Global Warming - Marshall Smith

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1
Page 1 of 12
Special offer
Click on the Menu Bar to Select a Section of the Gazette

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
Business Weekly Science Your Comics Puzzles USA Feature
World the USA Politics Industry Magazine Techno Health Crafts Games Humor Articles
BROTHER JONATHAN'S
FRONT PAGE NEWS

BroJon Exclusive Report
Before Uncle Sam There Was Brother Jonathan
GLOBAL WARMING: THE SCIENTIFIC HOAX EXPOSED
Prolog...
Over the last two decades a great debate has occurred over whether Global Warming
exists or not. The Pro-warming group did not have sufficient data to prove their point
other than computer predictions and a "concensus of scientists." The Anti-warming
group knew that the theory was not possible, but they also could not prove it. What they
didn't know was that the rules for calculating atmospheric gases had been arbitrarily
changed by a hoax. What follows exposes the hoax.
In 1976, the U.S. government issued a standard reference manual called "The U.S.
Standard Atmosphere 1976." This large reference contains all the information about the
atmosphere of earth, and has since then been used by all scientists such as
environmentalists, space researchers, and geo-physicists.
The previous edition, before the beginning of the space age, "The U.S. Standard
Atmosphere 1965" was based on decades of data collected by thousands of researchers
using balloons. That extensive balloon data showed that the components of the
atmosphere were not equally distributed. Heavier gases such as, argon, carbon dioxide
and freon, were mostly found down near the ground. While the much lighter
components, such as hydrogen and helium floated up through the atmosphere to the top
and disappeared into space.
In the 1976 edition, all that pre-space age balloon data was completely discarded, even
though the manual said that the older data was incorporated into the 1976 models. But
that claim was false. In 1976 the older data was replaced with the false claim that in the
troposphere all the gases are uniformly distributed. This false claim constitutes
"scientific fraud." Based on this 1976 fraud, later theories in the 1980's were proposed
that heavy gases such as carbon dioxide and freon, could climb very high in the
atmosphere.
That was the basis for the false claim that very heavy CFC's could "float" up to the
stratosphere and destroy the Ozone Layer. Also based on the false 1976 data, it was
claimed that heavy carbon dioxide could float high in the atmosphere and create a
"green house gas layer" which would cause Global Warming.
Both of these false scientific theories are based on the fraudulent data in the 1976
scientific reference manual. The perpetrators of that scientific hoax, so far have made
over 60 billion dollars in fraudulent profits. With the implementation of the Kyoto
Treaty, the perpetrators could earn as much as half a trillion dollars, taken out of your
pocket, based on a hoax.
To find out how such a massive world-wide scientific hoax could have been perpetrated
in such a brazen manner, read the information below. The who, what, where, how, and
why are all explained in detail.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION: THE SWEEP OF HUMAN
HISTORY
Where It All Began and Where American Science Failed
- The Coming Dark Age of Science 2012
http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/global/globalwarming1.html
10.09.2007
Page 2 of 12
SCIENCE IN THE FIRST DARK AGE 2,500 BC

Previously, in the March 9th Digest, I told the tale of the Egyptian
Temple, which from about 3,500 BC, was an advanced scientific instrument
that produced scientific discoveries which we all still use today. There is much
more to come in the form of documentary proof of that story. I also explained
that from the historical period from about 2,500 BC to 500 BC was a
mysterious early first ancient Dark Age with almost no new science discovery,
and in fact, all the ancient science, based on talismans and totems, was swiftly
being turned into miraculous myth stories which we now call pagan religions.
Fortunately writing had been discovered so we have early written proof of this
event.
The use of the mostly Egyptian, ancient science, which produced the
ancient 365.245 day solar calendar for farming was being used by the new
burgeoning form of government, kingdoms and monarchies, to secretly feed
their local empires. The public wasn't told how the calendar worked.
Otherwise, they would revolt and feed themselves.
Without the solar calendar, the early local governments only remained
roaming tribal clans of sheep and camel herders constantly looking for food.
These local or regional governments, under the control of chiefs or elders,
could not supply enough food to form large dynastic kingdoms or empires.
During the time of 2,500 to 500 BC, the local dynastic monarchy system
spread throughout most of Europe and the middle east supported by the new
discovery of solar calendar-based farming, under the control of kings and
monarchs.
THE NEW SCIENCE AND GOVERNMENT 100 BC

From 500 BC to about 100 BC at the height of the local monarchies, a new
birth of science, math and astronomical discoveries were made by such Greek
scientists and mathematicians as Socrates, Aristotle, Ptolemy and Euclid. But
it turns out that they were simply rediscovering the ancient science of
Zoroaster and Imhotep, from thousands of years before.
They were re-discovering the new science simply by separating it from the
ancient religious pagan myths of their own cultures. That original ancient
science had been turned into myth stories by the local monarchy governments
as a means to control the local populace by using science as a means of "mind
control." This first cycle of creating new science, turning into mythological
belief to create a new governmental system followed by a complete Dark Age,
has been repeated several times in the history of mankind. We are now
entering into a new third Dark Age, based on "mind control" to rule the
people, which is based on perverting the science of the previous century.
In the period of 500 BC to 100 BC both the Greeks and the Romans
developed a whole new form of government, called representative democracy
with the government centralized in a Senate or forum elected by the people.
This was a golden age of science and discovery. But by 100 AD the powerful
dynasty of the Caesars had taken hold of the control of the Roman Empire
and the Roman Senate became a mere sham of sycophants. By 300 AD free
thought, science and discovery came to an abrupt halt. The new science now
was to be used to create new "religious" myths which completely hid the
recent scientific discoveries of the Greeks.
THE SECOND DARK AGE 300 AD

From 300 AD to 1300 AD, a new second Dark Age occurred which was
devoid of free thought and scientific discovery, except in those regions not
under control of the Roman or Holy Roman Empire - which was the remnant
of the old Alexandrian Greek Empire, the government of the Greek Ptolemies
in Egypt. But even in those regions, the scientific discoveries of the Ptolemies,
10.09.2007
Page 3 of 12
later called "Arabic" science, collapsed under the mental strictures of the
religion of Islam in 675 AD. During the second Dark Age, all real science had
disappeared and had been replaced by the new religious mythology based on
the old science.
In the second Dark Age from 300 to 1300 AD, the advanced Greek math
and science of Aristotelian logic and the "scientific method" was used by
scholars such as Augustine to prove "scientifically" that "Jesus is Lord." And
of course, mathematically how many angels can dance on pins, etc. To us,
today that all sounds frivolous and silly, but it was the only "science" allowed
by the government in Rome. It is what happens when government gains
control of scientific thought. It is always done by using a consensus of the
members of a council or a consensus of "scientists" who "vote" to decide what
is "true scientific fact." Any free thinking or science outside that belief system
was heretical and punishable by death or torture using the latest scientific
instruments of Dark Age science.
This second Dark Age of the "government science" system began to
collapse when it was clear that the only way to maintain a belief in the correct
tenets of the second Dark Age "scientific religion" was to use the horrible
methods of the Inquisition from 1200 to 1500 AD to terrorize the masses. This
so disgusted many local leaders, and the populace throughout Europe that
they completely turned away from the old "myth science" called Catholicism.
They created new science and free thought such as Protestantism and
Newtonian science. This started a new cycle of new scientific discoveries.
ENDING THE SECOND DARK AGE 1500 AD

It was primarily Copernicus, Martin Luther and Galileo, who were
prominent leaders and believers in Catholisism, who led the march away from
the old "science-religious" mythology into a new model of the world. That new
scientific model was exquisitely described by Isaac Newton, who lived in
England, which had not been under the control of the "Empire of Belief" in
the Vatican since Henry VIII split with Rome in the early 1500's.
From 1500 to 1800 AD the new freedom of thought and science created
the discoveries of the Industrial Age and what we now know as modern
science. As in all previous times, during the very short periods of scientific
freedom, a new form of government is also created. That new scientific
invention of government after 1700 AD was called "a constitutional republic."
It first appeared in the United States, but within less than a generation it had
nearly swept all the way around the world.
That new system of government "looked" something like the old Greek
and Roman Senate, but it was not. It was the old system of "democracy"
completely turned upside down and inside out. It had never been seen before
in all of human history.
THE COMING THIRD DARK AGE 1870

The symbol of that amazing new system of government was called
"Brother Jonathan" which is why you only hear about this story here in the
BroJon Daily Digest. Only here is it easily predictable that the next coming
Third Dark Age in science actually started in 1870. The world is already
turning modern science into a new myth religion, using the words of closedminded political correctness and the false scientific "global religious beliefs"
that led to world government and conquest and the third scientific Dark Age.
In radio interviews and articles which I did nearly 20 years ago, based on
calculations I had done in the 1960's, I predicted that the timing of the coming
scientific Dark Age would be shortly after the year 2000. Does the year 2012
sound familiar? Many people have also found or "sensed" that same date to
mark the end of something, but the end of what? Could it be the ending of the
10.09.2007
Page 4 of 12
current third golden age of science and the beginning of the next
generation Dark Age.
In the mid-1700's that new scientific governmental system discovery only
lasted about 100 years from 1760 to 1860, when it was completely corrupted
and disappeared during the "upheaval in belief" called the American Civil
War.
THE SOURCE OF THE NEW GOVERNMENT 1700 AD

What was that absolutely novel discovery in a new form of government,
derived from the free-thinking science following the second Dark Ages of the
Holy Roman Empire? That amazing discovery which completely swept
around the world and was accepted by everyone? And why was it stomped on
and obliterated by the events of the American Civil War and thus was
completely eliminated from any future governments around the world?
What you are about to read, you have never read before. It is not taught
in schools, nor in any history classes, especially in America. It is not to be
found in any books. But it is an absolute fact of history.
For over a century now, most people are taught that some white-haired
old guys, called the "Founding Fathers" created the Constitution of the United
States out of their own heads. Wrong. They didn't invent it. Most people are
taught that because some old guys made the Constitution over 200 years ago,
it is now obsolete. Wrong. Most people believe that they have "Rights,"
because of the Constitution. Wrong. The Constitution, and the Bill of Rights,
only guarantee that the new American Congress will make NO laws to "Take
Away Any of Your Rights." Read the Bill of Rights again. It says "Congress
shall make no law..." The Constitution says absolutely nothing about giving
anybody any rights. In fact, quite the contrary, it now clearly takes away ALL
of your rights as a citizen.
"BROTHER JONATHAN" DESTROYED 1868 AD

Just after the American Civil War, the U.S. Congress did pass an
"unconstitutional" law in the form of the 14th Amendment, which in fact, did
take away all of your rights. The 14th Amendment states "All persons born in
the US and under the jurisdiction thereof ... will have certain privileges and
immunities." Nowhere in the wording of that very lengthy amendment does it
use the word "rights." At that point in time, the rights of ALL American
citizens had just been taken away by that amendment. That is the exact date
when Brother Jonathan died.
That is not taught in American history classes. In fact, most students now
are lied to about the meaning of the words in that amendment, if it is even
discussed at all. Even students and all American citizens in 1867 were also lied
to. I have carefully read many dozens of books written in the 1860's all
centered around the debate of passing the 14th Amendment, each with
arguments pro and con. It was pointed out in all those old books that the
American public was being "tricked" by giving up all their rights of
citizenship, for the "greater good" of giving equal "privileges and
immunities" to the poor enslaved blacks in the South. That's a nice "trick" if
you can pull it off.
The public in 1868, who like you, probably never read the complete
wording of the very long amendment, was told that the amendment was about
giving "equal rights" of citizenship to the black slaves. But the word "rights"
and especially not "equal rights" does not appear anywhere in that
amendment. The Amendment was passed by the States, and the amazing
scientific discovery on which the American Constitution had been created,
suddenly ceased to exist. What was that amazing scientific discovery which
had swept around the world, like a flame of freedom, in the preceding
10.09.2007
Page 5 of 12
century?
FINDING THE SOURCE OF "BROTHER JONATHAN"

It was a scientific discovery based on the model of Newton's Law of
Gravity. Newton discovered that what made the moon go around the earth
and the earth around the sun, was not some ancient myth of Zeus or Jupiter
which propelled the planets in their orbits. No, it was a simple set of laws,
called the law of gravity. Thus the new form of government would be
something like a set of scientific laws which are independent of gods or men or
even senates or forums elected by the people. But even more important, was
the discovery made by a philosopher/scientist who was a contemporary of
Isaac Newton. He was the far-forward-thinking Dutchman named Baruch
Spinoza. And Spinoza's discovery was based on the concept of a new
government using Newton's law-of-gravity model.
SPINOZA SPARKS A WORLD REVOLUTION 1776 AD

By the mid-1700's Spinoza's book about his new discovery was the
popular rage all through Britain, the American Colonies, France and
Germany and all around the world. Millions of people marveled at the
discovery and most wished, "Wouldn't it be wonderful if we had a government
like that!" But the concept was so completely revolutionary, that it would take
a revolution to create it. It was the basis for the American Revolutionary War,
the founding of America. and a decade later for the French Revolution.
Spinoza's book was openly read and discussed by those white-haired old
men called America's Founding Fathers. It was the basis for many of their
writings, which we can read today. They all agreed that if the American
colonies ever did become separate from King George and the monarchy of
Britain, the new American government would be based on Spinoza's
astounding discovery. You surely did not read that anywhere before, nor was
it taught in any of your classes in American History. Since 1870, you were not
supposed to know that.
If you don't know or have not heard the name Baruch Spinoza, or know
about what he had discovered, nor heard about Spinoza in your American
History class, then you have not yet gotten to the kindergarten level of
understanding the American Constitution nor the original intent of the
Founding Fathers. You would have no understanding why at the end of the
American Civil War, wealthy northern industrialists, who made millions of
dollars during the War and had "bought" control of the Federal government,
wanted to make sure that Spinoza's amazing discovery would be completely
wiped from the face of the earth, forever.
SCIENCE OF SPINOZA CREATES A NEW GOVERNMENT

1786 AD
That revolutionary discovery by Spinoza, on the lips of every Founding
Father at the first Constitutional Convention was simply, "It is the purpose of
government to serve the people, and not the other way around." No
government in the whole 10,000 year sweep of human history had ever been
based on such a "revolutionary" concept. It was exactly the very basis of the
U.S. Constitution, as shown by the very beginning statement, "We the
people..." It was not a document created nor granted by any potentate, king
nor deity.
But that revolutionary new government was completely taken away with
the 14th Amendment at the end of the American Civil War. The concept of
"We the People" with certain unalienable rights, simply disappeared. The
concept of government serving the people just disappeared. Now, like all
earlier governments in human history, the "people" will instead serve the
government and in return the "people" will be granted "certain privileges and
10.09.2007
Page 6 of 12
immunities."
You have the privilege of obtaining licenses to drive a car, marry or go
into business, or a zillion other activities which all require a license from the
government. You have no "right" to do any of those things without license
from the government. You have the duty and "privilege" of paying taxes and
the "immunity" of not going to jail if you do pay your taxes. You have the
"privilege" of giving all of your wealth and property to the government when
you die, and not giving them as an inheritance to your children. If you actually
thought you had Constitutional Rights....
To read a documentation of the slide of modern science into the abyss of
the Third Dark Age from 1870 to the present, driven by wealthy industrialists
who now control modern scientific beliefs, See: "Black Gold Hot Gold" on the
BroJon Gazette front page.
THE FLOW AND CYCLES OF HISTORY

In the March 15th BroJon Digest I explained how there have been three
cycles of history. Each cycle has four parts: (1) A golden age of new science
discoveries, (2) the formation of a new governmental system based on the new
scientific discoveries, (3) a process of "mind control" where the new
discoveries and methods are turned into "religious" beliefs, and then (4) a
very long Dark Age were the new government uses the new "religious" beliefs
to control the minds and behavior of the world population. Most of all human
history has been lengthy 1,000 year long dark ages with only about 200 years
of free thought and new science occurring in between the dark periods of
"mind control," oppression and despotism.
The latest cycle of the new freedom of thought and new scientific
discoveries began in the mid-1700's. This was called the Age of Enlightenment,
the rise of the Industrial Age and the beginning of modern science. It reached
a peak, similar to the past two periods, about 200 years after it began. In this
case at the end of World War II. Since about 1950, the United States, and most
of the world has been sliding into a new abyss of the third 1,000 year Dark Age
of the "new science." It is a new "scientific priesthood" which uses the new
tools of science such as computers, satellites and secret laboratories to make
you believe that only they can "save" the planet. They have become the new
"saviors." But don't you believe it. They are only using scientific "trickery" as
a new "religious belief system" to fool you.
WARNING OF THE COMING DARK AGE 1961 AD

In January 1961, in his Farewell Address, the outgoing President
Eisenhower warned of two great dangers to America and to the world. You've
heard of one, and heard it repeatedly, called the "Military Industrial
Complex." What you probably never heard about was the other great danger,
the "Educational Research Complex." If you do a web search on the BroJon
Gazette and look for Eisenhower, you can find his Farewell Address and then
read it for yourself, to find out that somebody has mislead you for the last 45
years about what he actually said and warned about.
It was the Educational Research Complex which would become the new
"priesthood" that would use "computers" and "laboratories," as cited by
President Eisenhower, as tools to control the "minds" of the populace to
create a new world order and a new one world government system based on
the "new science." Eisenhower could not have known nor predicted how
quickly that new secret "priesthood" would grow and become so powerful.
DOCTRINE OF THE NEW PRIESTHOOD 1990 AD

One of the "beliefs or tenets" of the new priesthood, is that there is a
"greenhouse gas layer" which is the cause of global warming. This "belief" is
being used to terrorize the world into cutting back on carbon dioxide, the
10.09.2007
Page 7 of 12
main "greenhouse" gas, and that the world should follow the orders of the
worldwide Kyoto Treaty. And the "priesthood" also wants you to allow the
price of oil to rise exorbitantly in order to force people to cut back on using
cars which produce carbon dioxide. The primary beneficiary or "profiteer" of
this new false "belief" is Big Oil which is the main promoter and producer of
this false "religious belief." They have enough money to buy their way into the
corridors of Congress, into NASA and into the top secret national laboratories
run by universities. They have produced the "new religion."
What I am going to show you right now are three very simple experiments
that you can do yourself at home, or if you are a teacher you can demonstrate
them to college students and even young children at school. They are
extremely simple. They will absolutely "prove" that a carbon dioxide
"greenhouse layer" does not exist and cannot and could never exist. I have
already taught these simple experiments to my own students, and even to
excited groups of young campers, Boy Scouts and Cub Scouts. Even very
young children can do them and understand them.
FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH THE PRIESTHOOD 1989 AD

I must add, please don't write to me and explain the latest data to be
found in global warming articles and textbooks. Do not waste your time nor
mine. Twenty years ago, I talked to the manager of the environmental project
at NASA Ames. I had worked at NASA Ames, as a top scientist/engineer on
the Space Shuttle program over a period of two decades, so I know the people.
The project manager, though she had a doctorate degree, it was in
"environmental science" or something, so she knew almost nothing about
basic physics and chemistry. Almost half of my phone call with her, was my
explaining over the phone, how and why the earth is tilted and how it effects
the weather. So she sent me off to talk to her boss at NASA headquarters.
I spent an hour talking to the big environmental boss at NASA
headquarters. He did not like the fact that I had proved that the huge NASA
program was basically a fraud. I never actually said that to him, but the data
and evidence I presented sure proved it. He said, "Mr. Smith, you just don't
have all the latest satellite data. I will put you on our mail list and send you all
the latest data." Well, I now have over one complete shelf in my library
consisting of the NASA data from the last 20 years, and updated with monthly
bulletins with the latest satellite data. Thank you.
So, those who now want to write to me and feel that I should look at some
new article or textbook with all the latest "greenhouse" findings, please don't.
I already get the latest data directly from NASA even before it gets into the
hands of the authors of those articles and textbooks. I have already read the
data. You should also know that I have multiple university degrees in different
areas of science, and am probably more educated and experienced than most
of the professors and authors who write those "greenhouse" articles and
textbooks. When somebody sends me emails telling me to read something, I
usually toss it. It is the same as somebody preaching to me and sending me
"proof" of the bible by sending me quotes like "Read John 3:16. It proves the
bible is true." No thanks. I consider NASA data or university textbooks about
"greenhouse" theories to be merely the new biblical scriptures from the
"greenhouse priesthood." Don't send me any "greenhouse" religious tracts. I
just ignore them. So let's cut to the chase.
EXPERIMENT ONE -- FUN WITH KITCHEN SCIENCE

Run to your kitchen and pull out a tray of ice cubes from the fridge. Hold
the tray over the kitchen sink vertically and place your other hand about one
inch away so your palm is facing the ice cubes. You can feel the cold ice cubes
even though you are not touching them. Why? Are the ice cubes radiating
cold? No. Nothing radiates cold. Only heat can radiate from a warm spot to a
10.09.2007
Page 8 of 12
colder spot. What is happening is that the warmth in your hand is

radiating toward the much colder ice cubes. As the heat in your hand radiates
much faster toward the cold ice cubes it lowers the temperature of your hand
and you feel it as cold.
This is a simple experiment in heat radiation, which uses the most basic
simple scientific instrument called - your hand. If you are a teacher, let the
kids experiment with tilting the ice tray at different angles to eliminate the
cold air coming from the cubes, wrapping it in plastic wrap, finding ways to
measure the distance of hand to ice, etc. There are many variations which
make very nice school science projects, with write ups on taking data,
explaining radiation and even methods of taking measurements. But as you
will see, it is one of the most powerful and important experiments you can do,
since you are learning about using "you" as the scientific instrument.
EXPERIMENT TWO -- YOUR CONNECTION WITH THE

UNIVERSE
On a warm summer evening, with no wind or clouds, and only a clear
starry night sky, use your "now calibrated" scientific thermometer
instrument, your hand, and aim the palm of your hand toward the ground.
You don't feel any heat or cold. Now lift the palm of your hand so it faces the
sky. Wow, it feels cold. That's because it is very cold way out there in outer
space. You are using your own hand to take the temperature of the cosmos.
That is your very own cosmic connection to the universe. Do this several times
aiming your hand at the ground and then at outer space. Prove for yourself
that it is cold out there, just as if you were inches away from an ice cube. You
can "touch and feel" the cold of distant outer space just with the palm of your
hand. I betcha didn't know that.
For the second part of this experiment, you need to wait for another
evening when there is a high cloudy overcast so you can't see the stars. But not
a stormy or windy night, just overcast. Then when you repeat the same
experiment, as you aim the palm of your hand to the sky, you can't feel any
cold. Why? What is happening is that the cloud is blocking all the heat coming
from both the earth and your hand and the cloud is reflecting it back to you
and the earth. It is also a true fact that it is always much colder on clear starry
nights than on overcast nights. The cloud cover causes local warming like a
blanket, so you feel warmer. Unless the globe of the world becomes completely
surrounded by a thick cloud layer there is no global warming - only local
warming where the clouds are.
PROVING YOUR CONNECTION TO OUTER SPACE

When you did the first experiment with the ice cubes your hand had a
temperature of 98 degrees F but the ice cubes were at freezing or 32 degrees F.
That is enough difference to feel the cold from a distance of about an inch. But
on a cloudy night, both the earth and the bottom of the clouds are at a
temperature of about 60 degrees. That is not enough difference to feel the cold.
So pointing your hand toward the ground and at the clouds show they are
about the same temperature. But on a clear starry night, the temperature of
outer space is actually around minus 459 degrees while your hand is plus 98
degrees. That is a difference in temperature of about 560 degrees. That's why
space feels so cold.
With the ice cubes, the temperature difference is about 70 degrees, but
with outer space the temperature difference is about 560 degrees. In the
science of thermodynamics it is shown that the amount of radiation is equal to
the temperature difference raised to the fourth power. That means
multiplying the number by itself four times. That humongous difference
between your temperature and outer space is why the dark sky feels so cold
even though it is so many light-years away.
10.09.2007
Page 9 of 12
EXPERIMENT THREE -- DISPROVING THE GREENHOUSE

LAYER
The third part of this experiment is only a thought experiment, since it
always fails - you can never make it work. If there ever were a layer of
"greenhouse" gases which is reflecting heat from the earth and raising the
temperature of the earth, then it should still be there as a gaseous layer at
night. Why would it go away just when the sun goes down? It couldn't and it
wouldn't. But if that "greenhouse" layer did exist, then when you do the
experiment with your hand on a clear starry night, then you could not feel the
cold of outer space since the "greenhouse" gases would reflect heat back to
your hand, just like a cloud, and you couldn't feel the cold of space. It would
be just like a cloudy night, but you would still see the stars. I have done this
experiment with my hand and shown it to students for over 40 years. It always
worked and still does even today. Thus proving that there is NO "greenhouse"
gas layer which reflects heat back to earth and to your hand - and never has
been and never will be.
HOW THE PRIESTHOOD FOOLED YOU

How did the NASA "greenhouse priesthood" fool you with their data and
their false belief that there is a new "religion" called greenhouse global
warming. It is simple. They used the tools described by President Eisenhower
in his Farewell Address. They used satellites to look down at the earth and
then used computers to make fictitious models which can produce any
"tricky" result they wish. But their's is one complicated messy method. They
use a thermometer in space on the satellite looking down at the earth, to
measure hundreds of thousands of data points on the earth. Then they find the
"average" temperature of earth. But that is always changing, night and day
and even with the weather and the seasons.
Then the NASA "priests" find the average energy coming from the sun
which warms the earth. But the energy from the sun is also always changing
with the seasons, with the 11-year sunspot cycle, and daily with the numbers of
sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections, all of which constantly
change the amount of energy coming from the sun. Then the "greenhouse
priests" subtract one average number from the other average number and
then claim "see our model shows the temperature of the earth is several
degrees warmer than it should be, as predicted by the computer model, so
there must be a greenhouse layer reflecting heat back to earth." Don't you
believe it. This is simply "greenhouse" computer 'religious" scripture.
WHERE THE NEW "RELIGION" FAILED

The fault or mistake with the "priesthood" method is to look DOWN from
space and measure the temperature of earth at jillions of data points over
many years and then find a fictitious "average." Instead, they could simply
take the same temperature sensor as on the satellite, and then from the ground
take one "single" data point measurement looking UP into space. That is
exactly what you did your temperature sensor - your hand, to prove that the
"greenhouse" layer does not exist. Instead of using a satellite to look
downward with millions of measurements, simply reverse the experiment and
take one single measurement looking upward. How much more simple can you
get? It requires no computer models, nor calculations. A single measurement
on a clear starry night either proves or disproves the existence of a
"greenhouse gas layer."
To get real scientific here, in the 1950's experimenters measured the
actual exact temperature of outer space. They found that it is not actually
absolute zero, but has a remnant background radiation temperature of about
3 degrees Kelvin. That's just 3 degrees above absolute zero and still real cold.
10.09.2007
Page 10 of 12
But that sensitive instrument only works on clear starry nights. On cloudy
nights, the sky temperature is about 300 degrees Kelvin which would be the
temperature of your hand or the temperature of the bottom of a cloud in the
sky.
But no astronomer who measures the universal background radiation
temperature has ever said, "We can't measure the temperature of space
anymore because there is a huge reflective greenhouse layer which measures
300 degrees Kelvin. So we can't see the 3 degrees Kelvin background
anymore." No astronomer has ever said that, thus proving absolutely, there is
NO "greenhouse" gas layer. Absolutely none. Any, even slight greenhouse
effect would raise the apparent background temperature of the night sky by
hundreds of degrees. Alright, so lets cut to the chase again.
EXPERIMENT THREE -- WHAT GOES UP?

This is a very simple and fun experiment which even kids can do and
shows much about scientific principles. You take two balloons and blow them
up to the same size, about one foot or so, depending on the size of the balloon.
The size is not important, just simply that they are the same size when blown
up with air. One of the principles of chemistry and thermodynamics is that if I
have two balloons of the exact same size, they will have exactly the same
number of molecules of gas in each one.
Advanced students can find out what that number of molecules is called
and even how to calculate that number. But let's just call it one jillion
molecules. Since the air is made up mostly of di-atomic molecules of Nitrogen
and Oxygen, there are two atoms inside each molecule of air. So each balloon
has exactly TWO jillion atoms inside. If they both have the same number of
molecules and atoms then they should weigh exactly the same. If you hold up
both balloons and then let go, they will slowly drift down to the floor. You've
probably seen this a lot at birthday parties and such. You know what it looks
like.
WHAT DOES NOT GO UP

Now take one of the balloons and instead of air, blow it up to the same size
with Carbon Dioxide gas. But the CO2 molecule is made of two atoms of
Oxygen, just like the air, and then also has an extra Carbon atom inside each
molecule. That's why it is called Carbon DiOxide - or one carbon atom and
two oxygen atoms in each molecule of gas. So if I have the same size balloon
filled with CO2, now instead of just two jillion atoms, this balloon contains
THREE jillion atoms. That means the weight of the CO2 balloon is half again
heavier than the balloon full of air. In science, that is called the specific gravity
and for CO2, it is 1.5 times that of air, meaning it weighs half again more than
1.0 which is the specific gravity of air. This is like weighing two tennis balls,
and then three tennis balls, and saying that three tennis balls weighs much
more than just two tennis balls. Thus the CO2 balloon is much heavier than
air. If you hold up the CO2 balloon and let go, it drops like a rock. Why?
Because it is much heavier than air.
What this proves is that CO2 molecule which comes out of cars burning
hydrocarbon fuels, does not make a gas which rises miles high up in the
atmosphere and creates a thick layer of Carbon Dioxide which reflects heat
and becomes a "greenhouse" layer gas. No No. If you have ever watched smog
coming from cars, it hangs close to the ground, and then disappears over
night. At most it will rise up several hundred feet into the air during the
daytime and no higher. Why does it disappear? Because all the components of
smog, such as: CO2, Ozone and smoky unburned hydrocarbons are all much
heavier than air, and over night when it is cool and calm they all sink to the
ground. They do not magically rise up high, all by themselves, into the sky to
become a high altitude "greenhouse" layer.
10.09.2007
Page 11 of 12
Hot air balloons can rise up in the air, but heavier-than-air craft, such as
airplanes do not rise up all by themselves to become a thick layer of heavy
airplanes floating in the sky. It will never happen, could never happen and has
never happened. It cannot happen with CO2 which is also much heavier than
air. And as I just showed you, with these three simple experiments, which you
can do yourself -- you can prove it for yourself.
THE PRIESTHOOD GOES "HIGH-TECH"

When the "greenhouse priests" quote you chapter and verse from their
computer model "greenhouse" scriptures, just ignore it. It is no more valuable
than preachers who quote to you biblical verses, such as John 3:16, to "prove"
the biblical model of the universe. It only works, if you "believe it." But it
provides no scientific evidence other than itself. It is not useful nor provable.
Of great shame, is the action of Science magazine several years ago, when
they decided not to accept any more articles attempting to present arguments
to disprove the greenhouse global warming theory. Science magazine once was
the most respected world journal of modern technology, but no more. For
years, there had been an ongoing debate about "greenhouse" gases. But
Science magazine simply decided that there IS "greenhouse global warming" and that's that, end of debate. It was a doctrinaire statement of belief, and not
a scientific finding.
THE HERESY OF THE GREENHOUSE

Well, I am fed up with such false "religious science" based on belief and
not real science, which has been produced by the "new priesthood of science"
in the last 50 years. That is why I wrote the three experiments as I just did. I
did it to prove with real scientific accuracy and proof, that the "global
warming greenhouse priesthood" along with the "new priests" at Science
magazine are Wrong. And provably wrong. They should be ashamed. Science
magazine has taken a debate between "belief systems" and made an arbitrary
decision. It is the same as Science magazine entering the debate about who is
God - is it Jesus or Allah? And Science magazine arbitrarily and without any
proof or evidence declared "Jesus is Lord" and Allah can go to hell. All very
"scientific." I am fed up with such cheap fiction.
If you don't "believe" what I just proved about there being no greenhouse
layer made of CO2, then I invite you to do the three simple experiments above,
and then decide for yourself whether a greenhouse layer does or even could
exist. You don't need to rely on the "greenhouse priests" with their
complicated computer model scriptures to explain simple facts to you. You
can do it yourself...
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

For proof and background reading, look for the article in the BroJon
Gazette which quotes and explains President Eisenhower's dire warning about
the dangers of the "new science." Everybody has heard of the "Military
Industrial Complex" but only the BroJon Gazette has the regular front page
articles near the bottom, documenting the actions of the "Educational
Research Complex" and the new Priesthood of Science.
Regular readers of the BroJon Digest are aware that I work on many
projects at the same time. I have not before now, written about the problems
with the "greenhouse gas" theory, though I have known it was incorrect for
over a decade, since I have many projects which I have felt were more
important. But it has now come time to bring the complete silliness called
"greenhouse global warming" to an end.
All the journals and university textbooks about the "greenhouse" effect
should be rounded up and sent back to the publisher to be remaindered as
useless pulp fiction. Maybe they can be recycled into something useful, like
10.09.2007
Page 12 of 12
Gideon Bibles or something. But "religious tracts" about greenhouse

global warming? No thanks. Never again.
A MESSAGE TO MY FRIENDS
The foolishness and the useless greenhouse layer global warming debate
has come to an end. My friends at NASA will probably respond by sending me
twice as many "religious tracts" about the Earth Observing System and
several other satellite programs, but forgive them, for they know not what
they do. I have already gotten the extra large size garbage can, so I am sure I
can handle all of NASA's future "gifts." I give NASA an "E" for their decades
long Effort to try to convince me that they are right. But I also give them an
"F" for Failing to do so. I am not so easily fooled.
There are many thousands of scientists around the world who already
know that I am correct. They already knew that there was something not quite
right with the "global warming greenhouse gas theory." I've now just given
them the simple scientific tools to disprove it beyond all doubt.
Marshall Smith
Editor, Brother Jonathan Gazette
newseditor@brojon.com
CLICK HERE TO SEE THE OTHER CHAPTERS

-- BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
If you wish, you can add additional addresses, comments
and messages after the email window opens.
Enter the email address
Keep Up With the Latest BroJon Articles

CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE FREE
BROJON DAILY DIGEST
Send this Article
Subscribe
To respond to this story click here to email BROJON GAZETTE. If you want to say something nice, we might read it. If you
only want to bitch then we will toss it without reading. BJNews is not responsible for the world situation nor your response to it.

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
Barnes & Noble University
BROTHER JONATHAN'S - FRONT PAGE NEWS

+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
Direct corrections and technical inquires to webmaster at brojon.com.

Please direct news submissions to newseditor at brojon.com.
All pages are Copyright 2006 the Teddy Speaks Foundation Inc., A Non-Profit Educational Corporation, Delaware USA
"BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE" and "BROTHER JONATHAN WEEKLY MAGAZINE" are Trademarks of
the Teddy Speaks Foundation, Inc. and the Kinderken Press.
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
10.09.2007
Page 1 of 6
392x72_1

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
BROTHER JONATHAN'S
FRONT PAGE NEWS

Chapter 2
SCIENCE AND THE PONTIFF
"The Belief in the Priesthood of the New Science"
- What you weren't Told about Truth
"DON'T TELL ME THE TRUTH -- TELL ME THE FACTS"

First a short note for Digest readers. The last edition of the Digest with the
three simple experiments which the readers can do to "prove" the "truth"
about the claims of the "greenhouse priesthood" seems to have hit home. It's
time for the BroJon readers to spread the "truth" through emails and chat
rooms, so that the "truth" can spread around the world. Let me know what
kind of response you get from the people to whom you tell about the three
experiments.
A reader named Andrew just sent me a very important email:
"I read with interest your explanation about the different topics that they
are based on theories and faulty scientific data. "Don't tell me the truth, show
me the facts and I find my truth" or something like that. Very good." "There
is one thing that you didn't consider. (Maybe you did). The movement of the
sun and the earth is ALSO a theory, (according to Copernicus himself and it is
STILL an assumption) yet you DO present it as a fact! Please correct me if I
am wrong!"
CENTRAL BELIEFS OF MODERN SCIENCE

-- Andrew, that is a most important question and gets right to the very
heart of the matter about where modern "Science" has gone wrong and
stepped over the bounds, and how the "new priesthood of science" has now
gone into the business of belief systems and "Religion."
Everyone today assumes that the earth goes around the sun. But is that a
truth or a fact? It was the very center of the greatest debate between religion
and science, that has raged for over 400 years. And it turns out the Religion
method was Correct. And no I don't mean biblical religion. But the "religion"
of the new mind-control "scientific priesthood." Let me explain.
In the early 1500's the Catholic priest Copernicus, who was also an
educated mathematician and astronomer, had found a simple way to calculate
the motions of the five observable planets by assuming that they all orbited
around the sun. This also "implied" that the earth also went around the sun,
but that was not the point of the Copernican system. Simply put, it was a math
tool. It was a simple math "fact" which was very useful for doing calculation.
Copernicus wisely said nothing about his discovery, and it was not published
until after his death.
10.09.2007
Page 2 of 6
GALILEO AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

Galileo Galilee, was also a devout Catholic and friend and confidant of the
Pope in the Vatican. Galileo glommed onto the newly published book by
Copernicus, and added his own observations, through the first astronomical
telescope, that some little lights, or moons appeared to be orbiting around
Jupiter. Galileo then made the outrageous claim that the earth orbits around
the sun, and not the other way around. At first the Church had no problem
with Galileo's new book and his claims. But when Galileo actually started
teaching his new theory to his university students, all hell broke loose.
The Pope roared, "Whoa Galileo, you've gone to far. OK. Everybody out
of the pool. Galileo you have broken the law." (That's a rough translation of
the Vatican text.) Then Galileo was arrested, tried and convicted for teaching
false "truths." But what was Galileo's crime? Did the Church deny that it
appeared that the earth goes around the sun? NO. That was not a problem. No
churchman ever complained when Copernicus claimed a simple way to
calculate the motion of the planets by using a mathematical model of the
planets going around the sun.
THE CRIME OF GALILEO

No, Galileo's crime was his claim that, if the earth goes around the sun,
then he was also making the claim that the earth "MOVES." Making that
claim as a "Truth" was something which the Catholic Church could not
tolerate. The reason was that maybe the earth did move, but it cannot be felt,
touched, smelled, tasted or sensed in any way. Since it could not be "sensed"
or physically proven it must be false. That was Galileo's crime.
To understand this crime, we need to look at how the ancient Greek
"science" during the previous golden age from about 200BC had been turned
into a new "priesthood religion" which lead to the second dark ages of mindcontrol which lasted from about 300AD to about 1600AD. During this dark
age, the new "science-priests" had divided all of human knowledge into two
parts. All of the old Greek and Roman science which was based on physical
observations and could be confirmed by scientific experiment was called
"scientific" and was allowed by the Church. And that included mathematical
models such as the Copernican system of planets going around the sun.
But any knowledge or facts which could not be "sensed" or tested by
physical experiment was determined to be "spiritual." And only the Church
could make declarations about "spiritual truths." The Church priesthood of
the second Dark Age claimed that right only for themselves.
ENTER THE PONTIFF

The Church for 2,000 years has developed this system into a "spiritual
science" by a technique called "The Pontiff." You never knew that, and only
assumed that "Pontiff" was merely another name or title for the Pope. Not so.
It is the basis for the Church's "scientific-system" of mind-control for deriving
spiritual "truths." The Pontiff is usually the Pope, but not necessarily so. They
are two separate functions or stations, which traditionally have been assigned
to the same person.
In the Catholic system of "spiritual truths" a "pontiff" is chosen by a
committee to be the one who determines "truth." The term "pontiff" comes
from the Latin word for "bridge." The Pontiff was elected to be the one
human person who crosses the bridge from the physical world and travels into
the spiritual world, then brings back the "spiritual truth" from somewhere on
high. Only the Pope is empowered by the "pontiff" system to be able reach
across the bridge into the spiritual world and then tell the truth as he saw it to
this physical world by encyclicals and homilies. This system of non-physical
"spiritual truth" has been successfully run by the Catholic Church for 2,000
10.09.2007
Page 3 of 6
years, but it sure ran into a problem with Galileo, about 400 years ago.
GALILEO AS THE NEW PONTIFF

Galileo had made the claim that the earth "moves." But that fact could
not be sensed nor felt. So that fact must be, by church definition, a "spiritual
fact." And then, only a factoid and not any truth. And yet Galileo was not only
claiming it as a fact, he was teaching it in the university as a "spiritual Truth"
which could not be physically sensed. But only the Pontiff can make
statements about "spiritual Truth." Galileo had jumped completely over the
College of Cardinals and had elected himself as a "new Pontiff" who could
make statements about "spiritual truths" that cannot be sensed or felt.
To the Catholic church, this was the same as Galileo, as a "new self-styled
Pontiff," proclaiming that, "God so loved the world that he gave his only
begotten daughter, Luci..." This was so against the Church teachings, that the
Church could not tolerate such inane behavior, especially from someone
claiming only to be a scientist. What do scientists know about the spiritual
world? No College of Cardinals had elected Galileo as a "new Pontiff" to
make such non-physical claims which could not be sensed in the physical
world.
THE NEW SCIENTIFIC PONTIFF

I should note that this is the same "pontiff" system used today by the new
"greenhouse priesthood" who uses a "College of Cardinals" called a
"consensus of scientists" to make claims about global warming and climate
change, even though no "physical" or real scientific data "proves" their claim
of Truth. In fact, in the last Digest, I provided three simple scientific
"experiments" which anyone can "experience" to determine their own facts
and then decide for themselves about what is Truth. The "greenhouse
priesthood" is guilty of the same fallacy of logic and overstepping the bounds
of reality, in the same way Galileo had done in making such outrageous claims
about the Truth of the earth moving. There is no way of proving such a claim.
The problem for Galileo was that in the 1500's, there were no observations
or scientific experiments which would show or even give an inkling that the
earth moved. And it certainly couldn't be felt or experienced. Two hundred
years later two scientific experiments were done to prove that the earth, in
fact, did move.
EXPERIMENT ONE -- AS THE WORLD TURNS

Run to your bathroom and flush the toilet. Notice that the water always
swirls in one direction as it goes down the drain. It goes one way in the
northern hemisphere and the other way in the southern hemisphere. This
"scientific" or physical observation is created by something called the Coriolis
Force and is caused by the rotation of the earth. The proof is that the force is
strongest nearer the poles of the earth, and is zero on the equator where the
water does not swirl. Thus in the 1700's, Galileo could have done a proof that
the earth moves, but it was 200 years too late for Galileo. Actually the much
earlier "golden age" Greek scientists in 200BC, such as Aristotle and Ptolemy
were on the very verge of making such breakthrough scientific observations
about the earth moving, except for one thing - they didn't have any toilets.
EXPERIMENT TWO -- FOUCAULT'S PENDULUM

Go to your local museum or planetarium, and find that huge metal ball
which hangs from the ceiling and seems to rotate around slowly like the hour
hand on a big clock as it swings back and forth, and it knocks down little
wooden pegs every 15 or 20 minutes or so. This is the Foucault Pendulum
which was discovered in the late 1700's and provided clear proof that the
earth rotates around itself about once a day, even though you cannot feel,
10.09.2007
Page 4 of 6
touch, smell, or "sense" the rotation. Just like the Coriolis Force, the
Foucault Pendulum works best near the poles of the earth and does not rotate
around at all near or on the equator. It's a very delightful and simple proof of
the fact that the earth rotates and "moves," but again 200 years too late for
Galileo.
But wait, that is only one part of Galileo's problem. Those two scientific
experiments prove that the earth rotates around itself once a day. But can you
actually prove that the earth also revolves in a yearly orbit around the sun at
about 25,000 miles per hour - even though you can't sense, touch or feel it?
Until about 1850 nobody had ever devised any such experiment to show that
fact, so Galileo was really out of luck.
EXPERIMENT THREE -- PROVING GALILEO WAS

WRONG?
About 1850, American and British physicists Michelson and Morley,
devised an exquisite experiment to prove that Galileo was correct and that the
earth actually did "move" despite the fact that you can't feel it. They took two
beams of light and then sent one beam forward of the earth in its orbit around
the sun, and the other beam was sent backwards. The difference in the speed
of the two beams of light would finally prove that the earth was "moving"
around the sun.
But hold on. The results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, no matter
how many times it was repeated by hundreds of other scientists, always
showed the beams of light were the same speed in both directions. Thus
proving with scientific finality the "truth" that the earth does NOT move.
What?? How could that be?
They had proved with the best science instruments of the time, that
Galileo was WRONG and that the Catholic Church was correct in convicting
Galileo for teaching false "truths." I am sure that you were never taught that
in your school, and it was never explained to you why there was such a tumult
and turmoil in physics and science from 1850, until 1905.
EINSTEIN ENTERS THE PONTIFF SCRUM

It was into this decades long, scientific scrum, that the young German
physicist, Albert Einstein, made the outrageous claim that god plays
mysterious tricks on our scientific instruments, and even though the earth
"moves," god always makes the masses, lengths and speeds change, to make it
appear that the earth does not move. But if the motion of the earth cannot be
sensed, and even our best scientific instruments and experiments cannot show
the motion, then Einstein's claim must be a "spiritual truth." That is the same
"scientific" crime for which Galileo was convicted 300 years earlier.
Since, Einstein had entered into the arena of "truth" using "spiritual
mathematics" to make the answer always come out to fit his "belief" that the
earth "moved," -- I have always assumed for the last 50 years that Einstein
himself was Wrong. That's why I wrote "Where Dr. Einstein Went Wrong,"
which can be found on the BroJon front page. Do I believe that the earth does
not move? No, of course not. But I found another much simpler method to
explain the zero result of the M-M experiment, other than Einstein's strange
"magical spiritual" mathematics, which are not even mathematically nor
arithmatically correct.
THE RULES OF THE TRUTH GAME

If you want to play the "truth" game on the level of Galileo, Newton,
Einstein, the Church, or the next generation of scientists beyond Einstein, then
you had better be very clear about the big difference between spiritual and
physical, "truths" and "facts." Otherwise, you fall into the same trap as
Galileo and Einstein and end up using the "Pontiff" mind-control system of
10.09.2007
Page 5 of 6
truth, which is authenticated only by a vote from the consensus

committee, and not by any scientific evidence.
The current "greenhouse priesthood" has shown that they don't have a
clue. They are using the "Pontiff" system of a consensus of scientists, or a
College of Climate Change Cardinals to proclaim their own brand of "truth."
For shame. The "greenhouse priesthood" should start wearing their clerical
collars in order to garner the "respect" they so dearly desire. Either that, or
get out of the "truth" business entirely. They should turn in their fraudulent
scientific degrees and doctorates, and go into something generally more useful
for humanity such as real estate, truck driving or running massage parlors.
GALILEO, THE PONTIFF OF THE NEW SCIENCE

And what about Galileo, is it possible to show that the argument between
Galileo and the Catholic Church was NOT about the sun being the center of
the solar system, as we have all been falsely taught by the new priesthood of
science, but instead was the argument about Galileo's claim of a "spiritual
truth" that the earth moves? It was actually about Galileo's "Pontiff" claim
that he could know "truth" about the earth without any physical evidence.
The Vatican Library indicates this in the archived transcript of Galileo's trial
400 years ago. But not everybody has access to the documents of the Vatican
Library.
But everybody can find a copy of Galileo's last dying statement, as he died
while still under house arrest for his "crimes." Did he say "...See I was right.
The sun is the center of the solar system?" No he didn't say that at all, because
that was not his claim for which he was arrested and convicted. The last words
of Galileo were "....and yet, it moves...."
Marshall Smith
For more evidence and additional articles, see the items in "The
Kinechron" on the Brother Jonathan Gazette front page. If you think what
you've just read is valuable then share it with someone.


BROJON DAILY DIGEST
Send this Article
Subscribe

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
392x72_1

10.09.2007
Page 1 of 6

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
BROTHER JONATHAN'S
FRONT PAGE NEWS

Chapter 3
THE GLOBAL WARMING PONTIFFS
"Belief in the College of Green House Cardinals"
THE SCIENTIFIC CYCLES OF HUMAN HISTORY

In seeking the facts behind the "global warming priesthood" we
previously looked at two new concepts. First, every 2,000 years for the last
6,000 years, there have been short periods of human scientific breakthroughs
for about 200 years, which quickly are turned into a form of scientific religion
which then becomes a new form of government. This is followed by a 2,000
year Dark Age with no new human science, as the new
government/religion/science is used to control the minds of mankind and turn
them into mental slaves. We also looked at how this was done using the
concept of "the Pontiff."
According to this repeating pattern of human history the last golden age
of scientific discovery started around 1750 and ended about 1950. Since about
1960, it is clear that modern science has made a clear break with the past and
is quickly being combined into a new religious belief system. One clear sign of
this is that in modern science classes, the normal role of doing "experiments"
is being quickly replaced by using computers to run "virtual" experiments on
"computer models" but NOT on reality.
THE FAILURE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION

To teach young science students that running experiments in "virtual"
reality on computers is just as good as real "experiments" is the ultimate form
of mind-control and brainwashing. It is the same as the teacher arbitrarily
determining the size of the head of a pin, and then allowing the student to
calculate how many angels can dance on the pin. And then using that result to
"prove" that angels, in fact, do exist and dance on pins - that is mind-control
using a false belief system.
I just completed an online survey of the college syllabus for about 25
courses in "global warming" from as many different universities. Each and
every course used the same method of allowing the student to enter data into a
computer model, and then calculate the "greenhouse effect" and the resulting
amount of "global warming." None of the courses allowed the students to do
the simple "hands on" experiments which you have seen here, and will see
below, which in fact, show that man-made global warming does not even exist.
SCIENCE BY HUMAN EXPERIENCE

It was the father of modern science, Galileo, who taught that the students
10.09.2007
Page 2 of 6
should run their own experiments to "prove" the facts for themselves, and
not just rely on the beliefs of dogmatic teachers. All around Galileo, teachers
used mathematic precision to prove how many angels could dance on a
pinhead. But Galileo taught his students to actually drop a light and heavy
object off a tower and then to "prove" for themselves which one falls faster, or
doesn't.
Galileo also taught his students to use their own bodies as instruments, as
when he used his own heart pulse rate to measure the speed of a pendulum
and "prove" that the time of the swing was only a property of the pendulum's
length, and not the speed or distance of its swing, as was claimed by the
"pontificators."
USING THE EXPERIENCE OF EXPERIMENTS

With that in mind, previously, we did several experiments which proved
that it is impossible to have a "greenhouse layer" which heats the earth and
causes "global warming." The simple experiment was to fill two balloons to
equal size, one with air and the other with CO2. The CO2 balloon is 50
percent heavier than air so it "drops like a rock" showing that CO2 cannot go
"up" into the atmosphere to become a "greenhouse layer." Many BroJon
readers wrote to say that they did the experiment and are convinced that there
cannot be a "greenhouse layer." But still, what about all those measurements
showing that there is "global warming?"
Is it true that the polar ice caps are melting, the northern polar ice pack
has not reformed in the last two years, there are glaciers melting all around
the world, and that Greenland ice pack glaciers are disappearing? Isn't that
global warming? Is it possible to prove with some simple experiments which
you can do yourself, that all of those are actually false observations. Yes. So
lets get started.
FINDING TRUTHS BY EXPERIENCE AND EXPERIMENT

First we need to measure the temperature of the earth. But how do you do
that? NASA and the "global warming greenhouse priesthood" has claimed a
method using several earth observing satellites. With jillions of measurements
averaged over decades and the data plugged into complex computer models,
they have measured the temperature of earth and they find it is slowing rising.
Is that true? Or is there another simpler way to measure the temperature of
earth?
Well, how do you measure the temperature of a squirming newborn
baby? You take your thermometer and apply it to the infant. But where? We
could take hundreds of temperatures all over the baby and then calculate the
average, but that usually doesn't, and in fact, never works. Oral temperatures
usually don't work with crying screaming babies, so the usual method is to use
a rectal thermometer, and "tada" the rectal temperature of baby is quickly
found to be 98.6 F or 37 C. Can we do that same thing with "baby" earth?
You betcha. It's easy.
EXPERIMENT ONE -- TAKING TEMPERATURE OF EARTH

Run to your kitchen and get an old spoon, or maybe run to the garage and
get a trowel and dig a small hole in your backyard about a foot deep. Deeper is
better. Don't use your mom's best silverware for this experiment. Then stick
your thermometer into the "rectum" you just made and take the "rectal"
temperature of earth. Depending on how far away you live from the equator
of the earth the temperature will be just about 40F.
If you repeat this experiment during the day and then later at night, and
even during the hot summer or snowing winter, the temperature at your
location will "always" be the same 40 F. That's because that "IS" the
temperature of the earth. It has been that same temperature of earth for the
10.09.2007
Page 3 of 6
last hundreds of thousands of years. It's that simple. It doesn't take billion
dollar satellites to measure the temperature of the earth. It's right under your
feet, about a foot down below the surface. And you can do it yourself.
DIGGING FOR THE TRUTH

Throughout the last 5,000 years of recorded history, since the
development of writing, it's been shown by archaeologists, that mankind has
dug holes in the earth to make root cellars to store food during freezing cold
winters and torrid hot summers. The modern refrigerator has a section at the
bottom for storing produce which has a temperature of about 40F, so it works
the same way as the 5,000 year old root cellar.
If there were ever to be "global warming" then the millions of root cellars
around the world wouldn't work anymore. There is no indication that there is
any global warming of the earth. And you just proved it by taking a single
temperature measurement of "baby" earth. And you can do that experiment
as many times as you like and always come up with the exact same result.
That's called science. Anybody can do it with their own bare hands and prove
it for themselves.
HOW THE PRIESTHOOD FOOLS YOU

In a previous set of experiments about the "greenhouse layer" we looked
at how NASA uses a method of looking at "jillions" of temperature
measurements, then measuring the total heat from the sun and then they find
that the earth is a few degrees warmer than it should be and then they claim
that the extra heating is due to "greenhouse warming."
But earlier, I showed you a simpler method by taking a single temperature
measurement from the ground looking upward at the night time sky, and
measure the temperature of outer space. You can even do it using just your
bare hand as the thermometer. If there is a "greenhouse layer" then the
temperature of the night sky would be much warmer, as it is on a cloudy
night. But if the temperature of the night sky on a clear night is zero, then that
is proof that there could be no "greenhouse layer."
Astronomers have already done this, and there is no "CO2 greenhouse
layer" and it is done with just a single temperature measurement, not with the
jillions of measurements as in the NASA "priesthood" method which is
designed to fool you with false computer models.
With the same "hands on" simplicity, you have also just learned how to
take the temperature of earth with just a single measurement using the
"rectal" method. It has worked for making "root cellars" for the last 5,000
years of human history. It still works.
BEWARE THE EDUCATIONAL-RESEARCH COMPLEX!

The "global warming greenhouse priesthood" has also made a major
mistake in their "virtual reality" computer models. There are TWO major
sources of heat which cause the temperature of earth, and NOT just one called
the sun. Thus measuring the total energy from the sun reaching earth, then
measuring the temperature of the earth will always give the result that the
earth is too hot.
The "global warming priesthood" then claims the extra heat must be due
to "greenhouse warming." The "priesthood" also claims that to prevent
"global warming" you need to "Repent" and "believe" that you should
"change your behavior" and stop driving cars or buying and burning fossil
fuels to stop the "runaway greenhouse." With "Protocols" such as Montreal,
Rio and Kyoto, you have been told that the price of oil and gasoline must be
allowed to rise multiple times to bring in increased billions of dollars of profit
each year to the oil companies - in order to prevent the "runaway
10.09.2007
Page 4 of 6
greenhouse." But that is false, since the other massive major source of
heat, beside the sun, is the earth itself.
FINDING TRUTH IN THE SKIES

About 50 years ago, astronomers measured the surface temperatures of
the large planets Jupiter and Saturn. They also calculated how much heat
from the sun reached those planets. They were amazed to find that both
planets were much hotter than they should be. They were both radiating much
more energy than they received from the sun. How could that be?
It turns out that the centers of all the planets are not cold but, in fact, are
very very hot. In fact, they are white hot, or about 20,000 to 40,000 degrees
hot. But they are all covered by a rocky layer of material which insulates the
interior, so the outside of Jupiter and Saturn appear to be almost frozen, but
still all that tremendous interior heat leaks outward to make them radiate
more heat than they ever get from the sun.
In the case of Saturn, based on the heat from the sun, and the tremendous
distance from the sun, the surface of Saturn still is about 100 degrees hotter
than it should be. Saturn radiates about 30 percent more energy than it
receives. In the case of Jupiter, since it is closer to the sun, it gets more heat
from the sun than does Saturn, but it still radiates about the same amount of
heat from the interior as does Saturn. Because Jupiter is closer to the sun, that
interior heat radiating outward is only about 10 percent more energy than it
receives from the sun. The astronomers figured that out about 30 years ago.
THE "PRIESTHOOD" IGNORES THE FACTS AND TRUTH

But what about in the case of the earth? It is much closer to the sun, so the
amount of extra heat coming from the core of the earth, compared to the total
heat coming from the sun is only about 2 percent more than should be
expected. But is that 2 percent extra heat due to "greenhouse warming" or is
it simply radiating from the center of the earth itself?
The "global warming priesthood" has chosen to simply ignore the data
from the astronomers. The "priesthood" made up their own theory of "the
runaway greenhouse." So how much total heat comes from the earth, and how
hot is the center of the earth where all that heat comes from?
EXPERIMENT TWO -- DIGGING BEYOND THE FACTS

Run out to your backyard where you just took the temperature of the
earth down about one foot or so. Now continue digging down about 10 miles.
This will have to be a thought experiment, since nobody can actually do that.
If you dig down into a coal or diamond mine about 1 mile, the temperature
goes up about 100F degrees. If you dig down 2 miles, the temperature is
already about 200F degrees. It takes special air conditioners and water cooling
of the rocks to dig mines that deep. Keep digging down to 10 miles and the
temperature is a whopping 1,000F degrees.
That high heat is the same temperature of the electric heating element on
your stove turned up full, or the temperature of the heating element in your
toaster. It is a bright yellow heat. At that temperature the metal in your old
digging spoon or garden trowel starts to melt. Of course, you would have
"melted" and ceased to exist long before you got to 10 miles, so this obviously
is only a thought experiment.
Sometimes, the hot molten rocky material from 10 miles deep comes
gushing up as melted metals in the form of glowing red or yellow lava spewing
from volcanoes. That shows how hot the earth is just a few miles down. The
deepest drill holes so far, are only about 6 miles, and maybe with new hi-tech
drilling equipment it might be possible to drill to 10 miles, but that is far in the
future. So what is the temperature of the center of the earth down a distance
10.09.2007
Page 5 of 6
of 4,000 miles?
WHAT THE "PRIESTHOOD" IGNORES ABOUT EARTH

The thermodynamic equations to find the temperature of the center of a
sphere, like the earth, are rather complicated. So I will smooth out the math
for you. Near the surface where we live, the temperature goes up about 100
degrees for every mile you dig. The actual measured number is more like 88
degrees per mile, but 100 degrees is a nice round number.
But nearer the center of the earth, the increase is only about 2 degrees per
mile, and at the exact center the increase is zero. So I have found for you, the
increase in temperature per mile from the surface of the earth to the center
has an average of about 5 degrees per mile. Now you can easily find the
temperature of the center of the earth, by multiplying the distance of 4,000
miles times the average increase of 5 degrees per mile, and it comes out to be
20,000F degrees. But by golly, that just happens to be the temperature of the
interior of the sun. It is even hotter than the solar surface which we can see
with our eyes. What a strange coincidence. And to where does all that heat go?
Does it just stay in the earth and not leak out?
And if you do the same calculations for the planets Jupiter and Saturn,
you find they also both have a center temperature of about 20,000F degrees,
the same as the interior of the sun. Just another very strange coincidence? Is it
the same for all the planets? Or is there something else going on here which
the "global warming priesthood" has not figured out and told you about? Of
course there is, but I will explain it later with some easy experiments you can
do to show what is happening.
LEARNING FROM YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE

In the meantime, notice that you have just learned how to properly take
the temperature of the earth, not with jillions of measurements, nor with
billions of dollars of satellite hardware and computers, but with a single
measurement which you can easily do in your own backyard.
The simple experiment comes up with the exact same average number
which all the satellite data shows as the average of the earth temperatures over
day and night and through the seasons and years. The average temperature of
the earth's surface is about 40F degrees, and it hasn't changed for thousands
of years.
You have also learned that each of the planets also radiate extra heat from
their planetary cores which all have the same high temperatures and it's not
from any "greenhouse" effect.
But what about the melting icecaps, the disappearing glaciers, the
thinning ice sheet on Greenland, and what causes the Ice Ages to come and
go? Would I let you down? That's coming soon, with simple experiments you
can do yourself to prove that the "global warming greenhouse priesthood" is
still counting angels on the head of a pin. And then making you "believe" that
their mind-control "pontifications" are true...
Marshall Smith
NOTE: Why is it that to understand "global warming" you also need to
know the history of the Catholic Church? That will also be explained. The two
concepts are inseparable. Why isn't that also true of Judaism, Hinduism or
Islam? It's simple - they don't have "pontiffs."
10.09.2007
Page 1 of 6

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA
BROTHER JONATHAN'S
FRONT PAGE NEWS

Chapter 4
THE REVELATION OF GLOBAL WARMING
The Catholics, the Gnostics and Global Warming
THE NEW RELIGION OF CLIMATE CHANGE

In recent Digest Articles we looked at simple science experiments you can
do to prove that there is NO greenhouse layer, and thus there is no man-made
global warming. We looked at how the concept of "global warming" is based
on a new "religion" with the so-called "proof" being based not on scientific
evidence, but on a "consensus" of the College of "green house" Cardinals.
We looked at how human history shows a repeating cycle of about 2,000
years of Dark Ages with a small interlude of 200 years of scientific discoveries
and technological break-throughs. Then the new science is quickly turned into
a new form of world government-religion. The new Dark Age and a new "one
world government" is about to begin with the "belief" in the Global Warming
religion as the harbinger.
THE NEW GNOSTICS OF THE 21ST CENTURY

Recently there has been much news hype about a newly discovered
ancient gnostic scroll called the Gospel of Judas. This gives us another look
into the Global Warming religion. Anyone wanting information about the
Gnostic religion would probably start with the excellent books by Dr. Elaine
Pagels. But in those books you would be hard put to find any difference
between the Gnostic religion and the Catholic religion. And there is a reason.
There is NO difference between the "religion" of the Catholics and the
Gnostics. There might be some minor "sectarian" belief differences, but they
are both substantially "Christian" religions.
The big difference is that the beliefs of the Gnostics were a "religion" but
"Catholicism" is a GOVERNMENT. Catholicism became the first state
religion which is banned by the US Constitution, and is the model and basis
for all fundamentalist Muslim governments.
CATHOLICS VERSUS THE GNOSTICS

The term "Catholic" is not a religious term. It is from the Latin "cataholic" which means "categorically whole" or complete. It could be called the
First Century version of "The New World Order." It was the Christian
religion which was combined with the Roman Empire, but with the new head
of government being the Pope, rather than the Roman emperor. (I should note
that I am referring here only to the early or historical Catholic church and
NOT the current Catholic church.)
10.09.2007
Page 2 of 6
The Gnostics, mostly in Egypt, from about 200 AD refused to be

subservient to the newly forming central government church in Rome. Despite
all the "horror" stories about feeding Christians to the lions, the Roman
"church and state" actually started coming together about 100 AD. It is clear
from the apostle Paul's writings, that it started during the lifetime of Paul, in
the first century. For that reason, the early Gnostics were branded as
"heretics," simply because they refused to be subservient to the church in
Rome.
THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF THE GNOSTICS

The Gnostics were mostly all the many Christian churches in Egypt.
There were hundreds of them around 200 AD, all up and down the Nile River.
That is where the 50 or so Nag Hammadi Library texts and even the Gospel of
Judas were found, in Egypt. The Gnostic gospels were all secretly hidden
away, and only found thousands of years later, since the Catholics in Rome
had already decided to seek out and burn them all. We only now, are finding
the long lost remnants. And now you know why they were so carefully hidden
away, and why they were so very hard to find.
Most of the gnostic texts were written in Coptic, which is the Egyptian
language using Greek alphabet letters. The texts almost all describe an
ongoing "spiritual war" between the "good church" and the "bad church."
Most Gnostic scholars have all made the same mistake of thinking that the
two churches were two sects among the Hebrew religion. But not so. The "bad
church," as described in the Gnostic texts, was the nascent Catholic church in
Rome which about the time of the writing of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag
Hammadi Library, had already begun the mass-murders of all heretics and
the burning of all their writings.
WHAT'S HIDDEN IN THE VATICAN ARCHIVES?

I had discovered that fact back in 1975, but so far I have not read any
scholar, including Dr Elaine Pagels, who has figured out that the two churches
were "Christian" and not "Hebrew." But that is because the early Catholic
church had completely "erased" all history of the events between 100 AD and
350 AD, except in the "approved" biblical texts, so no Gnostic scholars ever
made the connection that the "bad church" was the Catholics.
The Vatican Library in Rome has 25 miles of shelves of historical books
and documents hidden in deep crypts, going back to the founding of the
church. Like all criminal governments, such as Hitler's Nazis and Saddam's
Tikriti Sunnis, they all kept good records of all the names of peoples and
groups annihilated. But so far, nobody has been able to get access to any of the
very early Vatican documents. Maybe some day.
BISHOP IRENAEUS DECLARES "JUDAS" A HERESY 180 AD

The Gospel of Judas is actually not new. It was discovered about 30 years
ago, about the same time as the Dead Sea Scrolls, along with the Nag
Hammadi Library, but the "owner" wanted to sell it to the highest bidder but
nobody bought it at her price. But finally the seller found a good price, since it
now has the value of being made into a movie, meaning potential big bucks.
But the text of the Judas scrolls had been translated and known for
decades. So, one wonders why all the current hoopla in the newsmedia about
"the Judas Text" -- unless it's pushing for a new movie. As a follow on to the
movie blockbusters, Mel Gibson's "Passion" and the new Dan Brown movie
"Da Vinci Code" -- the revelations in the Judas Text would fit right in as a
successful sequel -- "The Passion of Judas in the Da Vinci Code Part II."
THROWING CHRISTIAN HERETICS TO THE LIONS

Many people blame the "horrendous" reign of Constantine for the source
10.09.2007
Page 3 of 6
of massacres. But it wasn't just the corrupt emperors. They were all
corrupt and murderous which is why Rome failed and was taken over by a
religion. It was actually the Church itself, with its new "power of the state"
which now had the ability and manpower to produce and direct genocide
against all "infidels and heretics." Muhammad merely copied the early
Catholics 300 years later. And many Islamic sects still do today.
That early Catholic event is actually described in a odd book now found at
the end of the bible, called "Revelation" -- it is not properly a part of the bible
and is not a religious book. The book of Revelation is addressed to "the seven
churches in Asia." That meant it was written to the churches in Greece and
Turkey along with the church in Rome. But, it did NOT mention any of the
larger ten or twelve major Christian churches in Africa, meaning Egypt. The
Egyptian Christian or Coptic church was actually much larger with many
more sects than the Asian or Roman Church. But they had refused to be
subsumed under the control of Rome. It was a problem of government, and
not a difference in religious beliefs.
THE THEBAN LEGION CREATES A "ROMAN CATHOLIC

CHURCH"
In fact, it was a horrendous event called the "Massacre of the Theban
Legion" which directly led to the collapse of the Roman Empire under the
Roman emperors. The Theban Legion of the Roman Army was entirely made
up of Coptic Christians from the Egyptian city of Thebes. I will let the reader
look this up and read about the real reason why the Roman government
collapsed. It is a story which the early Catholic church did not want published.
It should have been one of the most popular and instructive religious books in
the bible, but since it involved the "heretical" Gnostic Christian Egyptian
Copts, it was "banned" from the bible.
THE REVELATION OF NICEA

The Revelation text was written about 300 AD and was part of the attempt
to find a "proper" collection of "acceptable" texts which had already been
"secretly chosen" before the Council of Nicea formally voted on any choices.
The story of the choice of the acceptable books is the story found in
Revelation. It described all the "horrible" events which would befall those
who did not join the "Seven Churches" under the hegemony in Rome.
The book of Revelation is NOT a book of prophecy. It is a book of history.
It was a book of advertising for the new Catholic World Government "under
god." I can see the parallels between the text in "Revelation" and the modern
"Federalist Papers." Both documents try to "sell" the advantages of a strong
central federal government or church. The big selling point in Revelation was
that if you don't join the central Roman Church, then you will be among the
"third of the world who will be destroyed -- unless you 'repent' and join the
seven churches." That is an odd prophesy, unless you know why the document
was written. That was a strong selling point, and it was actually put into
practice about 370 AD.
THE TEXT OF REVELATION IS DIFFERENT

All those who think "Revelation" is prophetic and to be read today as
prophesy, didn't understand the text. All the events predicted in the
Revelation text already came about with the founding of the Church in Rome
with the "Gift of Constantine" and the Council of Nicea about 10 years later.
This was followed by the massive genocide of Christian "heretics" described
in the "Revelation." Thus the Book of Revelation was really the historical
"marching orders" for the army of the newly founded RomanEmpire/Catholic-Church after 370 AD.
The book of Revelation is far different from all the other biblical texts, so
10.09.2007
Page 4 of 6
I wonder why it was ever included into the collection of biblical texts.
Except for the fact that it was was "specially commissioned" for the Council of
Nicea as their "plan of action" after the Council meeting. Thus, it really was
an addendum or appendix for the chosen biblical texts, which all the council
members took back home with them. It also must have been discussed and
approved by the Nicean Council for it to be on the approved list of books. But
the appendix then included what all the "good Catholics" should do when they
got back home, which is why the "appendix marching orders" now appears
stuck at the end of the bible. In modern day, newspaper headline language, it
was a "'Fatwa" declaring a "Jihad."
THE WARS OF THE PONTIFF

Much later, there was a big reason for the split in the Catholic Church
with the Reformation occurring in 1500 AD, which most people still don't
understand. Martin Luther did rebel, and formed the Protestant religion, but
NOT because his "religion" was different. Martin Luther protested and
seceded from the corrupt "government" in Rome. Both the Catholics and
Protestants are still "Christian" religions, but they have different
"governments." The Reformation was the "north" seceding from the "south"
followed by a century long civil war and the deaths of millions. It was a Civil
War, based on differences in constitution, and not on any theological
differences.
The Catholic constitution is based on the central control of a single
"pontiff." The word pontiff is from the Latin meaning a "bridge" who is
authorized to reach across from this world into the spiritual world, and then
bring back special spiritual knowledge. The Catholics only select and approve
one "pontiff." The Protestants don't accept the concept of the "pontiff" as the
only source of spiritual knowledge.
THE FIRST FAILURE OF THE PONTIFF CONCEPT

The first to show disbelief in the "pontiff" theory was the English King,
Henry VIII. Henry believed he could make his own spiritual rules. The
Anglican church is almost exactly the same as the Catholic church, but with a
different English Pontiff. When Henry's secession seemed to work, since the
army in Rome could not defeat the English army despite many attempts, this
quickly led Martin Luther to also decry the concept of the "Roman pontiff"
and then to secede. This also worked. The army of the Protestants was just too
big to be defeated by Rome.
This same situation was also true for the very early church, when the
Egyptian Christian Copts also did not believe in the concept of the Roman
"pontiff." The Copts felt that they had their own "bridge to knowledge" and
is why they were called "Gnostics." The word Gnostic comes from the Greek
word "gnosis" meaning "to Know" The Gnostics had their own "pontiff" or
way of "Knowing." The difference is one of governments and not religious
beliefs.
That same "reformation" civil war event had actually occurred nearly
1200 years earlier, when the Egyptian Gnostics seceded from the European
Catholics. The result was a massive world-wide civil war beginning about 370
AD. Of course, you never heard of this before. All of this was
completely"erased" from the history of the Catholic Church and none of the
bloodthirsty mass murders is to be found in the biblical texts -- except in
Revelation. It certainly was not taught as such in any Catholic churches. And
for that same reason, that "revelation" about Revelation has not been taught
in any Christian churches since then.
THE REVELATION OF THE GNOSTICS

That is the value of the newly discovered Gnostic Texts. The Catholic and
10.09.2007
Page 5 of 6
Gnostic religions were the same Christian religions, but the governments
described in the Gnostic texts were far different from the government in
Rome. That is what Dr. Elaine Pagel's was trying to describe in her books, but
most people don't understand that she was NOT showing the differences in the
"religions" but the differences in the "government."
I have to admit, that Dr. Pagels was not very clear on that point, which is
why many readers might not understand that is what she was describing. I
had already studied this topic back in 1975, with a special world-class scholar
who was a specialist on the Reformation. My professor at the University of
Santa Clara had actually spent several years of post-doctorate theological
study in the depths of the Vatican Library. That's how I know what's in that
library. Strangely, my professor was the only Lutheran scholar at the Jesuitrun University of Santa Clara.
A RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE?
My professor had been especially "commissioned" by both the Lutheran
and Catholic churches to research and report on the "reasons" for the
Reformation Movement, and maybe find a way to heal the great schism
between the two churches. That would be a massive job, and a major change
in today's world. Of course, that meant a special dispensation from the Pope in
Rome to allow a "foreigner," a highly respected Lutheran scholar from
America, to go rummaging through the basement of the Vatican Library
Archives. Wow? Just think, if only I had been able to tell him what to go look
for, before he began his research.
In my studies with him, I tried to "drain" him of everything he knew and
had seen in the Vatican Library. I knew he was a very special resource which
was not available to anybody else. He was most surprised to find that I had
already researched this topic on my own, several years earlier. That's why he
accepted me as a special independent study research student.
WHY YOU NEVER READ THIS BEFORE

Most of what you are reading here was discovered by me about 1972. I
told this to my professor in 1975. He was most amazed. Which is why we spent
almost a year working together on a new revised history of the Reformation
period. He had all the actual data from the Vatican Library, and I had the
theory. We put the two together.
For some reason, he expected me to publish our findings, and he said that
he hoped to read the book soon. But that was 30 years ago, and I still haven't
published it. I got distracted for two decades by a small side project called the
NASA Space Shuttle. But I am now back to publishing it as part of the front
page topics in the Brother Jonathan Gazette.
I wrote several advanced independent-studies research papers for him on
that topic as part of my university minor in Epistemology. Epistemology is
also called either the History of Science or the Theory of Knowledge.
Epistemology is properly a part of the department of philosophy, but at Santa
Clara it was under the religious studies department. So when I later, read the
newly published books by Dr. Pagels about Gnosticism, I already knew that
the big difference between Catholicism and Gnosticism was governmental and
NOT religious. When looked at from that point of view, the strange book,
"The Gnostic Gospels" by Pagels, suddenly all makes sense.
And now today's scientific experiment:
A "REVEALING" EXPERIMENT
Run to your bookshelf or library and get a copy of the book of Revelation.
Then grab a copy of your newspaper and look for the latest Theory of Global
Warming. You can find both on the Internet. Then carefully read both
10.09.2007
Page 6 of 6
documents.
Both documents claim to predict massive worldwide destruction. Both
claim to predict the end of the world as we know it. Both blame "the sins" of
mankind for bringing on the destruction. Both documents claim you must
repent and stop your beliefs in "heresies" or you will be among the dead. Both
claim that the "end times" are at hand.
Both documents are products of powerful government-controlled
priesthoods. One document proclaims you must accept the findings of the
Council of Nicea and accept the behavior protocols of Revelation - or else. The
other document proclaims you must accept the findings of the Council of Rio
and accept the behavior Protocols of Kyoto - or else. Both documents were
designed to make believers accept a One-World or Cata-holic universal New
World Order -- or else.
Since both similar documents are carefully crafted government "mind
control" propaganda, aimed at the true "believers," what is the major
difference between the two? About 1,700 years...
Marshall Smith



BROJON DAILY DIGEST
Send this Article
Subscribe

BroJon
Home
The News of
USA

+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
Direct corrections and technical inquires to webmaster at brojon.com.

Please direct news submissions to newseditor at brojon.com.
All pages are Copyright 2005 the Teddy Speaks Foundation Inc., A Non-Profit Educational Corporation, Delaware USA
"BROTHER JONATHAN GAZETTE" and "BROTHER JONATHAN WEEKLY MAGAZINE" are Trademarks of
the Teddy Speaks Foundation, Inc. and the Kinderken Press.
+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+
10.09.2007

Global Warming - Marshall Smith

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Global Warming - Marshall Smith

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

Click on the Menu Bar to Select a Section of the Gazette

FRONT PAGE NEWS

Before Uncle Sam There Was Brother Jonathan

GLOBAL WARMING: THE SCIENTIFIC HOAX EXPOSED

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

SCIENCE IN THE FIRST DARK AGE 2,500 BC

THE NEW SCIENCE AND GOVERNMENT 100 BC

THE SECOND DARK AGE 300 AD

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

ENDING THE SECOND DARK AGE 1500 AD

THE COMING THIRD DARK AGE 1870

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

THE SOURCE OF THE NEW GOVERNMENT 1700 AD

"BROTHER JONATHAN" DESTROYED 1868 AD

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

FINDING THE SOURCE OF "BROTHER JONATHAN"

SPINOZA SPARKS A WORLD REVOLUTION 1776 AD

SCIENCE OF SPINOZA CREATES A NEW GOVERNMENT

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

THE FLOW AND CYCLES OF HISTORY

WARNING OF THE COMING DARK AGE 1961 AD

DOCTRINE OF THE NEW PRIESTHOOD 1990 AD

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH THE PRIESTHOOD 1989 AD

EXPERIMENT ONE -- FUN WITH KITCHEN SCIENCE

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

colder spot. What is happening is that the warmth in your hand is

EXPERIMENT TWO -- YOUR CONNECTION WITH THE

PROVING YOUR CONNECTION TO OUTER SPACE

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

EXPERIMENT THREE -- DISPROVING THE GREENHOUSE

HOW THE PRIESTHOOD FOOLED YOU

WHERE THE NEW "RELIGION" FAILED

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

EXPERIMENT THREE -- WHAT GOES UP?

WHAT DOES NOT GO UP

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

THE PRIESTHOOD GOES "HIGH-TECH"

THE HERESY OF THE GREENHOUSE

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 1

Gideon Bibles or something. But "religious tracts" about greenhouse

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE OTHER CHAPTERS

BroJon Exclusive Report

Keep Up With the Latest BroJon Articles

Send this Article

Click on the Menu Bar to Select a Section of the Gazette

BROTHER JONATHAN'S - FRONT PAGE NEWS

Direct corrections and technical inquires to webmaster at brojon.com.

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 2

Click on the Menu Bar to Select a Section of the Gazette

FRONT PAGE NEWS

Before Uncle Sam There Was Brother Jonathan

GLOBAL WARMING: THE SCIENTIFIC HOAX EXPOSED

"DON'T TELL ME THE TRUTH -- TELL ME THE FACTS"

CENTRAL BELIEFS OF MODERN SCIENCE

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 2

GALILEO AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

THE CRIME OF GALILEO

ENTER THE PONTIFF

GLOBAL WARMING: The Scientific Hoax Exposed 2

GALILEO AS THE NEW PONTIFF