysis
Electric surveys and logs
Geological and engineering
Cementation
Completion, fracturing, acidizing, perforating
Rig transportation, erection and removal
Overhead
Other services
Examples of Tangible Drilling Costs
Casing (production and surface)
Tubing
Well head and subsurface
Pumping units
Tanks
Separators
Heater-treaters
Engines and automotives
Flow line
Installation costs of equipment
Sundry equipment
Question One
Janguza Oil Company, a joint venture operator, incurred the following costs in drilling an oil well:
N
i. Drilling (on footage basis)
675,256
ii. Cost of clearing and grading unpaved roadways to the drill site
23,560
iii. Construction of overflow mud pits
56,700
iv. Surface casing used in the well
675,908
v. Services such as acidizing and testing
246,200
vi. Cementing services for casing
17, 890
vii. Tubing and control valves
57, 500
viii. Flow lines, tanks and treaters
116, 700
ix. Labour to install lines and tanks
26, 500
Solution to Question One
I
Ii
Iii
Iv
V
Vi
Vii
Intangible
Drilling
Costs (IDC)
675,256
Tangible
Drilling
Costs
(TDC)
23,560
56,700
675,908
246200
17, 890
57, 500
50
116, 700
26, 500
675,908
51
DD&A =
It should be noted that this question uses identical figures as the preceding illustration except for the
revision of the estimate of reserves carried out at the end of the year. This additional information
changes the reserves at the beginning of the year, the amortization rate, and consequently, the
DD&A for the year from N 80,000 to N 94,118.
5.5.3 Nature of Cost Centre
Amortization amount is also affected by the nature of the cost centre i.e. whether it is carried out on
a well-by-well, field-by-field, or countrywide basis. This is clearly illustrated in Question four
below.
Example Four
Assume the following data are in respect of the entire leases owned by BUK Oil Company in
Nigeria. You are required to calculate the DD&A for the year Ended 31st December, 2011 on
(i)property-by-property basis and (ii) countrywide basis.
Concessions
Lease 1
Lease 2
Lease 3
Total
52
600,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,600,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
6,000,000
13,000,000
1,000,000
500,000
1,200,000
2,700,000
Lease 2:
Lease 3:
Total Amortization
53
additional developed costs are incurred, such as enhanced recovery systems, are excluded in
computing the DD&A rate. When a property contains both oil and gas reserves, the units of oil and
gas used to compute amortization are converted to a common unit of measure on the basis of their
relative energy content, known as the BTU (British Thermal Units). Despite the broad similarities
mentioned above, DD&A under the full cost and successful efforts method of accounting differs
fundamentally. The differences may be summarized as follows:
Successful Efforts Method (SEM)
1. Wells and related facilities costs are amortized using proved developed reserves.
2. The amortization must be on the basis of unit of production. Unit of revenue method is not
permitted.
3. Future development costs are considered in the amortization computation.
4. Costs are accumulated for each cost centre. For the purpose of capitalizing costs and
amortization, the centre is essentially the individual lease, block, licence area, concession or
field.
Full Cost Method (FCM)
1. Costs are accumulated separately for each cost centre. For this purpose, each country or
continent is considered a separate cost centre.
2. Costs are amortized using proved reserves (i.e. both developed and undeveloped).
3. Costs to be amortized include:
(a) Capitalized costs (net of previous depreciation, depletion and amortization);
(b) Future development costs to develop proved reserves are included in amortization
base;
(c) Future dismantlement and restoration cost.
4. Unit of revenue method may be used.
5. A cost ceiling based on a standardized measure of underlying value of assets is mandatory.
5.5.5 Computation of Depletion
As earlier stated, both full cost and successful efforts companies deplete mineral acquisition costs
using proved reserves. However, a successful efforts company amortizes capitalized costs, other than
acquisition costs, using proved developed reserves, whereas a full cost company amortizes such
costs using proved reserves. This is because the mineral acquisition costs apply to all recoverable
reserves in the field or property whereas wells and related equipment relate only to the portion of
reserves recoverable from the wells already drilled-proved developed reserves.
Question Five
(i) Calculate DD&A for New-Site Oil and Gas Nigeria Limited, a full cost company, assuming the
following:
Abandonment costs
N 15,000,000
Development costs
N 5,000,000
Capitalized costs
N 30,000,000
Proved reserves
5,000,000 bbls
First year production
500,000 bbls
(ii) Calculate DD&A for above company for the second year, assuming that production is 300,000
bbls.
(iii) Calculate DD&A for New-Site Oil and Gas Nigeria Limited, a succesful cost company,
assuming the following:
Abandonment costs
N 15,000,000
Development costs
N 5,000,000
54
N 15,000,000
N 5,000,000
N 30,000,000
N 50,000,000
= N l,000,000
= N 3,333,333
= N4,333,333
55
57
record in international operations, premium payable, signature bonus payable and political factors
are also taken into account.
Acquisition costs for licences, concession or leases, yet to have proved reserves discovered in them,
are classified and referred to as Unproved Properties. Although the basic provisions in leases and
licences are similar, each lease and/ or licence may contain unique provisions. Basic provisions for
Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL) and Oil Mining Lease (OML) are as follows:
Signature Bonus
The signature bonus is the cash or other consideration paid to the lessor (property-owner) by the
lessee (leaseholder) in return for the lessor granting the 1essee the rights to explore for minerals, drill
wells, and produce oil. The bonus is computed at per-acre basis.
Duration
The Minister for Petroleum Resources determines the duration of an Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL)
or Oil Mining Lease (OML). In the case of an OPL the duration may not be more than 5 years
including any renewals, whereas an OML may not have a term of more than 20 years but may be
renewable.
Rent
The agreements typically provide for rentals to be paid on concessions. Such rentals are based on
acreage or hectare granted by the lease.
Royalty Provisions
Lease contracts provide for royalty to be paid to the lessor of a mineral concession. Royalties are
based on the quantity of oil and gas produced. The Federal Government of Nigeria fixes royalty
rates, which may vary from time to time.
Right to Assign Interest
The lease contract grants the lessee the right to assign, subject to approval by the Minister for
Petroleum Resources, any part or all of its rights and obligations.
Drilling
The lessee or licensee is required to commenced exploration using accepted geological and
geophysical techniques within six months and to commence drilling operations in eighteen months
of the grant of the relevant concession.
5.7.2 General Principles of Accounting for Acquisition Cost of Unproved Properties
Successful Efforts Method
In successful efforts accounting, costs associated with the acquisition of unproved properties are
initially capitalized when incurred. These consist of costs incurred in obtaining a mineral interest in a
property such as signature bonuses, options to lease, brokers fees, legal costs, stamp duties and
other similar costs in acquiring property interest. Unproved .properties should be assessed at least
once a year to determine if there is any loss in value (impairment). If there is any impairment, it must
be recorded as a loss.
58
Cementation
Completion, fracturing, acidizing, perforating
Rig transportation, erection and removal
Overhead
Other services
Tangible Expenditure
Casing (production and surface)
Tubing
Well head and subsurface
Pumping units
Tanks
Separators
Heater-treaters
Engines and automotives
Flow line
Installation costs of equipment
Sundry equipment
Additional Information
Apart from details of estimates and actual costs under the above subheads, AFEs contain the
following additional information: (i) AFE number and date; (ii) approvals required both from
company and joint venture parties; (iii) purpose of expenditure i.e. whether exploratory drilling or
development drilling; (iv) location of project or well; (v) well number; projected total depth; and
(vii) type of well i.e. whether oil, gas, or condensate.
5.8 Accounting for Exploration and Drilling Costs
Examples of exploration and drilling costs are: a) Costs of topographical, geological and geophysical studies, rights of access to properties to
conduct those studies, and salaries and other expenses of geologists, geophysical crews, and
others conducting those studies. Collectively, those are sometimes referred to as or G&G
(geological and geophysical) costs.
b) Costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties, such as delay rentals, tax on the
properties, legal costs for title defence and the maintenance of land and lease records.
c) Dry hole contributions and bottom hole contributions.
d) Costs of drilling and equipping exploratory wells
e) Costs of drilling exploratory-type stratigraphic tests wells.
Accounting treatment of exploration and drilling costs depends on whether the enterprise uses the
successful efforts method or full cost method of accounting.
5.8.1 Successful Efforts
An oil company which adopts the SEM of accounting will expense all G&G costs and carrying costs
of undeveloped properties, regardless of whether exploration activities led to discovery of reserves
or not. All other exploration and drilling costs such as costs of drilling wells and exploratory- type
stratigraphic test wells are charged to expense if they result in dry holes and capitalized if reserves
are discovered in them.
The reason for the divergent treatment of G&G costs and other exploration and drilling costs is
61
because a successful efforts company treats G & G costs as cost of obtaining information, similar to
research and development costs (R & D) which generally must be charged to expense as incurred.
The costs that may be capitalized are held temporarily in a well in progress account until a
determination is made as to whether the wells are productive or not. If an exploratory well is
determined to be dry, the costs accumulated in work in progress, less salvage value, are written off
as expense.
5.8.2 Full Cost
Under the FCM, all exploratory and drilling costs are capitalized. The work in progress account is
used temporarily to accumulate costs of wells being drilled in the same manner as a successful effort
company, until the outcome of the well is known. If the well proves successful, the accumulated cost
in the wells in progress account is transferred to Wells and Related Facilities account and amortized.
The work in progress account can either be included or excluded from the amortization base.
However, as soon as the outcome of the well is known, it must be reclassified to wells and related
facilities and included in the amortization computation.
5.9 Accounting for Development Costs
Development costs are costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for
extracting, treating, gathering, and storing the oil and gas. More specifically, development costs,
including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other
costs of development activities are costs incurred to:
a) Gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling, including the survey of well locations for
the purpose of determining specific development drilling sites, clearing ground, draining, road
building, and relocating public roads, gas lines, and power lines, to the extent necessary in
developing the proved reserves.
b) Drill and equip development wells, development-type stratigraphic test wells, and service wells,
including the costs of platforms and of well equipment such as casing, tubing, pumping
equipment, and the wellhead assembly.
c) Acquire, construct, and install production facilities such as lease flow lines, separators, treaters,
heaters, manifolds, measuring devices, and production storage tanks, natural gas cycling and
processing plants, and utility and waste disposal systems.
d) Provide improved recovery systems.
Development costs are basically classified into two i.e. IDC (intangible drilling and development
cost) and LWE (Lease and well equipment cost). Generally intangible drilling cost are down hole
costs up to and including the wellhead. They include cost of preparation for drilling, drilling cost,
well servicing (fracturing, acidizing) and the cost of subsurface well equipment. Equipment includes
cost of well equipment and other lease equipment.
An oil company capitalizes all development costs. The costs of drilling development wells are
temporarily included in Wells in Progress account - Development Wells until drilling is complete.
Upon completion, the costs are re-classified to wells and related equipment account and amortized.
In effect, development well costs are capitalized whether or not they result in discovery of
hydrocarbons. This is because development wells are regarded as costs incurred to produce reserves
already located by an exploratory or discovery well. Accounting for development costs is the same
under both full cost and successful efforts method.
It is clear from the foregoing that a proper distinction must be made between exploratory wells and
development wells since the accounting treatments are not the same. An exploratory well is a well
62
drilled to find and produce oil in an unproved area, to find a new reservoir in a field previously
found to be productive.
Question Six
First Hydrocarbon Company Limited incurred the following costs for a development well drilled
during 2011 in a recently acquired concession.
N
Site survey
150,000
Bush clearing
500,000
Road building and bridges
2,500,000
Tubing and casing pipes
1,400,000
Well head assembly and valves
2,100,000
Flow lines
4,000,000
Separators
10,000,000
Treaters and heaters
2,000,000
Desander
1,500,000
Required:
a) Prepare journal entries to record the cost of the development well, assuming BUK Hydrocarbon
Company uses successful efforts method of accounting.
b) Prepare journal entries to record the development well assuming that the full cost method of
accounting is used.
c) Would it make any difference if the development well were dry or productive? Comment.
Solution to Question Six
(a) Successful Efforts Company
General Journal
Particulars
Wells and related facilities (Intangible)
Wells and related facilities (equipment)
Bank Account
Being cost of development wells incurred.
(b)
(c)
Dr
3,150,000
21,000,000
Cr
24,150,000
Entry for full cost company is the same as for successful efforts company above.
It would not make any difference. Both full cost and successful efforts companies are required
to capitalize costs of development dry holes and producing development wells.
63
For a proper understanding of revenue accounting it is necessary to explain the various types of
economic interest in oil and gas property. The particular types of economic interest owned by the
parties involved in a property determine how the benefits and obligation of the property i.e. costs and
revenue is shared. Economic interest consists of ownership of minerals in place that gives the owner
the right to share in the mineral produced or in the proceeds from the sale of minerals produced.
Basic types of ownership interests are as follows:
Royalty Interest (RI)
This is basic type of interest in production that is retained by the mineral interest owner when he
leases the property to another party. It is a non-working interest and the owner is entitled to receive a
fraction of the oil produced in form of royalty.
on a run ticket. By the use of a device known as a thief, samples of crude oil are taken at various
levels from the tank, centrifuged and measured to determine the B.S. & W content i.e. Basic
Sediment (BS) and Water (W) content.
Other information included in the run ticket are the tanker or pipeline names, the lease or well
identification, tank number, the observed temperature, the observed gravity, B.S & W content,
signatures of the gauger and other witnesses such as Customs, Petroleum Inspectorate, Nigeria Port
Authority personnel and other interested parties. All of the foregoing data are necessary because the
volume, and consequently the value of a barrel of oil, can be significantly affected by a change in the
oils gravity, temperature, pressure, or, basic sediment and water content.
The specific gravity of oil is expressed in degrees API. The thinner (less viscous) the oil, the higher
the API gravity, and the higher the API gravity of the oil, the more valuable the oil. This is because
higher gravity oil usually produces a higher yield of white products and requires less complex
operations to refine into useable products. API gravity is related to specific gravity and oil with 10o
API gravity will have a specific gravity of 1, the same as the specific gravity of water. The formula
for API gravity is:
141.5
APIo =
-131.5
Specific gravity
Temperature has a dual effect on the measurement of crude oil. Not only can temperature change the
gravity of oil, it can also change the volume. The gravity changes because oil will become lighter
(less viscous and thinner) when it is heated. Obviously, if no adjustment were made, the change in
gravity would affect the price of oil. The effect of temperature on volume can be appreciated when
one considers that 10,000 barrels of oil at 40F could increase to as much as 10,300 barrels at 90F.
This is an increase of 12,600 US gallons of oil. The standard unit of measurement of crude oil is a
barrel of 42 US gallons at a temperature of 60F. The composition of oil itself can also affect the
volume of oil sold. Most purchasers of crude oil set limits on the percent of B.S & W they will
allow. Where B.S. & W exceeds 1%, the price is usually discounted.
The efficiency of production measurement has been enhanced by automated techniques using Lease
Automatic Custody Transfer (LACT) units to measure the volume and quality of crude oil adjusted
for temperature, gravity, compression and B.S & W content. After the adjusted volumes of oil have
been calculated or determined, they are valued on a property-by-property basis in accordance with
the sales contract with the purchaser. Each lifting is then valued for each purchaser, summarised for
the month, and billed.
5.10.3 Revenues from Gas
Accounting for revenue from gas is similar to accounting for revenue from oil in that it involves
measurement, pricing and formal recording of values. The difference is that quantitative
measurement and pricing are more complex. The volume of gas delivered from a well (or the point
at which oil and gas are separated) is calculated from orifice meter charts and accumulated by
months. An orifice meter is a device in which the pressure differential between the two sides of an
opening or construction called an orifice is used as a factor for determining the volume of flow.
Gas Sales Contracts
Take - or - Pay Provision
65
A gas sales contract normally provides that if the purchaser does not take the specified delivery, he
must pay for the shortfall (deficiency) even if not taken. However, the purchaser is usually entitled to
make-up for the deficiency payment in future supplies.
Minimum Royalty
Under this arrangement, the purchaser agrees to pay to a minimum amount for a stated period. The
excess of the minimum payment over the value of the gas taken for a given period may or may not
be deductible from the shortage arising in any future period. The essence of both the take-or-pay
provision and the minimum royalty provision is to compel the purchaser to live up to the terms of
agreement both in quantity and value.
5.11 Accounting for Production Costs
Production cost consists of the costs of gathering, field processing, treating and field storage of oil
and gas. Production commences with the lifting of oil and gas to the surface and terminates at the
outlet valve on the field production storage tank. However, sometimes due to operational factors, the
production function is regarded as terminating at the point at which oil or gas is delivered to a trunk
line, a refinery or marine terminal. Production costs are the cost of producing oil and gas.
Accordingly, they should be charged to expense. Although DD&A of capitalized acquisition,
exploration and development costs form part of the cost of oil and gas produced, they are usually not
classified as production costs. The practice is to disclose them separately in the financial statements.
5.11.1Classification of Production Costs
Production costs may be classified in many ways. One basis of classification is by the nature of the
object of the expenditure, e.g. salaries, taxes, materials and supplies. Another is by the nature of
operational function served, e.g., pumping and gauging, sub-surface maintenance, secondary
recovery operations. The various types of production costs classified as to their nature are as follows:
Salaries
This category includes salaries and wages of pumpers, gaugers, roustabouts, maintenance crews,
welders etc. It also includes the salaries of the tank farms superintendent and production foremen.
Where such supervisors have responsibility for more than one lease - as is often the case - the
practice is to allocate their salaries to individual leases or wells.
Contract Services
Services such as pump maintenance, recompletion and workover, catering, casing repairs, paraffin
control and desanding may be contracted out by an oil company.
Insurance
Typical insurances that may affect production costs are medical, workmens compensation, fire and
windstorm, boiler explosions, etc.
Fringe Benefits
Fringe benefits are part of total compensation of labour and should be allocated to individual leases.
Repairs and Maintenance
Costs incurred in repairing lease equipment such as tank farms, separators, desanders, desalters, flow
lines, lease cabins, engines, motors, pumps and other surface production equipment are classified as
repair and maintenance and form part of production costs.
66
Royalties
Royalties are based on quantities produced, valued at posted prices and levied at various rates.
Overhead and Supervision
This category usually includes an allocated portion of the expense of operating the district office. In
some companies, general and administrative expenses are allocated to district offices and thus
become part of the district expenses allocated to individual leases. Two of the allocation bases most
commonly used are: (a) Number of wells served, and (b) Barrels of crude oil produced.
5.11.2 Functional Classification of Expenses
Company practices vary with respect to functional groupings or classification of production costs.
The following functional groups or subgroups are typical:
Pumping and gauging
Subsurface maintenance: Pumps
Tubing
Casing
Workovers and recompletions
Treatment of oil
Gas Dehydration
Saltwater disposal
Gathering
Surface maintenance: Lease and well equipment
Roads
Cutting of grass and weeds
Secondary recovery operations
5.11.3Direct and Indirect Expenses
Production costs of oil and gas companies are classified as either direct or indirect. Direct
production Costs are generally regarded as those expenditures that are absolutely essential to the
production operation. Costs of gauging and pumping, sub-surface maintenance, heating and treating
costs of oil and/or gas are typical direct production costs. Indirect production costs are those that
facilitate or are incidental to petroleum production but do not directly contribute to it. Some
examples are taxes, royalties, insurance and overhead and superintendence.
If the productivity of a well is restored or enhanced, it would seem logical that since such costs will
benefit future periods, they should be capitalized and amortized to those periods. Industry practice,
however, is to expense workover costs. They justify the treatment on the basis of immateriality (for
large companies). Although prevailing practice may result in a more conservative financial
statement, proper matching of expenses with related revenues may not have been achieved. Well
workover costs that involve drilling to a deeper horizon or plugging back to a shallower producing
formation are referred to as recompletions. Since recompletions increase the production potential of
reserves, such costs are capital in nature and should be capitalized as intangible costs and amortized
to future periods.
Although generally accepted accounting principles require that production cost, being part of the
cost of oil and gas produced, should be allocated to cost of goods sold and inventory, very seldom do
oil companies value the oil in pipelines and tanks at cost. Inventories in pipelines and tanks are
generally ignored or are valued at selling prices. The oil in the tank is viewed as a fungible good,
with an assured market and therefore presumed sold as produced. Thus a portion of the revenue is
realized before actual sale, a practice contrary to the realization concept. Proponents of this method
67
argue that it does not materially distort income. Clearly, two principles - the matching principle and
realization principle had not been fully complied with, as costs would not have been matched
with revenues.
5.12 Financial Statements Disclosures
The oil and gas industry, in fact the extractive industry as a whole, differ from companies in other
industries in one significant respect - their most important economic asset, oil and gas reserves are
not recorded in the balance sheet. This uniqueness posed a peculiar challenge in financial reporting,
especially in reporting the financial position of oil companies without the real substance of
the enterprise.
In an attempt to make up for this limitation and meet the financial reporting requirements of
investors, oil companies have been disclosing information on reserves by way of footnotes and
supplemental information to the financial statements. It was in response to this need that the in April
1986, the U.K Oil Industry Accounting Committee issued Statement of Recommended Practice
(SORP) No. l to provide guidance on disclosures. Also, paragraph 134 in Part IV of SAS No. 14
issued by the NASB stipulates certain disclosures, including the following:
i. Method of accounting
ii. Capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities
iii. Costs incurred
iv. Disclosure of the results of operation for oil and gas producing activities
v. Proved oil and gas reserve quantity information
vi. Disclosure of a standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
relating to proved oil and gas reserves.
Broadly, the disclosure rules apply to quoted companies with significant oil and gas producing
activities. A company is deemed to have significant oil and gas producing activities if it meets any of
the following three tests: i. The revenue from oil and gas producing activities (including transfers to other activities of
the company) is 10 percent or more of the combined revenue from all the companys
industry segments.
ii. The assets identified as related to oil and gas producing activities are 10 per cent or more of
total assets of all industry segments.
iii. Income after taxes (before extraordinary items) from oil and gas producing activities is 10
percent or more of the consolidated net income before extraordinary items.
5.13 Accounting for Refining and Petrochemical Operations
Operations in the oil and gas industry are broadly divided into two, namely upstream and
downstream. Refining and petrochemical production are therefore part of the downstream. Crude oil,
which is the major raw material of a refinery, is a mixture of a family of organic chemical
compounds made up of hydrogen and carbon in various proportions called hydrocarbons. The nonhydrocarbon materials that are usually present in crude oil are sulphur, nitrogen, nickel, vanadium,
and other metals or salt which is usually in quantities less than one in a thousand. The distinguishing
feature of a mixture (as distinct from a compound) is that in a mixture the components retain their
individual characteristics and can be separated fairly easily. Crude oil almost has unlimited
possibilities as a raw material.
2.13.1 Key Drivers of Refining Economics and Profitability
The key drivers of profitability of refineries are:
68
1. Quality of Crude: A company that buys light crude will be more profitable. Light crude is
crude oil with API gravity that yields a high proportion of the lighter, more valuable
products after refining.
2. Conversion Capacity of Refinery Plant: A more complex refinery will produce a higher
total value of products from a given crude oil even though the total quantity will be reduced
through the greater use of fuel for process heating.
3. Other factors that affect refinery yields are
(a) Direct costs and yields
(b) Lead times for receipt of crude oil
(c) Storage considerations
(d) Spot markets considerations etc.
The fractions produced from this atmospheric fractionation towers can be used in their new state,
blended with other substances or further processed to make useful products. The maximum
temperature at which hydrocarbons can be separated in the atmospheric tower is 900oF. Steam keeps
the oil hot and low pressure allows the hydrocarbons to vaporize at temperatures below their
cracking points enabling them to be separated into fractions. The light and heavy gas oils are
separated from the heaviest residue.
The primary process separates the various fractions, which may serve as inputs for the secondary
process. These inputs are otherwise known as charging stocks. The term charging stock refers to
unfinished products that are to be further processed in some secondary refining operation. These
secondary processes either result in new products or bring primary products to required quality
standards. The intermediate products, in order of increasing boiling range, are listed below.
(a) Fuel gas -to refinery fuel gas - below 100F
(b) Light straight run gasoline - to sweetening and then to gasoline blending (Boiling range
100F-200F).
(c) Heavy straight - run gasoline -to hydrogenation, to catalytic reforming and then to gasoline
blending (Boiling range 200F-400F).
(d) Middle distillates to kerosene, jet fuel, furnace oils, diesel fuels (Boiling range 350F600F).
(e) Catalytic cracking charge to fluid catalytic unit charge (Boiling range
450F -750F).
(f) Fuel residue vacuum distillation unit. (Boiling range about 700F)
Secondary or Conversion Processing
The primary process can only separate crude oil into its natural components as they exist and cannot
alter the mix of the components. It is therefore necessary to use some form of conversion (or yield
shift or upgrading) process in order to change the proportions of the various products that can be
obtained from crude oil. Secondary or conversion processing consists of cracking and non-cracking
processes.
Cracking
Cracking is the most common form of conversion. Cracking involves breaking up of large
molecules to form smaller ones. Cracking can either by thermal cracking (which involves heating
the feedstock to very high temperatures, which cause the large molecules of heavy feedstock to
decompose into the smaller molecules of gas oil and motor spirit), or fluid catalytic cracking
(which involves the use of chemicals known as catalysts that break hydrocarbon molecules at a high
reaction temperature into smaller molecules. Oil is mixed with fresh catalyst and run through the
reaction several times in order to enhance the yield and turn all the cycle oil to useful petroleum
products), or hydro-cracking (which involves the use of extra hydrogen to saturate the chemical
bonds of the cracked hydrocarbons, thus resulting in reduction of the molecular size), or visbreaking (which is a refinery upgrading process that lowers (i.e. breaks) the viscosity of residues by
cracking at fairly low temperatures)
Non-cracking Conversion Processes
This is achieved through delayed coking (a more specialized process that normally uses the residue
from low-sulphur crude to produce electrode-grade coke used in the production of aluminum, gas,
motor spirit and gas oils), or fluid coking (a development of the coking process in which the yield of
the more valuable lighter products from the residue feedstock is maximized), or blending
70
(process that involves the selective mixing of basic components to give a wide range of individual
grades of the same product).
5.13.4 Petrochemicals
A petrochemical is a chemical substance produced commercially from feedstock derived from crude
oil or natural gas. Petrochemical plants are usually integral parts of large refining complexes and
often subsidiaries of major oil companies. Their function is to turn outputs of the refining process
either in form of crude oil fractions or their cracked or processed derivatives into feedstock that will
ultimately be used in the manufacture of a host of other products e.g. plastics, resins, synthetic
rubbers, printing ink, paints, acid, fertilizers, detergents, etc. Petrochemical feedstock falls into three
main classes based on the chemical structure and composition of each. The three main classes are:
(a) aliphatic compounds, (b) aromatic compounds, and (c) inorganic compounds.
72
DISCUSSION EXERCISES
Question One
During the first quarter of 2012, BUK Oil Company Nigeria Limited produced 50,000
barrels of crude oil from field New-Site oil field, which is located onshore. 5,000 barrels out
of the total production were re-injected into the well to enhance crude oil recovery from an
adjoining lease. The power generators used for field operations consumed 1,000 barrels
during the quarter and 500 barrels were lost through evaporation. Assuming that posted price
for the crude stream is US$21.00 per barrel and exchange rate of US$1 is equal to N152.00
You are required to compute royalty liability for the quarter, assuming that the
applicable rate of royalty is 20 per cent.
Solution to Question One
BUK Oil Company Nigeria Limited
Computation of Royalty Liability for the First Quarter, 2012
Gross production of crude oil
Less:
Quantity of crude oil re-injected into the formation 5,000 bbls
Production used for field operations
1,000 bbls
Quantity lost through evaporation
500bbls
50,000 bbls
6,500 bbls
43,500 bbls
$21
Net production
Posted price per barrel
73
$ 913,500
N 152
138,852,000
20%
N27,770,400
Question Two
Ramat Oil Company Limited is an integrated oil company whose operations include
exploration, production, refining, petrochemicals and transportation. During the year ended
31 December 2011, the company produced and transported 1,000,000 barrels of crude oil
through its network of pipelines. Out of the quantity produced 400,000 barrels were
transferred to the companys refineries in Nigeria.
The posted price of the crude oil transferred to the refinery was $22.00 per barrel and the
standard and actual API of the crude stream were 40 and 42 respectively. The pipelines
cost was N 95,000,000 and are depreciated on a straight- line basis at the rate of 5 per cent
per annum. N 8,000,000 were spent on repair and maintenance of the pipelines during the
year. Exchange rate of Naira to the Dollar is $1.00 = N 150.00
Required
Calculate the value of crude oil delivered to the refineries during year 2011, assuming that
posted price of crude oil are escalated or de-escalated by $0.03 for every API difference
between standard and actual API degree.
Solution to Question Two
Ramat Oil Company Limited
Computation of Value of Oil Delivered to Refinery
For the Year Ended 31st December , 2011
Quantity of oil transported to refinery
400,000 bbls
Posted price of crude oil per barrel
Standard API gravity
40
Actual API gravity
42
Difference
2
Escalation rate
$0.03
Escalation
Adjusted posted price per barrel (in Dollar)
Adjusted posted price per barrel (in Naira)
$22.00
$0.06
$22.06
N3,309
N
3,309,000,000
1,323,600,000
74
5,100,000
N 1,328,700,000
Question Three
The following information relates to Gwarzo Oil and Gas Nigeria PLC for the year
ended 31 December 2009.
Trial Balance as at 31st December, 2009
Particulars
Dr.
Cr.
N' 000
N' 000
Crude oil Inventory at 1/1/2009
6,700,000
Export Sales
50,000,000
Local Sales
10,000,000
Production Cost
9,000,000
Transportation cost
1,500,000
Intangible oil and gas assets
117,000,000
Salaries and wages
300,000
Proved oil and gas properties
13,500,000
Unproved oil and gas properties
8,300,200
Accumulated DD&A: Oil and Gas Assets
5,200,500
Loan Interest
3,500,000
Bank interest
1,700,000
Geological and geophysical costs
800,000
Carrying costs and overhead
135,000
Surrendered and impaired leases
230,150
Unimpaired leases
1,500,000
Exploratory wells: Successful
15,672,000
Unsuccessful
2,250,000
Development wells
20,567,000
Wells in Progress
11,570,000
Expenditure for purchase of seismic data
683,650
Royalties
1,500,000
Derivative financial instruments
500,800
Loss on exchange
1,450,000
Trade and other receivables
3,500,000
Derivative financial instruments
2,503,200
75
500,000
12,500,000
14,500,000
50,250,100
289,111,300
200,500,000
9,850,000
560,000
289,111,300
The following additional information are also available (all the Naira figures are in
thousand N'000):
(i) Closing stock of oil and gas as at 31st December, 2009 N1,200,000
(ii) Accrued expenses as at 31st December, 2009 amounted to N3,500,700
(iii) Provision for decommissioning amounting to N564, 2000 is to be provided.
(iv) DD& A is to be provided on proved oil and gas properties. Production during the
year was 500,000 of oil and 600,000 mcf of gas. Reserves estimates of oil and gas at the
beginning of the year (i.e. 1st January 2009) were: oil 5,000,000 bbls and gas 1,800,000
mcf, and the relative proportion of oil and gas is not expected to continue throughout the
life of the property.
(v) All capitalized costs and intangible oil and gas assets are to be amortized at the rate
of 10% per annum.
(vi) The Director's proposed a dividend of N2, 000,000 on shares and Petroleum Profit
Tax is to be calculated at the rate of 70%.
(vii) All workings are to be made to the nearest Naira.
You are required to prepare the final accounts of the company in Horizontal form for
use of the Company's management for the year ended 31st December, 2009, using (i)
Full Cost Method, and (ii) Successful Efforts Method.
Solution to Question Three
(i) Full Cost Method
60,000,000
Accrued expenses
Provision for decommissioning
DD&A on proved properties
Salaries and wages
Loan Interest
Bank interest
Purchase of seismic data
Loss on exchange
Amortization: Intangible assets
Other capitalized costs
Net income from operations c/d
PP Tax 70%
Proposed dividend
Balance c/d
60,000,000
WORKINGS
(i) DD&A on proved properties
100,000
500,000
600,000
300,000
5,000,000
5,300,000
600,000
8,299,500=
N 939,566
5,300,000
(ii) Other Capital Costs
Geological and geophysical costs
Carrying costs and overhead
Surrendered and impaired leases
N
800,000
135,000
230,150
77
42,500,000
42,500,000
8,968,669
8,968,669
Unimpaired leases
Exploratory wells: Successful
Unsuccessful
Development wells
Total
1,500,000
15,672,000
2,250,000
20,567,000
41,154,150
Share capital
Reserves
Share premium
Other reserves
P&L a/c balance
Shareholders' fund
Long Term Liability
Long Term Borrowings
Current Liabilities
Accrued expense
Provision for
decommissioning
Derivative financial
instruments
Trade and other payables
Petroleum profit tax
Proposed dividend
N'000
N'000
Accumlatd
Cost
DD&A
NBV
13,500,000 6,140,066
7,359,934
Fixed Assets
200,500,000 Proved properties
Unproved
properties
8,300,200
----8,300,200
Intangible assets 117,000,000 11,700,000 105,300,000
Other capitalized
9,850,000 costs (ii)
41,154,150 4,115,415 37,038,735
560,000 Wells in Progress 11,570,000
----11,570,000
690,601
191,524,350 21,955,481 169,568,869
211,600,601 Investment
Derivative financial instruments
Investments in subsidiaries
27,500,00
2,503,200
14,500,000
Current Assets
3,500,700 Stock
1,200,000
3,500,000
500,000
50,250,100
55,450,100
242,022,169
N'000
78
Unimpaired leases
Successful exploratory wells
Development wells
1,500,000
15,672,000
20,567,000
37,739,000
PP Tax 70%
Proposed dividend
Balance c/d
42,500,000
42,500,000
5,895,034
5,895,034
Share capital
Reserves
Share premium
Other reserves
P&L a/c balance
Shareholders' fund
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses
Provision for
decommissioning
Derivative financial
instruments
5,895,034
N'000
N'000
Accumlatd
DD&A
NBV
6,140,066
7,359,934
----
8,300,200
11,700,000 105,300,000
3,773,900
---11,570,000
21,613,966 166,495,234
210,678,510 Investment
Derivative financial
instruments
Investments in subsidiaries
Current Assets
3,500,700 Stock
Trade and other
5,642,000 receivables
500,800 Cash and cash equivalents
Other
current
12,500,000 assets
4,126,524
2,000,000
238,948,534
80
33,965,100
2,503,200
14,500,000
1,200,000
3,500,000
500,000
50,250,100
55,450,100
238,948,534
81