Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doc
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
WITH
C
ou
CRIMINALAPPLICATIONNO.592OF2015
IN
CRIMINALAPPEALNO.572OF2015
rt
APPELLATESIDE
CRIMINALAPPEALNO.572OF2015
Applicant
ig
h
SalmanSalimKhan ...
V/s.
StateofMaharashtra...
Respondent
om
ba
y
.....
Mr.Harish Salve SeniorAdvocate withMr.ShrikantShivadewith
Mr.Niranjan MundargiwithMr.AnandDesaiwithMr.NiravShah
withMs.ChandrimaMitrawithMr.ManharS.Saini,Advocatefor
theApplicant.
Mr.S.S.Shinde,PublicProsecutorwithMr.DeepakThakre,APPfor
theRespondent.
....
CORAM: ABHAYM.THIPSAYJ.
DATED: 6THMAY2015
P.C.:
1.
placedonboardonbeingmentionedforproductionontheground
of urgency. The appellant has been convicted of offences
punishable underSections304PartIIoftheIndianPenalCode
(IPC), 338 of the IPC, 337 of the IPC and offences punishable
under Motor Vehicles Act. He has been sentenced to different
termsofImprisonmentinrespectofvariousoffencesofwhichhe
Gaikwad RD
1/3
::: Downloaded on - 06/05/2015 20:18:56 :::
pro.1.APPANo.5922015.doc
hasbeenfoundguilty. Themostseveresentenceimposedupon
the applicant/appellant is in respect of the offence punishable
rt
C
ou
Theurgencyinthematterisarisingoutofthefactthat
ig
h
theappellant,whowasthroughoutonbail,islikelytobetakenin
custody, on conviction. It is submitted that though the
applicant/appellant has been convicted, copy of the impugned
Judgmenthadnotbeendeliveredtohimyet.Thatthecopyisnot
sodelivered,isnotindispute.
ba
y
3.
thatappealisnotcompetent,inasmuchas,itisnotaccompanied
byacopyoftheimpugnedJudgment.Thoughthisappearstobe
correct, in view of the admitted position that the copy of the
om
urgentreliefsoughtforbytheappellant,whichisinthenatureof
continuation of his bail for some further period. This is
particularlyso,becausetheCourttimeisgettingover;andeven
otherwise,itwouldnotbepossibletohearelaborateargumentson
themeritsoftheconviction,withoutknowingthecontentsofthe
JudgmentdeliveredbythetrialCourt.
Gaikwad RD
2/3
::: Downloaded on - 06/05/2015 20:18:56 :::
pro.1.APPANo.5922015.doc
4.
Sincetheapplicant/appellantwasonbailthroughout
thetrial,andsinceacopyoftheimpugnedjudgmentofconviction
5.
C
ou
theappellantforsometimeintheinterestofjustice.
rt
hasnotyetbeenfurnishedtohim,itwouldbepropertoprotect
theapplicant/appellant,itappearsthatthereisapossibilityofthe
appellantsecuringacopyofthejudgmentby8thMay2015.
Inviewofthis,itisdirectedthattheappealbelisted
ig
h
6.
onboard,foradmission,on8thMay2015.
7.
ba
y
during the trial, but on executing a fresh bond before the trial
Court.
8.
Allconcernedtoactonanauthenticatedcopyofthis
om
Order.
9.
Leavetoamendtheappealmemobyannexingacopy
(ABHAYM.THIPSAYJ.)
Gaikwad RD
3/3
::: Downloaded on - 06/05/2015 20:18:56 :::